Government's Ex Parte Application for Protective Order on Discovery — United States v. Baines (Document 21)
Summary
Government's Ex Parte Application for a Protective Order Regarding Discovery Containing Personal Identifying Information and Privacy Act Information, with a declaration of Assistant United States Attorney Ranee A. Katzenstein, in United States v. Fontrell Antonio Baines, No. CR 20-522-MWF, filed on November 19, 2020, as Document 21. In it, the government asks the Court to enter a proposed protective order governing personal identifying information of real persons under Rule 16(d)(1) and material within the Privacy Act. The government says defense counsel declined on November 19, 2020 to stipulate because she could not reach her client given quarantine at the Metropolitan Detention Center, so it proceeds ex parte to speed discovery.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Government's Ex Parte Application for Protective Order on Discovery — United States v. Baines (Document 21).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-c-d-cal-no-2-20-cr-00522-dkt-21-c-d-cal-e3058a1b6a/
, SHA-256 95f24d18989211b9a7ca889c8155e3c5b462595cc4c4f2be36bf9f66371a11f1.Full text
Case 2:20-cr-00522-MWF Document 21 Filed 11/19/20 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:72
1 NICOLA T. HANNA
United States Attorney
2 BRANDON D. FOX
Assistant United States Attorney
3 Chief, Criminal Division
RANEE A. KATZENSTEIN (Cal. Bar No. 187111)
4 Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Major Frauds Section
5 1100 United States Courthouse
312 North Spring Street
6 Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: (213) 894-2432
7 Facsimile: (213) 894-6269
E-mail: ranee.katzenstein@usdoj.gov
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. CR 20-522-MWF
13 Plaintiff, GOVERNMENT’S EX PARTE APPLICATION
FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING
14 v. DISCOVERY CONTAINING PERSONAL
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND
15 FONTRELL ANTONIO BAINES, PRIVACY ACT INFORMATION:
aka “Nuke Bizzle,” DECLARATION OF RANEE A.
16 KATZENSTEIN
Defendant.
17 [PROPOSED ORDER LODGED SEPARATELY]
18
19 Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel
20 of record, the United States Attorney for the Central District of
21 California and Assistant United States Attorney Ranee A.
22 Katzenstein, for the reasons set forth in the attached declaration
23 of AUSA Katzenstein, requests that the Court enter the proposed
24 protective order (the “Protective Order”) governing the use and
25 dissemination of (1) personal identifying information (“PII”) of
26 real persons pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule
27 16(d)(1), and (2) material that may contain information within the
28 scope of the Privacy Act.
Case 2:20-cr-00522-MWF Document 21 Filed 11/19/20 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:73
1 On November 6, 2020, the government sent the proposed
2 protective order to counsel for defendant, seeking counsel’s
3 position on the proposed order, which the government explained would
4 facilitate the production of discovery in this case, and whether
5 defendant would enter into a stipulation requesting entry of the
6 protective order. On November 19, 2020, counsel stated that she
7 declined to enter into the proposed stipulation because she has been
8 unable to communicate with her client regarding it because of the
9 quarantine and other conditions put in place at the Metropolitan
10 Detention Center.
11 The government is proceeding by way of ex parte application
12 rather than noticed motion in order to expedite the government’s
13 ability to produce discovery in this matter. As is further
14 explained in the declaration of AUSA Katzenstein, the discovery in
15 this matter contains third parties’ PII. The government seeks the
16 requested protective order to: (1) protect the privacy and security
17 of the information’s legitimate owners; (2) be able to produce
18 information that would otherwise have to be redacted to comply with
19 Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1, the Central District of
20 California’s Local Rules regarding redaction, and the Privacy Policy
21 of the United States Judicial Conference, which information may have
22 evidentiary value; and (3) satisfy the requirements of the Privacy
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28
2
Case 2:20-cr-00522-MWF Document 21 Filed 11/19/20 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:74
1 Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, to the extent documents in the discovery to be
2 produced come within the scope of the Privacy Act.
3
Respectfully Submitted,
4
5 NICOLA T. HANNA
United States Attorney
6
BRANDON D. FOX
7 Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Criminal Division
8
9
DATED: Nov. 19, 2020 ____/S/Ranee A. Katzenstein_____
10 RANEE A. KATZENSTEIN
Assistant United States Attorney
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
File and source
- File
- 21.pdf
- Size
- 46,139 bytes
- SHA-256
- 95f24d18989211b9a7ca889c8155e3c5b462595cc4c4f2be36bf9f66371a11f1
- Our copy
- 21.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.