Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Consent Order and Judgment of Forfeiture — United States v. Antoine Johnson (Dkt. 37, W.D.N.C.)

Consent Order and Judgment of Forfeiture — United States v. Antoine Johnson (Dkt. 37, W.D.N.C.)

Summary

Based on Antoine Johnson's plea of guilty, this consent order in United States v. Antoine Johnson, Docket No. 3:24-cr-00044 in the Western District of North Carolina, enters a forfeiture money judgment of $2,432,238, described as proceeds traceable to and property involved in the offenses to which the defendant pled guilty. The defendant stipulates that the government may satisfy the judgment through forfeiture of crime proceeds or substitute property under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p). The order authorizes the U.S. Attorney's Office to conduct discovery to identify, locate or dispose of property, and the money judgment is to be included in the defendant's sentence. The defendant waives the notice requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2 and 43(a). A United States magistrate judge signed the order, filed as Document 37 on 07/10/24.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

FILED
CHARLOTTE, NC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUL 10 2024
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION US DISTRICT COURT
DOCKET NO.: 3:24-cr-00044 WESTERN DISTRICT OF NC
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
) CONSENT ORDER AND
V. ) JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE
) PENDING RULE 32.2(c)(2)
(1) ANTOINE JOHNSON )

BASED UPON the Defendant’s plea of guilty and finding that there is a nexus between
the property listed below and the offense(s) to which the Defendant has pled guilty and that the
Defendant (or any combination of Defendants in this case) has or had a possessory interest or other
legal interest in the property, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The following property is forfeited to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982
and/or 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), provided, however, that forfeiture of specific assets is subject to any
and all third-party petitions under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), pending final adjudication herein:

A forfeiture money judgment in the amount of $2,432,238, such amount constituting
the proceeds traceable to and property involved in the offenses to which Defendant
pled guilty. Defendant stipulates that the Government may satisfy the money
-judgment via forfeiture of proceeds of the crime as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 982 and/or
substitute property as defined in 21 U.S.C. § 853(p). For purposes of forfeiture under
Section 853(p), Defendant stipulates that, as a result of acts or omissions of Defendant,
one or more provisions of Section 853(p)(1)(A)-(E) are satisfied.

2. If and to the extent required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(6), 21 U.S.C. § 853(n),
and/or other applicable law, the United States shall publish notice and provide direct written notice
of forfeiture.

3, Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3), upon entry of this order, the United States
Attorney’s Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate, or dispose of
the property, including depositions, interrogatories, and requests for production of documents, and
to issue subpoenas pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.

4, A forfeiture money judgment shall be included in the defendant’s sentence, and the
United States may take steps to collect the judgment from any property of the defendant, provided,
the value of any forfeited specific assets shall be credited toward satisfaction of this money
judgment upon liquidation.

The parties stipulate and agree that the aforementioned asset(s) constitute property derived

from or traceable to proceeds of defendant’s crime(s) herein and are therefore subject to forfeiture
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982, and/or 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). The defendant hereby waives the

Case 3:24-cr-00044-FDW-SCR Document 37 Filed 07/10/24 Page 1 of 2
requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2 and 43(a) regarding notice of the forfeiture in the charging
instrument, announcement of the forfeiture at sentencing, and incorporation of the forfeiture in the
judgment against defendant. If the defendant has previously submitted a claim in response to an
administrative forfeiture proceeding regarding any of this property, defendant hereby withdraws
that claim. If defendant has not previously submitted such a claim, defendant hereby waives all

right to do so.

DENA J. KING
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

SENIAMIN B: BAIN. San er ANTOINE JOHNS
Assistant United States Attorney Defend

Attorney for eee

Signed this the \6 day of July, 2024.

|)

THE HONORABD . KEESLER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:24-cr-00044-FDW-SCR Document 37 Filed 07/10/24 Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
37.pdf
Size
126,435 bytes
SHA-256
339e2d9463a085a52ac6b81c54b076c5bf98fb5460a3a8e0ec4142d347c00f3f
Our copy
37.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top