Consent Order and Judgment of Forfeiture — No. 3:25-cr-00106 (Dkt. 83, W.D.N.C.)

Summary

A Consent Order and Judgment of Forfeiture, Document 83, filed June 15, 2026 in United States of America v. Antionette Rouse, Case 3:25-cr-00106-KDB-DCK, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, marked pending Rule 32.2(c)(2). Based on the defendant's plea of guilty, the order forfeits to the United States, under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), a forfeiture money judgment in the amount of $51,666. The defendant stipulates that the government may satisfy the judgment with proceeds or substitute property under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) and waives notice requirements under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2 and 43(a). The signature blocks name Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Warren, defense counsel John Parke Davis and United States Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

FILED
CHARLOTTE, NC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA JUN 15 2026
CHARLOTTE DIVISION couRT
- 2. . Ic

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
CONSENT ORDER AND

JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE
PENDING RULE 32.2(c)(2)

Vv.

(3) ANTIONETTE ROUSE

BASED UPON the Defendant’s plea of guilty and finding that there is a nexus between
the property listed below and the offense(s) to which the Defendant has pled guilty and that the
Defendant (or any combination of Defendants in this case) has or had a possessory interest or other
legal interest in the property, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The following property is forfeited to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), provided, however, that forfeiture of specific assets is
subject to any and all third-party petitions under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), pending final adjudication
herein:

A forfeiture money judgment in the amount of $51,666, such amount constituting the
proceeds traceable to the offense to which Defendant pled guilty. Defendant
stipulates that the Government may satisfy the money judgment via forfeiture of
proceeds as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 981 and/or substitute property as defined in 21
U.S.C. § 853(p). For purposes of forfeiture under Section 853(p), Defendant
stipulates that, as a result of acts or omissions of Defendant, one or more provisions
of Section 853(p)(1)(A)-(E) are satisfied.

2. If and to the extent required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(6), 21 U.S.C. § 853(n),
and/or other applicable law, the United States shall publish notice and provide direct written notice
of forfeiture.

3, Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3), upon entry of this order, the United States
Attorney’s Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate, or dispose of
the property, including depositions, interrogatories, and requests for production of documents, and
to issue subpoenas pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.

4, A forfeiture money judgment shall be included in the defendant’s sentence, and the
United States may take steps to collect the judgment from any property of the defendant, provided,
the value of any forfeited specific assets shall be credited toward satisfaction of this money
judgment upon liquidation.

The parties stipulate and agree that the aforementioned asset(s) constitute property derived
from or traceable to proceeds of defendant’s crime(s) herein and are therefore subject to forfeiture

Case 3:25-cr-00106-KDB-DCK Document 83 _ Filed 06/15/26 Page1of2
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). The defendant hereby waives the
requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2 and 43(a) regarding notice of the forfeiture in the charging
instrument, announcement of the forfeiture at sentencing, and incorporation of the forfeiture in the
judgment against defendant. If the defendant has previously submitted a claim in response to an
administrative forfeiture proceeding regarding any of this property, defendant hereby withdraws
that claim. If defendant has not previously submitted such a claim, defendant hereby waives all
right to do so.

DALLAS J.E. KAPLAN!

FIRSTASSIST, UNITED STAT ORNEY

, MATTHEW WARREN ANTIONETTE ROUSE
Assistant United States Attorney Defendant

)

JOHN PARKE DAVIS, ESQ.
ttorney for Defendant

THE HO LE JAMES P. MAZZONE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

te
Signed this the day of June, 2026.

' Acting under authority conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 515.

Case 3:25-cr-00106-KDB-DCK Document 83 _ Filed 06/15/26 Page 2 of 2


File and source

File

83.pdf

Size

300,759 bytes

SHA-256

4756329daebacc3c25d132980d9b51bfc1c0c0d092f13d95127cdce2b16c9f71

Our copy

83.pdf

Original

archive.org