Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Congressional Research Service IN11628.1 (Estimated “Direct Payments” by State Under the House and Senate Versions of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (H.R. 1319))

Congressional Research Service IN11628.1 (Estimated “Direct Payments” by State Under the House and Senate Versions of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (H.R. 1319))

Summary

A Congressional Research Service Insight, IN11628, dated March 5, 2021, estimating direct payments by state under the House and Senate versions of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (H.R. 1319). It states that the House passed the bill on February 27, 2021, that section 9601 would create a third round of direct payments, and that on March 4, 2021 Senator Schumer proposed S.Amdt. 891, which would narrow the income ranges over which the payments phase out. Under both versions, households could receive up to $1,400 for each eligible adult ($2,800 for most married couples) plus $1,400 for each dependent. Under the House-passed version, payments would phase out between $75,000 and $100,000 for single filers and between $112,500 and $150,000 for heads of household.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                                                                                                INSIGHTi



Estimated “Direct Payments” by State Under
the House and Senate Versions of the
American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (H.R. 1319)

March 5, 2021
On February 27, 2021, the House passed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA, H.R. 1319).
Section 9601 of that bill would create a third round of direct payments (also referred to as economic
impact payments or stimulus checks). On March 4, 2021, Senator Schumer proposed S.Amdt. 891 to H.R.
1319 (hereinafter referred to as “the Senate amendment”), which would narrow the income ranges over
which the direct payments are phased out. This Insight compares the effects of the shortened phaseout
ranges in the Senate amendment to the phaseout ranges included in the House-passed version of H.R.
1319.
In this Insight, a household is defined as all individuals included on a federal income tax return. Under
both the House-passed version of H.R. 1319 and the Senate amendment, households could receive a
maximum of
       $1,400 for each eligible adult individual ($2,800 in the case of most married couples),
        plus
       an additional $1,400 for each dependent as defined for tax purposes.
The House-passed version of the bill would phase out the payments for households with income in given
ranges. Households with incomes exceeding these ranges would be ineligible to receive a payment. Under
the House-passed version of H.R. 1319, the phaseout ranges would be as follows:
       $75,000 to $100,000 for single filers,
       $112,500 to $150,000 for head of household filers, and
       $150,000 to $200,000 for married joint filers.
The Senate amendment would narrow the income ranges over which the payments would phase out.
Under the Senate amendment, the phaseout ranges would be as follows:
       $75,000 to $80,000 for single filers,
       $112,500 to $120,000 for head of household filers, and
                                                                          Congressional Research Service
                                                                           https://crsreports.congress.gov
                                                                                                   IN11628

CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress
Congressional Research Service                                                                                       2




           $150,000 to $160,000 for married joint filers.
Both the House-passed version of H.R. 1319 and the Senate amendment would phase out the payment
amounts proportionally (or “ratably”) in relation to the amount of a household’s income within the
phaseout range. Due to the narrower phaseout ranges, fewer households would be eligible to receive a
direct payment under the Senate amendment than the House-passed version.
CRS estimates that under the House-passed version of H.R. 1319, approximately 152.9 million
households (out of a total of 166.1 million households in the United States) would be eligible to receive a
total of $394 billion in direct payments. Under the Senate amendment, CRS estimates that approximately
145.5 million households would be eligible to receive a total of $380 billion in direct payments. Table 1
presents these estimates by state.

              Table 1. Estimated Eligibility for a Proposed Third Direct Payment, by State
                                                 Dollars in thousands
                          House-Passed Version of          Senate Amendment to          Difference Between House
                                H.R. 1319                        H.R. 1319                  and Senate Versions

                         Number of          Aggregate     Number of       Aggregate     Number of      Aggregate
                         Households          Total of     Households       Total of     Households      Total of
                         Receiving a        Payments      Receiving a     Payments      Receiving a    Payments
            State         Payment          (thousands)     Payment       (thousands)     Payment      (thousands)

 Alabama                     2,307,184       $6,075,380      2,225,966     $5,912,647        81,218      $162,733
 Alaska                          319,462      $885,754        297,440       $847,315         22,022       $38,440
 Arizona                     3,307,739       $8,722,874      3,166,937     $8,471,635       140,802      $251,239
 Arkansas                    1,426,980       $3,788,341      1,381,715     $3,693,877        45,266       $94,464
 California                 18,007,433      $47,032,680    17,030,537     $45,245,424       976,896     $1,787,256
 Colorado                    2,673,375       $6,654,986      2,492,806     $6,354,081       180,569      $300,905
 Connecticut                 1,691,912       $4,164,154      1,561,605     $3,932,063       130,307      $232,092
 Delaware                        489,020     $1,177,504       466,105      $1,133,329        22,915       $44,175
 District of Columbia            361,230      $704,900        325,339       $663,331         35,891       $41,569
 Florida                    10,434,594      $25,917,820    10,050,121     $25,186,699       384,473      $731,120
 Georgia                     4,840,794      $12,833,802      4,629,178    $12,413,266       211,616      $420,536
 Hawaii                          676,384     $1,726,110       642,143      $1,660,746        34,241       $65,363
 Idaho                           761,616     $2,166,736       734,604      $2,111,168        27,012       $55,568
 Illinois                    5,901,274      $14,976,996      5,560,063    $14,344,124       341,210      $632,873
 Indiana                     3,143,686       $8,383,536      3,013,560     $8,104,439       130,126      $279,097
 Iowa                        1,482,964       $3,917,328      1,414,893     $3,776,146        68,070      $141,182
 Kansas                      1,349,856       $3,516,540      1,286,528     $3,386,559        63,329      $129,981
 Kentucky                    2,155,461       $5,668,389      2,065,798     $5,501,097        89,663      $167,292
 Louisiana                   2,264,159       $5,811,487      2,189,021     $5,665,454        75,139      $146,034
 Maine                           686,175     $1,704,211       659,989      $1,650,211        26,185       $54,000
 Maryland                    2,727,672       $6,617,686      2,516,312     $6,256,440       211,360      $361,246
 Massachusetts               3,343,811       $7,784,598      3,108,170     $7,366,438       235,640      $418,161
Congressional Research Service                                                                                           3




                         House-Passed Version of           Senate Amendment to           Difference Between House
                               H.R. 1319                         H.R. 1319                   and Senate Versions

                        Number of           Aggregate     Number of       Aggregate      Number of         Aggregate
                        Households           Total of     Households       Total of      Households         Total of
                        Receiving a         Payments      Receiving a     Payments       Receiving a       Payments
            State        Payment           (thousands)     Payment       (thousands)      Payment         (thousands)

 Michigan                   4,840,418       $12,104,068     4,622,706      $11,722,475        217,712         $381,593
 Minnesota                  2,578,735        $6,659,716     2,420,333       $6,331,264        158,403         $328,452
 Mississippi                1,434,947        $3,833,330     1,399,455       $3,761,854         35,492          $71,477
 Missouri                   2,863,938        $7,501,545     2,735,611       $7,251,562        128,328         $249,983
 Montana                         512,507     $1,318,388       491,225       $1,275,668         21,282          $42,719
 Nebraska                        885,087     $2,364,448       843,104       $2,278,711         41,984          $85,738
 Nevada                     1,472,921        $3,823,369     1,426,531       $3,719,497         46,390         $103,873
 New Hampshire                   637,723     $1,535,633       597,274       $1,457,134         40,449          $78,498
 New Jersey                 3,970,639       $10,164,989     3,691,546       $9,618,195        279,093         $546,794
 New Mexico                 1,022,549        $2,646,889       989,431       $2,583,471         33,119          $63,418
 New York                   9,495,311       $23,235,163     8,968,004      $22,386,444        527,307         $848,718
 North Carolina             4,891,572       $12,695,860     4,673,848      $12,330,532        217,723         $365,328
 North Dakota                    367,944       $962,551       351,652        $931,557          16,292          $30,994
 Ohio                       5,638,336       $14,476,548     5,373,432      $13,961,598        264,905         $514,950
 Oklahoma                   1,809,893        $5,007,780     1,742,950       $4,878,388         66,943         $129,392
 Oregon                     2,042,262        $5,175,572     1,932,081       $4,986,382        110,181         $189,191
 Pennsylvania               6,187,751       $15,480,849     5,876,366      $14,883,553        311,385         $597,296
 Rhode Island                    529,393     $1,270,325       497,590       $1,217,312         31,803          $53,013
 South Carolina             2,417,867        $6,190,530     2,335,098       $6,046,296         82,769         $144,234
 South Dakota                    411,892     $1,074,909       389,712       $1,034,286         22,180          $40,623
 Tennessee                  3,260,040        $8,366,563     3,162,228       $8,170,429         97,812         $196,134
 Texas                     12,441,832       $34,237,251    11,873,736      $33,134,439        568,096       $1,102,811
 Utah                       1,256,134        $3,919,291     1,191,708       $3,764,534         64,426         $154,757
 Vermont                         313,619       $764,325       295,651        $731,749          17,968          $32,576
 Virginia                   3,840,885        $9,772,254     3,611,098       $9,323,938        229,787         $448,316
 Washington                 3,374,198        $8,791,815     3,180,298       $8,435,046        193,900         $356,770
 West Virginia                   923,102     $2,336,866       891,039       $2,275,091         32,062          $61,775
 Wisconsin                  2,839,872        $7,217,337     2,722,268       $6,981,675        117,605         $235,662
 Wyoming                         271,898       $731,820       260,222        $710,257          11,676          $21,563
 Total                   152,886,047       $393,891,796   145,365,025    $379,859,827       7,521,021     $14,031,969

    Source: Congressional Research Service (CRS) analysis of data from the Current Population Survey (CPS) and the TRIM3
    microsimulation model. TRIM3 is funded by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and maintained at the
    Urban Institute.
Congressional Research Service                                                                                              4




    Notes: Data presented in this table reflect three-year averages. Further discussion of the use of a three-year average is
    available in the “Data and Methods” section. Additional information on the TRIM3 model is available in Appendix B of CRS
    Report R45971, The Impact of the Federal Income Tax Code on Poverty.


Limitations
Due to data limitations, the estimates in Table 1 do not account for some features of the direct payment
included in either version of H.R. 1319. For example, the estimates provided in Table 1 cover only the 50
states and the District of Columbia. Although residents of U.S. territories would be eligible for the direct
payments, the data used in this analysis do not include U.S. territories. As a result, CRS is not able to
estimate territorial residents’ eligibility for a direct payment
Additionally, the data used to create these estimates do not include information on identification numbers
used when a household files their income tax return. Language in H.R. 1319 (both versions) requires
individuals to provide a Social Security Number (SSN) in order to be eligible for a direct payment, and
any dependents’ SSN in order to receive the additional $1,400 per-dependent amount. Because the
estimates in Table 1 do not account for whether the individuals listed on a taxpayer’s income tax return
would provide an SSN, they may somewhat overestimate the true number and amount of direct payments.
Other limitations of this analysis may lead the estimates in Table 1 to somewhat underestimate the true
number and amount of payments. More information on this potential overestimation effect is available
here.

Data and Methods
The estimates in Table 1 are based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Annual Social and Economic
Supplement (ASEC) to the Current Population Survey and data from the TRIM3 microsimulation model.
Due to sample-size limitations, these estimates represent a three-year average covering the years 2015,
2016, and 2017 (the most recent three-year period for which TRIM3-adjusted ASEC data are available).




Author Information

Conor F. Boyle                                                 Jameson A. Carter
Analyst in Social Policy                                       Research Assistant




Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
Congressional Research Service                                                                              5




as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.




                                          IN11628 · VERSION 1 · NEW


File and source

File
IN11628.1.pdf
Size
818,231 bytes
SHA-256
0c8edfa1a08b05613ef775649493fc9117e103d524b128479fd8c256b7915bfa
Our copy
IN11628.1.pdf
Original
crsreports.congress.gov
Back to top