Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Congressional Research Service IN11254 (COVID-19 and Stimulus Payments to Individuals: How the 2009 Economic Recovery Payment Worked)

Congressional Research Service IN11254 (COVID-19 and Stimulus Payments to Individuals: How the 2009 Economic Recovery Payment Worked)

Summary

CRS Insight IN11254, COVID-19 and Stimulus Payments to Individuals: How the 2009 Economic Recovery Payment Worked, by William R. Morton, Analyst in Income Security, dated March 18, 2020. It looks at how lawmakers could make direct cash payments to people who do not file a federal income tax return, using the 2009 Economic Recovery Payment (ERP) as a model. Under Section 2201 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5), the ERP was a one-time $250 payment to most individuals receiving recurring benefits from the Social Security Administration (SSA), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) or the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The Insight lists the eligible groups and notes that dependent minor or student children were excluded.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                                                                                               INSIGHTi



COVID-19 and Stimulus Payments to
Individuals: How the 2009 Economic Recovery
Payment Worked

William R. Morton
Analyst in Income Security

March 18, 2020
In response to concerns about an economic slowdown due to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
outbreak, some lawmakers have expressed interest in providing direct cash payments to Americans. One
option to provide such payments would be to establish a new advanced refundable tax credit, as was done
in 2008 with “recovery rebates.” Although this option would disburse payments to the vast majority of
Americans relatively quickly, it would not directly help those who do not file a federal income tax return.
A 2017 study found that “nonfilers” were more likely to be seniors or recipients of public assistance than
those who filed a tax return.
To provide direct cash payments to nonfilers, lawmakers could consider providing such payments through
existing programs for certain vulnerable populations. To assist lawmakers in assessing the merits of such
a proposal, this Insight examines the 2009 Economic Recovery Payment (ERP), which was a one-time
$250 payment made to most individuals who received recurring cash benefits from the Social Security
Administration (SSA), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), or the Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA).

Overview
The ERP was established as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA; P.L.
111-5). Section 2201 of ARRA provided a one-time payment of $250 to the following groups:
       Adult Social Security beneficiaries;
       Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients of all ages;
       Adult railroad retirement annuitants; and
                                                                          Congressional Research Service
                                                                                                   7-....
                                                                                              www.crs.gov
                                                                                                   IN11254

CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress
Congressional Research Service                                                                             2




        Adult VA disability compensation or pension recipients.
The ERP was not available to dependent minor or student children who might otherwise receive benefits
under Social Security, railroad retirement, or VA’s programs, nor was it available to SSI recipients who
received a personal needs allowance.
To qualify, an individual must have been eligible for benefits under one of the aforementioned programs
for at least one month during the three-month period prior to ARRA’s enactment (i.e., eligible for benefits
between November 2008 and January 2009). Individuals were ineligible for the ERP if they resided
outside of the United States or had their benefits suspended during the qualifying month prior to ARRA’s
enactment because they were (1) incarcerated, (2) a fugitive felon, (3) a probation or parole violator, (4)
not lawfully present in the United States, or (5) found to have committed fraud.
Each eligible individual received the ERP. Thus, a married couple composed of two eligible individuals
received $500 in combined payments ($250 each). However, ARRA specified that no eligible individual
could receive more than one payment, even if he or she were eligible for benefits under multiple programs
(e.g., Social Security and VA disability compensation). In addition, the ERP reduced the amount of the
Making Work Pay tax credit, which was another stimulus measure in ARRA.
ARRA specified that the ERP was not subject to federal income tax, and it provided the ERP with certain
garnishment protections, although the ERP was still subject to the Treasury Offset Program. ARRA also
provided that the ERP could not be treated as income, or as a resource for the month of receipt and the
following nine months, in determining the individual’s eligibility or assistance amount under any
federally funded public program. ERPs and administrative costs were financed by general revenues.

Legislative History and Rationale
The House version of ARRA would have provided for a one-time payment to SSI recipients equal to the
average monthly SSI payment. In justifying the payment, Representative Carolyn Kilpatrick noted that
ARRA “focuses on addressing the needs of those who need assistance most” and SSI recipients would be
more likely to spend the payment quickly because they have “very low incomes.”
The Senate version of ARRA would have set the one-time payment equal to $300 and extended it to
Social Security, RRB, and VA beneficiaries. Then-Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus said
the provisions in ARRA (including the one-time payment) were designed to “counteract weak consumer
demand and spending slowdowns.”
The conference agreement followed the Senate version but set the payment level at $250. Representative
Paul Kanjorski remarked that by providing the ERP to retirees and disabled individuals, the payment was
designed to “help more people without jobs.” Meanwhile, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse noted that the
ERP provided “extra help from the Federal Government” for vulnerable seniors.

Implementation
ARRA required SSA, RRB, and VA to work with Treasury to coordinate and certify the eligibility of each
ERP recipient. Administering agencies sent out notices to identified individuals in advance of receiving
the ERP, as well as provided FAQs on their websites.
Treasury was required to start disbursing ERPs no later than 120 days (4 months) after enactment of
ARRA (February 17, 2009), and no payments were to be made after 2010. Treasury disbursed most ERPs
in May 2009, as well as a “catch-up” payment in December 2010 for individuals identified as eligible
after the initial disbursement date (Table 1). SSA considered the May 2009 timeframe to be “a major
accomplishment,” given the short statutory deadline for initial payments. Treasury ultimately issued more
than 55.2 million ERPs, totaling over $13.8 billion.
Congressional Research Service                                                                            3




                          Table 1. Economic Recovery Payment (ERP) Schedule
                                                                           Days Since Enactment of ARRA
                Milestone                          Completion Date                 (Feb. 17, 2009)

 First Social Security payments                       05/07/2009                        79
 SSI payments                                         05/18/2009                        90
 Last Social Security payments                        05/28/2009                       100
 RRB payments                                         05/29/2009                       101
 VA payments                                          06/30/2009                       133
 “Catch-up” payments                                  12/31/2010                       682

    Source: U.S. Department of the Treasury.


Discussion
The congressional rationale for the ERP was twofold: (1) to provide assistance to certain vulnerable
populations and (2) to stimulate economic activity through consumer spending. A 2012 study analyzed the
answers to a 2009 household survey on certain stimulus measures created in 2008 and 2009. It found that
most ERP recipients were aged 65 or older, had household income at or below $35,000, and had little or
no wealth in stocks. With respect to how recipients used the ERP, the study found that 30% mostly spent
it, 29% mostly saved it, and 41% mostly paid down debt with it.




                                               IN11254 · VERSION 1 · NEW
EveryCRSReport.com

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a federal legislative branch agency, housed inside the
Library of Congress, charged with providing the United States Congress non-partisan advice on
issues that may come before Congress.

EveryCRSReport.com republishes CRS reports that are available to all Congressional staff. The
reports are not classified, and Members of Congress routinely make individual reports available to
the public.

Prior to our republication, we redacted phone numbers and email addresses of analysts who
produced the reports. We also added this page to the report. We have not intentionally made any
other changes to any report published on EveryCRSReport.com.

CRS reports, as a work of the United States government, are not subject to copyright protection in
the United States. Any CRS report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without
permission from CRS. However, as a CRS report may include copyrighted images or material from a
third party, you may need to obtain permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or
otherwise use copyrighted material.

Information in a CRS report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public
understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to members of Congress in
connection with CRS' institutional role.

EveryCRSReport.com is not a government website and is not affiliated with CRS. We do not claim
copyright on any CRS report we have republished.


File and source

File
IN11254.620265.pdf
Size
646,209 bytes
SHA-256
1b4c3e74dfbd570285a4c394dcbeeb9e04815fb67385bfc97152393fdf89d7be
Our copy
IN11254.620265.pdf
Original
www.everycrsreport.com
Back to top