Congressional Research Service IN11230 (Payroll Tax Cuts as an Economic Stimulus Response to Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19))

Summary

CRS Insight IN11230, Payroll Tax Cuts as an Economic Stimulus Response to Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), by Donald J. Marples and Molly F. Sherlock, Specialists in Public Finance, dated March 5, 2020. It examines a temporary payroll tax cut for employees as a fiscal stimulus option, noting it was used in 2011 and 2012 and that on March 2, 2020 President Trump and others expressed interest in a one-year payroll tax cut. It explains that the Social Security (OASDI) payroll tax equals 6.2% of wages up to the taxable earnings base of $137,700 in 2020, paid by both employers and employees. The Insight then evaluates such a cut against three CBO criteria: timing, cost-effectiveness and consistency with long-term fiscal objectives.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

INSIGHTi

Payroll Tax Cuts as an Economic Stimulus
Response to Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)

Donald J. Marples
Specialist in Public Finance

Molly F. Sherlock
Specialist in Public Finance

March 5, 2020
The current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak has increased concerns that the U.S. economy
could be affected as part of a global economic downturn. A range of fiscal and monetary policy tools have
been used to address prior times of economic weakness. One option for fiscal stimulus is a temporary
payroll tax cut for employees. This option was used to address economic weakness in 2011 and 2012. On
March 2, 2020, President Trump and others expressed interest in a one-year payroll tax cut to help bolster
the economy.

What Are Payroll Taxes?
Payroll taxes are collected to finance certain entitlement programs, including Social Security, parts of
Medicare, and Unemployment Compensation (UC). Social Security’s old age, survivors, and disability
insurance (OASDI) payroll tax is paid by eligible workers and their employers, and it finances the Social
Security trust funds. The tax equals 6.2% of wages on the taxable earnings base ($137,700 in 2020). This
tax is paid by both employers and employees (with self-employed individuals paying both the employer
and the employee share, or 12.4%).

Stimulus Effects of a Temporary Reduction in Payroll Taxes
Short-term fiscal stimulus measures aim to boost economic activity primarily through increases in the
demand for goods and services. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), in testimony before Congress,
previously identified three key criteria commonly used to assess the stimulating effects of policy
Congressional Research Service
7-....
www.crs.gov
IN11230

CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress
Congressional Research Service 2

proposals: (1) timing, (2) cost-effectiveness, and (3) consistency with long-term fiscal objectives. The
following sections evaluate a payroll tax rate reduction using these criteria.

Timing
To be effective, short-term stimulus should affect the economy while it is in a period of economic
weakness. Although there is general agreement that the coronavirus will have dampening effects on the
U.S. economy, there is substantial uncertainty regarding the magnitude of these effects. The Federal
Reserve Federal Open Market Committee decision to lower the federal funds rate by half a percentage
point is indicative of the risk the coronavirus poses to the economy. Many fundamentals of the U.S.
economy, however, remain strong. Unemployment is at its lowest level since the 1960s, consumer
spending is strong, and the economy remains in its longest period of economic expansion. Some Members
of Congress and other commentators have expressed skepticism regarding fiscal stimulus in the form of a
payroll tax cut as a coronavirus response. Others believe the situation warrants an immediate response
that includes some form of fiscal stimulus. Relative to most other forms of fiscal stimulus, a payroll tax
cut could be implemented relatively quickly. It could also be designed to expire as the economy
strengthens.

Cost-Effectiveness
Effective short-term stimulus maximizes the increase in output and employment per dollar of budgetary
cost. This is often colloquially referred to as the policy’s “bang for the buck.” Economists more often use
the term multiplier effect. The multiplier effect of a fiscal policy depends on the fraction of additional
income spent, as opposed to saved, on goods and services relative to the lost federal revenue. Provisions
targeted at low-income individuals or the unemployed often are expected to be more cost-effective—have
larger multiplier effects—than broad tax rate reductions, as those facing financial constraints are more
likely to fully spend any additional disposable income.
Considering the source of the economic weakness can inform analysis of the likely effectiveness of a
payroll tax cut. A payroll tax cut does not address supply-chain disruptions and might have limited
effectiveness if the economy were positioned to snap back on its own after the shock—referred to as a “V-
shaped” economic disruption. If, however, the coronavirus-induced economic slowdown leads to layoffs,
reduced hours, or reduced consumer spending, a payroll tax cut could help offset reduced demand.
A 2015 CBO working paper presented data suggesting that multipliers vary according to the strength of
the economy—with the smallest multipliers occurring when the economy is at or near full employment. A
payroll tax cut enacted in a strong economy likely would have less “bang for the buck.” Currently, the
coronavirus does not appear to have caused widespread economic damage, and a statement from the G7
Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors affirmed a readiness to respond if economic conditions
deteriorate. As noted above, however, the situation is evolving.

Consistency with Long-Term Fiscal Objectives
Effective short-term stimulus should not hinder long-term fiscal sustainability. Any reduction in payroll
taxes, by itself, adds to short-term budget deficits and could be at odds with the long-term goal of debt
sustainability. This is a consideration given that the budget deficit and federal debt are higher than their
historical averages, relative to the size of the economy.
To address long-term fiscal objectives, a temporary reduction in payroll taxes could include offsets to
reduce or eliminate the net budgetary cost of the proposals. Offsets are, by definition, contractionary, as
they either cut spending or raise taxes—though the timing of the offsets could be designed to apply their
contractionary effects in later years.
Congressional Research Service 3

In the past, the effect of payroll tax cuts on federal tax revenue has been substantial. The temporary
payroll tax cut effective for 2011 reduced federal tax revenue by $111.7 billion. The two-month extension
for early 2012 reduced federal revenue by $20.8 billion, and extending the payroll tax cut through the
remainder of 2012 reduced federal revenue by $93.2 billion. When payroll tax cuts were used as
economic stimulus in 2011 and 2012, the Social Security trust fund was “made whole” by a transfer of
general revenue.

IN11230 · VERSION 1 · NEW
EveryCRSReport.com

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a federal legislative branch agency, housed inside the
Library of Congress, charged with providing the United States Congress non-partisan advice on
issues that may come before Congress.

EveryCRSReport.com republishes CRS reports that are available to all Congressional staff. The
reports are not classified, and Members of Congress routinely make individual reports available to
the public.

Prior to our republication, we redacted phone numbers and email addresses of analysts who
produced the reports. We also added this page to the report. We have not intentionally made any
other changes to any report published on EveryCRSReport.com.

CRS reports, as a work of the United States government, are not subject to copyright protection in
the United States. Any CRS report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without
permission from CRS. However, as a CRS report may include copyrighted images or material from a
third party, you may need to obtain permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or
otherwise use copyrighted material.

Information in a CRS report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public
understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to members of Congress in
connection with CRS' institutional role.

EveryCRSReport.com is not a government website and is not affiliated with CRS. We do not claim
copyright on any CRS report we have republished.

File and source

File: IN11230.618966.pdf
Size: 594,940 bytes
SHA-256: 88f3cb6e81ff6199c9b80f931c9189e2d24b71f544571995a5f87ddede51d1be
Our copy: IN11230.618966.pdf
Original: www.everycrsreport.com