Complaint — United States v. Kamil Suja (No. 2:25-cv-00577)

Summary

A civil complaint by the United States, on behalf of the U.S. Small Business Administration, against Kamil Suja, Case 2:25-cv-00577-SDN in the United States District Court for the District of Maine, filed November 19, 2025 as Document 1. It seeks treble damages and penalties under the False Claims Act and FIRREA, and recovery for unjust enrichment and payment by mistake. The complaint alleges that the defendant obtained a first-draw PPP loan of $20,832.00, approved on May 20, 2021, by claiming a sole proprietorship with annual gross revenues of approximately $100,000 and submitting fabricated tax return documents. It alleges the funds went to non-qualifying purchases such as a car and securities on an online trading platform, and that the SBA paid the lender $2,500 in processing fees. It is signed /s/ by Assistant U.S. Attorney James D. Concannon.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Complaint — United States v. Kamil Suja (No. 2:25-cv-00577).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/complaint-no-2-25-cv-00577-dkt-1-a2ff39bec5/, SHA-256 321f07df3b76e6a6a014e619890ba293d673e776d281592d5296d0f987d8d723.

Full text

Case 2:25-cv-00577-SDN Document 1 Filed 11/19/25 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.
No. 2:25-cv-
KAMIL SUJA,

Defendant.

COMPLAINT
NOW COMES Plaintiff, the United States of America (the “United States”), on

behalf of its agency the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”), and hereby files the

instant Complaint against Kamil Suja (“Defendant” or “Suja”) to recover treble damages

and civil penalties under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33, civil

penalties under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act

(“FIRREA”), partially codified at 12 U.S.C. § 1833a, and to recover money for common

law or equitable causes of action for payment by mistake and unjust enrichment based

upon Suja’s receipt of Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) funds to which he was not

entitled.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

1. This action arises under the FCA, FIRREA, and Maine common law.

2. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1345 because the United States is the plaintiff. The Court also has subject matter

jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367(a).

3. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant under 31 U.S.C.

1
Case 2:25-cv-00577-SDN Document 1 Filed 11/19/25 Page 2 of 11 PageID #: 2

§ 3732(a) because Defendant can be found, resides, or transacts business in this District,

or has committed the alleged acts in this District.

4. Venue is proper in this district under 31 U.S.C. § 3732(a) and 28 U.S.C.

§ 1391(b) as Defendant can be found in this District.

PARTIES

5. Plaintiff, United States of America, guarantees and funds certain loans

through the SBA.

6. Defendant, Kamil Suja, is a resident of South Portland, Maine.

The Paycheck Protection Program

7. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act was a

federal law enacted in or around March 2020 and designed to provide emergency

financial assistance to the millions of Americans suffering the economic effects caused

by the COVID-19 pandemic. One source of relief provided by the CARES Act was the

authorization of forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other

expenses, through a program referred to as the Paycheck Protection Program. The

program was modified and extended thereafter.

8. To obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business submitted a PPP loan

application, which was signed by an authorized representative of the business. The PPP

loan application required the business (through its authorized representative) to

acknowledge the program rules and make certain affirmative certifications to be eligible

to obtain the PPP loan. In the PPP loan application (SBA Form 2483), the small

business (through its authorized representative) was required to provide, among other

things, its: (a) average monthly payroll expenses; and (b) number of employees. These

2
Case 2:25-cv-00577-SDN Document 1 Filed 11/19/25 Page 3 of 11 PageID #: 3

figures were used to calculate the amount of money the small business was eligible to

receive under the PPP. In addition, businesses applying for a PPP loan were required to

provide documentation confirming their payroll expenses.

9. A PPP loan application was processed by a participating lender. If a PPP

loan application was approved, the participating lender funded the PPP loan using its

own monies. While it was the participating lender that issued the PPP loan, the loan was

100% guaranteed by the SBA. Data from the application, including information about

the borrower, the total amount of the loan, and the listed number of employees, was

transmitted by the lender to the SBA in the course of processing the loan and

subsequent forgiveness process.

10. PPP loan proceeds were required to be used by the business on certain

permissible expenses—payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent, and utilities. The PPP

allowed the interest and principal on the PPP loan to be entirely forgiven if the business

spent the loan proceeds on these expense items within a designated period of time and

used a defined portion of the PPP loan proceeds on payroll expenses.

11. The application process to obtain a PPP loan required the eligible recipient

to make the following good faith certifications and acknowledgments:

a. That the applicant was eligible to receive a PPP loan under the rules in

effect at the time the application was submitted (the “PPP Rules”);

b. That the uncertainty of current economic conditions made the loan

request necessary to support the ongoing operations of the eligible

recipient;

c. That the applicant was in operation on February 15, 2020, had not

3
Case 2:25-cv-00577-SDN Document 1 Filed 11/19/25 Page 4 of 11 PageID #: 4

permanently closed, and was either an eligible self-employed

individual, independent contractor, or sole proprietorship with no

employees, or had employees for whom it paid salaries and payroll

taxes or paid independent contractors, as reported on Form(s) 1099-

MISC;

d. That the funds would be used to retain workers and maintain payroll;

or make payments for mortgage interest, rent, utilities, or other

covered costs under the PPP Rules;

e. That if the funds were knowingly used for unauthorized purposes, the

federal government may find the individual legally liable for such

charges as fraud;

f. That not more than 40 percent of the loan proceeds may be used for

non-payroll costs;

g. That documentation verifying the number of full-time equivalent

employees on payroll as well as the dollar amounts of payroll costs,

covered mortgage interest payments, covered rent payments, and

covered utilities would be provided to the lender if required;

h. That the eligible recipient had not received and would not receive

another loan under the Paycheck Protection Program;

i. That the information provided in the application and the information

provided in all supporting documents and forms was true and accurate

in all material respects; and

j. That the lender would confirm the eligible loan amount using the

4
Case 2:25-cv-00577-SDN Document 1 Filed 11/19/25 Page 5 of 11 PageID #: 5

documents submitted by the applicant.

The False Claims Act

12. The FCA provides, in pertinent part, that any person who:

(a)(1)(A) knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or
fraudulent claim for payment or approval; [or]

(a)(1)(B) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false
record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim;

is liable to the United States for three times the amount of damages which the United

States sustains, plus a civil penalty per violation. 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1).

13. FCA penalties are regularly adjusted for inflation, pursuant to the Federal

Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015. See 28 U.S.C. § 2461

note. For violations occurring after November 2, 2015, the civil penalty amounts

currently range from a minimum of $14,308 to a maximum of $28,619. 28 C.F.R. § 85.5.

14. For purposes of the FCA, the terms “knowing” and “knowingly”

(A) mean that a person, with respect to information—

i. has actual knowledge of the information;

ii. acts in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information; or

iii. acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information; and

(B) require no proof of specific intent to defraud.

31 U.S.C. § 3729(b)(1).

15. Under the FCA, the term “claim” includes requests to the United States for

payment, whether made directly or indirectly to the United States. Id. § 3729(b)(2)(A).

16. The FCA defines “material” to mean “having a natural tendency to

influence, or be capable of influencing, the payment or receipt of money or property. Id.

5
Case 2:25-cv-00577-SDN Document 1 Filed 11/19/25 Page 6 of 11 PageID #: 6

§ 3729(b)(4).

FIRREA

17. Section 951 of FIRREA, as amended, codified at 12 U.S.C. § 1833a,

provides that the Attorney General may recover civil penalties of up to $1 million per

violation against persons who commit specified violations as established by a

preponderance of the evidence. 28 C.F.R. § 85.5 (the maximum civil penalty was

increased to $2,513,215 for assessments after July 3, 2025 for which violations occurred

after November 2, 2015). The statute further provides that the Attorney General

alternatively may recover the amount of any gain to the person committing the

violation, or the amount of the loss to a person other than the violator stemming from

such conduct, up to the amount of the gain or the loss. Id. The predicate violations

identified in Section 951 that can form the basis for liability under FIRREA include,

among others: (a) knowingly or willfully making a materially false or fraudulent

statement affecting a federally insured financial institution (18 U.S.C. § 1001); (b)

making a false statement on a loan application to a financial institution, “the accounts of

which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation” (18 U.S.C. § 1014);

and (c) knowingly making a false statement for the purpose of influencing a decision by

the Administrator of the SBA or to obtain a loan, money, or anything of value under the

SBA’s 7(a) program, including the PPP (15 U.S.C. § 645(a)).

18. Section 1109(i) of the CARES Act provides that PPP loans are SBA loans

for purposes of 15 U.S.C. § 645.

6
Case 2:25-cv-00577-SDN Document 1 Filed 11/19/25 Page 7 of 11 PageID #: 7

Allegations

19. It is a violation of the FCA to knowingly obtain an SBA-guaranteed PPP

loan which is not supplied in compliance with the PPP Rules. Suja obtained or caused to

be obtained a PPP loan in violation of the FCA.

20. Defendant applied for and received an SBA-guaranteed first-draw PPP

loan numbered 3866329004 in the amount of $20,832.00, which was approved on May

20, 2021 (the “PPP Loan”), based upon misrepresentations in a loan application

submitted to a financial institution (the “Lender”). In the PPP Loan application,

Defendant knowingly misrepresented that he operated a sole proprietorship with annual

gross revenues of approximately $100,000. In reality, Defendant did not own any

business. Defendant submitted or caused to be submitted fabricated tax return

documents in furtherance of his fraudulent scheme to obtain the PPP Loan. These

misrepresentations caused Defendant to receive loan proceeds well in excess of what he

would have been entitled, if any at all.

21. Defendant did not spend the PPP Loan funds on qualifying business

expenses. Instead, Defendant used the PPP Loan funds on a variety of non-qualifying

expenditures, such as the purchase of a car and to fund securities purchases on an

online trading platform.

22. The SBA paid $2,500 in processing fees to the Lender in connection with

the PPP Loan distributed to Defendant.

23. False statements and documents were submitted or caused to be

submitted by Defendant to the Lender which misrepresented the amount of eligible

payroll for Defendant’s use of the loan proceeds. These false statements in the loan

7
Case 2:25-cv-00577-SDN Document 1 Filed 11/19/25 Page 8 of 11 PageID #: 8

application were material to the payment of money by the Lender that was then

reimbursed by the SBA (along with accrued interest), causing damages to the United

States.

24. Additionally, the false statements and documents Defendant submitted or

caused to be submitted to the Lender were material to the payment of processing fees by

the SBA to the Lender, furthering damaging the United States.

The United States realleges and incorporates all paragraphs above of this

Complaint as fully set forth herein in all Counts listed below:

COUNT I
False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(A)
Presenting or Causing False Claims to Be Presented for Payment

25. Defendant knowingly requested and obtained a PPP Loan for an amount

he was not entitled to, in violation of the PPP Rules.

26. By virtue of these false claims, the United States was damaged for the full

amount of the PPP Loan and the processing fee paid to the Lender, plus any other costs

or interest, and is entitled to treble damages under the FCA, plus civil penalties for each

violation.

COUNT II
False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(B)
Making or Using False Records or Statements
27. Defendant knowingly submitted or caused to be submitted a PPP loan

application that contained misrepresentations regarding his payroll costs, business

activities, and intended use of PPP funds.

28. By virtue of these false statements, the United States was damaged for the

full amount of the loan and the processing fee paid to the Lender, plus any other costs or

8
Case 2:25-cv-00577-SDN Document 1 Filed 11/19/25 Page 9 of 11 PageID #: 9

interest, and is entitled to treble damages under the FCA, plus civil penalties for each

violation.

COUNT III
False Statements to the SBA
12 U.S.C. § 1833a (FIRREA)
29. This is a claim for civil penalties under FIRREA, 12 U.S.C. § 1833a, as

amended.

30. Defendant, for the purposes of fraudulently obtaining a federally

guaranteed PPP loan and inducing the SBA to forgive the loans, in violation of 12 U.S.C.

§ 1833a, unlawfully, willfully and knowingly made or caused to be made false statements

or certifications to SBA Lenders and the SBA in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 645(a).

31. Defendant signed the PPP loan agreements, thereby knowingly falsely

representing that he would “comply with all SBA guidance” as it applied to the PPP

Loan. These false statements were knowingly false and made for the purpose of

influencing the SBA to obtain PPP loan proceeds in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 645(a).

32. Because of Defendant’s acts, he is liable for civil penalties up to the

maximum amount authorized under 12 U.S.C. § 1833a(b).

COUNT IV
Unjust Enrichment

33. This is a claim for the recovery of monies by which Defendant has been

unjustly enriched.

34. By obtaining from the United States funds to which he was not entitled

(through the Lender), Defendant was unjustly enriched and the United States is entitled

to damages in an amount of $20,832.00, plus interest, together with any other damages

to be determined at trial.
9
Case 2:25-cv-00577-SDN Document 1 Filed 11/19/25 Page 10 of 11 PageID #: 10

COUNT V
Payment by Mistake

35. This is a claim for the recovery of monies the United States paid directly or

indirectly to Defendant as a result of mistaken understandings of fact.

36. The United States’ mistaken understandings of fact were material to its

decision to approve the PPP Loan.

37. The United States, acting in reasonable reliance on the truthfulness of the

statements contained in the PPP loan application, approved the PPP Loan distribution

to Defendant to which he was not entitled.

38. Thus, the United States is entitled to recoup the amount of the PPP Loan

plus any other amounts to be determined at trial.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff the United States requests that judgment be entered in

its favor and against Defendant as follows:

(a) On Counts I and II (False Claims Act), awarding the United States treble the

damages it sustained for (1) the total charged off amount ($20,832.00) of the

PPP Loan Defendant received, and (2) the total amount ($2,500.00) of the

processing fee paid by the United States to the Lender, together with the

maximum civil penalties allowed by law;

(b) On Count III (FIRREA), awarding the United States civil penalties pursuant

to 12 U.S.C. § 1833a equal to, at minimum, the total charged off amount of the

PPP Loan - $20,832.00.

which Defendant was unjustly enriched;
10
Case 2:25-cv-00577-SDN Document 1 Filed 11/19/25 Page 11 of 11 PageID #: 11

(d) On Count V (Payment by Mistake), awarding the United States the amount

mistakenly paid to Defendant;

(e) awarding the United States pre- and post-judgment interest, costs, and filing

fees; and

(f) granting such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

The United States demands a jury trial in this case pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 38(b) of all claims and issues so triable.

Dated: November 19, 2025 Respectfully submitted,
Portland, Maine

ANDREW B. BENSON
U.S. Attorney for the District of Maine

BY: /s/ James D. Concannon
JAMES D. CONCANNON
Counsel for the United States of America
Assistant U.S. Attorney
100 Middle Street
East Tower, 6th Floor
Portland, Maine 04101
(207) 780-3257
James.Concannon@usdoj.gov
On behalf of the United States

File and source

File: 1-complaint.pdf
Size: 173,181 bytes
SHA-256: 321f07df3b76e6a6a014e619890ba293d673e776d281592d5296d0f987d8d723
Our copy: 1-complaint.pdf
Original: archive.org