Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Criminal Complaint — United States v. Darrell Lamont Baker (No. 2:20-mj-30184, E.D. Mich.)Search ⌕

Criminal Complaint — United States v. Darrell Lamont Baker (No. 2:20-mj-30184, E.D. Mich.)

Summary

A criminal complaint (AO 91) filed June 1, 2020 as ECF No. 1 in United States v. Darrell Lamont Baker, Case 2:20-mj-30184, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, charging wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and money laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1957. The affidavit of FBI Special Agent Matthew Sluss, sworn before U.S. Magistrate Judge David R. Grand, alleges that Baker obtained a $590,900 PPP loan from Customers Bank for Motorcity Solar Energy, Inc., whose application claimed 68 employees and about $2.8 million in 2019 wages, although the state had dissolved the corporation on July 15, 2019. It alleges Baker bought four vehicles with cashier's checks and spent or withdrew approximately $172,000 of the proceeds. The affidavit states that the remaining $418,415.60 was returned to Customers Bank.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Criminal Complaint — United States v. Darrell Lamont Baker (No. 2:20-mj-30184, E.D. Mich.).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/complaint-no-2-20-mj-30184-dkt-1-e-d-mich-d2982b75bc/, SHA-256 cb00d0ba74d06371cc0ee215f074347c92e420e51e2055e5f8f5f68a49175cd1.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 2:20-mj-30184-DUTY ECF No.1 filed 06/01/20 PagelD.1 Page 1of10

AUSA: — John K. Neal Telephone: (313) 670-7539
AO 91 (Rev. 11/11) Criminal Complaint Special Agent: Matthew R. Sluss Telephone: (313) 919-1327
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the

Eastern District of Michigan

United States of America Case: 2:20—mj—30184

v. Assigned To : Unassigned
Case No Assign. Date : 6/1/2020
Darrell Lamont Baker Description: RE: SEALED MATTER
(EOB)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

|, the complainant in this case, state that the following is true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

On or about the date(s) of May 13, 2020 - present in the county of Wayne in the
Eastern District of Michigan , the defendant(s) violated:
Code Section Offense Description
18 U.S.C. § 1343 Wire fraud
18 U.S.C. § 1957 Money laundering

This criminal complaint is based on these facts:

Continued on the attached sheet. Be,

Complainant’s signature

Matthew R. Sluss, Special Agent, FBI

Printed name and title

Sworn to before me and signed in my presence

and/or by reliable electronic means. \ ‘ | Ly J

Date: June 1, 2020 Judge’s signature

City and state: Detroit, MI David R. Grand, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Printed name and title
Case 2:20-mj-30184-DUTY ECF No.1 filed 06/01/20 PagelD.2 Page 2 of 10

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF A COMPLAINT

I, Matthew Sluss, Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), being
duly sworn, state that:

INTRODUCTION AND AGENT BACKGROUND

1. I am an investigative or law enforcement officer of the United States within
the meaning of Section 2510(7) of Title 18 of the United States Code. I am
empowered to conduct investigations of and to make arrests for offenses enumerated
in Title 18 of the United States Code.

2. I have been employed by the FBI as a Special Agent since September 2017.
During my employment with the FBI, I have investigated federal crimes including
mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, bankruptcy fraud, and various other criminal
matters. At all times during the investigation described in this affidavit, I have been
acting in an official capacity as a Special Agent of the FBI.

3. This affidavit is made in support of a criminal complaint and summons to
appear for DARRELL LAMONT BAKER for violating 18 U.S.C. §1343 (wire
fraud) and 18 U.S.C. §1957 (money laundering).

4. This affidavit is submitted for the limited purpose of securing a criminal
complaint and summons to appear; therefore, this affidavit does not contain every
fact that I have learned during the course of the investigation. I have only set forth

the facts necessary to establish probable cause to believe that BAKER violated the
Case 2:20-mj-30184-DUTY ECF No.1 filed 06/01/20 PagelD.3 Page 3 of 10

statutes identified above. The information contained in this affidavit is based upon
my personal knowledge, training and experience, as well as the combined
knowledge, training and experience of other law enforcement officers and agents
with whom I have had discussions.

5. 18 U.S.C. §1343 criminalizes schemes or artifices to defraud, or obtaining
money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or
promises, when for the purpose of executing the scheme, the person transmits, or
causes to be transmitted, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds by means
of wire communication in interstate commerce.

6. 18 U.S.C. §1957 makes it a crime to knowingly engage, or attempt to engage,
in a monetary transaction with proceeds of a specified unlawful activity in an amount
greater than $10,000 by, though, or to a financial institution.

BACKGROUND OF THE PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM

7. The Small Business Administration (SBA) defined a Paycheck Protection
Program (PPP) loan as an SBA loan that helps businesses keep their workforce
employed during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. These loans are designed to
provide a direct incentive for small businesses to keep their workers on the payroll,
for businesses that were in operation as of February 15, 2020. The SBA will forgive
the loans if all employees are kept on the payroll for eight weeks and the money is

used for payroll, rent, mortgage interest, or utilities. The loans are funded by any
Case 2:20-mj-30184-DUTY ECF No.1 filed 06/01/20 PagelD.4 Page 4 of 10

participating federally insured depository institution or federally insured credit
union. Some applications to participate in the program are made directly to the
lender.

PROBABLE CAUSE

8. On May 13, 2020, MA, Director of Risk Management at MICHIGAN FIRST
CREDIT UNION (MFCU), Southfield, Michigan, informed the FBI that BAKER
fraudulently applied for a PPP loan on behalf of MOTORCITY SOLAR ENERGY,
INC. (MOTORCITY). The $590,900 PPP loan was funded by an ACH wire transfer
from CUSTOMERS BANK, in Pennsylvania, to MOTORCITY’s MFCU, in
Michigan, account on May 11, 2020.

9. On May 15, 2020, KM, Fraud Investigator at CUSTOMERS BANK, was
interviewed by your affiant. BAKER applied for a PPP loan on behalf of
MOTORCITY, and the online application came through READY CAPITAL, an
application processing vendor located in New Jersey. The submitted application
included a copy of BAKER’s driver’s license and MOTORCITY’s four 2019 941s,
“Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return’. The note date of the loan was May 4,
2020 and it was funded directly by ACH to MFCU in the amount of $590,900.

10. KM provided your affiant with BAKER’s complete PPP loan application,

which I have reviewed.
Case 2:20-mj-30184-DUTY ECF No.1 filed 06/01/20 PagelD.5 Page 5 of 10

11. The loan application asserted a primary business address of 220 Bagley, Suite
514, Detroit, Michigan 48226. I have observed that this location appears to be a
multi-level office building located in downtown Detroit, Michigan, and
MOTORCITY was not listed on the bulletin board directory in the lobby of the
building. There was no MOTORCITY signage observed at the building, including
on or around the fifth-floor door displaying the numbers 514. I have also learned that
the address of 220 Bagley was not included on any of the incorporation documents
found on the State of Michigan’s License And Regulatory Affairs “corporation
lookup” website.

12. The four 2019 941s included with the loan application asserted
MOTORCITY’s address as 11397 Stockwell Street, Detroit, Michigan. I have
observed this address to represent a single-family residence.

13. The application and four 2019 941s asserted MOTORCITY to have 68
employees and 2019 annual wages, tips, and other compensation of approximately
$2.8 million.

14. [have learned that as of April 21, 2020, the State of Michigan’s License And
Regulatory Affairs corporation lookup website indicated the State of Michigan
dissolved MOTORCITY’s corporation status on July 15, 2019.

15. On May 26, 2020, I reviewed Michigan’s Unemployment Insurance

Agency’s webpage on Michigan.gov and obtained certain background information
Case 2:20-mj-30184-DUTY ECF No.1 filed 06/01/20 PagelD.6 Page 6 of 10

about employers’ obligations under Michigan’s unemployment insurance program.
Unemployment insurance is a form of social insurance, administered by Michigan's
Unemployment Insurance Agency. It is designed to provide unemployment benefits
to help workers replace some of their lost wages after they have become unemployed
through no fault of their own, such as by a layoff. Michigan employers are required
to file Employer’s Quarterly Wage/Tax Reports listing their employees and the
wages earned for each quarter. A quarterly report must be filed even if the employer
does not have any employees and/or wages to report for the quarter. Employer’s
Wage/Tax Reports must be filed online through the Michigan Web Account
Manager (MiWAM) account.

16. Further, the State of Michigan, Department of Attorney General, Labor
Division, Regulatory Section, Payroll Fraud Enforcement Unit informed the FBI that
there was no Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency account registered for
MOTORCITY.

17. According to corporation documents filed with the State of Michigan,
BAKER was the resident agent for MOTORCITY, with a street address 11397
Stockwell Street, Detroit, Michigan. MOTORCITY was listed with a registered
office mailing address of 4000 Chatsworth Street, Detroit, Michigan, and BAKER

was listed as the President, Treasurer, Secretary, and Director with the same address.
Case 2:20-mj-30184-DUTY ECF No.1 filed 06/01/20 PagelD.7 Page 7 of 10

18. I have observed 4000 Chatsworth Street, Detroit, Michigan to be a single-
family residence.

19. BAKER electronically signed the PPP loan application as the CEO with 100%
ownership on April 10, 2020.

20. All four 2019 941s were also signed by BAKER as CEO.

21. The loan package’s Certificate of Completion was also signed by BAKER, on
May 4, 2020.

22. On May 15, 2020, MA was interviewed by your Affiant. On May 11, 2020,
MOTORCITY’s MFCU XXXX1891 account received a $590,900 deposit from
CUSTOMERS BANK. On May 11, 2020, BAKER purchased two cashier’s checks
from MFCU out of the MOTORCITY account. He also withdrew $30,000 in cash.
On May 12, 2020, BAKER purchased two additional cashier’s checks from MFCU,
and withdrew $30,000 more in cash. MFCU saw the account had been inactive for a
long time prior to these transactions and subsequently froze the account.

23. By review of MOTORCITY’s MFCU account statements, I have determined
that the account was opened on October 23, 2017. The account was active from
October 23, 2017 to July 16, 2019, during which time the account activity did not
appear to resemble payroll transactions or deposits or withdrawals related to solar
energy. The account remained closed from July 16, 2019 to April 14, 2020. On April

14, 2020 money was paid to reopen the account. The account activity between April
Case 2:20-mj-30184-DUTY ECF No.1 filed 06/01/20 PagelD.8 Page 8 of 10

14, 2020 and May 21, 2020 did not appear to resemble payroll transactions or
deposits or withdrawals related to solar energy. MFCU closed the account on May
21, 2020.

24. None of the cashier’s checks went to payroll; all four cashier’s checks were
made payable to TAS, an auto dealership in Redford, Michigan. MA provided the
FBI with the check date, check number, and check amount for all four cashier’s

checks, summarized as:

DATE CHECK NO. CHECK AMOUNT
5/11/2020 2924765 S 37,590.30
5/11/2020 2924766 S 36,461.90
5/12/2020 2924905 S 14,234.20
5/12/2020 2924906 S 20,706.90

25. TAS also provided your Affiant with vehicle sales documents, including
copies of purchase agreements and canceled checks, which documented BAKER’s
purchase of four vehicles. I have reviewed the documents. All four vehicles were
purchased by checks issued from MFCU that were obtained by BAKER,

summarized as:

DATE CHECK NO. CHECKAMOUNT VEHICLE PURCHASED YEAR VIN
5/11/2020 2924765 S 37,590.30 Cadillac Escalade 2015 1GYS4NKJ7FR587893
5/11/2020 2924766 S 36,461.90 Dodge Charger 2018 2C3CDXGJ4JH220865
5/12/2020 2924905 S 14,234.20 Hummer 2007 + 5SGRGN23UX7H103219
5/12/2020 2924906 S 20,706.90 Cadillac Escalade 2012 1GYS4KEF3CR128099

26. I spoke with AS, owner of TAS, and learned that BAKER purchased two
vehicles for himself, one for his sister, and one for his brother-in-law. AS described

BAKER as being the individual pictured in the driver’s license obtained during the

7
Case 2:20-mj-30184-DUTY ECF No.1 filed 06/01/20 PagelD.9 Page 9 of 10

vehicle sales transactions. BAKER told AS that he made the money to purchase the
vehicles by selling N95 masks to “FEMA”.

27. In the course of the investigation, I have learned that, in total, BAKER spent
and/or withdrew approximately $172,000 of the loan proceeds from the MFCU
account, none of which appeared to be spent on payroll. CUSTOMERS subsequently
issued a Hold Harmless agreement to MFCU to freeze the remaining funds.
CUSTOMERS then received a check from MFCU, dated May 21, 2020, returning
the remaining loan proceeds in the amount of $418,415.60.

28. BAKER then sent an e-mail to KM of CUSTOMERS stating, “We are
requesting that the funds that have been repossessed by your institution be returned
to our account immediately so that we can continue in our business and honor our
agreement.”

CONCLUSION
29. Your affiant submits that there is probable cause to believe that BAKER

devised and perpetrated a scheme or artifice to defraud CUSTOMERS BANK. In
furtherance of and to execute this scheme, BAKER sent an electronic loan
application and other writings, signs, signals, and pictures in interstate commerce by
means of wire communication, as set forth above. He received the proceeds of the

loan via an electronic funds transfer wire that crossed state lines as well.
Case 2:20-mj-30184-DUTY ECF No.1 filed 06/01/20 PagelD.10 Page 10 of 10

30. Further, your affiant submits that there is probable cause to believe BAKER
engaged in monetary transactions through a financial institution while using the
proceeds of his wire fraud scheme, , specifically by obtaining four cashier’s checks
issued by MFCU in amounts greater than $10,000, and using those checks to
purchase four vehicles.

31. Therefore, your Affiant believes that probable cause exists that DARRELL

LAMONT BAKER violated 18 U.S.C. §1343 (wire fraud) and 18 U.S.C. §1957

(money laundering).

MATTHEW SLUSS

Special Agent

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Sworn to before me and signed in my
presence and/or by reliable electronic means.

Date: June 1, 2020 ae Lr. Ao

Hon. David R. Grand
United States Magistrate Judge
Eastern District of Michigan


File and source

File
1-complaint.pdf
Size
857,853 bytes
SHA-256
cb00d0ba74d06371cc0ee215f074347c92e420e51e2055e5f8f5f68a49175cd1
Our copy
1-complaint.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top