Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Complaint, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians et al. v. Mnuchin, No. 1:20-cv-01136 (D.D.C.), Doc. 1 (April 30, 2020)

Complaint, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians et al. v. Mnuchin, No. 1:20-cv-01136 (D.D.C.), Doc. 1 (April 30, 2020)

Summary

Complaint in Case No. 1:20-cv-01136, Document 1, filed April 30, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians and five other tribal plaintiffs against Steven Mnuchin, sued in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury. The plaintiffs allege that the Secretary failed to disburse Title V funds to Tribal governments by April 26, 2020, as 42 U.S.C. § 801(b)(1) requires. Count I seeks declaratory, injunctive and mandamus relief, and the prayer asks the court to order disbursement within 24 hours consistent with the April 27, 2020 Order in Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, et al v. Mnuchin. The signature block names Keith M. Harper, Catherine F. Munson and Mark H. Reeves.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Complaint, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians et al. v. Mnuchin, No. 1:20-cv-01136 (D.D.C.), Doc. 1 (April 30, 2020).” Original at storage.courtlistener.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/complaint-agua-caliente-band-of-cahuilla-indians-et-al-v-mnuchin-no-1-6747222f6f/, SHA-256 c3616018a0a22e84ac03744b1dfe8b087e2f97b68c67a5292c27e0bbd927590e.

Full text

            Case 1:20-cv-01136 Document 1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 1 of 10



                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF                     )
CAHUILLA INDIANS,                         )
5401 Dinah Shore Drive,                   )
Palm Springs, CA 92264                    )
                                          )
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY,                 )
42507 W. Peters and Nall Road             )
Maricopa, AZ 85138-3940                   )
                                          )
ARAPAHO TRIBE OF THE WIND                 )
RIVER RESERVATION                         )
533 Ethete Road                           )
Ethete, WY 82520,                         )
                                          )
CHEROKEE NATION                           )
P.O. Box 1533                             )
Tahlequah, OK 74465,                      )
                                          )
SNOQUALMIE INDIAN TRIBE,                  )
9571 Ethan Wade Way SE,                   )
Snoqualmie, WA 98065                      )
                                          )
YUROK TRIBE OF THE YUROK                  )
RESERVATION                               )
190 Klamath Boulevard                     )
Klamath, CA 95548,                        )
                                          )
              Plaintiffs,                 )
                                          )
       v.                                 )   Case No. 1:20-cv-1136
                                          )
STEVEN MNUCHIN, in his official           )
Capacity as the Secretary of the United   )
States Department of the Treasury,        )
1500 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.              )
Washington, D.C. 20220                    )
                                          )         COMPLAINT
                                          )
              Defendant.                  )
              Case 1:20-cv-01136 Document 1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 2 of 10



       Plaintiffs the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Ak-Chin Indian Community,

Arapaho Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Cherokee Nation, Snoqualmie Indian Tribe, and

Yurok Tribe of the Yurok Reservation (“Plaintiffs”) federally recognized Indian Tribal

governments, by and through counsel, state and allege as follows:

                                       INTRODUCTION

       1.      Congress enacted the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act

(CARES Act), Pub. L. 116-136, which President Trump signed into law on March 27, 2020, to

respond to the devastating and ongoing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Title V of the CARES

Act amends the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 301, et seq.), and appropriates $150 billion for

fiscal year 2020 (Title V funds) for “payments to States, Tribal governments, and units of local

government.” 42 U.S.C. § 801(a)(1). Of that sum, $8 billion is “reserve[d] . . . for making payments

to Tribal governments.” Id. § 801(a)(1).

       2.      Congress, responding to the urgent situation throughout Indian Country and the

desperate need for these resources, mandated that the Secretary of the United States Department

of the Treasury (Secretary) disburse Title V funds to Tribal governments “not later than 30 days

after” March 27, 2020, the date of enactment of this section—in other words, by April 26, 2020.

Id. § 801(b)(1).

       3.      Plaintiffs are each federally recognized Indian tribes, acting through their Tribal

governments, who qualify to receive Title V funds and have submitted the requisite certifications

and information to the Secretary as requested by the Secretary to effectuate timely distribution of

such funds.

       4.      As of today, April 30, 2020, the Secretary has violated his clear non-discretionary

duty to act in accordance with the CARES Act mandate by failing to disburse Title V funds to



                                                 2
             Case 1:20-cv-01136 Document 1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 3 of 10



Tribal governments, including the Plaintiffs, within the timeframe Congress determined. Plaintiffs

are in dire need of the Title V funds, as Congress recognized, to support the necessary and

increased expenditures caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Plaintiffs’ injuries are ongoing,

worsening, and irreparable such that if the Secretary does not immediately disburse the emergency

relief funds, Plaintiffs will be forced to curtail essential governmental services and furlough or lay

off a substantial number of employees. Plaintiffs request that the Court order the Secretary to

immediately disburse Title V funds as directed by the CARES Act and this Court’s Order, issued

on April 27, 2020 in Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, et al v. Mnuchin, Case No.

1:20-cv-01002-APM (Doc. 36) (“April 27, 2020 Order”).



                                 JURISDICTION AND VENUE

       5.      This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1361,

and 1362.

       6.      Plaintiffs Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Ak-Chin Indian Community,

Arapaho Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Cherokee Nation, Snoqualmie Indian Tribe, and

Yurok Tribe of the Yurok Reservation have governing bodies duly recognized by the Secretary of

the U.S. Department of the Interior. The Plaintiffs assert claims arising under the Constitution and

laws of the United States, including the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706 and

the Mandamus Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1361.

       7.      This suit alleges that the Secretary is failing to act in accordance with a mandatory,

non-discretionary duty imposed by the CARES Act. Accordingly, Defendant has consented to suit

under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 702.

       8.      The allegations of the Complaint give rise to an actual controversy within the

meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2201.
                                                  3
              Case 1:20-cv-01136 Document 1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 4 of 10



        9.      Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e) because the

Defendant, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, is an officer of the United States

and because a substantial part of the actions or omissions giving rise to the claims occurred in this

District, a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated in this District,

and the Defendant maintains his principal place of business in this District.

                                            THE PARTIES

        10.     Plaintiff tribes are federally recognized Indian tribal government whose governing

bodies are recognized by the Secretary of the Interior. See Indian Entities Recognized by and

Eligible To Receive Services From the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, 85 Fed. Reg. 5462-

01, 5463 (Jan. 30, 2020).

        11.     The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians exercises sovereign powers of self-

governance and jurisdiction over the Agua Caliente Reservation, which was set aside by Executive

Orders in 1876 and 1877 and is located within the exterior boundaries of the State of California.

Agua Caliente brings this action through its Tribal government on its own behalf and on behalf of

its members.

        12.     The Ak-Chin Indian Community exercises sovereign powers of self-governance

and jurisdiction over the Ak-Chin Indian Community Reservation, which was set aside by

Executive Order in 1912 and is located within the exterior boundaries of the State of Arizona. Ak-

Chin brings this action through its Tribal government on its own behalf and on behalf of its

members.

        13.     The Arapaho Tribe of the Wind River Reservation exercises powers of self-

governance and jurisdiction. The Arapaho Tribe of the Wind River Reservation is a signatory to

the Fort Laramie Treaties of 1851 and 1868, their Reservation is shared with the Eastern Shoshone



                                                     4
             Case 1:20-cv-01136 Document 1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 5 of 10



Tribe of the Wind River Reservation and is located within the exterior boundaries of Wyoming.

The Arapaho Tribe of the Wind River Reservation brings this action through its Tribal government

on its own behalf and on behalf of its members.

       14.     The Cherokee Nation is a federally recognized Indian tribe located in Oklahoma,

and with over 383,000 citizens is the largest Indian tribe in the United States. In the 1830s, the

United States forced the Nation to remove from its Georgia homeland to present-day Oklahoma.

By the mid-19th century, most members of the Cherokee Nation had been forcibly moved to the

Indian Territory in what is today eastern Oklahoma. Treaties between the United States and the

Nation entered in 1835, 1846 and 1866 defined the boundaries of the Nation’s territory and

guaranteed the Nation’s sovereign powers of self-governance and jurisdiction over those lands.

Cherokee Nation brings this action through its Tribal government on its own behalf and on behalf

of its members.

       15.     The Snoqualmie Indian Tribe (sdukwalbixw in the Lushootseed language),

exercises sovereign powers of self-governance and jurisdiction over the Snoqualmie

Reservation. The Snoqualmie Indian Tribe is a signatory to the Treaty of Point Elliott of

1855. The Snoqualmie Indian Reservation was proclaimed on October 20, 2006, and is located

within the exterior boundaries of the State of Washington. The Snoqualmie Indian Tribe brings

this action through its Tribal government on its own behalf and on behalf of its members.

       16.     The Yurok Tribe of Yurok Reservation exercises powers of self-governance and

jurisdiction. The present day Yurok Reservation was established by partition pursuant to the

Hoopa-Yurok Settlement Act of 1988 and is located in the exterior boundaries of California. The

Yurok Tribe of the Yurok Reservation brings this action through its Tribal government on its own

behalf and on behalf of its members.



                                                  5
             Case 1:20-cv-01136 Document 1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 6 of 10



       17.     Defendant Steven Mnuchin, sued in his official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S.

Department of the Treasury, is charged by Congress with distributing Title V funds to Tribal

governments no later than April 26, 2020. Defendant’s failure to distribute Title V funds by the

date mandated in the CARES Act violates the plain language of the Act and threatens the Plaintiffs

with imminent irreparable injury, as set forth in greater detail below.

                                   FACTUAL BACKGROUND

       18.     Plaintiff Tribes each provide a wide array of governmental services throughout their

Reservations and for the benefit of their Tribes. Some of the services the Plaintiff Tribes provide

include, but are not limited to, healthcare, food distribution, heating assistance, education, planning

and development services, environmental regulatory services, building inspection services, food

and safety regulatory services, power services, water and water treatment, police, fire, social

services, housing, judicial services, health and welfare services, educational programs, and social

and cultural preservation facilities and programs.

       19.     Plaintiffs have each declared Tribal States of Emergency and responsibly have

closed their tribal enterprises in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The closing of these

enterprises has eliminated the Tribes’ sources of governmental revenue that permit each ordinarily

to provide essential government services and employee salaries and benefits.

       20.     Tribal Plaintiffs have taken emergency protective measures and incurred

substantial unbudgeted expenses to address the COVID-19 crises. For example, Plaintiff Tribes

have procured additional personal protective equipment (PPE) for distribution to Tribal members

and Tribal staff; procured and distributed water, toilet paper and food to Tribal members; increased

spending on cleaning and sanitation supplies, including washing stations and thermometers, tents

for testing facilities, medical equipment, testing supplies, public communication materials;

services to tribal elders and food distribution programs; incurred additional IT and professional
                                                  6
             Case 1:20-cv-01136 Document 1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 7 of 10



services related expenses; and incurred additional security expenses to secure closed facilities.

These emergency services are unbudgeted expenses. Congress understood that tribes would incur

these COVID-19 related expenditures and enacted Title V of the CARES Act precisely to provide

additional resources to tribes, including Plaintiff Tribes, so as to ensure that they had the resources

for such expenditures.

       21.     If the Plaintiff Tribes do not receive Title V funds immediately, Plaintiffs will be

forced to take additional measures such as reducing and curtailing additional essential

governmental services or laying off or furloughing their employees.

       22.     The increased and necessary unbudgeted expenditures by the Plaintiff Tribes

resulting from the devastating impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic are exactly the costs that

Congress intended the Title V funds to cover. See 42 U.S.C. § 801(d).

       23.     This Court recently held, consistent with the plain statutory language, that the

CARES Act “requires the Secretary [] to disburse the Title V funds to the Tribal governments ‘not

later than 30 days after’ March 26, 2020, the date of enactment of this section – that is, by April

26, 2020.” (Court’s April 27, 2020 Order, citing 42 U.S.C. § 801(b)(1).)

       24.     On April 13, 2020, the Secretary published on the Treasury Department’s website

a form titled “Certification for Requested Tribal Data” (“Certification”), which requested certain

data to effectuate disbursement of the CARES Act funds.

       25.     Plaintiffs each submitted the requisite Certification and other information before

the Secretary’s April 17, 2020 deadline. The Defendant possesses all of the requisite information

needed to disburse the funds to the Plaintiffs, and has had such information for nearly two weeks.

Nevertheless, as of the date of this filing, April 30, 2020, Defendant has failed to disburse the




                                                  7
               Case 1:20-cv-01136 Document 1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 8 of 10



funds. Defendant’s delay and inaction is in violation of a mandatory, non-discretionary duty

imposed by the CARES Act.

       26.      Any further delay in funding will force Plaintiffs to curtail essential governmental

services and furlough or lay off a substantial number of employees.

       27.      This Court can redress the Plaintiffs’ injuries by awarding declaratory, injunctive,

and mandamus relief requiring Defendant to disburse the Title V funds within 24 hours in a manner

consistent with the CARES Act and this Court’s April 27, 2020 Order.

         Count I – Declaratory, Injunctive, and Mandamus Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2201-
                        2202, 5 U.S.C. § 706, and 28 U.S.C. § 1361

       28.      The Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference all preceding paragraphs and

allegations.

       29.      The APA authorizes judicial review of agency actions, including actions

unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed. 5 U.S.C. § 702.

       30.      The APA provides that the reviewing Court shall compel agency action unlawfully

withheld or unreasonably delayed. 5 U.S.C. § 706(1).

       31.      Under the Mandamus Act, a federal court may “compel an officer or employee of

the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the Plaintiff.” 28 U.S.C. § 1361.

       32.      The CARES Act requires the Secretary to disburse Title V funds to Tribal

governments “not later than 30 days after” March 27, 2020, the date of its enactment—in other

words, by April 26, 2020. Id. § 801(b)(1). Plaintiffs are entitled to an order declaring the same and

compelling Defendant through a mandatory injunction to disburse funds without further delay.

       33.      By failing to disburse the funds, Defendant is violating a clear, non-discretionary

and mandatory duty to act as mandated by Congress through the CARES Act.




                                                 8
             Case 1:20-cv-01136 Document 1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 9 of 10



       34.     The Defendant’s duty to disburse the funds within 30 days of enactment of the

CARES Act is a plainly defined and peremptory duty.

       35.     In light of the clear statutory mandate, Defendant’s inaction in failing to disburse

the Title V funds amounts to inaction unlawfully withheld or unreasonable delayed.

       36.     The Plaintiffs are entitled to a preliminary injunction and mandamus relief requiring

the Secretary to immediately disburse the Title V funds to the Plaintiffs in a manner consistent

with the CARES Act and the Court’s April 27, 2020 Order.

       37.     The Plaintiffs will suffer irreparable harm and have no other adequate remedy if

Defendant continues to delay in disbursing the Title V funds.

                                      PRAYER FOR RELIEF

       WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court:

       1.      Enter a judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 declaring that Defendant’s failure

to disburse Title V funds violates the CARES Act and amounts to agency action unlawfully

withheld or unreasonably delayed under 25 U.S.C. § 706(1)(a).

       2.      Preliminarily order Defendant to disperse Title V funds to the Plaintiffs within 24

hours in a manner consistent with the CARES Act and this Court’s April 27, 2020 Order.

       3.      Issue a writ of mandamus requiring Defendant to disperse the Title V emergency

relief funds to the Plaintiffs within 24 hours in a manner consistent with the CARES Act and this

Court’s April 27, 2020 Order.

       4.      Award the Plaintiffs their reasonable attorney’s fees, costs, and other such relief

as the Court deems just and appropriate.



Dated this 30th day of April, 2020.



                                                 9
Case 1:20-cv-01136 Document 1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 10 of 10



                                 Respectfully submitted,

                                 _/s/ Keith M. Harper___________
                                 Keith M. Harper, DC Bar No. 451956

                                 _/s/ Catherine F. Munson_______
                                 Catherine F. Munson, DC Bar No. 985717

                                 _/s/ Mark H. Reeves___________
                                 Mark H. Reeves, DC Bar No. 1030782

                                 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
                                 607 14th Street, N.W.
                                 Suite 1100
                                 Washington, D.C. 20006
                                 Tel: 202-508-5800
                                 Fax: 202-508-5858

                                 Rob Roy Smith (pro hac vice motion
                                 forthcoming)
                                 WSBA No. 33798
                                 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
                                 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3700
                                 Seattle, Washington 98101
                                 Tel: (206) 467-9600
                                 Fax: (206) 623-6793

                                 Attorneys for Plaintiffs




                            10


File and source

File
1-complaint.pdf
Size
54,823 bytes
SHA-256
c3616018a0a22e84ac03744b1dfe8b087e2f97b68c67a5292c27e0bbd927590e
Our copy
1-complaint.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top