"Arizona House of Representatives Committee on Commerce Report of Regular Meeting (January 31, 2023)"
Summary
The report of the regular meeting of the Committee on Commerce of the Arizona House of Representatives, Fifty-sixth Legislature, First Regular Session, held Tuesday, January 31, 2023, chaired by Representative Wilmeth. It records committee action on eight House bills: HB2019 DP 7-3-0-0, HB2007 DPA/SE 10-0-0-0, HB2472 DP 6-4-0-0, HB2198 DP 10-0-0-0, HB2498 DP 10-0-0-0 and HB2381 DPA 9-0-1-0, with HB2108 and HB2228 held. Attachments include the agenda, the Request to Speak report listing registered positions and comments on bills including HB2019 on licensing and permitting and HB2108 on unemployment benefits, and an attendance report. The packet closes with a House summary of HB 2498, which prohibits a seller or solicitor from sending a text message to a number on the national do-not-call registry, and its roll call vote.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legislature - First Regular Session
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE
Report of Regular Meeting
Tuesday, January 31, 2023
House Hearing Room 3 -- 2:00 P.M.
Convened 2:07 P.M. MINUTES RECEIVED
Hecessed ; CHIEF CLERK'S OFFICE
econvene
Adjourned 4:01 P.M. P-({-DQS
Members Present Members Absent
Representative Aguilar
Representative Austin
Representative Carter
Representative Gress
Representative Heap
Representative Hendrix
Representative Ortiz
Representative Sun
Representative Carbone, Vice-Chairman
Representative Wilmeth, Chairman
Agenda
Original Agenda — Attachment |
Request to Speak
Report — Attachment 2
Committee Attendance
Report — Attachment 3
Presentations
Name Organization Attachments (Handouts)
Committee Action
Bill Action Vote Attachments
HB2019 DP 7-3-0-0 4,5
HB2007 DPA/SE 10-0-0-0 6,7, 8
HB2472 DP 6-4-0-0 9, 10
HB2198 DP 10-0-0-0 =11, 12
HB238i DPA 9-0-1-0 13, 14, 15
HB2498 DP 10-0-0-0 = 16, 17
HB2108 HELD
HB2228 HELD
Susan Nelson, Committee Secretary
February 1, 2023
(Original attachments on file in the Office of the Chief Clerk; video archives available at http:/Avww.azleg.gov)
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE
January 31, 2023
REVISED - 1/27/23 REVISED - 1/27/23 REVISED - 1/27/23
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legislature - First Regular Session CONEN Ee A ' O o p N)
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA ADS OURNED? 4:01
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE
DATE Tuesday, January 31, 2023 ROOM HHR3 TIME 2:00 P.M.
Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting here:
https:/Avww.azleg.gov/videoplayer/?clientID=63 61 162879&eventID=2023011 150
Members:
Representative Aguilar Representative Heap
Representative Austin Representative Hendrix
Representative Carter Representative Ortiz
Representative Gress
Representative Sun
Representative Carbone, Vice-Chairman
Representative Wilmeth, Chairman
Bills Short Title
A*HB2007 n DA , es liability insurance
Livingston)
OM, RULES
10:0 0.6)
} HB2019 Db p licensing; permitting; criteria; clarity
—_+_—_— (Grantham)
Jo. Qo CFOM, RULES
Se enatatti negate anenaaa |
unemployment benefits; requirements;
HELD disqualifications
(Livingston)
COM, RULES
H HB2198 bP claimant; guardian ad litem; procedure
(Wilmeth)
[or 01066™: RULES
HB2228 ,; home solicitation sales
HELD (Gress)
COM, RULES
HB2108
Page 1 of 2
Strike Everything Title
S/E: same subject
Attachment _{
Bills Short Title Strike Everything Title
S HB2381 | D mobile homes; recreational vehicles; fund
(Gress: Shah)
qy 0: J COM, RULES
3HB2472 D social credit; use; prohibition
(Montenegro)
bp ' uf “(1 EDM, RULES
£ HB2498 D p do-not-call list; text messages
—- (Griffin)
IO ' Od 5™, RULES
* On previous agenda
ORDER OF BILLS TO BE SET BY THE CHAIRMAN
RA
64252023
01/27/2023
People with disabilities may request reasonable accommodations such as interpreters, alternative formats, or
assistance with physical accessibility. If you require accommodations, please contact the Chief Clerk's Office at
(602) 926-3032 or through Arizona Relay Service 7-1-1.
Page 2 of 2
Information Registered on the Request to Speak System
House Commerce (1/31/2023)
HB2007, group excess liability insurance
Support:
Marc Osborn, Chubb Insurance ; Abigail Hlavacek, representing self
Neutral:
Stephen Briggs, AZ DEPT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
HB2019, licensing: permitting: criteria; clarity
Support:
Jenna Bentley, BARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH; Jake Hinman, Arizona Multihousing
Association; Chad Heinrich, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS; Mike Sullivan, representing self;
David Schafranka, representing self; R Mark Russell, MD, representing self; Paul Avelar, INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE AZ
CHAPTER, Self; Suzanne Kinney, ARIZONA CHAPTER OF NAIOP; Courtney Coolidge, AZ CHAMBER OF COMMERCE;
Brock Wilson, representing self; Michael DiMaria, Lumen Technologies; R Morrison, representing self; Wendy
Jonessee, representing self; Richard Hawkins, representing self; Spencer Kamps, HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF
CENTRAL AZ
Oppose:
Tom Savage, LEAGUE OF ARIZONA CITIES & TOWNS; Jacob Emnett, representing self; Marge Zylla, TEMPE, CITY OF;
Mohave County Supervisor Jean Bishop, representing self; Robyn Prud'homme-Bauer, representing self; Rob Bohr,
GILBERT, TOWN OF; Kenneth Bierman, representing self; Dianne Post, representing self; Miranda DeWitt, MESA,
CITY OF; Kathleen Pettycrew, representing self; Cole Libera, AZ PLANNING ASSOCIATION; Sharon Lee, representing
self; Suzanne Mead, representing self; Marie Thearle, representing self; Scott Grzybowski, representing self;
Sharron Grzybowski, representing self; Alexis Apodaca, CHANDLER, CITY OF; Christine McLachlan-Comer,
representing self; Ginna Carico, GOODYEAR, CITY OF; Emily Webb, PEORIA, CITY OF; Dale Wiebusch, “SCOTTSDALE,
CITY OF ™
All Comments:
Jake Hinman, Arizona Multihousing Association: Housing takes too long to receive approval from local government
in Arizona.; Jacob Emnett, Self: It seems there is a glitch with RTS, but | am representing the County Supervisors
Association of Arizona; Scott Grzybowski, Self: 30 days seems to be a random number, please consult with staff
from a few different towns to get a more realistic expectation; Sharron Grzybowski, Self: without even considering
a public engagement process, 30 days is an unreasonably short amount of time. Please talk to the staff in a few of
your city/town halls for a more reasonable expectation
Attachment kb
HB2108, unemployment benefits: requirements; disqualifications
Support:
Barbara Blewster, representing self; R Morrison, representing self; Joseph Myers, representing self; Espe Frecks,
representing self; Wendy Jonessee, representing self; Terry Stines, representing self; Mackenzie Shane,
representing self; Catherine Barrett, representing self; Allen Skillicorn, representing self; Andrea Wolverton,
representing self
Neutral:
Beverlee Loat, representing self; Nadine Smith, representing self; Kathy Ber, DES Director of Legislative Services,
Arizona Department Of Economic Security
Oppose:
Elizabeth Putnam-Hidalgo, representing self; Catherine Patterson, representing self; kathleen mayer, representing
self; Dave Long, representing self; Laurence Wittig, representing self; Pat VanMaanen, representing self; Steve
Ramos, representing self; Mary Pradelt, representing self; Denise Link, PhD, WHNP, representing self; Shirley
Muney, representing self; Janet Larkin, representing self; Peggy Chaikin, representing self; Rebecca Smith Gross,
representing self; Judith Robbins, representing self; Peggie Jo Vincent, representing self; marilyn duerbeck,
representing self; Maria Salvucci, representing self; Craig McDermott, representing self; Kevin Brown, representing
self; Michael Bryan, representing self; Eve Shapiro, representing self; Jeanne Casteen, representing self; Kenneth
Bierman, representing self; Mariana Spier, representing self; Mary Ann Graffagnino, representing self; Beatriz
Urrea, representing self; Amy Arnold, representing self; DOUG ARNOLD, representing self; Raquel Mamani,
representing self; Claudia Bloom, representing self; Karen Syversen, representing self; Sallie Kiadnik, representing
self; Christina Mollica, representing self; Dianne Post, representing self; Cynthia Couture, representing self; Carol
Maas, representing self; Sherrilynn James, representing self; Kathleen Pettycrew, representing self; Elizabeth
Goodman, WILDFIRE; Molly McGovern, representing self; Donita Ramos, representing self; Margaret Baca,
representing self; Daniella Smith, Activate 48; Bryna Koch, representing self; Helen Kim, representing self;
Catherine Sigmon, representing self; Brenda White, representing self; Kathryn Kaczmarek, representing self;
SUSAN ARNOLD, representing self; Elizabeth Kelchner, representing self; Katherine Doman Sheydayi, representing
self; Elizabeth Schauer, representing self; Elizabeth Goff, representing self; Gail Kamaras, representing self; Charlie
Silver, representing self; Barbara Kain, representing self; Ruth Lambert, representing self; Barbara Oliver,
representing self; Cynthia Hans, representing self; Ginger Hamp, representing self; Christine Whitley, representing
self; Becky Sayler, representing self; Janet Hamlin, representing self; Susan Morris, representing self; barbara
wodrich, representing self; Stefanie Richardson, representing self; Terry Gunn, representing self; Sally Harvey,
representing self; Judith Ellen Sirkis, representing self; Alexei Sheydayl, representing self; Robin LaVoie,
representing self; Julie Golding, representing self; Janet Wilson, representing self; Kristin Roberts, representing
self; Anna Arnold, representing self; Christine Keitges, representing self; Patricia Mullenix, representing self; Jackie
Rich, representing self; Sharon Lee, representing self; Chris Senko, representing self; Pamela Haack, representing
self; Peter Coston, representing self; Sarabeth Spencer, representing self; Cynthia Lehigh, representing self; Laura
Weeshoff, representing self; Kathy Fraser, representing self; Jeri Dow, representing self; Elizabeth McClure,
representing self; Suzanne Mead, representing self; Angela J. Miller, representing self; Jennifer Jones, representing
self; Gail Block, representing self; Ellen M. Ferreira, representing self; Kathy Pyner, representing self; Jocelyn
Dustan, representing self; Marilyn Coyle, representing self; Joan Murphy, representing self; Penny Boone,
representing self; Anne Leota Hart, representing self; Mary Santy, representing self; Nancy Wood, representing
self; GARY LEW OLIVER, representing self; Valerie Policastro Edie, representing self; Margaret Adams ,
representing self; Polemnia Amazeen, representing self; Amy Etzkorn, representing self; Jeffrey Fortney,
representing self; Mary Fortney, representing self; Mariette Francis, representing self; Leslie Hanson, representing
self; Lisa Maczura, representing self; Irene Arango, representing self; Paisley Rossetti, representing self; Julian
Donahue, representing self; Nataly Reed, representing self; David Patchen, representing self; Robert Larson,
representing self; ilene Riffle, representing self; Athol Sutton, representing self; Jacqueline deSa, representing self;
Barbara Larson, representing self; Kirstin Woodburne, representing self; Gary Townsend, representing self;
Amanda Coitman, representing self; Charlotte Lis, representing self; Brendan O'Connor, representing self; Edna
Weigel, representing self; Cassandra Morano, representing self; Lisa Calderon, representing self; Vickey Finger,
representing self; Jennifer Dawson, representing self; Christine McLachlan-Comer, representing self; Matthew
Nelson, representing self; Carol Garnett, representing self; Dale Cohen-Bruno, representing self; Karen Harris,
representing self; Melinda lyer, representing self; Claire Bickel, representing self; Cynthia Paster, representing self;
Frederick James, representing self; Kathleen Schanus-Gohl, representing self; Nelson Morgan, representing self;
Jean Meconi, representing self; Christina Kalel, representing self; John Neville, representing self; Sally Caruso,
representing self; Kathleen Dubbs, representing self; Mary Lisa, representing self; Cynthia Bordelon, representing
self; Mary Nelson, representing self; ALICE BUCK, representing self; Allison Jackson, representing self; Joseph
Bihms LD29, representing self; Victor Peterson, representing self; Zachary Rome, representing self; Mary Marshall,
representing self; Jerrold Borchardt, representing self; Margaret Lacey, representing self; Nora Welsh, representing
self; Sheila Green, representing self; Willie Jan Owen, representing self; Patricia Edelen, representing self; Janie '
Smieszek, representing self; Christopher Cerrato, representing self; Karolyn Switzer, representing self; RITA
DEPUYDT, representing self; Nancy Santori, representing self; Kathleen Butler, representing self; Susan Nee,
representing self; Suzanne Waltman, representing self; Loretta O'Connor, representing self; Devon Sloan,
representing self; Margaret Tinsley, representing self; Janell Alewyn, representing self; Dawn Norton LD29,
representing self; Margaret Owen, representing self; Sarah Bihms LD29, representing self; Sarah Harris,
representing self; Mary Gaudio, representing self; Gary Rulapaugh, representing self; Linda Block, representing
self; Jane Atkins, representing self; Kathleen Sauer, representing self; Emily Norton, representing self; Carol
Campbell, representing self; David Williams, representing self; Crystal Bazarnic, representing self; LINDA
GANTVERG, representing self; William S. James, representing self; Sharon Ehrlich, representing self; Rivko Knox,
representing self; Alice Patricia Price, representing self; Robert Fisher, representing self; George Ehrlich,
representing self; Elizabeth Brauer, representing self; Lisa Koenig, representing self; Joseph Alexander,
representing self; Paula Feely, representing self; Marilyn Murov, representing self; Marcia Tingley, representing
self; Kathleen Woessner, representing self; Roxanna Kearns, representing self; Shelley Stephenson, representing
self; Stephen Coyle, representing self; Elizabeth Miles Packard, representing self; Diana Alexander, representing
self; Susan Heck, representing self; Richard Della Porta, representing self; Peggy Church, representing self; Dee
Maitland, representing self; Jessica Kitterman, representing self; William Yohey, representing self; Diane Kiock,
representing self; Rebecca Haynes, representing self; David Myers, representing self; Amy Pedotto, representing
self; Donna Corbin, representing self; Leda DeVlieger, representing self; Brandy Reese, representing self; Jill
Anderson, representing self; Jessica Ebel, representing self; Beth Ballmann, representing self; Sandra Rizzo,
representing self; Mary Ganapol, representing self; Carmen Terrell, representing self; Sharon Hendrickson,
representing self; kaveh najafi, representing self; jeff green, representing self; Remy Sinclair, representing self;
Shea Najafi, representing self; Jo Ann Caruthers, representing self; Barbara Jones, representing self; Lois Hansen,
representing self; Mary-Jeanne Fincher, representing self; Teresa Neiberg, representing self; Pamela Thompson,
representing self; Francesca Pardes, representing self; Francis Glad, representing self; Dan Schwartzstein,
representing self; Valerie Harris, representing self; Nancy Hancock, representing self; Aaron Essif, representing self;
Eileen Hollowell, representing self; Jolie Amaya, representing self; Dieter Knecht, representing self; Mariann Leahy,
representing self; Denise Hudson, representing self; Michael Pyska, representing self; Paula Van Derven,
representing self; Susan McMillan, representing self; Linda Guarino, representing self; Nicole Fordey, representing
self; Steve Gorman-Hackstadt, representing self; Claudia Oreck-Teplitsky, representing self; Linda Ekstrum,
representing self; Susan Stumpf-Hebert, representing self; Jena Sheydayi, representing self; Gabe Leadley,
representing self; Dwight Moore, representing self; Erin McCamish, representing self; Joyce Howard, representing
self; Karen Robbins, representing self; Jennifer Hanley, representing self; Sherri Johnson, representing self; Roger
Blain, representing self; Michelle Donahue, representing self; Rebecca Shook, representing self; JOHN FIENE,
representing self; Dorothy Reed-Inman, representing self; Kathryn Anderson, representing self; Catherine Gomez,
representing self; Sharon Reinbott, representing self; Margaret Nichols, representing self; Kristin Sellers,
representing self; Shirley Isaacson, representing self; Marilyn Rodriguez, HOPEWELL FUND, UNIDOSUS; Annarose
Lilly, representing self; Jeanmarie Haney, representing self; Karina Sampson, representing self; Micheal Slattery,
representing self; Marla Presley, representing self; Sharron Grzybowski, representing self; Scott Grzybowski,
representing self
All Comments:
Barbara Blewster, Self: Unemployment compensation eligibility needs to be tightened. This bill goes a long ways
towards that end.; Joseph Myers, Self: This is not a good bill to improve unemployment compensation for
Arizona's workers who face layoffs. Find a more effective way to improve essential benefits.; Espe Frecks, Self:
There is a lot of abuse in this sector. People should earn a living not living off others; Mackenzie Shane, Self: The
Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce is supportive of HB 2108; Allen Skillicorn, Self: Lax unemployment
requirements is a leading cause of inflation.; Elizabeth Putnam-Hidalgo, Self: NO on 2108. Az. is already almost the
most miserly with unemployment benefits. Don't make being unemployed even more difficult than it is.; Catherine
Patterson, Self: As someone that was laid off in the dot-com bust and affected by 9/11, | think this increase is too
much. One should be able to have time to learn new skills if five jobs a week do not show up for one's job
experience. You can't LIVE on unemployment.; Pat VanMaanen, Self: Unnecessarily punitive and adds more
paperwork to prospective employer by requiring a report be submitted to DES. It is hard enough to get and keep
workers right now, adding more paperwork isn't helping businesses.; Mary Pradelt, Self: Has there been a
cost/benefit analysis for this? With the low unemployment benefits paid by this state, it is likely to cost more to
track and validate the required job searches this bill would mandate to qualify for said benefits.; Denise Link, PhD,
WHNP, Self: Punative requirements for people trying to find gainful employment that will support themselves and
a family; Shirley. Muney, Self: Also unconstitutionall; Peggy Chaikin, Self: Let's raise the unemployment benefits
instead of making the unemployed lives more difficult.; Judith Robbins, Self: Unemployment benefits are already
highly conditioned by onerous rules. AZ has one of the lowest paying benefits in the country. Our citizens need be
support and not to add unnecessary paperwork to the searching process.; Craig McDermott, Self: Demonizing
unemployed people? Really/; Michael Bryan, Self: This bill is a full-employment-for-bureaucrats bill. It will cost far
more to staff and administer than it will ever save in benefits paid. It also seems to assume that jobless people
don't WANT a job, which is a foolish and insulting supposition.; Mary Ann Graffagnino, Self: No one wants to be
unemployed. Why put an extra burden on someone who fs already struggling. This would be inhumane.; Beatriz
Urrea, Self: Unemployment fs already hard enough without punitive bills like this one.; Claudia Bloom, Self: Rich
people are the welfare queens.; Karen Syversen, Self: It is hard enough to get unemployment benefits without
tying applicants’ hands further.; Christina Mollica, Self: }am a registered voter in LD29. There are already enough
regulations on unemployment.; Cynthia Couture, Self: We need to assist unemployed people, not make life harder
for them.; Carol Maas, Self: This bill has no reasonable implementation. Who is going to determine a suitable job?
Who is going to track the 5 interviews required? Do you think people want unemployment in AZ? They could make
more money on the street corner than AZ pays!!; Helen Kim, Self: The current UI requirements of job-searching on
at least 4 days each week AND making at least 4 work search contacts each week is already ample. This increase
would be too demanding on single parents and the chronically ill who have less time/energy.; Kathryn Kaczmarek,
Self: This is a punitive bill in nature punishing unemployed people, already experiencing hard times, with fines if
they miss their job interview. What a burden to both small and large companies to have to report applicants to
DES for a missed appt.; Gail Kamaras, Self: Unemployment benefits in AZ are already among the stingiest and most
difficult to obtain. More limits are cruel.; Barbara Kain, Self: Why do you want to punish the poor and
unemployed? Really, this is a serious question. How does this bill improve the lives of Arizona workers and their”
children? It's a PR stunt. Please vote no.; Barbara Oliver, Self: UNEMPLOYMENT IS HARD ENOUGH WITHOUT BILLS
LIKE THIS!; Anna Arnold, Self: Will cause a delay in receiving benefits due to agency lack of staff and resources;
Patricia Mullenix, Self: Being unemployed is a big enough trauma without such punitive measures. Shamefully, all
of this is for the second lowest unemployment payment in the entire country. Aren’t we better than this? | guess
not.; Jackie Rich, Self: creates more bureaucracy; Elizabeth McClure, Seif: So little time, so much punishment. We
Arizonans actually believe in supports for those less fortunate. Yet it appears our Legislature believes in punishing
those very people. Who writes these bills? Talk about complete disconnect.; Kathy Pyner, Self: More unneeded
paper work.; Penny Boone, Self: This is a right-wing extremist punitive bill intent on punishing unemployment
which is already very difficult. Az unemployment benefits are currently paltry & difficult to obtain when needed.
This bill is blatantly & inappropriately judgemental.; Anne Leota Hart, Self: Good grief, stop penalizing people for
losing their jobs. Arizona pays the second lowest benefit of any state and hasn't raised the amount since 20041;
Mary Santy, Self: Making it harder to collect unemployment is bad for the person experiencing joblessness and bad
for state tax collections if a person would be denied unemployment benefits under this potential law.; Lisa
Maczura, Self: How about bills that encourage smail businesses, provide affordable housing, and support public
education instead?; Ilene Riffle, Self: unemployment is hard enough without being pressured to take a job below
your education for example. And, who determines whether the job is a suitable offer. This sounds more like
something that would be enacted in a police state,; Gary Townsend, Self: Unemployment is already hard enough
without punitive bills fike this one. Arizona pays the second lowest benefit of any state; the amount hasn't been
raised since 2004.; Jennifer Dawson, Self: Incredibly punitive towards people who are having a hard time just
getting by.; Carol Garnett, Self: Punish the unemployed who receive a pittance in weekly benefits. This is more
bureaucracy to discourage the unemployed.; Karen Harris, Self: This bill is excessive and punitive to those who are
already unemployed by no fault of their own.; Melinda lyer, Self: Unemployment is already hard enough without
punitive bills like this one. Arizona pays the second lowest benefit of any state; the amount hasn't been raised
since 2004.; Nelson Morgan, Self: Punitive laws against the unemptoyed are not a great idea.; Jean Meconi, Self:
There are already enough rules and regulations surrounding unemployment.; Christina Kalel, Self: Homelessness
and poverty at an ail time high and you're going after people trying to find a job? Really great use of priorities.
Instead, maybe try funding help for families and people in need, or capping exorbitant rent hikes.; John Neville,
Self: What a spiteful, hateful bill! It's meant to hurt people who need help.; Kathleen Dubbs, Self: Perhaps you
should be looking into our unemployment rate instead of punishing people when they cannot find a job.; Mary
Nelson, Self: Who named you judge over someone’s personal life? This is unnecessary and punishing for people
already struggling; Joseph Bihms LD29, Self: HB2108 would require job search actions documentation and penalize
refusal of suitable job offers or missed interviews. Arizona pays low unemployment benefits, hasn't raised since
2004, and makes qualifying for unemployment harder. Please vote no.; Patricia Edelen, Self: Stop punitive bills tha
make job hunting harder.; Janie Smieszek, Self: Why punish people who have it hard enough as it is?; RITA
DEPUYDT, Self: What a huge workload this bill would add to state employees work day. It would also be punitive to
the unemployed, causing a lot of unnecessary and unproductive stress and anxiety.; Susan Nee, Self:
Unemployment is already hard enough without punitive bills like this one. Arizona pays the second lowest benefit
of any state; the amount hasn't been raised since 2004. Currently people must lose their job through no fault of
their own.; Loretta O'Connor, Self: This vicious bill perpetuates ugly urban legends. As we pray for an educational
application of the Golden Rule to Rep Livingston, vote NO; Margaret Tinsley, Self: Don't make it harder to survive
while unemployed.; Dawn Norton LD29, Self: Oppose HB2108 in Arizona, as it requires documentation of job
search actions and punishes refusal of suitable job offers. Arizona pays low unemployment benefits and requires
job loss for eligibility. Makes unemployment harder.; Margaret Owen, Self: This bill that seeks to "punish"
unemployed folks is beneath the dignity of a lawmaker. There are already requirements in place (loss thru no fault
of their own; compelling personal reason) in order to be eligible for unemployment.; Sarah Bihms LD29, Seif:
HB2108 imposes punitive job search documentation and punishes job refusal or missed interviews. AZ already pays
low, outdated unemployment benefits, only available for job loss. Oppose HB2108 for making unemployment
harder.; Crystal Bazarnic, Self: This bill adds additional struggles onto those already struggling. How about more
resources to help instead? Vote no.; Rivko Knox, Self: Even more mean spirited than the existing very very low (2nd
lowest in the US) unemployment payments AZ makes. Making recipients submit documentation of 5 work searches
per week (regardless of health, family issues) etc. is cruel & derneaning.; Elizabeth Brauer, Self: This is a punitive
bill for the unemployed.; Marilyn Murov, Self: 2108 is cruel and repressive. Individuals know what jobs suit them,
not DES. No one should be forced to take a job that doesn’t fit them and then be denied unemployment if they
leave and look for other work. 5 work searches/week is unreasonable.; Marcia Tingley, Self: Unemployment is hard
enough without punitive bills like this one.; Roxanna Kearns, Self: Do not make it harder for unemployed people to
claim Arizona's meager unemployment benefits.; Stephen Coyle, Self: i hope you are unemployed someday and get
to experience it.; Elizabeth Miles Packard, Self: Why make things even harder for people down on their luck, given
all the chaos in the/job world caused by Covid.; Susan Heck, Self: Oppose. Az already has embarrassingly low
unemployment benefits without adding more punitive clauses.; Dee Maitland, Self: | ended up unemployed after
the 2008 crash. There were no jobs to even try for. How short a memory you guys have. This is complicated and
punitive for no good reason.; Jessica Kitterman, Self: Unemployment is already hard enough without punitive bills
jike this one. Arizona pays the second lowest benefit of any state; the amount hasn't been raised since 2004.;
William Yohey, Self: Terrible punitive idea,; Rebecca Haynes, Self: What constitutes a "suitable" job? Also punitive
towards those who are in bad situations already.; Donna Corbin, Self: | oppose this bill because | have been
unemployed and it is onerous to the unemployed and difficult to monitor.; Brandy Reese, Self: As though being
unemployed isn't already hard enough, this bill is punitive and mean-spirited,; Beverlee Loat, Self: | hope/request
the Committee to consider how hard it is for working people to seek work. Adding red tape and creating more
challenges will only exacerbate the problem for those who have lost their job.; Beth Ballmann, Self:
Unemployment is hard enough without a punitive bill like this. AZ already pays the 2nd lowest benefit of any
state.; Lois Hansen, Self: this is a punitive bill making an undo hardship on people who lost job through no fault of
their own; Mary-Jeanne Fincher, Self: This bili seems punitive and unnecessary. It's hard enough already to qualify
and collect unemployment in AZ.; Aaron Essif, Self: Unemployment is already hard enough without punitive
measures like this AND Arizona pays the second lowest benefit of any state.; Dieter Knecht, Self: Please oppose;
I've been unemployed in the past and don't see how this would have helped me, but rather been an additional
impairment.; Linda Guarino, Self: punitive and burdensome for prospective employers; Susan Stumpf-Hebert, Self:
DO NOT pass this biil, it will only delay people from getting jobs.; Erin McCamish, Self: Unemployment is hard
enough to qualify for and already a very small benefit.; Michelle Donahue, Self: This penalizes the unemployed and
| oppose it; JOHN FIENE, Self: As if life isn't dismal enough for the unemployed, this bill further descends into
misery. This is tantamount to forcing an unemployment recipient to take a bad job or lose compensation, which is
one of the lowest in the country...lose, lose.; Margaret Nichols, Self: 2d lowest unemployment benefit in the nation
and you want to make it more onerous to even qualify?!; Marilyn Rodriguez, HOPEWELL FUND, UNIDOSUS: .;
Marla Presley, Self: Unemployment is already hard enough without punitive bills like this one. At a weekly
maximum of just $320, Arizona ranks in the bottom 5 nationally for unemployment benefits.
HB2198, claimant; quardian ad litem; procedure
Support:
Barry M. Aarons, AZ ASSN OF LAWYERS FOR INJURED WORKERS; Wendy Briggs, AMERICAN PROPERTY CASUALTY
INSURANCE ASSOCIATION; Courtney Coolidge, AZ CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; Emily Rice, AZ SELF-INSURERS ASSOC;
Mark Kendall, COPPERPOINT INSURANCE COMPANY
HB2228. home solicitation sales
Support:
Wendy Briggs, ASURION; Jeremy Gerlach, ASURION
HB2381, mobile homes: recreational vehicles: fund
Support:
Dana Paschke, AZ ASSN MANUFACTURED HOME OWNERS; Gaelle Esposito, Urban Phoenix Project; Spencer Kamps,
HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL AZ; Janna Day, MANUFACTURED HOUSING COMMUNITIES OF AZ INC.;
Kelly Griffith, SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR ECONOMIC INTEGRITY; Elizabeth Goodman, WILDFIRE; Drew Schaffer, WM
E MORRIS INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE; Mark Fitzgerald , AZ DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
All Comments:
Dana Paschke, AZ ASSN MANUFACTURED HOME OWNERS: AAMHO, a membership organization of 5,000 mobile
home owners appreciates your support of HB 2381 and the proposed committee amendment.; Gaelle Esposito,
Urban Phoenix Project: We support this bill as part of a larger package that reverses years of policy hostile to
affordable housing; Drew Schaffer, WM E MORRIS INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: The William £. Morris Institute for
Justice supports House Bill 2381 with the amendment extending the time for contractor repair services to ensure
the bill's goals are meaningfully advanced for mobile homeowners.
HB2472, social credit; use: prohibition
Support:
Lisa Blankenship, representing self; Tara Maldonado Oster, representing self; Elijah Oster-Morris, representing self;
JAG JAG, representing self; Barb Hinderland, representing self; Mickie Niland, representing self; Joanne Johnson,
representing self; Charles McCorkle, representing self; Shirley Dye, representing self; Jere Fredenburgh,
representing self; Rose Sperry, representing self; Jered Skousen, representing self; Gary Johnson, representing self;
Nancy Cottle, representing self; Mike Sullivan, representing self; James Dutton , representing self; Christine Maceri
Genge, representing self; Dennis Genge, representing self; Jeff Mulder, representing self; Jennifer Wellsman,
representing self; Aimee Yentes, AZ FREE ENTERPRISE CLUB; Nan Nicoll, representing self; David Schafranka,
representing self; Susan Leeper, representing self; Mike MacDonald, representing self; C D Tavares, representing
self; JoAnn Dutton, representing self; Brandon LaBorde, representing self; Cheryl Todd, representing self; Eugene
Slutskiy, representing self; David Esch, representing self; Cindy Sullivan, representing self; Jeanne Tavares,
representing self; Shannon Severson, representing self; Deanna Schreckler, representing self; Catherine Barrett,
representing self; Stephen Harris, representing self; Lyle Tuttle, representing self; Carol Getz, representing self;
Robyn Cushman, representing self; Leslie White, representing self; JOHN GRAY, representing self; Linda Russell,
representing self; Lynette Hamilton, representing self; Buffalo Rick Galeener, representing self; Ute Edge,
representing self; Molly B, representing self; Linda Jorgensen, representing self; Steve Hetsler, representing self;
Margie Heffnieder, representing self; Robert Glass, representing self; William & Mary Jurica, representing self;
David Kahn, REPUBLICAN LIBERTY CAUCUS OF ARIZONA; Pam Anderson, representing self; Bill Anderson,
representing self; Charles Mackey, representing self; John Yoder, representing self; Vicki Vaughn, representing self;
Sheryl Schauer, representing self; Bridget Nelke, representing self; LISA FARR LD4 - STATE Committeeman,
representing self; Cindy Hill, representing self; Charles Bell, representing self; Melanie Hutchings, representing self;
Shillene Hancock, representing self; Crystal Dohanyos, representing self; James K., representing self; James
McFadzean, representing self; Donald Hiatt, representing self; Scottsdale Parent, representing self; Alison Klotnia,
representing self; Kaite Lambert, representing self; LouAnn Sedgwick, representing self; Pam Lauck, representing
self; R Morrison, representing self; April Smith, representing self; Jamie Alford, representing self; Beverly Ann,
representing self; Tamara Holley, representing self; Mary Grace Werner, representing self; Darla Kissling,
representing self; Christina Malo, representing self; Joseph Myers, representing self; Chelsey Yeats, representing
self; Ryan Yeats, representing self; Richard Kissling, representing self; Teri Grunewald, representing self; Kevin
vanderjack, representing self; Steve Ware, representing self; Mary Kay Ruwette, representing self; bruce emmons,
representing self; Anna Cronon, representing self; C Fire, representing self; Cherie Anello, representing self; Peter
Anello, representing self; Raymond Darragh, representing self; Rachel Walden, representing self; Susan Sigl,
representing self; Ted Boyd, representing self; Carrie Heikkala, representing self; Cynthia Newswander,
representing self; Nathan Moss, representing self; Denny Thomason, representing self; Alison Walukiewicz ,
representing self; Crystal O'Haver, representing self; Espe Frecks, representing self; Lady Surprise, representing
self; Jack Payne, representing self; Mozelle Ault, representing self; John Gailey, representing self; Aaron Strassberg,
representing self; Karen Chaney, representing self; Juli Webb, representing self; Cynthia Kolander, representing.
self; Harold DarcAngelo, representing self; Brent Meadows, representing self; Janet Klepacz, representing self;
Anne Howard, representing self; Indy Rebhun, representing self; Mary Jamsa, representing self; Sue Unverricht,
representing self; Nancy Barrett, representing self; Chris Russo, representing self; Allen Skillicorn, representing
self; Andrea Wolverton, representing self; Kathryn Farkas, representing self; Shelley Spucces, representing self;
Brian Eckley, representing self; Vivian Figueroa, representing self; Joelene Williamson, representing seif; Eric
Lovelis, representing self; Doris Mills, representing self; Carol Stines, representing self; Doris Hinton, representing
self; C. Sullivan, representing self; Kathleen Hahn, representing self; Henry Ganster, representing self; Cynthia
Finnegan, representing self; Joseph Camilleri, representing self; Scott Chance, representing self; RoseAnn Watts,
representing self; Gwen Carey, representing self; Justine Case, representing self; Kurt Neumann, representing self;
Terry Stines, representing self; Jill Martin, representing self; Cindy Sanders, representing self; Patricia Keitel,
representing self; Danielle Earl, representing self; Elouise Flagg, representing self; diane marins, representing self;
E Seeley, representing self; Maria Lopez, representing self; Marc Monterey, representing self; Jeff Specter,
representing self; Marlene Leatherwood, representing self; Gretchen Petersen, representing self; Karl Stone,
representing self; Trent DeBusk, representing self; Bev Miller, representing self; Mary Lunn, representing self; Roy
Scott Lassell, representing self; Paul Marriott, representing self; John Reed, representing self; Cristy Cole,
representing self; Jennifer Marriott, representing self; Gaye Champine, representing self; Bonnie Lund,
representing self; Cynthia Dean, representing self; Laura Belcourt, representing self; Judith Swietlik, representing
self; Sue VanRiper, representing self; Michael Finnegan, representing self; Sue Harrison, representing self; Denise
Lockwood, representing self; Veronica Spear, representing self; Jeff Caldwell, representing self; Lee Aronson,
representing self; Wendy Jonessee, representing self; Lee Chadbourn, representing self; Julie Solem, representing
self
Neutral:
Julian Donahue, representing self
Oppose:
Dianne Post, representing self; Jim Moran, representing self; Nancy Santori, representing self; Sherry Massie,
representing self; Alice Stambaugh, representing self; Vickey Finger, representing self; Eve Shapiro, representing
self; Martha O'Connor, representing self; Irene Arango, representing self; Jana Segal, representing self; Kevin
Brown, representing self; Kathleen Pettycrew, representing self; Paisley Rossetti, representing self; Elizabeth
Schauer, representing self; Maria Salvucci, representing self; Meg Weesner, representing self; David Patchen,
representing self; Kimberlee McClure, representing self; Irwin Sheer, representing self; Barbara Larson,
representing self; Gail Block, representing self; Kirstin Woodburne, representing self; Charlotte Lis, representing
self; Cassandra Morano, representing self; barbara wodrich, representing self; Terry Gunn, representing self; GARY
LEW OLIVER, representing self; Sherrilynn James, representing self; Jennifer Dawson, representing self; Margaret
Baca, representing self; Carol Garnett, representing self; Dale Cohen-Bruno, representing self; Becky Sayler,
representing self; Melinda lyer, representing self; Karen Harris, representing self; Elizabeth Goff, representing self;
Kathy Fraser, representing self; John Neville, representing self; Kathleen Dubbs, representing self; Robin LaVoie,
representing self; Amy Arnold, representing self; Brenda White, representing self; Jeri Dow, representing self; Mary
Nelson, representing self; Penny Boone, representing self; Ruth Lambert, representing self; Margaret Owen,
representing self; Mary Marshall, representing self; Mary Fortney, representing self; Jeffrey Fortney, representing
self; Carol Maas, representing self; Gail Kamaras, representing self; Chris Senko, representing self; Suzanne
Waltman, representing self; Rebecca Smith Gross, representing self; Janell Alewyn, representing self; Carol Fiore,
representing self; Sarah Harris, representing self; Gary Rulapaugh, representing self; Linda Ekstrum, representing
self; Mary Gaudio, representing self; Mary Santy, representing self; Emily Norton, representing self; Ellen M.
Ferreira, representing self; Craig McDermott, representing self; Crystal Bazarnic, representing self; William S.
James, representing self; Joan Murphy, representing self; Laurence Wittig, representing self; Alice Patricia Price,
representing self; Robert Fisher, representing self; Barbara Oliver, representing self; Susan Morris, representing
self; Pamela Haack, representing self; Elizabeth Brauer, representing self; Marie Thearle, representing self;
Elizabeth Kelchner, representing self; Anne Leota Hart, representing self; Marilyn Coyle, representing self.
Polemnia Amazeen, representing self; Janet Larkin, representing self; Barbara Kain, representing self; Bryna Koch,
representing self; Paula Feely, representing self; Roxanna Kearns, representing self; Cynthia Couture, representing
self; Janet Hamlin, representing self; Stephen Coyle, representing self; Michael Bryan, representing self; Kathy
Pyner, representing self; Elizabeth Miles Packard, representing self; Valerie Policastro Edie, representing self; Dee
Maitland, representing self; Shirley Muney, representing self; Ginger Hamp, representing self; Christina Mollica,
representing self; Jessica Kitterman, representing self; Judith Robbins, representing self; Rebecca Haynes,
representing self; Catherine Sigmon, representing self; Beverlee Loat, representing self; Margaret Adams ,
representing self; Charlie Silver, representing self; Mary Pradelt, representing self; Helen Kim, representing self;
Alisa McMahon, representing self; Sharon Lee, representing self; Patricia Mullenix, representing self; Michael Fiflis,
representing self; Angela J. Miller, representing self; William Yohey, representing self; Julte Golding, representing
self; Jocelyn Dustan, representing self; Elizabeth Putnam-Hidalgo, representing self; Candice Fremouw,
representing self; Mary Ganapol, representing self; Jackie Rich, representing self; Amy Etzkorn, representing self;
Christine Keitges, representing self; Raquel Mamani, representing self; Shea Najafi, representing self; marilyn
duerbeck, representing self; Jo Ann Caruthers, representing self; Cynthia Hans, representing self; Janet Wilson,
representing self; Christine Whitley, representing self; Mary-Jeanne Fincher, representing self; Teresa Neiberg,
representing self; Pamela Thompson, representing self; Jennifer Jones, representing self; Suzanne Mead,
representing self; Valerie Harris, representing self; Anna Arnold, representing self; Eileen Hollowell, representing
self; Mary Ann Graffagnino, representing self; kathleen mayer, representing self; Mariette Francis, representing
self; Michael Pyska, representing self; Sallie Kladnik, representing self; Susan McMillan, representing self; Elizabeth
McClure, representing self; Linda Guarino, representing self; Steve Gorman-Hackstadt, representing self; Sandy
Bahr, Sierra Club - Grand Canyon Chapter; Susan Stumpf-Hebert, representing self; Katherine Doman Sheydayi,
representing self; Alexei Sheydayl, representing self; Sarabeth Spencer, representing self; Gail Bliss, representing
self; Nancy Wood, representing self; Steve Ramos, representing self; Amy Pedotto, representing self; Karen
Syversen, representing self; Denise Link, PhD, WHNP, representing self; Dave Long, representing self; Kathryn
Kaczmarek, representing self; Rosalind Switzer, representing self; Sally Harvey, representing self; Judith Simons,
representing seif; Judith Ellen Sirkis, representing self; Peggy Yeargain-Williams, representing self; Dorothy Reed-
inman, representing self; Kathryn Anderson, representing self; Peter Coston, representing self; Catherine Gomez,
representing self; Donita Ramos, representing self; Sandy Whitley, representing self; Margaret Nichols,
representing self; Peggie Jo Vincent, representing self; DOUG ARNOLD, representing self; Pat VanMaanen,
representing self; SUSAN ARNOLD, representing self; Stefanie Richardson, representing self; Peggy Chaikin,
representing self; Jeanne Casteen, representing self; Beverly Janowitz-Price, representing self; Theresa Paszkiewicz,
representing self; Carissa Sipp, representing self; Charlene Hoffman, representing self; Leslie Hanson, representing
self; Lisa Maczura, representing self; Nataly Reed, representing self; Robert Larson, representing self; Hene Riffle,
representing self; Athol Sutton, representing self; Jacqueline deSa, representing self; Amanda Coltman,
representing self; Gary Townsend, representing self; Brendan O'Connor, representing self; Lisa Calderon,
representing self; Christine McLachlan-Comer, representing self; Claire Bickel, representing self; Cynthia Paster,
representing self; Frederick James, representing self; Kathleen Schanus-Gohl, representing self; Nelson Morgan,
representing self; Jean Meconi, representing self; Christina Kalel, representing self; Sally Caruso, representing self;
Cynthia Bordelon, representing self; Mary Lisa, representing self; Richard Gohl, representing self; ALICE BUCK,
representing self; Allison Jackson, representing self; Jerrold Borchardt, representing self; Margaret Lacey,
representing self; Nora Welsh, representing self; Sheila Green, representing self; Patricia Edelen, representing self;
Willie Jan Owen, representing self; Christopher Cerrato, representing self; Karoilyn Switzer, representing self;
Joseph Bihms LD29, representing self; Janie Smieszek, representing self; RITA DEPUYDT, representing self; Kathleen
Butler, representing self; Devon Sloan, representing self; Loretta O'Connor, representing self; Margaret Tinsley,
representing self; Dawn Norton L029, representing self; Sarah Bihms LD29, representing self; Linda Block,
representing self; Jane Atkins, representing self; Kathleen Sauer, representing self; Carol Campbell, representing
self; David Williams, representing self; LINDA GANTVERG, representing self; Sharon Ehrlich, representing self; Rivko
Knox, representing self; George Ehrlich, representing self; Lisa Koenig, representing self; Joseph Alexander,
representing self; Kathleen Woessner, representing self; Marcia Tingley, representing self; Shelley Stephenson,
representing self; Diana Alexander, representing self; Susan Heck, representing self; Richard Della Porta,
representing self; Peggy Church, representing self; Diane Klock, representing self; Leda DeVlieger, representing
self; Brandy Reese, representing self; Jessica Ebel, representing self; Beth Ballmann, representing self; Sandra Rizzo,
representing self; Carmen Terrell, representing self; Sharon Hendrickson, representing self; kaveh najafi,
representing self; jeff green, representing self; Remy Sinclair, representing self; Barbara Jones, representing self;
Lois Hansen, representing self; Francis Glad, representing self; Dan Schwartzstein, representing self; Nancy
Hancock, representing self; Jolie Amaya, representing self; Aaron Essif, representing self; Dieter Knecht,
representing self; Mariann Leahy, representing self; Denise Hudson, representing self; Paula Van Derven,
representing self; David Myers, representing self; Claudia Oreck-Teplitsky, representing self; Jena Sheydayi,
representing self; Gabe Leadley, representing self; Dwight Moore, representing self; Erin McCamish, representing
self; Joyce Howard, representing self; Karen Robbins, representing self; Jennifer Hanley, representing self; Sherri
Johnson, representing self; Cheryl Stafford, representing self; Rebecca Shook, representing self; Julie Pindzola,
representing self; JOHN FIENE, representing self; Sharon Reinbott, representing self; Kristin Sellers, representing
self; Shirley Isaacson, representing self; Annarose Lilly, representing self; Jeanmarie Haney, representing self;
Karina Sampson, representing self; Micheal Slattery, representing self; Marla Presley, representing self; Karen Muir,
representing self
All Comments:
Lisa Blankenship, Self: As a taxpayer | would prefer for you to vote yes on this bill. it's my $ and banks shouldn't get
to decide how | live my life by picking winners and losers.; JAG JAG, Self: It is not up to the government to decide
winner or losers in their access to economic freedom. This is pure woke ideology by banking institutions.; Barb
Hinderland, Self: This is a total communist idea and we MUST keep any of those out of our free Arizona!; Shirley
Dye, Self: Banks have no business considering my social credit score if | were to be asking for a loan. My political
views should have nothing to do with my banking practices. VOTE YES on this bill; Jere Fredenburgh, Self: Ability to
pay and individual's record...period.; Jered Skousen, Self: The only two considerations for qualifying should be
ability to pay and past record, not one’s race or ethnicity; Nancy Cottle, Self: This isn't Government's business;
Christine Maceri Genge, Self: Stop this Marxist tactic of racism and Identity Politics. it is evil and we should not be
copying the Communist Party of China.; Nan Nicoll, Self: No Social Credit Scores allowed; David Schafranka, Self:
This bill ensures government isn’t picking winners and losers in our access to economic freedom.; Brandon LaBorde,
Self: Banks and other institutions should not engage in social credit type scoring of patrons!; David Esch, Self: Do
not fet corrosive socialist ideas foul our Republic.; Shannon Severson, Self: Government should not pick winners
and losers in access to economic freedom. Please vote yes to keep Arizonans free and to stop restrictions on those
who don't adhere to the religion of woke social beliefs.; Stephen Harris, Self: The only two considerations for
qualifying should be ability to pay and past record, not one’s race or ethnicity, or some arbitrary ESG score.; Carol
Getz, Self: Welcome to the 21st Century. How did our state come full circle to the 60's? This is common sense.;
JOHN GRAY, Self: social credit score is a COMMUNIST IDEA. HELL NO III!!; Ute Edge, Self: State committeeman
Yuma, Az; John Yoder, Self: error in position when posting; Vicki Vaughn, Self: As a PC, | ask that you support this
bill; Bridget Nelke, Self: may not require doesn’t go far enough but I'll support this step to address stopping this
score system; Charles Bell, Self: Two considerations for qualifying should be ability to pay and past record, not
one’s race or ethnicity; Melanie Hutchings, Self: The only two considerations for qualifying should be ability to pay
and past record, not one's race or ethnicity.; James K., Self: Woke social credit scoring is discrimination.; James
McFadzean, Self: One's credit worthiness should depend on one's ability to pay and past credit history not their
race or ethnicity.; Scottsdale Parent, Self: no social credit scoring in AZI!; LouAnn Sedgwick, Self: | am a PC and ist
chair in LD13; Pam Lauck, Self: Only the ability to pay and records of past payments should be considered.; April
Smith, Self: Ban social credit!! Evil people are trying to create this!; Mary Grace Werner, Self: No social credits by
banks and other financial institutions for those individuals filling out the paperwork for loans and mortgages, etc.;
Joseph Myers, Self: | am opposed to usage of ESG in general, and ideology such as "social credit scores" which may
be used against law abiding citizens over pop ideology rooted in Marxism; Carrie Heikkala, Self: The only two
considerations for qualifying should be ability to pay and past record. This type of government overreach and
manipulation should be outlawed.; Espe Frecks, Self: Free citizens don't want to be scored against some tyrannical
government point of reference.; Mozelle Ault, Self: Yes, people with disabilities should be accomodated; Harold
DarcAngelo, Self: LD15 PC; Janet Klepacz, Self: NO social credit! PRIVACY -WE THE PEOPLE - CONSTINUTION
RIGHTS; Anne Howard, Self: want my voice heard but do not want to speak in perosn.; Mary Jamsa, Self: This bill is
a necessary step to protect the rights of all Arizona citizens.; Sue Unverricht, Self: The state's duty in managing
funds is to keep them safe and to obtain the best return relative to risk available. Requiring a bank to use Social
Credit Score in lending detracts from those duties.; Nancy Barrett, Self: i support this bill as we need to avoid
implementing social credit scoring systems. Let's not be like a Communist country; Chris Russo, Self: | am a PC.
What are we, China? Ban social credit scores NOW1; Jana Segal, Self: The social credit score is not only good for our
community and the environment. It is also good business.; Kevin Brown, Self: What?; Allen Skillicorn, Self: Anything
other than financial data is discriminatory.; Irwin Sheer, Self: Political opinion isn't covered by fair lending laws.;
Jennifer Dawson, Self: Unnecessary - fair lending laws don't care about your political opinion.; Melinda iyer, Self:
Society should be allowed to hold extremists accountable for their actions.; Karen Harris, Self: Strongly oppose.;
John Neville, Self: Why would anyone want our banks to give money to businesses that might harm our
communities? This bill makes no sense.; Mary Nelson, Self: Get a life; this is ridiculous; Penny Boone, Self: This
right-wing extremist bill is absurd. Political opinion is not covered by fair lending laws. This driven by panic that
society will hold extremists accountable for their actions, as well they should be. ! oppose!; Carol Maas, Self: Since
when has a "social credit score" been used by a bank? If you are talking about a criminal record, | am sure that
should be taken into consideration (and probably is) since | don’t think a bank would not want to know that!
Embezzlement for one.; Gail Kamaras, Self: The legislature wants to regulate the operational policies of financial
institutions? How about running the state instead.; Crystal Bazarnic, Self: Why? Vote no.; Barbara Oliver, Self; THIS
BILL IS FOOLISH! IT FAILED LAST YEAR AND SHOULD FAIL THIS YEAR.; Anne Leota Hart, Self: Just stop this nonsense.
This bill failed last year. Political opinion isn’t covered by fair lending laws.; Barbara Kain, Self: Unlike race, religion
or gender, political opinion is not covered by fair lending laws. This bill is a PR stunt. Please vote no.; Roxanna
Kearns, Self: Banks must be able to use a “social credit score" to be able to refuse a loan to a potential terrorist.;
Cynthia Couture, Self: NOT a good idea; Michael Bryan, Self: A paranoia-based intrusion into the operation of the
free market in the name of ideology. Reagan would be appalled. Stay in your lane and leave business to business
and the market.; Dee Maitiand, Self: As a retired commercial banker I find this intrusive and unworkabie.; Christina
Mollica, Self: lam a registered voter in LD29; Jessica Kitterman, Self: This is absurd: unlike race, religion or gender,
political opinion isn’t covered by fair lending laws.; Rebecca Haynes, Self: Political opinion is not covered by fair
lending laws.; Beverlee Loat, Self: This bill does not reflect science. Do better for our kids. Please!; Patricia
Mullenix, Self: Show me where political or social opinions have been used in lending laws. Again foolish talk
unsupported by facts does nothing except undermine your credibility.; Brian Eckley, Self: The government should
not get involved with the transactions between private citizens and banks. Government should not be allowed to
force social credit scoring criteria of any kind. This is what the CCP does.; Candice Fremouw, Self: The state should
not be interfering with standards and practices of banking. There is plenty of federal regulation and oversight;
Jackie Rich, Self: unnecessarily interferes with private enterprise.; Joelene Williamson, Self: Social Credit Scores?
Get real - we do not want to be the Arizona republic of China; Eric Lovelis, Self: As a PC | feel the ESG score is just
another way to limit a person's access to money. We need to stand up and say you will not control us using
money,; Doris Mills, Self: WE can't become Chinal; Carol Stines, Self: bankers should not follow social scoring in
serving their customers; Mary-Jeanne Fincher, Self: This bill interferes with decision-making in private businesses
and is unwarranted government control.; C. Sullivan, Self: Social credit scores should not be state mandated.
Indeed, they are arbitrary and unnecessary in any industry.; Kathleen Hahn, Self: Social credit is Un-American and
unconstitutional.; Joseph Camilleri, Self: This is just crazy.; RoseAnn Watts, Self: The only qualifications for a credit
score should be the ability to pay and past record, not what is posted on social media.; Justine Case, Self: It should
be outlawed all together. Bank may not do business in this state if they practice discrimination of any kind. Many
large Banks are now following World Banking rules. Lets nip this in the bud.; Anna Arnold, Self: Much to far
reaching into the private sector. What about limited government?; Kurt Neumann, Self: Passage of this bill would
be a welcome change but only a partial victory. Much better would be to prohibit financtal institutions from ever
using a social credit score in the loan evaluation process would be a full victory.; Mary Ann Graffagnino, Self: This is
not justifiable.; Jill Martin, Self: Social Credit Scores are something from communist china. PROHIBIT them in
ARIZONA; Cindy Sanders, Self: We dont need to go down the road that China uses to contro! their citizens.;
kathleen mayer, Self: | thought R's believed in the free market. Apparently not. Since corporations are people
then they have the right to free speech & free association which is reflected in their business practices, therefore
this is unconstitutional; diane marins, Self: Government should NOT be involved in social credit scoring; Elizabeth
McClure, Self: How can so many in our Leg not understand what they are supposed to be focused on? Try ensuring
our public schools have adequate funding; that's in fine with Arizonans’ needs.; Maria Lopez, Self: As a Precinct
Committeeman for LD16, i support this bill.; Marc Monterey, Self: Discrimination on the basis of our lawful
exercise of choices in speech (1A) and commerce is un-American and wrong. Please affirm this clearly. Thank you.;
Jeff Specter, Self: It would be totalitarian to restrict lending based on the applicant's social credit score. That is a
communist tactic.; Linda Guarino, Self: You can't regulate political opinions just because they differ from yours;
Susan Stumpf-Hebert, Self: Absurd bill. Credit is not based on social/cultural opinions.; Bev Miller, Self: Absolutely
NO "social credit" should ever be used to judge a person's ability to pay. Only past record and financial info. Not
ethnicity ever.; Mary Lunn, Self: Using social credit information is an invasion of privacy. We are not China!; Roy
Scott Lassell, Self: Agree. Please support this bill.; Karen Syversen, Self: This bill would cost Arizona millions of
doftars.; Kathryn Kaczmarek, Self: This bill is based on a nonexistent problem....that people might be punished in
some way for the social/political views they hold. This bill is not needed.; Bonnie Lund, Self: Social credit scoring is
a threat to freedom.; Sandy Whitley, Self: Bill says state cannot require the use of a social credit score in its lending
process. This limits having banks determine the environmental harm or health impacts of lending. This should be
the lending bank decision and not dictated by legislatur; Margaret Nichols, Self: This legislation looking for a
problem that does not exist.; Pat VanMaanen, Self: This is ridiculous: political opinion isn’t covered by fair lending
laws.; SUSAN ARNOLD, Self: Doesn’t this legislature have more important real issues that need their attention and
not be a total wast of time?; Veronica Spear, Self: Use of social scores is akin to communism. A bill should be
created to prohibit use of social credit scores; Jeff Caldwell, Self: This bill prohibits government from requiring
woke social credit scoring by banking institutions. This bill ensures government isn’t picking winners and losers in
your access to economic freedom.; Lee Chadbourn, Self: All social credit and use should cease.; Lisa Maczura, Self:
Uh boy...; Gary Townsend, Self: Extremists need to be held accountable for their actions.; Mary Lisa, Self: Political
opinion isn’t covered by fair lending iaws.; Karolyn Switzer, Self: Opinions are not currently covered by lending laws.
This is absurd.; Joseph Bihms LD29, Self: HB2472 bans banks from using "social credit scores" for loanworthiness
evaluation to stop discrimination based on political affiliation or values. Political opinion not protected under fair
lending laws. Similar to failed bill from last year. Vote No; Loretta O'Connor, Self: Another creepy pseudo-solution
to anon-existent problem - why? Why does Rep Montenegro need a booster chair for his political opinions? Waah
waah.; Margaret Tinsley, Self: This is not a valid criterion for limiting credit. Please do not pass this bill.; Dawn
Norton LD29, Self: HB2472 bans banks from using “social credit scores" for loan assessments. Targets
discrimination based on political beliefs, but political opinion isn't protected by lending laws. Aims to stop
accountability for extremism. Vote NO; Sarah Bihms LD29, Self: HB2472 bans state from requiring banks to use
"social credit scores” for loanworthiness. Protects against discrimination based on political views but political
opinion not protected by fair lending laws. Aims to prevent accountability for extremism.; Rivko Knox, Self: Similar
to a bill that failed last year. Not necessary.; Marcia Tingley, Self: Political opinion isn't covered by fair lending
laws.; Brandy Reese, Self: This is absurd: unlike race, religion or gender, political opinion isn’t covered by fair
lending laws.; Beth Ballmann, Self: Unlike race, religion and gender, political opinion is not covered by fair lending
laws. This is similar to a bill that failed last year.; Lois Hansen, Self: this bill is absurd. the idea of "discrimination"
for political opinion in pushing a non issue; Dieter Knecht, Self: Please oppose; it failed last year-political opinions
not covered by fair lending laws in our democracy; David Myers, Self: This is another solution in search ofa ‘
problem. Small government, please.; Erin McCamish, Self: Extremists don't deserve loans.; Chery! Stafford, Self:
Unlike race, religion or gender, political opinion isn’t covered by fair lending laws. This is a waste of money for
Arizona.; JOHN FIENE, Self: Using “social credit scores" clearly is just discrimination based on political affillation,
social values, or environmental values. Bad bill, and likely unconstitutional.; Jeanmarie Haney, Self: This is utterly
unnecessary and could cost Arizona taxpayers millions.; Marla Presley, Self: This could cost Arizonians millions of.
dollars, | oppose.
HB2498, do-not-calli list: text messages
Support:
R Morrison, representing self; Veronica Spear, representing self
ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE
Fifty-sixth Legislature - First Regular Session
COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE RECORD
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE
CHAIRMAN: Justin Wilmeth VICE-CHAIRMAN: _ Michael Carbone
DATE 01/31/23 123 123 123 123
CONVENED Li0Z pm m m m m
RECESSED
RECONVENED
ADJOURNED H30/ py
MEMBERS |
Aguilar v
Austin v
Carter vA
Gress Y
Heap v
Hendrix v
Ortiz v
Sun v
Carbone, Vice-Chairman v
Wilmeth, Chairman Vv
V Present --- Absent exc Excused
Attachment 3
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legislature
First Regular Session
HB 2019: licensing; permitting; criteria; clarity
Sponsor: Representative Grantham, LD 14
Committee on Commerce
Overview
Requires a municipality or county (local government) to specify the criteria for granting a license
or permit which is required for certain activities.
History
A local government that issues licenses is required to provide to an applicant at the time the
applicant obtains an application for a license the following information:
1) A list of all of the steps the applicant is required to take in order to obtain the license;
2) The applicable licensing time frames;
3) The name and telephone number of a municipal contact person who can answer questions
or provide assistance throughout the application process;
4) The website address and any other information, if applicable, to allow the regulated person
to use electronic communication with the municipality; and
5) Notice that an applicant may receive a clarification from the municipality of its
interpretation or application of a statute, ordinance, code or authorized substantive policy
statement (A.R.S. §§ 9-836 and 11-1606).
Provisions
1. Directs a local government that requires a license or permit for constitutionally protected
activities or activities that change the use, appearance or density of a structure or land to
specify the criteria, in clear and unambiguous language, for granting such license or permit.
(Sec. 1, 2)
2. Requires a local government, within 30 days of submittal, to grant or deny an application for
the activities license or permit, unless another time frame is specified by law. (Sec. 1, 2)
3. Deems the application for the activities license or permit is granted if the local government
fails to take action within the applicable time frame, unless the application is:
a) Incomplete;
b) The local government issues a notice relating to administrative completeness; and
c) The applicant fails to complete the application. (Sec. 1, 2)
4. Requires a court to determine if the application approval criteria language is clear and
unambiguous in proceedings involving a denial of an activities license or permit. (Sec. 1, 2)
[ Prop 105 (45 votes) 0 Prop 108 (40 votes) © Emergency (40 votes) (i Fiscal Note
HB 2019
Initials PRB Page 4 Commerce
Attachment ua
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legisiature - First Regular Session
ROLL CALL VOTE
COMMITTEE ON Commerce BILL NO. HB 2019
DATE January 31, 2023 MOTION: D P
PASS AYE NAY | PRESENT | ABSENT
Aguilar vA .
Austin J
Carter JS
Gress v4
Heap VA
Hendrix f
Ortiz V4
Sun JS
Carbone, Vice-Chairman JS
Wilmeth, Chairman J
T | 3 0 O
/ Arian AC by erm
APPROVED; er f.. — 7 COMMITTEE SECRETARY
ASTIN WILMETH, Chairman
MICHAEL CARBONE, Vice-Chairman
ATTACHMENT. 5
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legislature
First Regular Session
HB 2007: group excess liability insurance |
Sponsor: Representative Livingston, LD 28
Committee on Commerce
Overview
Authorizes insurance companies to issue or delivery a group excess liability insurance policy
(Policy).
Provisions
Group Excess Liability Insurance (Sec. 1)
4. Permits an insurer to issue or deliver a Policy which provides excess coverage after the
insured's primary liability insurance limits have been exhausted.
2. Specifies a group policy may provide ancillary and additional coverages to certificate holders
provided the terms and conditions comply with statute.
3. Permits authorized insurers or unauthorized insurers to offer group excess liability insurance
coverage in this state.
4. Stipulates that.an authorized insurer who issues a Policy must file the policy and the certificate
of insurance forms with the Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions.
5. Permits an insurer to issue a Policy to any eligible group to which a group disability insurance
policy may be issued.
6. Limits the eligible group to only those natural persons identified as qualifying group members
pursuant to statute and includes a certificate holder's immediate family or household.
Directs an insurer to treat all eligible groups of the same class in a like manner.
8. Specifies the Policy premiums can be wholly paid by the group policy holder, the certificate
holders or both.
9. Requires the Policy to provide separate limits of coverage for each certificate holder
10. Requires that the group policyholder receives a copy of the group policy, and the certificate
holder receives a copy of the certificate of insurance along with any endorsement or
amendment.
11. Allows specified persons to send the certificate of insurance to the certificate holders on behalf
of the insurer.
12. Requires the Policy to be provided to a certificate holder within a reasonable amount of time
after the certificate of insurance is delivered and outlines the contents of the certificate of
insurance.
13. Delineates Policy cancellation, nonrenewal or conditional renewal coverage requirements.
C1 Prop 105 (45 votes) D Prop 108 (40 votes) 0 Emergency (40 votes) (1 Fiscai Note
PB HB 2007
Initials Page 1 “ommerce
Attachment &
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17,
18.
19.
Asserts insurers must treat all eligible groups of the same class in a like manner.
Specifies the Policy premiums may be wholly paid by the group policyholder, the certificate
holders or both.
Requires the Policy to provide separate limits of coverage for each certificate holder.
Prevents the Policy from providing coverage to a group policyholder.
Requires a copy of the group policy and any endorsement or amendment be delivered to the
group policyholder.
Permits the group policyholder, with certain approval, to send the certificate of insurance and
any endorsement to the certificate holders on behalf of the insurer.
Outlines the contents of the certificate of insurance.
Requires a copy of the group policy be delivered to the certificate holder after the certificate
of insurance is delivered.
Prevents the disclose of claims-related information about a certificate holder to the group
policyholder other than the existence of a claim.
Provides the requirements for canceling, nonrenewing or conditional renewing of a coverage
under a Policy.
20. Allows the group policyholder, with a 30-day written notice, to cancel or not renew the group
21.
22.
policy for any reason.
Requires a covered loss that occurs before the effective date of the cancellation, nonrenewal
or conditional renewal of the group policy or certificate of insurance to be covered as provided
under the group policy.
Defines pertinent terms.
HB 2007
initials PRB Page 2 Commerce
Oo Oo ns DBD TO SF WO MH FF
RB BR ORO a et
wo FP 2S YH DO YN DO KR WO DY KF CO
Fifty-sixth Legislature Commerce
First Regular Session H.B. 2007
PROPOSED
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B. 2007
(Reference to printed bil?)
Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Title 20, chapter 6, Arizona Revised Statutes, is
amended by adding article 6, to read:
ARTICLE 6. GROUP EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICIES
20-1491. Definitions
IN THIS ARTICLE, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES:
1. “CERTIFICATE HOLDER” MEANS THE INDIVIDUAL NAMED INSURED GROUP
MEMBER UNDER A GROUP EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY.
2, "CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE": MEANS THE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE,
EVIDENCE OF COVERAGE OR OTHER SUMMARY OF COVERAGE THAT IS ISSUED TO EACH
CERTIFICATE HOLDER UNDER A GROUP EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY.
3. “CONDITIONAL RENEWAL" MEANS A RENEWAL THAT IS CONDITIONED ON ANY
OF THE FOLLOWING:
(a) A CHANGE OF LIMITS.
(b) A CHANGE IN THE TYPE OF COVERAGE.
(c) A REDUCTION OR ELIMINATION OF COVERAGE.
(d) INCREASED DEDUCTIBLES OR THE ADDITION OF EXCLUSIONS.
(e) INCREASED PREMIUMS IN EXCESS OF TEN PERCENT, EXCEPT FOR PREMIUM
INCREASES THAT ARE GENERATED AS A RESULT OF INCREASED EXPOSURE UNITS OR AS
A RESULT OF EXPERIENCE RATING, LOSS RATING, RETROSPECTIVE RATING OR AUDIT.
4, “EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE" MEANS LIABILITY INSURANCE, AS
PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 20-252, PARAGRAPH 1, THAT PROVIDES EXCESS COVERAGE
Oo Om 4H TD OO FF WD PRO
WO W ©! DM HM MH HD MP DW WH HW YH LH KF KF KF RP HP Se SS Ee
fro
Yn = 5S GON Aasons Hh SF Conrwiaarkt onrnsos
House Amendments to H.B. 2007
AFTER THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER'S PRIMARY LIABILITY INSURANCE LIMITS HAVE BEEN
EXHAUSTED.
5. “EXCESS UNINSURED OR UNDERINSURED LIABILITY" MEANS DAMAGES FOR
BODILY INJURY, PERSONAL INJURY OR PROPERTY DAMAGE THAT THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER OR AN IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER OF THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER IS LEGALLY
ENTITLED TO RECEIVE FROM AN UNINSURED OR UNDERINSURED NEGLIGENT PERSON.
6. "GROUP EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE’ MEANS EXCESS LIABILITY
INSURANCE THAT IS ISSUED ON A GROUP BASIS AND THAT COVERS GROUPS OF PERSONS
AS PRESCRIBED IN THIS ARTICLE.
7. “GROUP POLICYHOLDER" MEANS THOSE GROUPS IDENTIFIED IN SECTION
20-1492, SUBSECTION C TO WHICH A GROUP EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY
MAY BE ISSUED.
8. “IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER" INCLUDES ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
(a) THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER'S SPOUSE OR DOMESTIC PARTNER.
(b) ANY RELATIVE OF THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER WHO LIVES WITH THE
CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
(c) ANY PERSON WHO IS UNDER TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF AGE AND WHO IS IN
THE CARE OF THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
9, “NEGLIGENT PERSON” MEANS A NATURAL PERSON WHO IS IDENTIFIABLE BY
LEGAL NAME, WHO IS NOT AN IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER OF THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER
AND WHO IS LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES THAT WERE SUSTAINED BY THE
CERTIFICATE HOLDER OR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER'S IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER AND
THAT WERE CAUSED BY AN ACCIDENT OR OFFENSE TO WHICH THE GROUP EXCESS
LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY APPLIES.
20-1492. Group excess liability insurance; eligible groups
A. AN AUTHORIZED INSURER OR AN UNAUTHORIZED INSURER AS PROVIDED IN
CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 5 OF THIS TITLE MAY OFFER GROUP EXCESS LIABILITY
INSURANCE IN THIS STATE. AN AUTHORIZED INSURER THAT ISSUES A GROUP EXCESS
LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY IN THIS STATE SHALL FILE THE GROUP POLICY AND
THE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE FORMS WITH THE DEPARTMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION
20-398 BUT IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 20-385. THE TERMS OF
THE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS OF THE
-2-
Oo Oo 4H DBD oO F&F WD MD
2 RM MM DR M PR MR PM DR MR DR we rR
oOo OND Oo NSN DO OF BO MM KF DO OH ON DOD OO fF WY DH KF OO
House Amendments to H.B. 2007
GROUP EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY PURSUANT TO WHICH THE CERTIFICATE
OF INSURANCE IS ISSUED.
B. AN INSURER MAY ISSUE OR DELIVER A GROUP EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE
POLICY AND CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE IN THIS STATE ONLY PURSUANT TO THIS
ARTICLE, IN ADDITION TO EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE, A GROUP EXCESS
LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY MAY ALSO PROVIDE EXCESS UNINSURED MOTORIST,
EXCESS UNDERINSURED MOTORIST AND EXCESS UNINSURED OR UNDERINSURED LIABILITY
COVERAGE TO CERTIFICATE HOLDERS. THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR ANY EXCESS
UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE AND EXCESS UNDERINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE
PROVIDED UNDER THE GROUP POLICY SHALL COMPLY WITH THIS TITLE.
C. NOTWITHSTANDING SUBSECTION B OF THIS SECTION, A GROUP EXCESS
LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY MAY PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR EXCESS UNINSURED
MOTORIST OR UNDERINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE IN AMOUNTS THAT EXCEED THE
LIMITS SET FORTH IN SECTION 20-259.01.
D. AN INSURER MAY ISSUE A GROUP EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY TO
AN EMPLOYER THAT INSURES ONE OR MORE EMPLOYEES OF THE EMPLOYER. FOR THE
PURPOSES OF THIS SUBSECTION:
1. “EMPLOYEES” INCLUDE:
(a) THE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, MANAGERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE EMPLOYER.
(b) THE PARTNERS IF THE EMPLOYER IS A PARTNERSHIP.
(c) THE OFFICERS, MANAGERS AND EMPLOYEES OF A SUBSIDIARY OR ANY
AFFILIATED CORPORATIONS, COMPANIES, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, FIRMS OR
PARTNERSHIPS.
(d) THE MEMBERS OF THE EMPLOYEE'S IMMEDIATE FAMILY.
2. “EMPLOYER" INCLUDES ANY TYPE OF CORPORATION, COMPANY, FIRM,
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND PARTNERSHIP.
E, AN INSURER MAY ESTABLISH UNDERWRITING CRITERIA FOR THE GROUP
POLICYHOLDER AND CERTIFICATE HOLDERS THAT APPLY AT ISSUANCE AND RENEWAL OF
THE GROUP POLICY AND THE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE. INSURERS SHALL TREAT
ALL ELIGIBLE GROUPS OF THE SAME CLASS IN A LIKE MANNER.
gS Oo nN DW TO SP WO MY
WO WCW NM MR MR ARH PR MRF MS PR PO PR RB eH we oR
House Amendments to H.B. 2007
20-1493. Group excess liability insurance policy: premiums;
cancellation; requirements
A. THE GROUP POLICYHOLDER MAY PAY THE PREMIUM FOR A GROUP EXCESS
LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY FROM MONIES -CONTRIBUTED WHOLLY BY THE GROUP
POLICYHOLDER, WHOLLY BY THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OR JOINTLY BY THE GROUP
POLICYHOLDER AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS.
B. THE GROUP EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY SHALL PROVIDE
SEPARATE LIMITS OF COVERAGE FOR EACH CERTIFICATE HOLDER. A GROUP EXCESS
LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY MAY NOT PROVIDE COVERAGE TO A_ GROUP
POLICYHOLDER.
C. THE INSURER OR, IF AUTHORIZED BY THE INSURER AND AGREED TO BY THE
INSURANCE PRODUCER, THE GROUP POLICYHOLDER'S INSURANCE PRODUCER SHALL
DELIVER A COPY OF THE GROUP POLICY AND ANY ENDORSEMENT OR AMENDMENT TO THE
GROUP POLICYHOLDER. IF AUTHORIZED BY THE INSURER AND AGREED TO BY THE
GROUP POLICYHOLDER OR THE GROUP POLICYHOLDER'S INSURANCE PRODUCER, THE
GROUP POLICYHOLDER OR THE GROUP POLICYHOLDER'S INSURANCE PRODUCER MAY SEND
THE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE AND ANY ENDORSEMENT OR AMENDMENT TO THE
CERTIFICATE HOLDERS ON BEHALF OF THE INSURER.
D. THE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE SHALL CONTAIN ALL MATERIAL TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF COVERAGE THAT ARE AFFORDED TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER,
INCLUDING A DISCLOSURE IN CLEAR AND EASILY UNDERSTANDABLE LANGUAGE OF ANY
LIMITATION, EXCLUSION OR REQUIRED UNDERLYING COVERAGE, OR A COPY OF THE
GROUP POLICY SHALL BE DELIVERED TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER WITHIN A
REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME AFTER THE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE IS DELIVERED
TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
E. THE INSURER MAY NOT DISCLOSE CLAIMS-RELATED INFORMATION ABOUT ANY
CERTIFICATE HOLDER TO THE GROUP POLICYHOLDER OTHER THAN THE EXISTENCE OF A
CLAIM,
F. THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO THE CANCELLATION, NONRENEWAL
OR CONDITIONAL RENEWAL OF COVERAGE UNDER A GROUP EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE
POLICY:
Oo ON TD oT BR WY DY
OO WWD MRM MR PM MH MR MH FH PT HM RD RB ww Re em Re pe
House Amendments to H.B. 2007
1. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 5 OF THIS SUBSECTION, AN INSURER
MAY NONRENEW THE GROUP POLICY OR ANY CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ISSUED UNDER
THE POLICY IF THE INSURER COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE.
THE INSURER SHALL SEND NOTICE OF NONRENEWAL TO THE GROUP POLICYHOLDER AND
THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS AT LEAST THIRTY DAYS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF
THE NONRENEWAL. IF AUTHORIZED BY THE INSURER AND AGREED TO BY THE GROUP
POLICYHOLDER, THE GROUP POLICYHOLDER MAY SEND NOTICE OF NONRENEWAL TO THE
CERTIFICATE HOLDERS AT LEAST THIRTY DAYS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE
NONRENEWAL ON BEHALF OF THE INSURER.
2. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 5 OF THIS SUBSECTION, AFTER A
GROUP POLICY OR CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE HAS BEEN IN EFFECT FOR SIXTY DAYS,
OR IF THE GROUP POLICY OR CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE IS A RENEWAL, EFFECTIVE
IMMEDIATELY, AN INSURER MAY CANCEL THE GROUP POLICY OR ANY CERTIFICATE OF
INSURANCE ISSUED UNDER THE POLICY AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE GROUP
POLICY OR CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE BASED ON ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
(a) THE NONPAYMENT OF THE PREMIUM.
(b) THE CONVICTION OF THE GROUP POLICYHOLDER OR CERTIFICATE HOLDER
OF A CRIME THAT AROSE OUT OF ACTS THAT INCREASED ANY OF THE HAZARDS INSURED
AGAINST.
(c) ANY ACTS OR OMISSIONS BY THE GROUP POLICYHOLDER, THE GROUP
POLICYHOLDER'S REPRESENTATIVE OR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER THAT CONSTITUTE
FRAUD OR MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION IN OBTAINING OR CONTINUING THE GROUP
POLICY OR CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE OR IN PRESENTING A CLAIM UNDER THE GROUP
POLICY OR CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE.
(d) A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE IN THE RISK ASSUMED BY THE INSURER SINCE
THE GROUP POLICY OR CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE WAS ISSUED, EXCEPT TO THE
EXTENT THAT THE INSURER SHOULD REASONABLY HAVE FORESEEN THE CHANGE OR
CONTEMPLATED THE RISK IN WRITING THE CONTRACT.
(e) A DETERMINATION BY THE DIRECTOR THAT CONTINUING THE GROUP POLICY
OR CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE WOULD PLACE THE INSURER IN VIOLATION OF THE
INSURANCE LAWS OF THIS STATE OR WOULD JEOPARDIZE THE SOLVENCY OF THE
INSURER.
Oo Oo ns DBD TO SB WD MD
YP DH MY) TH YW WB TY RH KY DRO RB wR me ee Re ee ope pe
oOU DN DOD FT fF WYO NY KF DO OD Mu DH OT BP WD wD HM oO
House Amendments to H.B. 2007
(f) THE LOSS OF REINSURANCE THAT APPLIES TO THE RISK INSURED
AGAINST, BUT ONLY IF THE ABSENCE OF REINSURANCE RESULTED FROM THE
TERMINATION OF TREATY REINSURANCE OR FACULTATIVE REINSURANCE INITIATED OR
IMPLEMENTED BY THE REINSURER OR REINSURERS OF THE INSURER ISSUING THE GROUP
POLICY.
(g) THE DISCOVERY OF GROSSLY NEGLIGENT ACTS BY THE GROUP
POLICYHOLDER, THE GROUP POLICYHOLDER'S REPRESENTATIVE OR THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER THAT MATERIALLY INCREASED ANY OF THE HAZARDS INSURED AGAINST.
3. THE INSURER SHALL SEND NOTICE OF CANCELLATION TO THE GROUP
POLICYHOLDER AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS IF THE GROUP POLICY IS BEING
CANCELED OR TO AFFECTED CERTIFICATE HOLDERS IF ONE OR MORE CERTIFICATES OF
INSURANCE ARE BEING CANCELED AT LEAST THIRTY DAYS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE
OF THE CANCELLATION. IF AUTHORIZED BY THE INSURER AND AGREED TO BY THE
GROUP POLICYHOLDER, THE GROUP POLICYHOLDER MAY SEND NOTICE OF CANCELLATION
TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS IF THE GROUP POLICY IS BEING CANCELED OR TO
AFFECTED CERTIFICATE HOLDERS IF ONE OR MORE CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE ARE
BEING CANCELED AT LEAST THIRTY DAYS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE
CANCELLATION ON BEHALF OF THE INSURER,
4. THE GROUP POLICY SHALL SET FORTH THE CONDITIONS AND TIMING ON
WHICH A CERTIFICATE HOLDER'S COVERAGE WILL TERMINATE FOLLOWING THE
TERMINATION OF A CERTIFICATE HOLDER'S EMPLOYMENT WITH THE GROUP
POLICYHOLDER.
5. AN ACT OR OMISSION BY A CERTIFICATE HOLDER MAY NOT CONSTITUTE THE
BASIS FOR CANCELLATION OF THE GROUP POLICY.
6. THE NOTICE OF CANCELLATION AND ANY REFUND OF UNEARNED PREMIUM MAY
BE SENT SEPARATELY, BUT BOTH MUST BE SENT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS BEFORE THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE CANCELLATION.
G. WITH THIRTY DAYS" WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE INSURER AND EACH
CERTIFICATE HOLDER, A GROUP POLICYHOLDER MAY CANCEL OR NONRENEW THE GROUP
POLICY FOR ANY REASON.
oS DBD OHO BSB WO PR Be
House Amendments to H.B. 2007
H. IF A CERTIFICATE HOLDER SUSTAINS A LOSS THAT WOULD BE COVERED BY
THE GROUP POLICY AND THAT OCCURS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE
CANCELLATION, NONRENEWAL OR CONDITIONAL RENEWAL OF THE GROUP POLICY OR THE
CERTIFICATE HOLDER'S CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE, WHETHER INITIATED BY THE
INSURER, GROUP POLICYHOLDER OR CERTIFICATE HOLDER, THE LOSS REMAINS COVERED
AS PROVIDED UNDER THE GROUP POLICY NOTWITHSTANDING THE CANCELLATION,
NONRENEWAL OR CONDITIONAL RENEWAL."
Amend title to conform
JUSTIN WILMETH
Ot 2672023
TOrO3 At
€—SK
2007WILMETH SE.docx
01/27/2023
08:31 AM
H: PRB/1s
Attachment L
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legislature - First Regular Session
ROLL CALL VOTE
COMMITTEE ON Commerce BILL NO. __HB 2007
DATE January 31, 2023 motion: JP AISE
PASS AYE NAY PRESENT | ABSENT
Aguilar
Austin
Carter
Gress
Heap
Hendrix
Ortiz
Sun
Carbone, Vice-Chairman
SININISI ISIS SINS
Wilmeth, Chairman
O © ©
COMMITTEE SECRETARY
ATTACHMENT. 8
is)
APPROVE
STIN WILMETH, Chairman
AAEL CARBONE, Vice-Chairman
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legislature
First Regular Session
HB 2472: social credit; use; prohibition
Sponsor: Representative Montenegro, LD 29
Committee on Commerce
Overview
Asserts this State may not require a bank to use a social credit score in determining whether to
lend money.
History
A bank may lend up to 20% of its capital to a single borrow. A bank may lend an additional 10%
of its capital if the additional amounts are fully secured by readily marketable collateral that has a
market value at least equai to the amount of the loan (A.R.S. § 6-352).
A bank uses certain factors in determining whether to lend money and the amount that is lent..
These factors may include a borrower's credit score, credit history, debt-to-income ratio,
employment history, collateral and the type of loan and the loan term.
Provisions
1. Prohibits this State from requiring a bank or financial institution to use a social credit score
when evaluating whether to lend money to a customer. (Sec. 1)
CJ Prop 105 (45 votes) OO Prop 108 (40 votes) O Emergency (40 votes) 1 Fiscal Note
HB 2472
Initials PRB Page 1 Commerce
Attachment 4
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legislature - First Regular Session
ROLL CALL VOTE
COMMITTEE ON Commerce BILL NO. __ HB 2472
DATE January 31, 2023 MOTION: DP ;
PASS AYE NAY PRESENT | ABSENT
Aguilar WA
Austin Vv
Carter J
Gress /
Heap vA
Hendrix J
Ortiz A
Sun /
Carbone, Vice-Chairman J
Wilmeth, Chairman VA
lo [4 | © |O
Aw \ ow bon
77 4 VA /COMMITTEE SECRETARY
TIN WILMETH, Chairman
AEL CARBONE, Vice-Chairman
ATTACHMENT. [©
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legislature
First Regular Session
HB 2198: claimant; guardian ad litem; procedure
Sponsor: Representative Wilmeth, LD 2
Committee on Commerce
Overview
Removes a trustee from being appointed to represent a minor or incapacitated person relating to
workers’ compensation claims.
History
The Industrial Commission of Arizona (ICA) is responsible for overseeing various labor-related
issues in Arizona including processing and adjudicating workers’ compensation claims. A claim
for compensation is valid or enforceable only if it has been filed with the ICA by the employee
within one year after the injury occurred. The employer, within ten days of receiving a notice of an
accident, must inform the employer's insurance carrier and the ICA. Upon receiving notification of
the injury, the ICA sends a claim form to the employee. However, if an insurance carrier or self-
insured employer receives written notice from the injured employee who intends to file a claim
compensation, the insurance carrier or self-insured employer has seven days to forward the
notice to the ICA and inform the employee of the requirement to file with the ICA (A.R.S. § 23-
1061).
If the claimant for compensation or death benefits is a minor or an incompetent person, the ICA
may appoint a trustee or guardian ad litem to appear for and represent the person. The ICA sets
the terms and conditions as it deems proper for the representation of the person (A.R.S. § 23-
1066).
Provisions
4. Removes a trustee as a person who may be appointed to represent a minor or incapacitated
person in a claim for compensation or death benefits. (Sec. 1)
2. Specifies the guardian ad litem's representation of the minor or incapacitated person must be
in accordance with the terms, conditions and rules of the ICA, rather than in such terms and
conditions as the ICA deems to be proper. (Sec. 1)
3. Clarifies that the guardian ad litem's representation must be in the best interests of the minor
or incapacitated person.
4. Changes the reference of incompetent person to. incapacitated person. (Sec. 1)
5. Makes clarifying changes. (Sec. 1)
Ci Prop 105 (45 votes) O Prop 108 (40 votes) 1] Emergency (40 votes) 1 Fiscal Note
PB HB 2198
Initials Page 1 Commerce
Attachment qh
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legislature - First Regular Session
ROLL CALL VOTE
COMMITTEE ON Commerce BILL NO. HB 2198
DATE January 31, 2023 MOTION: b p
PASS AYE NAY PRESENT | ABSENT
Aguilar J
Austin v
Carter VA
Gress Via
Heap vA
Hendrix J
Ortiz WA
Sun Vi
Carbone, Vice-Chairman J
Wilmeth, Chairman vA
{O © O @
A UU ton, NM clr.
APPROVED: COMMITTEE SECRETARY
TIN WILMETH, Chairman
Mi EL CARBONE, Vice-Chairman
ATTACHMENT 1A
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legislature
First Regular Session
NN eeeEEeEeEeEeeeeEeEeEeEeEeEee———e
HB2381: mobile homes; recreational vehicles; fund
Sponsor: Representative Gress, LD 4
Committee on Commerce
Overview
Increases certain payments to and disbursements from the Mobile Home Relocation Fund (Fund).
History
The Fund provides relief to tenants required to relocate due to: 1) a change in land use; 2) rent
increases; or 3) community age restrictions. Current law allows a tenant moving due to change in
land use to receive Fund disbursements up to $7,500 for single section mobile homes or $12,500
for multi-section mobile homes in relocations within 100 miles from the vacated mobile home park
(A.R.S. § 33-1476.01).
Each owner of a mobile home located in a mobile home park who does not own the land on which
the mobile home is located are annually assessed a rate of $.5 per $100 of a taxable assessed
valuation. Monies collected from the annual assessment are deposited into the Fund (A.R.S. §
33-1476.03).
Provisions
1. Increases the maximum amount of Fund monies a tenant required to relocate due to a change
in use or redevelopment of the mobile home park may receive from:
a) $7,500 to $12,500 for a single section mobile home; or
b) $12,500 to $20,000 for a multisection mobile home. (Sec. 1)
2. Increases the percentage amount for abandonment of a mobile home in the park a tenant
may receive from the Fund from 25% to 40% of the maximum allowable moving expense.
(Sec. 1)
3. Increases the amount the landlord must pay to the Fund for each tenant filing for relocation
assistance from:
a) $500 to $700 for each single section mobile home; and
b) $800 to $1,000 for each multisection mobile home. (Sec. 1)
4. Increases the amount of additional monies a landlord must pay to the Fund if a change in use
occurs before the time stated in a policy statement and the landlord fails to comply with certain
statutory requirements from:
a) $500 to $700 for each mobile home space occupied by a single section mobile home; and
b) $800 to $1,000 for each mobile home space occupied by a multisection mobile home.
(Sec. 1)
5, Increases the amount of additional monies a landlord must pay to the Fund if a change in use
occurs within 270 days of relocations as a result of a rent increase from:
a) $500 to $700 for each mobile home space occupied by a single section mobile home; and
b) $800 to $1,000 for each mobile home space occupied by a multisection mobile home.
(Sec. 1)
HB 2384
Initials PRB/LM Page 1 Commerce
Attachment 43
6. Requires, rather than permits, the Director (Director) of the Department of Housing to adopt,
amend or repeal rules to administer the Fund. (Sec. 2)
7. Requires, rather than permits, the Director to notify the county assessors to reinstate the
assessment for the Fund if at the end of a fiscal year the Fund monies are less than
$6,000,000. (Sec. 3)
8. Increases the maximum amount, from $4,000 to $6,000, that a tenant may receive from the
Fund for moving expenses of relocating the park trailer or park model to a new location. (Sec.
4)
9. Increases the percentage amount for abandonment of a park trailer or park model in the park
a tenant may receive from the Fund from 25% to 40% of the maximum allowable moving
expense. (Sec. 4)
10. Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1, 2, 3, 4)
HB 2381
Initials PRB/LM Page 2 Commerce
oO on DO FPF W DY FF
MR MR A M DR FR rR Re Re eR oO
> WO WO FF CO OBO OO wn DBD OT Se WH MH F&F |]
Fifty-sixth Legislature Commerce
First Regular Session H.B. 2381
PROPOSED
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B. 2381
(Reference to printed bill)
Page 1, between lines 1 and 2, insert:
"Section 1. Section 33-1476, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to
read:
33-1476. Termination or nonrenewal of rental agreement by
landlord: noncompliance with rental agreement by
tenant; failure to pay rent
A. The landlord shall specify the reason or reasons for the
termination or nonrenewal of any tenancy in the mobile home park. The
reason or reasons relied on for the termination or nonrenewal shall be
stated in writing with specific facts, so that the date, place and
circumstances concerning the reason or reasons for termination or
nonrenewal can be determined. Reference to or recital of the language of
this chapter, or both, is not sufficient compliance with this subsection.
B, The tandlord may not terminate or refuse to renew a tenancy
without good cause. "Good cause" means:
1. Noncompliance with any provision of the rental agreement.
2. Nonpayment of rent.
3. Change in use of land.
4. Clear and convincing evidence that a tenant has repeatedly
violated any provision of this chapter and established a pattern of
noncompliance with such provisions. ,
C. The landlord's right to terminate or to refuse to renew a tenancy
pursuant to subsection B of this section does not arise until the landlord
has complied with subsection D, E or H of this section.
Se ON DBD oO FP WY DY F&F
WOW ODO W MH MH MDH TH MP MY MP PK M/F DR wR eB BE ome ob oe
DF oS 6 ON Aas ORD - OC CGO NYA ARON EO
House Amendments to H.B. 2381
D. Except as otherwise prohibited by law:
1. If there is a material noncompliance by the tenant with the
rental agreement, the landlord shall deliver a written notice to the tenant
specifying the acts and omissions constituting the breach and that the
rental agreement will terminate upon a date not less than thirty days after
receipt of the notice if the breach is not remedied in fourteen days. If
the tenant remedies the situation within the time specified in the notice,
the landlord shall issue a notice to the tenant releasing the tenant from
the termination of rental agreement notice. IF WITHIN 14 DAYS OF RECEIPT
OF THE NOTICE OF THE BREACH THE TENANT PRESENTS TO THE LANDLORD A SIGNED
CONTRACT WITH A CONTRACTOR LICENSED UNDER SECTION 32-1101 TO CORRECT THE
BREACH SHOWING THE BREACH WILL BE REPAIRED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE NOTICE,
THE LANDLORD SHALL EXTEND THE TIME FOR REPAIRS FROM 14 DAYS TO 60 DAYS.
2. If there is a noncompliance by the tenant with section 33-1451
materially affecting health and safety, the landlord may deliver a written
notice to the tenant specifying the acts and omissions constituting the
breach and that the rental agreement will terminate upon a date not less
than twenty days after receipt of the notice if the breach is not remedied
in ten days. However, if the breach is remediable by repair or the payment
of damages or otherwise, and the tenant adequately remedies the breach
before the date specified in the notice, the rental agreement will not
terminate. If the tenant remedies the situation within the time specified
in the notice, the landlord shall issue a notice to the tenant releasing
the tenant from the termination of rental agreement notice.
3. If there is a noncompliance that is both material and irreparable
and that occurs on the premises, including an illegal discharge of a
weapon, homicide as prescribed in sections 13-1102 through 13-1105,
criminal street gang activity as prescribed in section 13-105, activity as
prohibited in section 13-2308, prostitution as defined in section 13-3211,
the unlawful manufacturing, selling, transferring, possessing, using or
storing of a controlled substance as defined in section 13-3451,
threatening or intimidating as prohibited in section 13-1202, infliction of
-?-
Oo DN DO Be WD MP FF
WO Ww GW MPM MP PP RP PR PD PO PP PR RHR RR Hb ef oR OR
eo FF Oo Oo ON DO OT FF WYO DS KH Oo YD oO YN DD OH BP ]H DH | |
House Amendments to H.B. 2381
serious bodily harm, assault as prohibited in section 13-1203, criminal
“activity involving serious property damage or acts that have been found to
constitute a nuisance pursuant to section 12-991, the landlord may deliver
a written notice for immediate termination of the rental agreement and
proceed pursuant to sectton 33-1485.
4, If a tenant engages in repetitive conduct that is the subject of
notices under this subsection, after two incidents of the same type
documented by the landlord within a twelve month period or after receipt by
the landlord of two written complaints from other tenants about the
repetitive conduct within a twelve month period, the landlord may deliver a
written notice to the tenant specifying the repetitive conduct and the
documentation and advising the tenant that on documentation of the next
incident of the same type final notice will be given and the rental
agreement or tenancy will be terminated thirty days after the date of the
notice.
5. If a tenant has been involved in three or more documented
incidents of conduct of any type described in this section within a twelve
month period, the landlord may deliver a written notice to the tenant
specifying the conduct and the documentation and advising the tenant that
on documentation of the next incident final notice will be given and the
rental agreement or tenancy will be terminated thirty days after the date
of the notice.
E. If rent is unpaid when due and the tenant fails to pay rent
within seven days after written notice by the landlord of nonpayment and
the landlord's intention to terminate the rental agreement if the rent is
not paid within that period of time, the landlord may terminate the rental
agreement. Before judgment in an action brought by the landlord under this
subsection, the tenant may have the rental agreement reinstated by
tendering the past due but unpaid periodic rent, reasonable attorney's fees
incurred by the landlord and court costs, if any.
F, Except as provided in this chapter, the landlord may recover
actual damages, obtain injunctive relief or recover possession of the
-3-
House Amendments to H.B. 2381
1 premises pursuant to an action in forcible detainer for repeated
2 noncompliance by the tenant with the rental agreement or section 33-1451.
3 G. The remedy provided in subsection F of this section is in
4 addition to any right of the landlord arising under subsection D of this
5 section.
6 H. If a change in use is intended for the land on which a mobile
7 home park or a portion of a mobile home park is located and the landlord
8 intends eviction of a mobile home tenant due to a change in use, the
9 landlord shal] notify all tenants in the park in writing that:
10 1. The change in use may subsequently result in the termination of a
11 rental agreement.
12 2. The tenant being terminated due to the change in use will receive
13 a one hundred eighty day notice before the actual termination of the rental
14 agreement." |
15 Renumber to conform
16 Page 1, lines 16 and 26, strike “mobite—tome—retocatton” insert “mobile home
17 relocation”
18 Amend title to conform
MATT GRESS
2381GRESS2.docx
01/27/2023
10:00 AM
H: PRB/Is
Attachment {4
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legislature - First Regular Session
ROLL CALL VOTE
COMMITTEE ON Commerce BILL NO. HB 2381
DATE January 31, 2023 MOTION: p
PASS AYE NAY PRESENT | ABSENT
Aguilar
Austin
Carter
Gress
Heap
Hendrix
Ortiz
Sun
Carbone, Vice-Chairman
Wilmeth, Chairman
© | O
LuLu ) Doin
/ COMMITTEE SECRETARY
APPROV
STIN WILMETH, Chairman
MICHAEL CARBONE, Vice-Chairman
ATTACHMENT_ {4
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legislature
First Regular Session
HB 2498: do-not-call list; text messages
Sponsor: Representative Griffin, LD 19
Committee on Commerce
Overview
Prohibits a seller or solicitor from sending a text message to a number that is on the national do-
not-call registry.
History
A telephone solicitation is any voice communication from a live operator, announcing device or
otherwise that offers merchandise for sale or rent and that is to or from a person located in this
state (A.R.S. § 44-1271).
A seller or solicitor is prohibited from initiating an outbound telephone solicitation call if the number
is registered in the national do-not-call registry established by the Federal Trade Commission.
However, certain telephone solicitations are permitted if made under the following circumstances:
1) regarding a consumer agreement for past or present employment; 2) responding to a referral;
3) with consumer's permission; or 4) responding to an express request. Furthermore, a seller or
solicitor who unlawfully calls a number on the do-not-call registry may be investigated by the
Attorney General and subjected to a civil penalty of up to $1,000 per violation (A.R.S. § 44-1282).
Provisions .
1. Prohibits a seller or solicitor from sending a text message to a number that is on the national
do-not-call registry. (Sec 1. )
2. Makes a technical change. (Sec. 1)
Uj Prop 105 (45 votes) 0 Prop 108 (40 votes) O Emergency (40 votes) 1 Fiscal Note
HB 2498
Initials PRB Page 1 Commerce
Attachment IG
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legislature - First Regular Session
ROLL CALL VOTE
COMMITTEE ON Commerce BILL NO. HB 2498
DATE January 31, 2023 motion: DP
PASS AYE NAY PRESENT ; ABSENT
Aguilar J
Austin vA
Carter ; / . J
Gress | /
Heap VA
Hendrix vA
Ortiz VA
Sun J.
Carbone, Vice-Chairman vA ;
Wilmeth, Chairman W/
LO ) o) O
APPROVE: ' JL. / COMMITTEE SECRETARY
JSTIN WILMETH, Chairman
ICHAEL CARBONE, Vice-Chairman
ATTACHMENT. {7
File and source
- File
- 2023-01-31_commerce-minutes.pdf
- Size
- 2,524,171 bytes
- SHA-256
- e1256cec755b92833e34c353e38a92abda714fb09bbac34945a1d7cd4ea86a6a
- Our copy
- 2023-01-31_commerce-minutes.pdf
- Original
- www.azleg.gov