Cleveland Fed Industries PPP Loans 2021
Summary
Economic Commentary Number 2021-08, dated April 1, 2021 and published by the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, titled Which Industries Received PPP Loans? and written by Mark E. Schweitzer and Garrett Borawski. The commentary examines small-business revenue losses during the COVID-19 pandemic and estimates the scale of Paycheck Protection Program loans by industry sector. It states that small businesses in most sectors received loans equivalent to between 80 percent and 120 percent of 10 weeks of their 2017 payrolls. It uses SBA loan data as of November 24, 2020, covering 5,155,987 loan records, and Census Bureau Statistics of US Businesses data, with tables on excluded loans and loan counts and average amounts by NAICS sector. The paper closes with endnotes and references.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
Number 2021-08
April 1, 2021
Which Industries Received PPP Loans?
Mark E. Schweitzer and Garrett Borawski*
We examine the financial challenges faced by small businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic and estimate the
scale of loans provided to small businesses through the Paycheck Protection Program. We find that the program
reached businesses throughout the economy, and we estimate that small businesses in most industry sectors
received loans equivalent to between 80 percent and 120 percent of 10 weeks of their 2017 payrolls. That
said, there are important differences in the distribution of funds across sectors that suggest some businesses
had problems accessing loans and that a significant number of firms with more than 500 employees likely used
alternative size criteria to qualify for the program.
The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic and the measures taken by We find that PPP loans were both large and widely sought
government officials to curb the spread of the coronavirus by US businesses. The support provided by PPP loans
drastically reduced revenue for many small businesses reached small businesses across most industry categories in
across the United States. Congress and the Treasury large enough amounts to support employment levels for at
Department recognized the scope of the challenges quickly least two and half months. Nonetheless, there are important
with the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security differences in the coverage of the program across industry
(CARES) Act. The act included funding for up to $659 billion sectors that are not just a function of the differing economic
of Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans earmarked for impact that the pandemic had on those industries.
small businesses. More money was devoted to this program
While it is challenging to isolate the impact of PPP loans
than any other in the fiscal response to the pandemic. The
given that policymakers intervened in the economy quite
intent of PPP loans was to provide “small businesses with
broadly, the facts that small-business employment recovered
the resources they need to maintain their payroll, hire back
more quickly than that of larger businesses and that the
employees who may have been laid off, and cover applicable
number of bankruptcies to date has been limited point to
overhead.”1 As long as businesses document certain
the impact of the program. A better understanding of the
conditions, notably, maintaining or rehiring their workforces,
program’s coverage and effectiveness is critical because
the PPP loan will be converted to a grant and be forgiven.
small businesses will likely continue to face challenges until
This Commentary examines the financial challenges faced the pandemic is over.
by small businesses during the pandemic and estimates
the impact of the PPP loan program by industry sectors.
*Mark E. Schweitzer is a senior vice president at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, and Garrett Borawski is a research analyst at the Bank. The views
authors express in Economic Commentary are theirs and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, or its staff.
Economic Commentary is published by the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and is available on the Cleveland Fed’s website at
www.clevelandfed.org/research. To receive an email when a new Economic Commentary is posted, subscribe at www.clevelandfed.org/subscribe-EC.
ISSN 2163-3738 DOI: 10.26509/frbc-ec-202108
Impact of the Pandemic on Small-Business Revenues owners how they would respond to an unexpected financial
Data on the pandemic’s impact on small-business revenues loss equal to two months of revenues. Seventeen percent of
are available from Opportunity Insights, a research institute respondents reported that they would either close or sell the
associated with Harvard and Brown Universities. The business.(Federal Reserve Banks, 2020). Larger percentages
institute obtains data from payment transactions and has of respondents reported that they would lay off employees
reported revenues for four categories of small businesses (33 percent), downsize operations (30 percent), or defer
since January 10, 2020.2 The data show that small expenses (29 percent) as nonexclusive methods to reduce costs.
businesses in all of these categories have experienced large We will probably never have a complete accounting of the
revenue shortfalls since the beginning of 2020. Revenues in revenue losses of small businesses, but if we accumulate the
the leisure and hospitality category were down about daily revenue losses of the retail and transportation sector
70 percent initially and down persistently about 45 percent in 2020 as reported by Opportunity Insights, we see that on
through December 2020 (figure 1). The categories of average small businesses in the sector lost 1.5 months’ worth
education and health services and retail and transportation of revenue. For the harder-hit set of leisure and hospitality
also experienced smaller but still large and persistent companies, the Opportunity Insight data indicate 5.4 months’
revenue losses. worth of lost revenue between March and December.
Many anecdotal sources corroborate the Opportunity Despite the clear loss of revenues, a surprising number of
Insights data and support the conjecture that revenue losses businesses appear to have avoided permanent closure due to
experienced by small businesses during this recession have the pandemic. A frequently cited statistic on small-business
been more sudden and far larger than during a typical failures, reported by the Society of Human Resource
recession. The Society for Human Resource Management Management and based on the same survey conducted
(SHRM) reported that 42 percent of the small business in mid-April 2020, is that 52 percent of small businesses
owners it surveyed had to close their businesses temporarily expected to be out of business within six months if the
because of the pandemic, and 62 percent of small businesses COVID-19 pandemic continued (SHRM, 2020).
reported a general decrease in revenue. This survey was
But despite the large shock to revenues, business
conducted in mid-April 2020, indicating how suddenly this
bankruptcy filings had not accelerated as of December 2020
recession impacted small businesses (SHRM, 2020).
(the latest data available; see figure 2). During the Great
The scale of these revenue losses is large enough that many Recession, business bankruptcies had risen 58 percent by
of these small businesses likely would have failed had they the eleventh month of the recession, but by the same point
received no assistance. A Federal Reserve Small Business in this recession, bankruptcies have fallen 25 percent. Small
Credit Survey conducted in 2019 asked small-business businesses can close without filing for bankruptcy, but
Figure 1. Small-Business Revenues in 2020 Figure 2. Business Bankruptcies
Percent change in small-business revenue Number of business bankruptcy filings
25 6,000
15
5 5,000
-5
4,000
-15
-25 3,000
-35
2,000
-45
-55
1,000
-65
-75 0
1/2020 3/2020 5/2020 7/2020 9/2020 11/2020 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020
Professional and business services: –10.2
Retail and transportation: –18.9
Education and health services: –22.0
Leisure and hospitality: –63.7
Sources: Womply. Calculations provided by Opportunity Insights, Note: Shaded bars indicate recessions.
Economic Tracker. First observation: January 10, 2020. Last Source: Administrative Office of the US Courts, retrieved from
observation: December 31, 2020 (daily). Haver Analytics. Last observation: December 2020.
2
bankruptcy counts typically include a large number of small The CARES Act allowed for some firms with more than
businesses. Greenwood, Iverson, and Thesmar (2020) use 500 employees to qualify for loans using the SBA size
a simple model to predict that bankruptcies for businesses standard applicable for their specific industry.7 For example,
of all sizes will rise 140 percent from 2019 levels, although carpet and rug mills with fewer than 1,500 employees and
according to this simple model, some of this rise should home builders with any employment level and annual
already be evident. How the bankruptcy status of small receipts of less than $39.5 million would qualify for PPP
businesses actually evolves could have big implications on loans. In addition, the SBA further extended its criteria
the economic outlook for both employment and investment: on April 6, 2020, to any business with a tangible net
Weak small-business growth hindered the recovery from worth of less than $15 million and an average net income
the Great Recession. Fortunately, today’s bankruptcy data over the previous two fiscal years of less than $5 million.
are not following that pattern to date. PPP loans have Unfortunately, we cannot use these SBA’s alternative size
likely played an important part in reducing the number of standards to identify firms that qualified for loans. The
bankruptcies, but fully evaluating the causal impacts of PPP standards are not available in the SUSB data, and the SBA
loans on this outcome will be econometrically challenging, did not collect information on the standard that the business
and the required data are not yet available. used to claim that it qualified. In addition, the inspector
general of the SBA identified “355 businesses that obtained
Data on PPP Loans by Sector PPP loans totaling approximately $856 million dollars that
To begin to evaluate the impact of PPP loans, we need to may have been erroneously approved” because they were
know how many businesses the program reached, how larger than 500 and did not meet the applicable alternative
generously the program reached businesses in different standard (Inspector General, 2021). So while an imperfect
industry sectors, and how large the loans were relative to indicator for qualifying business, the 500-employee cutoff is
the size of the businesses that received them. In this section, the best criterion we have for identifying small businesses
we describe the data we use to obtain this information from and thus the one we use for our comparisons.
loan-level data.
Finally, to estimate how large the loans were relative to the
To identify the small businesses that obtained PPP loans, size of the businesses that got them, we use the SUSB data
we use Small Business Administration (SBA) data on PPP to determine the size of small businesses in each sector in
loans as of November 24, 2020, which we believe are the terms of average payroll. Again these data are from 2017.
most complete accounting for PPP loans made in 2020.3
These data provide the specific loan amounts, the name of To make these two data sources compatible, we need to
the beneficiary, and an NAICS code, which identifies the exclude three categories of loans from the PPP dataset.
industry sector of the firm. The data include 5,155,987 loan First, we exclude loans with a missing NAICS code or
records with a total value of approved loans of more than those that used 99, which is the code for unclassified
$522 billion. Both of these figures are updated from those businesses. Second, we exclude loans with NAICS codes
reported in the August 8 SBA release (date of program that are not part of the SUSB dataset; these are in the
completion), which were 5,212,128 loans and a total of public administration and rail transport sectors. These
$525 billion in approved loans. The reduction in the exclusions account for 235,671 loans, but these were
number of loans likely reflects the fact that some PPP loans substantially smaller loans on average.
were canceled while other loan amounts and other records A more complicated exclusion is nonemployer firms. We are
appear to have been corrected. These data almost certainly interested in employer firms rather than self-employment,
still contain some errors, but they are the most complete but self-employed individuals sometimes qualified and
report of PPP loan recipients available that can be used to applied for PPP loans. These are harder to identify in the
assign loans to sectors.4 PPP loan data than it would appear based on the SBA
To estimate the reach of the PPP by sector, we need to reports. Businesses list the number of “jobs reported,” which
know how many loans went to each sector as a percentage the SBA uses in its analysis, but these data are often missing
of the total number of small businesses in the sector. For or equal to zero or one for businesses that are likely to have
the total number of small businesses in each sector, we use significantly larger employment levels.8 The number of jobs
data from the Census Bureau’s Statistics of US Businesses reported did not influence the loan amount, so it is unclear
(SUSB) to identify a count of firms with fewer than 500 what respondents were basing their counts on. Another
employees by NAICS code.5 The SUSB data derive from anomaly is that “self-employed individual” is a reported
the Census Bureau’s Business Register, which uses tax and business type, but many loans of this type also list “jobs
other administrative records to track business entities with reported” higher than 1.
employees for the Census Bureau’s economic surveys.6 The We address these issues and isolate the employer firms as
most recent data available are from 2017. follows. There were cutoffs for what the loans could be
for firms that had no employees other than the owner.9 We
exclude all loans below these cutoffs if the firm getting the
3
loan was listed as a self-employed individual with zero, one,
Table 1. Data Excluded from the Analysis or a missing number for jobs. We also treat other firms
with missing, zero, or one reported jobs that were close to
Number of Average loan
loans amount ($) this loan threshold as nonemployers. Firms classified as a
“partnership” or “limited liability partnership” with two
Full dataset 5,155,987 101,419
jobs reported and that were close to the threshold are also
–Missing NAICS code 219,132 43,943 included. Finally, all firms classified as “tenant in common”
–Not included in SUSB data 16,539 125,659 are treated as nonemployers.
–Nonemployers 335,982 15,258
Our resulting count of self-employee firms that received
Identified employers 4,584,334 110,394 a PPP loan, 335,982, may appear small when compared
Source: Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Report, Small
to the number of self-employee firms reported in the 2017
Business Administration. Nonemployer Statistics Report—more than 25 million—but
most self-employed people probably did not take out a PPP
loan. Many would likely have benefited more from Pandemic
Unemployment Insurance coverage, and businesses were not
Table 2. PPP Loan Frequencies and Size by NAICS Sectors allowed to use both programs. Table 1 reports the number of
loans excluded for each of these reasons and their average
Number of Average loan amount, along with the number of loans to small-business
NAICS sector loans amount ($) employers remaining in the data after these exclusions and
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, their average amount.
134,277 58,786
and hunting
Mining, quarrying, and gas The Number and Average Size of Loans by Sector
20,429 219,994 Examining PPP loans by NAICS sector reveals that the
extraction
Utilities 7,928 188,179 loans were not distributed evenly to all sectors (table 2).
There are large concentrations in the number of loans to
Construction 470,515 137,189
the following sectors: construction; professional, scientific,
Manufacturing 231,582 232,819 and technical services; health care and social assistance;
Wholesale trade 165,999 165,325 retail trade; and other services. Other sectors received a
Retail trade 451,611 88,973 far smaller number of PPP loans; notably, utilities and
Transportation and management of companies and enterprises received fewer
192,621 86,947
warehousing than 1 percent of all PPP loans. The average loan size also
Information 68,417 134,524 varies substantially in a distinct manner across sectors, with
Finance and insurance 161,261 73,186 small businesses in the manufacturer sector obtaining an
average loan of $232,819, while firms in the other services
Real estate and rental and
226,105 66,205 sector got an average loan of just $58,645.
leasing
Profesisonal, scientific, and The SBA noted that the PPP reached most industries, while
609,838 107,303
technical services media outlets reported that certain industries were large
Management of companies beneficiaries of the program. While both of these claims are
8,780 175,008
and enterprises true, they leave unexplored questions about the reach of the
Administration, support, and program to small businesses within each sector. To answer
239,053 109,748
waste management those questions more precisely, we compare the number
Educational services 81,889 146,158 of PPP loans that went to each sector as a percentage of
Health care and social the number of small businesses in the sector. As explained
494,017 135,632 above, the total number of small businesses in each sector is
assistance
Arts, entertainment, and calculated using data from 2017.
118,109 67,853
recreation Overall, we estimate that the loans made would represent
Accommodation and food 76 percent of employer firms with fewer than 500 employees.
374,184 112,893
services Some businesses may have been dissuaded from applying
Other services (excluding either because they needed to certify that they were being
527,719 58,645
public administration adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic or because
Total 4,584,334 110,394 they would have to retain their employees in order to see
the loan forgiven; businesses experiencing minor effects
Sources: Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Report, Small or businesses that were unable to call back employees may
Business Administration; Census Bureau, Statistics of US not have applied for PPP loans. Also, not all firms were
Businesses (SUSB). adversely affected by the pandemic. Even at the point during
the pandemic at which small-business revenues were at their
4
lowest (April 26 to May 2), more than 10 percent of firms February 2020 it declined by 7.2 percent, making a sharp
reported that they were either little or positively affected by rise in the number of firms since 2017 unlikely.11
the pandemic, according to a Census Bureau survey.10 With
Another sector in which more small businesses received
a new round of PPP loans signed in to law in December
PPP loans than existed in 2017 is utilities. About half of
2020, it will be interesting to see how many additional firms
the businesses in the sector that took out PPP loans are in
request a PPP loan for the first time and how many firms
power generation, with a concentration in solar generation
apply for a second PPP loan.
and other electric power generation, a subset of the sector
In most sectors, about 70 percent of small businesses that has actually experienced a decrease in employment of
received a PPP loan (figure 3). However, some sectors had 2.6 percent since 2017.12 It is possible for the number of
considerably more coverage; in a few cases, the number of firms to grow despite employment losses, but the difference
firms receiving PPP loans in the sector even exceeded the between the number of firms taking out PPP loans and the
number of small businesses that existed in that sector as of number of existing businesses recorded in the 2017 SUSB
2017. One reason the percentage of firms receiving loans data is quite large; that is, the difference would indicate
could have exceeded number of small businesses is that that a large number of relatively small firms had to have
some firms used the alternative SBA size standard for their been added in this sector since 2017. The power generation
industry when applying for the loan, as was permitted by subsection of utilities had more than double the number of
the CARES Act. loans relative to firms listed in 2017, which suggests that
further verification of the growth of small businesses in
One of the sectors that stands out is mining, quarrying,
power generation might be warranted. The remaining loans
and oil and gas exploration. In this sector, 9 percent more
made to the sector were concentrated in water and sewage
businesses received PPP loans than existed in SUSB
systems, where the number of firms receiving a PPP loan
records in 2017. Most of the PPP loans that went to this
was about 92 percent of the 2017 count of small firms.
sector went to oil and gas extraction and support activities
for mining (80 percent), which were severely impacted by Transportation and warehousing is another sector in which
the pandemic when oil and gas prices fell sharply. The more firms received PPP loans than existed in 2017
number of firms that could potentially qualify for loans in (5 percent more loans than the number of companies). The
this sector is hard to determine, but SBA standards allow bulk of these loans were made to trucking companies, which
oil and gas extraction firms with up to 1,250 employees and received more than 57 percent of the PPP loans made to
service firms with receipts less than $41.5 million to apply. the sector. This is another industry sector that has seen
While employment in the oil and gas exploration sector substantial employment growth since 2017. It seems possible
grew earlier in the decade, between February 2017 and that a surprisingly large number of small businesses were
Figure 3. Percentage of Small Businesses Getting a PPP Loan by Sector
Number of PPP loans as a share of
number of firms in 2017 (percent)
Mining, quarrying, and gas extraction 109.1
Utilities 137.8
Construction 67.2
Manufacturing 94.9
Wholesale trade 56.3
Retail trade 69.9
Transportation and warehousing 105.4
Information 87.2
Finance and insurance 68.1
Real estate and rental and leasing 73.4
Professional, scientific, and technical services 75.5
Management of companies and enterprises 45.9
Administration support, and waste management 69.5
Educational services 88.9
Health care and social assistance 75.9
Arts, entertainment, and recreation 91.4
Accommodation and food services 69.6
Other services (excluding public administration) 75.9
0 50 100 150
Note: The total number of firms in each sector is determined using SUSB data from 2017 (the latest available).
Sources: Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Report, Small Business Administration; Census Bureau, Statistics of US Businesses
(SUSB).
5
created in this sector over the last three years and that the The wholesale trading sector appears to have taken out
take-up rate of PPP loans was relatively high. fewer PPP loans, with 56 percent of small businesses in
the sector taking out loans. There is no pattern in the PPP
There are also sectors which appear to have to unusually
loan data that explains why fewer wholesalers participated,
low levels of loans compared to the number of firms in the
but it is a sector that has seen below-average employment
sector with fewer than 500 employees as of 2017. To the
growth since 2017. From February 2017 to February 2020,
extent that these outcomes were not intentional or did not
employment grew by just 1.6 percent, substantially less than
reflect the differing extent to which firms were adversely
the 4.6 percent growth seen for total nonfarm employment
impacted by the pandemic, they may suggest that some
during that period.13 Given that wholesalers are likely to have
aspect of the program’s design had consequences on the
been impacted by the general retail trade slowdown, this low
take-up rate.
participation rate suggests the sector could be one example of
Management of companies and enterprises, a sector which the program reaching fewer businesses than desired.
largely includes the offices of holding companies, stands
out for its relatively low loan participation rate. The PPP The Scale of PPP Loans by Sector
was designed in a such a way that the bulk of lending Next we assess how the total amount of PPP lending was
would likely have gone to active subsidiaries, and most of distributed across different sectors in terms of payroll
the employment that is reported would have been coded in expenses. Did some sectors receive more financial support
other sectors. So despite being one of the largest outliers, than others? As was shown in table 2, the average size of
this result seems to be consistent with the program’s design. PPP loans varies substantially by sector, but this finding
could simply reflect the size of the small businesses in
Interestingly, the accommodation and food service sector, those sectors. The PPP loan program was designed to
where firms were specifically allowed to receive loans even cover payroll expenses, and even for small businesses,
if their employment size exceeded SBA thresholds, has a employment is concentrated in the larger of those firms.
relatively low number of loans compared to the number To evaluate the scale of PPP loans made to each sector, we
of firms with fewer than 500 employees as of 2017. In this make loan amounts comparable by expressing them as a
sector, businesses were able to apply if they had subsidiaries share of 10 weeks of the sector’s payroll payments in the
or franchises with fewer than 500 employees. This allowed 2017 SUSB data. As can be seen in figure 4, many sectors
some relatively large firms to apply for loans for several received PPP funds equivalent to 90 percent to 110 percent
locations. This was the intended outcome, but the relatively of their 10-week payroll expenses.
low frequency of loans to this sector seems to indicate that
many businesses with more than 500 employees did not get
loans approved.
Figure 4. PPP Loan Amounts by Sector as a Share of 10 weeks of the Sector’s 2017 Payroll
PPP loan amount as a share
of 2017 wages (percent)
Mining, quarrying, and gas extraction 121.2
Utilities 89.5
Construction 108.4
Manufacturing 112.7
Wholesale trade 68.3
Retail trade 112.9
Transportation and warehousing 118.5
Information 63.8
Finance and insurance 38.2
Real estate and rental and leasing 105.5
Professional, scientific, and technical services 88.3
Management of companies and enterprises 24.3
Administration support, and waste management 94.5
Educational services 112.0
Health care and social assistance 94.6
Arts, entertainment, and recreation 80.5
Accommodation and food services 139.3
Other services (excluding public administration) 110.3
0 50 100 150
Note: The total number of firms in each sector is determined using SUSB data from 2017 (the latest available).
Sources: Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Report, Small Business Administration; Census Bureau, Statistics of US Businesses
(SUSB).
6
When compared in terms of payroll expenses, wholesalers This Commentary used detailed PPP loan data to examine
once again appeared to use the program less than other the reach and scale of the program. It is clear in the SBA’s
sectors, as they did when compared by percentage of loans data that the program was both large and widely received
to the sector. Sectors that appeared to use the program more by smaller US businesses. While high-frequency data
by percentage of loans to the sector (such as mining and show that revenue losses have been sharp and persistent
transportation) also received a larger share of the PPP loan for small businesses in hard-hit sectors such as leisure and
total in terms of payroll. hospitality, the program reached businesses throughout
the economy including less impacted sectors. We estimate
The accommodation and food services sector, which was
that small businesses in most sectors received between 80
specifically exempted in the CARES Act from the 500
percent and 120 percent of their 2017 payrolls for a 10-
employee maximum requirement, was granted an amount
week period. From these large loan amounts and the sheer
equivalent to 140 percent of its 2017 10-week payroll
number of loans made to some sectors, we conclude that a
through PPP loans. The SBA sets the maximum loan
substantial number of firms with employment levels above
amount at $10 million, and 19.1 percent of all loans made
500 employees received PPP loans.
at this maximum were provided to firms in this sector. This
allocation seemed to be within the Congressional intent We believe the differences in loan coverage may be an
surrounding the bill, but several large companies in the access issue rather than the result of businesses choosing
sector decided to return their PPP loans after it was made not to participate. Most small businesses should have been
public that they had received PPP funding. Some of these motivated to pursue PPP loans: By design, PPP loans
firms were criticized for taking on loans intended for smaller should become grants, and to the extent that the loans
businesses with less access to capital markets. do not get forgiven, the terms of the loans—a 1 percent
interest rate with deferred payment—would make them
On the other side of the average, finance and insurance
extraordinarily attractive for a small business in the midst
companies received a lower share of their 10-week 2017
of a recession. Access issues and coverage differences may
payroll expenses (38 percent) through the PPP, even though
result in differences in the performance of small businesses
68 percent of the companies in the sector are estimated
after the crisis, but at this point, the program looks to have
to have received a PPP loan. This outcome likely reflects
been strong enough to delay many bankruptcies.
the $100,000 per employee cap on support of payroll built
into the CARES Act; a substantial fraction of employees Footnotes
in the sector earn wages near or above $100,000. From the 1. See https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/
Occupational Employment Estimates Survey provided by assistance-for-small-businesses.
the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the 75th percentile annual
wage for the finance and insurance sector is above $90,000, 2. See https://www.tracktherecovery.org/.
and the 90th percentile annual wage is above $145,000.14 3. These data were made public after major media
A similar but less extreme difference can be seen in the outlets sued the SBA and Treasury under the Freedom of
information sector. This sector has received 64 percent Information Act to release the beneficiaries of PPP loans.
of its 10-week 2017 payroll expenses despite the fact that 4. There are observations with no business identified,
87 percent of companies in the sector received a PPP missing industry codes, and many observations with no
loan. However, subsections of this sector were impacted information on the number of jobs reported to be saved.
differently. The motion picture and video industry This is not unusual for large administrative datasets, and
received approximately 25 percent of the loans issued to the errors do not appear to be large enough to substantially
the information sector. This industry received about 82 hinder our analysis. For a report identifying similar
percent of its 10-week 2017 payroll expenses in PPP loans, problems with the SBA’s internal and public data, see Office
with about 92 percent of the firms in the industry having of the Inspector General (2021).
received a PPP loan; both of these values are significantly
higher than in the sector as whole. This result is congruent 5. The standard SBA cutoff for a small business is
with our expectations because the pandemic had a direct 500 employees although SBA rules allow firms with more
impact on this industry. than 500 employees to be counted as small in number of
narrowly defined industries.
Conclusion
6. SUSB data exclude nonemployer firms, along with data
Overall, PPP loans appeared to reach about 76 percent of
on private households, railroads, agricultural production,
US small businesses and to have covered 97 percent of a
and most government entities. We exclude the related
10-week period of their payrolls. In addition, PPP loans of
NAICS codes in the PPP loan data.
$5.3 billion were provided to 335,982 businesses that we
identified as likely having no employees. As Hubbard and 7. A full list of SBA size standards can be found in the
Strain (2020) indicate, the PPP was a novel program deviating Federal Register, Title 13, chapter 1, §121.201. See
intentionally from traditional stimulus programs to focus on Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR).
small businesses struggling financially during the pandemic.
7
8. An examination of loans shows that 19.7 percent References
of missing, 0, or 1 employee firms were classified as Greenwood, Robin, Benjamin Iverson, and David Thesmar.
corporations, a percentage that seems far too high because 2020. “Sizing Up Corporate Restructuring in the COVID
they have so few employees. Crisis.” NBER Working Paper No. 28104. https://doi.
org/10.3386/w28104.
9. Business owners were capped on the loan amount that
could be associated with their own compensation, primarily Hubbard, R. Glenn, and Michael R. Strain. 2020. “Has the
at $20,833. A large number of loan records for all business Paycheck Protection Program Succeeded?” Brookings Papers
types appear exactly at the cap values or just below it, on Economic Activity, BPEA Conference Drafts. https://doi.
which likely indicates that the loan application contained no org/10.3386/w28032.
employee payroll information beyond the owner/operator.
Federal Reserve Banks. 2020. Small Business Credit Survey,
A cap of $15,385 was used if firms applied before June 5,
Report on Employer Firms. Federal Reserve Banks of
2020, and used an 8-week coverage period.
Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, Kansas City,
10. Small Business Pulse Survey Data, US Census Bureau. Minneapolis, New York, Philadelphia, Richmond, St. Louis,
See https://portal.census.gov/pulse/data/#data. and San Francisco. https://www.fedsmallbusiness.org/
survey/2020/report-on-employer-firms.
11. Data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current
Employment Statistics. https://data.bls.gov/PDQWeb/ce. Office of the Inspector General. 2021. “Inspection of SBA’s
Implementation of the Paycheck Protection Program.”
12. Data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current
Small Business Administration, Report Number 21-07.
Employment Statistics. https://data.bls.gov/PDQWeb/ce.
https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/2021-01/SBA%20
13. Data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly OIG%20Report-21-07.pdf?utm_medium=email&utm_
Current Employment Statistics. https://data.bls.gov/ source=govdelivery.
PDQWeb/ce.
SHRM. 2020. “Navigating COVID: Impact of the
14. US Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2019 National Pandemic on Small Businesses.” Society for Human
Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Resource Management. https://shrm.org/hr-today/trends-
Estimates. and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/documents/shrm%20
cv19%20sbo%20research%20presentation%20v1.1.pdf.
8
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
License. This paper and its data are subject to revision; please visit clevelandfed.org for
updates.
File and source
- File
- cleveland-fed-industries-ppp-loans-2021.pdf
- Size
- 368,503 bytes
- SHA-256
- 5dc22384d177aec874802aa97be5bc8b46040df04e9690f485f2e3b84a0b67b6
- Original
- www.clevelandfed.org