Case Summary — U.S.A. v. Ramiro Da Rosa Mendes — No. 2:22-cr-00370 (Dkt. 2, C.D. Cal.)
Summary
This Central District of California criminal case summary (form CR-72), filed 08/16/22, accompanies the information against Ramiro Da Rosa Mendes in Case 2:22-cr-00370. It lists the investigating agencies as FHFA-OIG, IRS-CI, FBI and USPIS, a felony charge under 18 U.S.C. 1343, an offense date of June 29, 2020 and Los Angeles County in the Western Division. The form names Jeffrey Rubenstein as previous counsel and lists two related cases, United States v. Mateus Pina Mendes and United States v. Ammon Jose De Pina Mendes. Government fraud and mail/wire fraud are marked as the areas of substantive law. It is signed by Scott Paetty (AUSA) and Jennifer Bilinkas (DOJ Trial Attorney) and dated 08/12/2022.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
Reset Form Case 2:22-cr-00370-PA UNITED STATES
Document DISTRICT
2 Filed COURT
08/16/22 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE SUMMARY
8/16/2022
Case Number 2:22-cr-00370-JFW Defendant Number 1
JB
U.S.A. v. Ramiro Da Rosa Mendes Year of Birth 1961
Indictment ✔ Information Investigative agency (FBI, DEA, etc.) FHFA-OIG, IRS-CI, FBI, USPIS
NOTE: All items MUST be completed. If you do not know the answer or a question is not applicable to your case, enter "N/A."
OFFENSE/VENUE PREVIOUSLY FILED COMPLAINT/CVB CITATION
a. Offense charged as a: A complaint/CVB citation was previously filed on: N/A
Case Number:
Class A Misdemeanor Minor Offense Petty Offense
Assigned Judge:
Class B Misdemeanor Class C Misdemeanor ✔ Felony
Charging:
b. Date of Offense June 29, 2020
The complaint/CVB citation:
c. County in which first offense occurred
is still pending
Los Angeles County was dismissed on:
d. The crimes charged are alleged to have been committed in
(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): PREVIOUS COUNSEL
Was defendant previously represented? No ✔ Yes
✔ Los Angeles Ventura
IF YES, provide Name: Jeffrey Rubenstein
Orange Santa Barbara
Phone Number: 310-795-7739
Riverside San Luis Obispo
COMPLEX CASE
San Bernardino Other Are there 8 or more defendants in the Indictment/Information?
Yes* ✔ No
Citation of Offense 18 U.S.C. 1343
Will more than 12 days be required to present government's
evidence in the case-in-chief?
Yes* ✔ No
e. Division in which the MAJORITY of events, acts, or omissions
giving rise to the crime or crimes charged occurred: *AN ORIGINAL AND 1 COPY (UNLESS ELECTRONICALLY FILED)
OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLEX CASE MUST BE FILED AT THE
✔ Western (Los Angeles, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura) TIME THE INDICTMENT IS FILED IF EITHER "YES" BOX IS
CHECKED.
Eastern (Riverside and San Bernardino) Southern (Orange)
SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT/INFORMATION
RELATED CASE IS THIS A NEW DEFENDANT? Yes No
Has an indictment or information involving this defendant and This is the superseding charge (i.e., 1st, 2nd).
the same transaction or series of transactions been previously The superseding case was previously filed on:
filed and dismissed before trial?
✔ No Yes
Case Number
If "Yes," Case Number:
The superseded case:
Pursuant to General Order 21-01, criminal cases may be related
if a previously filed indictment or information and the present is still pending before Judge/Magistrate Judge
case:
a. arise out of the same conspiracy, common scheme,
transaction, series of transactions or events; or was previously dismissed on
b. involve one or more defendants in common, and would Are there 8 or more defendants in the superseding case?
entail substantial duplication of labor in pretrial, trial or Yes* No
sentencing proceedings if heard by different judges. Will more than 12 days be required to present government's
evidence in the case-in-chief?
Related case(s), if any (MUST MATCH NOTICE OF RELATED
Yes* No
CASE): United States v. Mateus Pina Mendes;
Was a Notice of Complex Case filed on the Indictment or
United States v. Ammon Jose De Pina Mendes Information?
Yes No
*AN ORIGINAL AND 1 COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLEX CASE
MUST BE FILED AT THE TIME THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT IS
FILED IF EITHER "YES" BOX IS CHECKED.
CR-72 (03/21) CASE SUMMARY Page 1 of 2
Case 2:22-cr-00370-PA UNITED STATES
Document DISTRICT
2 Filed COURT
08/16/22 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE SUMMARY
INTERPRETER CUSTODY STATUS
Is an interpreter required? YES ✔ NO Defendant is not in custody:
IF YES, list language and/or dialect: a. Date and time of arrest on complaint: N/A
b. Posted bond at complaint level on:
in the amount of $
OTHER No
c. PSA supervision? Yes
✔ Male Female d. Is on bail or release from another district:
✔ U.S. Citizen Alien
Alias Name(s) Defendant is in custody:
a. Place of incarceration: State Federal
This defendant is charged in: b. Name of Institution:
✔ All counts c. If Federal, U.S. Marshals Service Registration Number:
Only counts:
d. Solely on this charge. Date and time of arrest:
This defendant is designated as "High Risk" per
18 USC § 3146(a)(2) by the U.S. Attorney. e. On another conviction: Yes No
This defendant is designated as "Special Case" per
IF YES : State Federal Writ of Issue
18 USC § 3166(b)(7).
Yes ✔ No f. Awaiting trial on other charges: Yes No
Is defendant a juvenile?
IF YES, should matter be sealed? Yes No IF YES : State Federal AND
Name of Court:
The area(s) of substantive law that will be involved in this case
Date transferred to federal custody:
include(s):
financial institution fraud public corruption This person/proceeding is transferred from another district
pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. 20 21 40
✔ government fraud tax offenses
environmental issues ✔ mail/wire fraud
narcotics offenses immigration offenses
violent crimes/firearms corporate fraud
Other
EXCLUDABLE TIME
Determinations as to excludable time prior to filing indictment/information. EXPLAIN: N/A
Date 08/12/2022
Signature of Assistant U.S. Attorney
Scott Paetty (AUSA); Jennifer Bilinkas (DOJ Trial Attorney)
Print Name
CR-72 (03/21) CASE SUMMARY Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cacd.860450.2.0.pdf
- Size
- 173,565 bytes
- SHA-256
- e840350eae57537de4244168bfb5c3f2a8e1e532398738fa7c62514df911595f
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.cacd.860450.2.0.pdf
- Original
- archive.org