Case Summary — U.S.A. v. Fontrell Antonio Baines — No. 2:20-cr-00522 (Dkt. 12, C.D. Cal.)
Summary
This Central District of California case summary form (CR-72), filed October 27, 2020 in U.S.A. v. Fontrell Antonio Baines, No. 2:20-cr-00522-MWF, accompanies the charging document. It names DOL-OIG and IRS-CI as the investigative agencies and lists felony charges under 18 USC 1341, 1029(a)(2), 1028A(a)(1) and 2314, for offenses dated July 2020 to September 2020 in Los Angeles County. A complaint was previously filed on 10/15/2020 in case LA20-mj-04992 before Hon. Alexander F. MacKinnon and is marked still pending. The form lists the alias Nuke Bizzle, marks the defendant as in federal custody at MDC, and gives identity theft and interstate transportation of stolen property among the areas of law involved. Assistant U.S. Attorney Ranee A. Katzenstein signed it.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
FILED
Reset FormCase 2:20-cr-00522-MWF UNITED STATES
Document 12 DISTRICT COURTPage 1 of 2
Filed 10/27/20 Page ID #:63 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10/27/2020
CASE SUMMARY CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DM
BY: ___________________ DEPUTY
Case Number 2:20-cr-00522-MWF Defendant Number 1
U.S.A. v. Fontrell Antonio Baines Year of Birth 1989
✔ Indictment Information Investigative agency (FBI, DEA, etc.) DOL-OIG, IRS-CI
NOTE: All items MUST be completed. If you do not know the answer or a question is not applicable to your case, enter "N/A."
OFFENSE/VENUE PREVIOUSLY FILED COMPLAINT/CVB CITATION
a. Offense charged as a: A complaint/CVB citation was previously filed on: 10/15/2020
Case Number: LA20-mj-04992
Class A Misdemeanor Minor Offense Petty Offense
Assigned Judge: Hon. Alexander F. MacKinnon
Class B Misdemeanor Class C Misdemeanor ✔ Felony
Charging: 18 USC 1029(a)(2), 1028A(a)(1), 2314
b. Date of Offense July 2020- September 2020
The complaint/CVB citation:
c. County in which first offense occurred
✔ is still pending
Los Angeles was dismissed on:
d. The crimes charged are alleged to have been committed in
(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): PREVIOUS COUNSEL
Was defendant previously represented? No ✔ Yes
✔ Los Angeles Ventura
IF YES, provide Name: Ashley Mahmoudian
Orange Santa Barbara
Phone Number: 213 894-1442
Riverside San Luis Obispo
COMPLEX CASE
✔ San Bernardino Other Are there 8 or more defendants in the Indictment/Information?
Yes* ✔ No
Citation of Offense 18 USC 1341, 1029(a)(2), 1028A(a)(1),
Will more than 12 days be required to present government's
2314 evidence in the case-in-chief?
Yes* ✔ No
e. Division in which the MAJORITY of events, acts, or omissions
giving rise to the crime or crimes charged occurred: *AN ORIGINAL AND 1 COPY (UNLESS ELECTRONICALLY FILED)
OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLEX CASE MUST BE FILED AT THE
✔ Western (Los Angeles, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura) TIME THE INDICTMENT IS FILED IF EITHER "YES" BOX IS
CHECKED.
Eastern (Riverside and San Bernardino) Southern (Orange)
SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT/INFORMATION
RELATED CASE IS THIS A NEW DEFENDANT? Yes No
Has an indictment or information involving this defendant and This is the N/A superseding charge (i.e., 1st, 2nd).
the same transaction or series of transactions been previously The superseding case was previously filed on:
filed and dismissed before trial?
N/A
✔ No Yes
Case Number N/A
If "Yes," Case Number: N/A
The superseded case:
Pursuant to General Order 19-03, criminal cases may be related
if a previously filed indictment or information and the present is still pending before Judge/Magistrate Judge
case: N/A
a. arise out of the same conspiracy, common scheme,
transaction, series of transactions or events; or was previously dismissed on N/A
b. involve one or more defendants in common, and would Are there 8 or more defendants in the superseding case?
entail substantial duplication of labor in pretrial, trial or Yes* No
sentencing proceedings if heard by different judges. Will more than 12 days be required to present government's
evidence in the case-in-chief?
Related case(s), if any (MUST MATCH NOTICE OF RELATED
Yes* No
CASE): N/A
Was a Notice of Complex Case filed on the Indictment or
Information?
Yes No
*AN ORIGINAL AND 1 COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLEX CASE
MUST BE FILED AT THE TIME THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT IS
FILED IF EITHER "YES" BOX IS CHECKED.
CR-72 (03/19) CASE SUMMARY Page 1 of 2
Case 2:20-cr-00522-MWF UNITED STATES
Document 12 DISTRICT COURTPage 2 of 2 Page ID #:64
Filed 10/27/20
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE SUMMARY
INTERPRETER CUSTODY STATUS
Is an interpreter required? YES ✔ NO Defendant is not in custody:
IF YES, list language and/or dialect: a. Date and time of arrest on complaint: N/A
b. Posted bond at complaint level on: N/A
N/A
in the amount of $
OTHER No
c. PSA supervision? Yes
✔ Male Female d. Is on bail or release from another district:
✔ U.S. Citizen Alien
Alias Name(s) Nuke Bizzle Defendant is in custody:
a. Place of incarceration: State ✔ Federal
This defendant is charged in: b. Name of Institution: MDC
✔ All counts c. If Federal, U.S. Marshals Service Registration Number:
Only counts:
d. ✔ Solely on this charge. Date and time of arrest:
This defendant is designated as "High Risk" per
18 USC § 3146(a)(2) by the U.S. Attorney. e. On another conviction: Yes No
This defendant is designated as "Special Case" per
IF YES : State Federal Writ of Issue
18 USC § 3166(b)(7).
Yes ✔ No f. Awaiting trial on other charges: Yes No
Is defendant a juvenile?
IF YES, should matter be sealed? Yes No IF YES : State Federal AND
Name of Court:
The area(s) of substantive law that will be involved in this case
Date transferred to federal custody:
include(s):
financial institution fraud public corruption This person/proceeding is transferred from another district
pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. 20 21 40
✔ government fraud tax offenses
environmental issues mail/wire fraud
narcotics offenses immigration offenses
violent crimes/firearms corporate fraud
✔ Other Identity Theft, Interstate Transportation of
Stolen Property
EXCLUDABLE TIME
Determinations as to excludable time prior to filing indictment/information. EXPLAIN: N/A
Date 10/27/2020
Signature of Assistant U.S. Attorney
Ranee A. Katzenstein
Print Name
CR-72 (03/19) CASE SUMMARY Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cacd.800206.12.0.pdf
- Size
- 56,102 bytes
- SHA-256
- ed3271ba87ff16e672a31035d30ec835e72b6372d2e89ee5ed8efe5d0f6b81dd
- Original
- archive.org