Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Complaint for Damages — El Dorado v. First Service Bank

Complaint for Damages — El Dorado v. First Service Bank

Summary

A Complaint for Damages filed January 7, 2025 as Dkt 1 in adversary proceeding 25-06002-JAW, brought by El Dorado Gas & Oil, Inc., the Chapter 11 debtor in No. 23-51715-JAW, and Thomas L. Swarek against First Service Bank in the federal bankruptcy court for the Southern District of Mississippi. The complaint states that on September 17, 2020 the debtor entered into a Mainstreet Loan of $50,000,000.00 with the bank. It alleges the bank interfered with the debtor's business, controlled its bank account, charged unreasonable expenses to the loan and refused restructuring before declaring default. It also alleges the bank refused to subordinate a $4,000,000 secured position needed for a $15,000,000 payment. The plaintiffs assert breach of contract, lender liability, interference, fraud and breach of the covenant of good faith, and seek damages and attorney fees.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

     25-06002-JAW Dkt 1 Filed 01/07/25 Entered 01/07/25 09:20:29 Page 1 of 4




                    IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPCTY COURT
                    FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
                               SOUTHERN DISTRICT

IN RE: EL DORADO GAS & OIL, INC.                                               CHAPTER 11
                                                                           NO. 23-51715-JAW

EL DORADO GAS & OIL, INC. Debtor, and                                            PLAINTIFFS
THOMAS L. SWAREK, Interested Party

v.                                                                NO. ____________________

FIRST SERVICE BANK                                                             DEFENDANT




                               COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES


       COME NOW, El Dorado Gas & Oil, Inc. and Thomas Swarek and for their Complaint

for Damages against First Service Bank, state the following:


       1.      El Dorado Gas & Oil, Inc. is an Arkansas corporation in good standing and the

Debtor in this matter.

       2.      Thomas L. Swarek, as an adult resident citizen of Mississippi and is the sole

shareholder and Chief Executive Officer of El Dorado Gas & Oil, Inc.

       3.      First Service Bank is an Arkansas State Bank and may be served with process upon

its Registered Agent at 486 Highway 65 North, Clinton, Arkansas 72031.

       4.      On September 17, 2020, El Dorado Gas & Oil, Inc. entered into the Mainstreet

Loan in the amount of $50,000,000.00 with Defendant First Service Bank.

       5.      Defendant intentionally and without justification interfered with the business of

EDGO to the extent that EDGO was unable to comply with its obligations to Defendant.




                                                1
    25-06002-JAW Dkt 1 Filed 01/07/25 Entered 01/07/25 09:20:29 Page 2 of 4




       6.      Defendant violated the terms and provisions of the August 2020 directive from the

Federal Reserve regarding loan abatement and discriminated against EDGO in doing so.

       7.      These were conditions that applied, and they applied prior to execution of the

Mainstreet Loan in September of 2020.

       8.      As an example, Defendant commenced an action to remove EDGO from the

position of operator of oil wells in Texas, effectively forcing EDGO into a receivership.

       9.      In this way the Defendant took literal control of EDGO away from its principal,

Thomas Swarek, controlling not only it’s bank accounts, but its business activities.

       10.     This dramatic interruption to the largest cash flow of these companies led to the

inability of EDGO to service the relating to the Mainstreet Loan.

       11.     Defendant further took control of the bank account of EDGO and controlled

spending out of that account in such a way that hampered the business of EDGO, including

withholding and delaying certain advances and payments to the detriment of EDGO.

       12.     Defendant failed to keep clear records regarding the loan and the account from

EDGO, hiding the expenses charged to the loan from EDGO.

       13.     Defendant was required to designate one person who would be well versed in the

details of the Mainstreet loan and other loans and options available to EDGO but failed to do this

to the detriment of EDGO.

       14.     Defendant charged unreasonable expenses to the loan, including private air travel.

       15.     Defendant further promised, at the inception of the Mainstreet Loan, that

restructuring, modification and interest credits would be made available.

       16.     Rather than doing so, Defendant refused these options and declared default, without

valid justification and despite offering these same benefits to others.




                                                  2
    25-06002-JAW Dkt 1 Filed 01/07/25 Entered 01/07/25 09:20:29 Page 3 of 4




       17.     All of this amounts to overreaching and taking an active role in micromanaging the

decisions of EDGO to the dramatic detriment of EDGO.

       18.     Certain other parties and guarantors, including Swarek, were prepared to make

payment in the amount of $15,000,000, a sum sufficient for all of these obligations to be brought

current.

       19.     To facilitate this lump sum payment, Swarek and EDGO requested a subordination

of Plaintiff’s $4,000,000 secured position in certain equipment of EDGO.

       20.     Defendant refused to do so and Swarek and EDGO lost access to that $15,000,000.

       21.     Plaintiff will specifically supplement this list of unlawful and illegal acts by the

Defendant.

       22.     These actions amount to a breach of contract and entitle EDGO to damages against

Defendant.

       23.     These actions create lender liability for the Defendant.

       24.     These actions amount to intentional interference with the business of EDGO.

       25.     These actions are discriminatory by the Defendant.

       26.     Violating these assurances made by the Defendant to EDGO and which EDGO

reasonably and justifiably believed and relied upon directly led to the failure of EDGO and the

liabilities asserted in this litigation and amount to fraud by the Defendant.

       27.     These actions amount to a misuse of federal funds and a failure to comply with

regulatory requirements and practices.

       28.     These actions violate the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

       29.     Defendant acted in a willful manner or at least with gross negligence.

       THEREFORE, El Dorado Gas & Oil, Inc. and Thomas Swarek demand from Defendant

First Service Bank damages in an amount necessary to compensate them for the wrongful and


                                                  3
    25-06002-JAW Dkt 1 Filed 01/07/25 Entered 01/07/25 09:20:29 Page 4 of 4




improper acts described above, including all of its attorney fees and expenses. El Dorado Gas &

Oil, Inc. and Thomas Swarek ask for such other relief as this Court may find merited under the

circumstances.

       Respectfully submitted, this the 7th day of January, 2025.


                                                    EL DORADO GAS & OIL, INC., DEBTOR
                                                    THOMAS L. SWAREK, INTERESTED PARTY

                                             BY:     /s/ Bradley T. Golmon
                                                    BRADLEY T. GOLMON, MSB #10261
                                                    Counsel for Defendants

OF COUNSEL:

HOLCOMB LAW GROUP
400 Enterprise Drive
Post Office Drawer 707
Oxford, Mississippi 38655
Phone: (662) 234-8775
Fax: (662) 238-7552




                                                4


File and source

File
CASE_MSSB_25-06002_El-Dorado-v-First-Service-Bank_doc1_COMPLAINT_2025-01-07.pdf
Size
89,623 bytes
SHA-256
bfc9036e6089c9dda247752f0dd2615c842c0771859d8da0265d6d5eb7560f20
Our copy
CASE_MSSB_25-06002_El-Dorado-v-First-Service-Bank_doc1_COMPLAINT_2025-01-07.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top