Brady Obligation Order — United States v. Jared John Fiege, No. 21-cr-55 (MJD/LIB) (Dkt. 111, D. Minn.)
Summary
An order dated May 4, 2026 by U.S. Magistrate Judge Jon T. Huseby in United States v. Jared John Fiege, Case No. 21-cr-55 (MJD/LIB) (D. Minn., Dkt. 111), issued under the Due Process Protections Act. It confirms the government's obligation under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) to disclose all exculpatory evidence to the defendant, orders the government to do so, and lists consequences of untimely disclosure, including exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action or other sanctions.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No: 21-cr-55 (MJD/LIB)
Plaintiff,
v.
Brady Obligation Order
Jared John Fiege,
Defendant.
_________________________________________________
Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act the Court confirms the United States’
obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidence-that is, evidence that favors
the defendant or casts doubt on the United States’ case, as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373
U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders the United States to do so. Failure to disclose
exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited
to, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings,
disciplinary action, or other sanctions by the court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 4, 2026 s/Jon T. Huseby
Jon T. Huseby
U.S. Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.mnd.193372.111.0.pdf
- Size
- 105,163 bytes
- SHA-256
- e54e4d0deaf8578bb431b0d6f2147ba1d34695374c7e7967a71a54ed624f1f71
- Original
- archive.org