Appeals of SBA Loan Review Decisions Under the Paycheck Protection Program
Summary
A Small Business Administration interim final rule, "Appeals of SBA Loan Review Decisions Under the Paycheck Protection Program", published in the Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 167, on Thursday, August 27, 2020, under docket number SBA–2020–0042 and RIN 3245–AH55, effective August 25, 2020. It sets out the process for a PPP borrower to appeal certain SBA loan review decisions to the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). It states that only final SBA loan review decisions, as defined in the rule, can be appealed to OHA, and that a borrower cannot file an OHA appeal of any decision made by a lender concerning a PPP loan.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 52883 the States, or on the distribution of Rules that are exempt from notice and Applicability date: This interim final power and responsibilities among the comment are also exempt from the RFA rule applies to certain loan review various layers of government. Therefore, requirements, including conducting a decisions made by SBA under the SBA has determined that this rule has regulatory flexibility analysis, when Paycheck Protection Program. no federalism implications warranting among other things the agency for good Comment date: Comments must be preparation of a federalism assessment. cause finds that notice and public received on or before September 28, procedure are impracticable, 2020. Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 unnecessary, or contrary to the public ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, interest. SBA Office of Advocacy guide: identified by number SBA–2020–0042 SBA has determined that this rule How to Comply with the Regulatory through the Federal eRulemaking Portal: will not impose new or modify existing Flexibility Act, Ch.1. p.9. Accordingly, http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the recordkeeping or reporting requirements SBA is not required to conduct a instructions for submitting comments. under the Paperwork Reduction Act. regulatory flexibility analysis. SBA will post all comments on Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) Jovita Carranza, www.regulations.gov. If you wish to The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) Administrator. submit confidential business generally requires that when an agency information (CBI) as defined in the User [FR Doc. 2020–18940 Filed 8–25–20; 1:00 pm] issues a proposed rule, or a final rule Notice at www.regulations.gov, please BILLING CODE P pursuant to Section 553(b) of the APA send an email to ppp-ifr@sba.gov. or another law, the agency must prepare Highlight the information that you a regulatory flexibility analysis that SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION consider to be CBI and explain why you meets the requirements of the RFA and believe SBA should hold this publish such analysis in the Federal 13 CFR Part 134 information as confidential. SBA will Register. 5 U.S.C. 603, 604. Specifically, review the information and make the the RFA normally requires agencies to [Docket Number SBA–2020–0042] final determination whether it will describe the impact of a rulemaking on RIN 3245–AH55 publish the information. small entities by providing a regulatory FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A impact analysis. Such analysis must Appeals of SBA Loan Review Call Center Representative at 833–572– address the consideration of regulatory Decisions Under the Paycheck 0502, or the local SBA Field Office; the options that would lessen the economic Protection Program list of offices can be found at https:// effect of the rule on small entities. The www.sba.gov/tools/localassistance/ RFA defines a ‘‘small entity’’ as (1) a AGENCY: U.S. Small Business districtoffices. proprietary firm meeting the size Administration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: standards of the Small Business ACTION: Interim final rule. Administration (SBA); (2) a nonprofit I. Background Information organization that is not dominant in its SUMMARY: On April 2, 2020, the U.S. On March 13, 2020, President Trump field; or (3) a small government Small Business Administration (SBA) declared the ongoing Coronavirus jurisdiction with a population of less posted on its website an interim final Disease 2019 (COVID–19) pandemic of than 50,000. 5 U.S.C. 601(3)–(6). Except rule relating to the implementation of sufficient severity and magnitude to for such small government jurisdictions, sections 1102 and 1106 of the warrant an emergency declaration for all neither State nor local governments are Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic States, territories, and the District of ‘‘small entities.’’ Similarly, for purposes Security Act (CARES Act or the Act) Columbia. With the COVID–19 of the RFA, individual persons are not (published in the Federal Register on emergency, many small businesses small entities. April 15, 2020). Section 1102 of the Act nationwide are experiencing economic The requirement to conduct a temporarily adds a new product, titled hardship as a direct result of the regulatory impact analysis does not the ‘‘Paycheck Protection Program,’’ to Federal, State, tribal, and local public apply if the head of the agency ‘‘certifies the U.S. Small Business health measures that have been taken to that the rule will not, if promulgated, Administration’s (SBA’s) 7(a) Loan minimize the public’s exposure to the have a significant economic impact on Program. Subsequently, SBA issued a virus. These measures, some of which a substantial number of small entities.’’ number of interim final rules are government-mandated, have been 5 U.S.C. 605(b). The agency must, implementing the Paycheck Protection implemented nationwide and include however, publish the certification in the Program (PPP). This interim final rule the closures of restaurants, bars, and Federal Register at the time of supplements the interim final rule on gyms. In addition, based on the advice publication of the rule, ‘‘along with a Loan Review Procedures and Related of public health officials, other statement providing the factual basis for Borrower and Lender Responsibilities measures, such as keeping a safe such certification.’’ If the agency head posted on SBA’s website on May 22, distance from others or even stay-at- has not waived the requirements for a 2020 (published on June 1, 2020, in the home orders, are being implemented, regulatory flexibility analysis in Federal Register), as revised by the resulting in a dramatic decrease in accordance with the RFA’s waiver interim final rule posted on SBA’s economic activity as the public avoids provision, and no other RFA exception website on June 22, 2020, in order to malls, retail stores, and other applies, the agency must prepare the inform PPP borrowers and lenders of the businesses. regulatory flexibility analysis and process for a PPP borrower to appeal On March 27, 2020, the President khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES publish it in the Federal Register at the certain SBA loan review decisions signed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and time of promulgation or, if the rule is under the PPP to the SBA Office of Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) promulgated in response to an Hearings and Appeals, and requests (Pub. L. 116–136) to provide emergency emergency that makes timely public comment. assistance and health care response for compliance impracticable, within 180 DATES: individuals, families, and businesses days of publication of the final rule. 5 Effective date: This rule is effective affected by the coronavirus pandemic. U.S.C. 604(a), 608(b). August 25, 2020. The Small Business Administration VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:18 Aug 26, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM 27AUR1 52884 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations (SBA) received funding and authority good cause for SBA to dispense with the for a PPP loan; (2) was ineligible for the through the CARES Act to modify 30-day delayed effective date provided PPP loan amount received or used the existing loan programs and establish a in the Administrative Procedure Act. PPP loan proceeds for unauthorized new loan program to assist small Specifically, it is critical to meet uses; (3) is ineligible for PPP loan businesses nationwide adversely lenders’ and borrowers’ need for clarity forgiveness in the amount determined impacted by the COVID–19 emergency. concerning the OHA appeal process as by the lender in its full or partial Section 1102 of the CARES Act rapidly as possible because SBA can approval decision issued to SBA (except temporarily permits SBA to guarantee review a PPP loan and make for the deduction of any Economic 100 percent of 7(a) loans under a new determinations as to a borrower’s Injury Disaster Loan advance in program titled the ‘‘Paycheck Protection eligibility at any time. This interim final accordance with section 1110(e)(6) of Program’’ (PPP). Section 1106 of the rule supplements the previous the CARES Act); and/or (4) is ineligible CARES Act provides for forgiveness of regulation on the discrete issues related for PPP loan forgiveness in any amount up to the full principal amount of to SBA’s process for reviewing a when the lender has issued a full denial qualifying loans guaranteed under the borrower’s eligibility for a PPP loan, the decision to SBA. PPP. PPP loan amount received, the use of For a PPP loan of any size, SBA may On April 2, 2020, SBA posted its first the PPP loan proceeds and/or the PPP undertake a loan review at any time in PPP interim final rule (85 FR 20811) loan forgiveness amount claimed by the SBA’s discretion, and this subpart L (the First Interim Final Rule). borrower. applies to loan review decisions made Subsequently, SBA issued a number of This interim final rule is effective by SBA after SBA completes a review of other interim final rules implementing without advance notice and public a PPP loan as set forth in Part III.1 and the PPP. On April 24, 2020, the comment because section 1114 of the Part III.2c. of the Loan Review IFR, as President signed the Paycheck CARES Act authorizes SBA to issue amended. Only final SBA loan review Protection Program and Health Care regulations to implement title I of the decisions (as defined in this rule) can be Enhancement Act (Pub. L. 116–139), CARES Act without regard to notice appealed to OHA; a PPP borrower which provided additional funding and requirements. In addition, SBA has cannot file an OHA appeal of any authority for the PPP. determined that there is good cause for decision made by a lender concerning a On May 22, 2020, SBA and Treasury dispensing with advance public notice PPP loan. A PPP borrower can request posted an interim final rule on Loan and comment on the ground that it an SBA review of a lender decision to Review Procedures and Related would be contrary to the public interest. deny the borrower’s loan forgiveness Borrower and Lender Responsibilities Specifically, SBA has determined that application in full, in accordance with (85 FR 33010) (Loan Review Interim advance notice and public comment Part III.2.b. of the Loan Review IFR, as Final Rule (IFR)). The rule stated that would delay the ability of PPP SBA would be issuing a separate interim amended, but that request is for a borrowers to understand with certainty final rule addressing the process for review by SBA, not an OHA appeal. A the process for appealing certain SBA appealing certain SBA loan review borrower may exercise any other rights loan review decisions under the PPP. decisions under the PPP. On June 5, it has under applicable law against a This rule is being issued to allow for 2020, the Paycheck Protection Program PPP lender regarding a lender decision. immediate implementation of the OHA Flexibility Act of 2020 (Pub. L. 116–142) appeal feature of this program. Although In addition, this section sets forth (Flexibility Act) was signed into law, this interim final rule is effective other types of decisions and amending the CARES Act. On June 22, immediately, comments are solicited determinations that are not covered by 2020, SBA and Treasury posted an from interested members of the public this subpart L, and makes clear that interim final rule that in part revised the on all aspects of this interim final rule, subpart C of this part, Rules of Practice Loan Review IFR to incorporate the including section III below. These for Appeals From Size Determinations relevant Flexibility Act amendments, comments must be submitted on or and NAICS Code Designations, is not address revisions to the Loan before September 28, 2020. SBA will applicable to appeals from SBA loan Forgiveness Application (SBA Form consider these comments and the need review decisions. Lastly, this section 3508), and include a new alternative for making any revisions as a result of sets forth the specific provisions from Loan Forgiveness Application (SBA these comments. subpart B of this part, OHA’s general Form 3508EZ). On July 4, 2020, Public Rules of Practice, that are applicable to III. Subpart L—Rules of Practice for this subpart L. Other provisions from Law 116–147 was enacted, extending Appeals of Certain SBA Loan Review subpart B of this part do not apply to the authority for SBA to guarantee PPP Decisions Under the Paycheck this subpart L. Because a PPP borrower loans to August 8, 2020. As described below, this interim final Protection Program must begin making payments of rule informs PPP borrowers and lenders This interim final rule establishes a principal and interest on the remaining of the process for a PPP borrower to new subpart L for 13 CFR part 134, balance of its PPP loan at the end of the appeal certain SBA loan review establishing rules of practice for appeals loan payment deferral period or when decisions under the PPP to the SBA of certain SBA loan review decisions SBA remits the loan forgiveness amount Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) under the Paycheck Protection Program to the PPP lender (or notifies the lender by establishing a new subpart L for 13 (PPP). that no loan forgiveness is allowed), an CFR part 134, and requests public Section 134.1201, Scope of rules in appeal by a PPP borrower of any SBA comment. this subpart L, provides a process for loan review decision does not extend appeal to OHA of certain SBA loan the deferral period of the PPP loan. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES II. Comments and Immediate Effective review decisions under the PPP and any Additionally, if SBA remits to the Date other PPP matter referred to OHA by the lender the PPP loan forgiveness amount The intent of the CARES Act is that Administrator. This subpart defines the set forth in the decision issued by the SBA provide relief to America’s small term SBA loan review decision as an lender to SBA (except for the deduction businesses expeditiously. This intent, official written decision by SBA, after of any Economic Injury Disaster Loan along with the dramatic decrease in SBA completes a review of a PPP loan, advance), the borrower may not file an economic activity nationwide, provides that finds a borrower (1) was ineligible appeal with OHA, and the borrower VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:18 Aug 26, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM 27AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 52885 must begin repayment of any remaining to move for a motion for more definite however, contain all documents balance of its PPP loan. statement or otherwise comply with the pertaining to the appellant. In addition, Section 134.1202, The appeal requirements of this section. SBA may claim privilege as to certain petition, provides that an appeal Section 134.1203, Standing, provides materials. The administrative record petition must include the following that only the borrower on a loan for must be certified and authenticated that information: (1) The basis for OHA’s which SBA has issued a final SBA loan it is, to the best of the signatory’s jurisdiction, including, but not limited review decision has standing to appeal knowledge, complete and correct. SBA to, evidence that the appeal is timely the SBA loan review decision to OHA. will file the administrative record with filed in accordance with § 134.1204; (2) Individual owners of a borrower and OHA and serve it on appellant. This A copy of the SBA loan review decision lenders do not have standing to appeal section permits the appellant to object that is being appealed, or a description an SBA loan review decision. to the absence of any document from the Section 134.1204, Deadline for filing administrative record that the appellant of that decision if a copy is unavailable; appeal petition, prescribes that an believes should have been included in (3) A full and specific statement as to appeal petition must be filed within 30 the administrative record. An appellant why the SBA loan review decision is calendar days after (i) the appellant’s also may object to any claim that alleged to be erroneous, together with receipt of the final SBA loan review documents in the administrative record all factual information and legal decision, or (ii) notification by the are privileged. Such objections must be arguments supporting the allegations; lender of the final SBA loan review filed with OHA and served on SBA no (4) The relief being sought; (5) Signed decision, whichever is earlier. later than 10 calendar days after copies of payroll tax filings actually Section 134.1205, Dismissal, provides reported to the Internal Revenue Service appellant’s receipt of the administrative that the Judge must dismiss the appeal record. The Judge will rule upon such (IRS), and State quarterly business and if: (1) The appeal is beyond OHA’s individual employee wage reporting and objections and may direct or permit that jurisdiction as set forth under the administrative record be unemployment insurance tax filings § 134.1201; (2) the appellant lacks actually reported to the relevant state, supplemented. standing to appeal under § 134.1203; or Section 134.1208, Response to an for the relevant periods of time, if not (3) the appeal is untimely under appeal petition, prescribes that only provided with the PPP Loan Forgiveness § 134.1204, or is premature because SBA SBA may respond to an appeal and the Application (SBA Form 3508, SBA has not yet made a final SBA loan response should set forth the relevant Form 3508EZ, or lender’s equivalent), or review decision. This section also facts and legal arguments to the issues an explanation as to why they are not provides that the Judge may dismiss the presented on appeal. Except for good relevant or not available; (6) Signed appeal if, among other things, the cause shown, a response filed after the copies of applicable federal tax returns appeal does not, on its face, allege close of record established by the Judge actually filed with the IRS with specific facts that if proven to be true, will not be considered. SBA must file its appropriate schedules (e.g., IRS Form warrant reversal or remand of the SBA response with OHA, and serve a copy of 1040 with Schedule C/F) documenting loan review decision. the response upon the appellant and income for self-employed individuals or Section 134.1206, Notice and order, upon each of the persons identified in partners in a partnership, if not provides that upon receipt of an appeal the certificate of service attached to the provided with the PPP Borrower challenging a final SBA loan review appellant’s appeal petition. No reply to Application Form (SBA Form 2483 or decision, OHA will assign the matter to a response will be permitted unless the lender’s equivalent), or an explanation either an Administrative Law Judge or Judge directs otherwise. as to why they are not relevant or not an Administrative Judge in accordance Section 134.1209, Evidence beyond available; and (7) The name, address, with § 134.218. Unless the appeal will the record, discovery and oral hearings, telephone number, email address and be dismissed under § 134.1205, the provides that, generally, the Judge may signature of the appellant or its attorney. Judge will issue a notice and order not admit evidence beyond the written This provision is consistent with OHA’s establishing a deadline for production of administrative record or permit any general rules of practice in subpart B, the administrative record and specifying form of discovery. Discovery will be with the addition of the requirement for a date for the close of record. Typically, permitted in OHA’s appellate submission of certain financial the administrative record will be due 20 proceedings only if the Judge information. SBA has determined that calendar days after issuance of the determines that SBA, upon written submission by the appellant of financial notice and order unless additional time submission, has made a showing of information, or an explanation as to is requested and granted, and the record good cause for discovery. An oral why they are not relevant or not will close 45 calendar days from the hearing will not be held on an appeal of available, is appropriate to support date of OHA’s receipt of the appeal an SBA loan review decision, unless, SBA’s efforts to assess compliance with unless additional time is requested and following the motion of a party, or at the the PPP requirements set forth in the granted. With this timeframe, SBA seeks Judge’s own initiative, the Judge orders statute, rules, and guidance. The to provide a timely and judicious an oral hearing upon concluding that appellant must serve a copy of the processing of the appeal petition, while there is a genuine dispute of material appeal petition with attachments on the also affording additional time if, for fact that cannot be resolved except by Associate General Counsel for example, the volume of appeals or other the taking of testimony and the Litigation, U.S. Small Business matters require additional time for confrontation of witnesses. SBA has Administration, 409 Third Street SW, compilation of the administrative record determined that allowing an oral Washington, DC 20416, OLITService@ and the close of record. hearing under limited circumstances, khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES sba.gov. The appellant must attach to Section 134.1207, The administrative and allowing discovery by SBA, only the appeal petition a signed certificate record, requires that the administrative upon a showing of good cause, balances of service meeting the requirements of record shall include relevant documents SBA’s potential need for discovery since § 134.204(d). This section further that SBA considered in making its final it may not have all relevant documents provides that an appeal petition which decision or that were before SBA at the from appellant with the efficient use of does not include the above may be time of the final decision. The limited resources available. If an oral dismissed by the Judge and permits SBA administrative record need not, hearing is ordered, the proceeding shall VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:18 Aug 26, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM 27AUR1 52886 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations be conducted in accordance with final decision of SBA 30 calendar days a new appeal is filed as a result of a new §§ 134.214 and 134.222 in subpart B of after its service. This section allows for SBA loan review decision. this part as the Judge deems a request for reconsideration pursuant to Section 134.1215, Equal Access to appropriate. All appeals under this paragraph (c) of § 134.1213 by either Justice Act (EAJA), provides that a subpart L will be decided solely on a party or by the Judge on his or her own prevailing appellant is not entitled to review of the written administrative initiative. This section also provides for recover attorney’s fees. Appeals to OHA record, the appeal petition, response(s) the right to request review by the from SBA loan review decisions under filed thereto, any admitted evidence, Administrator pursuant to § 134.228(a), the PPP are not proceedings that are and an oral hearing, if held. in which case the provisions in required to be conducted by an Section 134.1210, Interlocutory § 134.228 will apply. If a request for Administrative Law Judge under appeals, provides that either party may review pursuant to § 134.228(a) is filed, § 134.603. file an interlocutory appeal of a Judge’s the decision of the Administrator is a ruling which decides an issue of Section 134.1216, Exhaustion of final decision of SBA appealable to administrative remedies, provides that privilege. Interlocutory appeals will be federal district court. In order for a an appeal to OHA and request for decided by the Administrator or a borrower to exhaust its administrative review by the Administrator of a designee. An interlocutory appeal must remedies and preserve its right to seek disputed initial decision or be filed and served no later than 20 calendar days after issuance of the judicial review of an SBA final decision reconsidered initial decision are ruling to which the interlocutory appeal in a federal district court, a borrower administrative remedies that must be applies. A response to the interlocutory that disputes the initial decision or exhausted before judicial review of an appeal must be filed 10 calendar days reconsidered initial decision must file SBA loan review decision may be after the interlocutory appeal is served. and serve a request for review of an sought in a federal district court. The Judge may stay the proceedings initial decision or reconsidered initial Section 134.1217, Confidential before OHA, in whole or in part, as he decision by the Administrator pursuant information and protective order, or she deems appropriate pending to § 134.228(a). If the borrower does not provides that if a filing or other resolution of the interlocutory appeal. request review by the Administrator submission made pursuant to an appeal Section 134.1211, Alternative dispute pursuant to § 134.228(a), the borrower’s in this subpart L contains confidential resolution, provides that at any time right to seek review in federal court is business and financial information; during the pendency of an appeal, the waived due to the borrower’s failure to personally identifiable information; parties may submit a joint motion exhaust administrative remedies. This source selection sensitive information; requesting that the Judge permit the use section also provides that the final OHA income tax returns; documents and of alternative dispute resolution to assist decision creates precedent only for information covered under § 120.1060 of in resolving the matter. If the motion is appeals involving the PPP. Any OHA this title; or any other exempt granted, the Judge will also stay the decision pursuant to this subpart L information, that information is not proceedings before OHA, in whole or in applies only to the PPP and does not available to the public pursuant to the part, as he or she deems appropriate, apply to SBA’s 7(a) Loan Program Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 pending the outcome of the alternative generally or to any interpretation or U.S.C. 552. This provision is consistent dispute resolution. In addition, the application of the regulations in part with the general rule of practice in Assistant Administrator for Hearings 120 or part 121 of this title. SBA has subpart B of this part. In addition, this and Appeals (AA/OHA) or a Judge may determined that this is appropriate section permits SBA or appellant to seek designate another Judge or attorney because the PPP is governed by the a protective order over any document or assigned to OHA to serve as a neutral in CARES Act, which adds a new information filed pursuant to an appeal alternative dispute resolution temporary program to SBA’s 7(a) Loan in this subpart L, including any procedures. If OHA provides the neutral Program, but does not apply to SBA’s document or information exchanged in and the mediation fails to resolve all 7(a) Loan Program generally. Lastly, this discovery if permitted in accordance issues in the case, the OHA-provided section provides that, consistent with with § 134.1209. neutral will not be involved in the the general OHA rules of practice in adjudication. Compliance With Executive Orders subpart B of part 134, OHA decisions Section 134.1212, Standard of review, 12866, 12988, 13132, 13563, and 13771, are normally published without provides that the standard of review is the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. redactions on OHA’s website. A whether the SBA loan review decision Ch. 35), and the Regulatory Flexibility decision may contain confidential was based on clear error of fact or law. Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612) business and financial information or The appellant has the burden of proof, personally identifiable information Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and by a preponderance of the evidence. 13771 where that information is either Section 134.1213, Decision on appeal, decisionally-significant or otherwise This interim final rule is provides that the Judge will issue his or her decision within 45 calendar days necessary for a comprehensible economically significant for the after the close of record, as practicable. decision. Where no protective order is purposes of Executive Orders 12866 and The decision will contain findings of in place, a party may request a redacted 13563, and is considered a major rule fact and conclusions of law, the reasons public decision by contacting OHA. under the Congressional Review Act. for such findings and conclusions, and Where a protective order is in place, the SBA, however, is proceeding under the any relief ordered. The decision will be Judge will usually issue the unredacted emergency provision at Executive Order khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES served on each party. The Judge’s decision under the protective order and 12866 Section 6(a)(3)(D) based on the decision on the appeal is an initial a redacted version for public release. need to move expeditiously to mitigate decision. However, unless a request for Section 134.1214, Effects of the the current economic conditions arising review is filed pursuant to § 134.228(a), decision, provides that OHA may affirm, from the COVID–19 emergency. This or a request for reconsideration is filed reverse, or remand an SBA loan review rule’s designation under Executive pursuant to paragraph (c) of § 134.1213, decision. If remanded, OHA no longer Order 13771 will be informed by public an initial decision shall become the has jurisdiction over the matter unless comment. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:18 Aug 26, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM 27AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 52887 Executive Order 12988 If the agency head has not waived the Subpart L—Rules of Practice for SBA has drafted this rule, to the requirements for a regulatory flexibility Appeals of Certain SBA Loan Review extent practicable, in accordance with analysis in accordance with the RFA’s Decisions Under the Paycheck the standards set forth in section 3(a) waiver provision, and no other RFA Protection Program and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, to exception applies, the agency must prepare the regulatory flexibility Sec. minimize litigation, eliminate 134.1201 Scope of rules in this subpart L. ambiguity, and reduce burden. The rule analysis and publish it in the Federal 134.1202 The appeal petition. has no preemptive or retroactive effect. Register at the time of promulgation or, 134.1203 Standing. if the rule is promulgated in response to 134.1204 Deadline for filing appeal Executive Order 13132 an emergency that makes timely petition. SBA has determined that this rule compliance impracticable, within 180 134.1205 Dismissal. will not have substantial direct effects days of publication of the final rule. 5 134.1206 Notice and order. on the States, on the relationship U.S.C. 604(a), 608(b). Rules that are 134.1207 The administrative record. between the National Government and exempt from notice and comment are 134.1208 Response to an appeal petition. the States, or on the distribution of also exempt from the RFA requirements, 134.1209 Evidence beyond the record, including conducting a regulatory discovery and oral hearings. power and responsibilities among the 134.1210 Interlocutory appeals. various layers of government. Therefore, flexibility analysis, when among other 134.1211 Alternative dispute resolution SBA has determined that this rule has things the agency for good cause finds procedures. no federalism implications warranting that notice and public procedure are 134.1212 Standard of review. preparation of a federalism assessment. impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 134.1213 Decision on appeal. to the public interest. SBA Office of 134.1214 Effects of the decision. Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Advocacy guide: How to Comply with 134.1215 Equal Access to Justice Act Chapter 35 (EAJA). the Regulatory Flexibility Act, Ch.1. p.9. SBA has determined that this interim Accordingly, SBA is not required to 134.1216 Exhaustion of administrative final rule does not impose additional conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis. remedies. reporting or recordkeeping requirements 134.1217 Confidential information and under the Paperwork Reduction Act. List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 134 protective order. Administrative practice and Authority: 15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36); Pub. L. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 116–136; Pub. L. 116–139; Pub. L. 116–142; procedure, Claims, Equal access to The Regulatory Flexibility Act justice, Lawyers, Organization and Pub. L. 116–147 generally requires that when an agency function (Government agencies). § 134.1201 Scope of the rules in this issues a proposed rule, or a final rule For the reasons stated in the subpart L. pursuant to section 553(b) of the APA or another law, the agency must prepare a preamble, the Small Business (a) The rules of practice in this regulatory flexibility analysis that meets Administration amends 13 CFR part 134 subpart L apply to appeals to OHA from the requirements of the RFA and as set forth below: certain SBA loan review decisions publish such analysis in the Federal under the Paycheck Protection Program PART 134—RULES OF PROCEDURE (PPP) as described in paragraph (b) of Register. 5 U.S.C. 603, 604. Specifically, the RFA normally requires agencies to GOVERNING CASES BEFORE THE this section, and to any other PPP matter describe the impact of a rulemaking on OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS referred to OHA by the Administrator of small entities by providing a regulatory SBA. The PPP was established as a ■ 1. The authority citation for part 134 temporary program under section 1102 impact analysis. Such analysis must is revised to read as follows: address the consideration of regulatory of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and options that would lessen the economic Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504; 15 U.S.C. 632, Economic Security Act (CARES Act) effect of the rule on small entities. The 634(b)(6), 634(i), 637(a), 648(l), 656(i), 657t (Pub. L. 116–136). and 687(c); 38 U.S.C. 8127(f); E.O. 12549, 51 (b) A final SBA loan review decision RFA defines a ‘‘small entity’’ as (1) a FR 6370, 3 CFR, 1986 Comp., p. 189. that is appealable under this subpart L proprietary firm meeting the size Subpart J issued under 38 U.S.C. is an official written decision by SBA, standards of the Small Business 8127(f)(8)(B). after SBA completes a review of a PPP Administration (SBA); (2) a nonprofit Subpart K issued under 38 U.S.C. organization that is not dominant in its loan, that finds a borrower: 8127(f)(8)(A). field; or (3) a small government Subpart L issued under 15 U.S.C. (1) Was ineligible for a PPP loan; jurisdiction with a population of less 636(a)(36); Pub. L. 116–136; Pub. L. 116–139; (2) Was ineligible for the PPP loan than 50,000. 5 U.S.C. 601(3)–(6). Except 116–142; 116–147. amount received or used the PPP loan for such small government jurisdictions, proceeds for unauthorized uses; neither State nor local governments are ■ 2. Amend § 134.102 by: (3) Is ineligible for PPP loan ‘‘small entities.’’ Similarly, for purposes ■ a. Removing the word ‘‘and’’ at the forgiveness in the amount determined of the RFA, individual persons are not end of paragraph (u); by the lender in its full approval or small entities. The requirement to ■ b. Removing the period at the end of partial approval decision issued to SBA conduct a regulatory impact analysis paragraph (v) and adding ‘‘; and’’ in its (except for the deduction of any does not apply if the head of the agency place; and Economic Injury Disaster Loan advance ‘‘certifies that the rule will not, if ■ c. Adding paragraph (w) to read as in accordance with section 1110(e)(6) of promulgated, have a significant follows: the CARES Act); and/or khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES economic impact on a substantial (4) Is ineligible for PPP loan § 134.102 Jurisdiction of OHA. number of small entities.’’ 5 U.S.C. forgiveness in any amount when the 605(b). The agency must, however, * * * * * lender has issued a full denial decision publish the certification in the Federal (w) Appeals of certain SBA loan to SBA. Register at the time of publication of the review decisions as defined in 13 CFR (c) A borrower cannot file an OHA rule, ‘‘along with a statement providing 134.1201. appeal of any decision made by a lender the factual basis for such certification.’’ ■ 3. Add subpart L to read as follows: concerning a PPP loan. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:18 Aug 26, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM 27AUR1 52888 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations (d) Any determination by SBA’s than twenty cases, regulations, or (1) The appeal is beyond OHA’s Office of Inspector General concerning a statutes. jurisdiction as set forth under PPP loan is not appealable to OHA. (c) Service of the appeal petition. In § 134.1201; (e) This subpart L does not create any addition to filing an appeal with OHA (2) The appellant lacks standing to right to appeal any SBA decision on any in accordance with § 134.204(b), the appeal under § 134.1203; or 7(a) loans other than PPP loans. appellant must serve a copy of the (3) The appeal is untimely under (f) The Rules of Practice for Appeals appeal petition with attachments on the § 134.1204, or is premature because SBA From Size Determinations and NAICS Associate General Counsel for has not yet made a final SBA loan Code Designations in subpart C of this Litigation, U.S. Small Business review decision. part do not apply to appeals of SBA loan Administration, 409 Third Street SW, (b) The Judge may dismiss the appeal review decisions or to the PPP. Washington, DC 20416, OLITService@ in accordance with § 134.1202(e) or (g) In addition to the subpart B of this sba.gov. (f)(2), or if the appeal does not, on its part provisions specifically referenced (d) Certificate of service. The face, allege specific facts that if proven in this subpart L, the following appellant must attach to the appeal to be true, warrant reversal or remand of regulations from subpart B of this part petition a signed certificate of service the SBA loan review decision. also apply to this subpart L: 13 CFR meeting the requirements of § 134.204(d). § 134.1206 Notice and order. 134.207 through 134.209, 134.211, Upon receipt of an appeal challenging (e) Dismissal. An appeal petition 134.212, and 134.217 through 134.221. a final SBA loan review decision, OHA which does not contain all of the § 134.1202 The appeal petition. information required by paragraphs (a) will assign the matter to either an (a) Contents. The appeal petition must through (d) of this section may be Administrative Law Judge or an include the following information: dismissed, with or without prejudice, at Administrative Judge in accordance (1) The basis for OHA’s jurisdiction, the Judge’s own initiative, or upon with § 134.218. Unless the appeal is including, but not limited to, evidence motion of SBA. dismissed under § 134.1205, the Judge (f) Motion for more definite statement. will issue a notice and order that the appeal is timely filed in SBA may, not later than five days after establishing a deadline for production of accordance with § 134.1204; receiving an appeal petition, move for the administrative record and specifying (2) A copy of the SBA loan review an order to the appellant to provide a a date for the close of record. The notice decision that is being appealed, or a more definite appeal petition or and order will be served upon all description of that decision if a copy is otherwise comply with this section. A known parties (or their attorneys). unavailable; Judge may order a more definite appeal Typically, the administrative record will (3) A full and specific statement as to petition on his or her own initiative. be due 20 calendar days after issuance why the SBA loan review decision is (1) A motion for a more definite of the notice and order unless additional alleged to be erroneous, together with appeal petition stays SBA’s time for time is requested and granted, and the all factual information and legal filing a response. The Judge will record will close 45 calendar days from arguments supporting the allegations; establish the time for filing and serving the date of OHA’s receipt of the appeal (4) The relief being sought; a response and will extend the close of unless additional time is requested and (5) Signed copies of payroll tax filings the record as appropriate. granted. actually filed with the Internal Revenue (2) If the appellant does not comply Service (IRS), and State quarterly with the Judge’s order to provide a more § 134.1207 The administrative record. business and individual employee wage definite appeal petition or otherwise (a) Contents. The administrative reporting and unemployment insurance fails to comply with applicable record shall include relevant documents tax filings actually reported to the regulations, the Judge may dismiss the that SBA considered in making its final relevant state, for the relevant periods of petition with prejudice. decision or that were before SBA at the time, if not provided with the PPP Loan (g) Calculation of a deadline when the time of the final decision. The Forgiveness Application (SBA Form time period is given in days. Do not administrative record need not, 3508, SBA Form 3508EZ, or lender’s count the day the time period begins, however, contain all documents equivalent), or an explanation as to why but do count the last day of the time pertaining to the appellant. In addition, they are not relevant or not available; period. If the last day is Saturday, SBA may claim privilege as to certain (6) Signed copies of applicable federal Sunday, or a Federal holiday, the time materials. The administrative record tax returns actually filed with the IRS period ends on the next business day. must be certified and authenticated that with appropriate schedules (e.g., IRS it is, to the best of the signatory’s Form 1040 with Schedule C/F) § 134.1203 Standing. knowledge, complete and correct. documenting income for self-employed Only the borrower on a loan for which (b) Filing. SBA will file the individuals or partners in a partnership, SBA has issued a final SBA loan review administrative record with OHA and if not provided with the PPP Borrower decision has standing to appeal the SBA serve it on appellant. Application Form (SBA Form 2483 or loan review decision to OHA. (c) Objection. The appellant may lender’s equivalent), or an explanation § 134.1204 Deadline for filing appeal object to the absence of any document as to why they are not relevant or not petition. from the administrative record that the available; and An appeal petition must be filed with appellant believes should have been (7) The name, address, telephone OHA within 30 calendar days after the included in the administrative record. number, email address and signature of appellant’s receipt of the final SBA loan An appellant also may object to any khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES the appellant or its attorney. review decision, or notification by the claim that documents in the (b) Format. The maximum length of lender of the final SBA loan review administrative record are privileged. an appeal petition (not including decision, whichever is earlier. Such objections must be filed with OHA attachments) is 20 pages, unless leave is and served on SBA no later than 10 sought by the appellant and granted by § 134.1205 Dismissal. calendar days after the appellant’s the Judge. A table of authorities is (a) The Judge must dismiss the appeal receipt of the administrative record. The required only for petitions citing more if: Judge will rule upon such objections VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:18 Aug 26, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM 27AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 52889 and may direct or permit that the appeal is served. The Judge may stay the decision. The request for administrative record be supplemented. proceedings before OHA, in whole or in reconsideration must clearly show an part, as he or she deems appropriate error of fact or law material to the § 134.1208 Response to an appeal petition. pending resolution of the interlocutory decision. The Judge may also reconsider (a) Who may respond. Only SBA may appeal. a decision on his or her own initiative respond to an appeal. The response within 20 calendar days after service of should set forth the relevant facts and § 134.1211 Alternative dispute resolution. the written decision. legal arguments to the issues presented (a) Joint Motion. At any time during (d) Request for review. Within 30 on appeal. the pendency of an appeal, the parties calendar days after the service of an (b) Time limit. Except for good cause may submit a joint motion requesting initial decision or a reconsidered initial shown, a response filed after the close that the Judge permit the use of decision of a Judge, any party, or SBA’s of record established by the Judge will alternative dispute resolution to assist Office of General Counsel, may file and not be considered. in resolving the matter. serve a request for review by the (c) Service. The SBA must file its (b) Procedures. If the motion is Administrator pursuant to § 134.228(a). response with OHA, and serve a copy of granted, the Judge will also stay the In order for a borrower to exhaust its the response upon the appellant and proceedings before OHA, in whole or in administrative remedies and preserve its upon each of the persons identified in part, as he or she deems appropriate, right to seek judicial review of an SBA the certificate of service attached to the pending the outcome of the alternative final decision in a federal district court, appeal petition pursuant to dispute resolution. In addition, the AA/ a borrower that disputes an initial § 134.1202(d). OHA or a Judge may designate another decision or reconsidered initial decision (d) Reply to a response. No reply to Judge or attorney assigned to OHA to must file and serve a request for review a response will be permitted unless the serve as a neutral in alternative dispute of the initial decision or reconsidered Judge directs otherwise. resolution procedures. If OHA provides initial decision by the Administrator the neutral and the mediation fails to pursuant to § 134.228(a). If a request for § 134.1209 Evidence beyond the record, resolve all issues in the case, the OHA- discovery and oral hearings. review is filed pursuant to § 134.228(a), provided neutral will not be involved in the provisions in § 134.228 will apply. (a) General Rule. Generally, the Judge the adjudication. (e) Publication. OHA decisions are may not admit evidence beyond the § 134.1212 Standard of review. normally published without redactions written administrative record or permit on OHA’s website. A decision may any form of discovery. The standard of review is whether the (b) Discovery. Discovery will be contain confidential business and SBA loan review decision was based on permitted only if the Judge determines financial information or personally clear error of fact or law. The appellant that SBA, upon written submission, has identifiable information where that has the burden of proof, by a made a showing of good cause for information is either decisionally- preponderance of the evidence. discovery. significant or otherwise necessary for a (c) Oral hearings. Oral hearings will § 134.1213 Decision on appeal. comprehensible decision. Where no not be held on an appeal of an SBA loan (a) Time limits and contents. The protective order is in place, a party may review decision, unless, following the Judge will issue his or her decision request a redacted public decision by motion of a party, or at the Judge’s own within 45 calendar days after the close contacting OHA. Where a protective initiative, the Judge orders an oral of record, as practicable. The decision order is in place, the Judge will usually hearing upon concluding that there is a will contain findings of fact and issue the unredacted decision under the genuine dispute of material fact that conclusions of law, the reasons for such protective order and a redacted version cannot be resolved except by the taking findings and conclusions, and any relief for public release. of testimony and the confrontation of ordered. The decision will be served on § 134.1214 Effects of the decision. witnesses. If an oral hearing is ordered, each party. (b) Initial decision. The Judge’s OHA may affirm, reverse, or remand the proceeding shall be conducted in an SBA loan review decision. If accordance with §§ 134.214 and 134.222 decision on the appeal is an initial decision. However, unless a request for remanded, OHA no longer has in subpart B of this part as the Judge jurisdiction over the matter unless a deems appropriate. review is filed pursuant to § 134.228(a), or a request for reconsideration is filed new appeal is filed as a result of a new (d) The record. All appeals under this SBA loan review decision. subpart L will be decided solely on a pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, review of the written administrative an initial decision shall become the § 134.1215 Equal Access to Justice Act record, the appeal petition, and final decision of SBA 30 calendar days (EAJA), 5 U.S.C. 504. response(s) filed thereto, any admitted after its service. The final OHA decision A prevailing appellant is not entitled evidence, and an oral hearing, if held. creates precedent only for appeals to recover attorney’s fees. Appeals to involving the PPP. Any OHA decision OHA from SBA loan review decisions § 134.1210 Interlocutory appeals. pursuant to this subpart L applies only under the PPP are not proceedings that (a) General. Either party may file an to the PPP and does not apply to SBA’s are required to be conducted by an interlocutory appeal of a Judge’s ruling 7(a) Loan Program generally or to any Administrative Law Judge under which decides an issue of privilege. interpretation or application of the § 134.603. Interlocutory appeals will be decided by regulations in part 120 or part 121 of the Administrator of SBA or a designee. this title. § 134.1216 Exhaustion of administrative khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES (b) Procedures. An interlocutory (c) Reconsideration. An initial remedies. appeal must be filed and served no later decision of the Judge may be An appeal to OHA and request for than 20 calendar days after issuance of reconsidered. Either SBA or the review by the Administrator of a the ruling to which the interlocutory appellant may request reconsideration disputed initial decision or appeal applies. A response to the by filing with the Judge and serving a reconsidered initial decision are interlocutory appeal must be filed 10 petition for reconsideration within 10 administrative remedies that must be calendar days after the interlocutory calendar days after service of the written exhausted before judicial review of an VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:18 Aug 26, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM 27AUR1 52890 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations SBA loan review decision may be DATES: This AD is effective August 27, 14268 and 14270 through 14286 and sought in a federal district court. 2020. helicopters with a hose part number (P/ The FAA must receive any comments N) A785–31 installed after April 30, § 134.1217 Confidential Information and on this AD by October 13, 2020. 2018, inspecting the inside of the hose Protective Order. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, for separation between the outer and (a) If a filing or other submission inner layers and flexing the hose in all using the procedures found in 14 CFR made pursuant to an appeal in this directions while listening for a crinkling 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following subpart L contains confidential business sound, which is an indication of methods: and financial information; personally • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to separation. If there was any separation identifiable information; source or a crinkling sound, AD 2019–12–18 https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the selection sensitive information; income required replacing the hose before instructions for submitting comments. tax returns; documents and information • Fax: 202–493–2251. further flight. If there was no separation covered under § 120.1060 of this title; or • Mail: U.S. Department of and no crinkling sound, AD 2019–12–18 any other exempt information, that Transportation, Docket Operations, M– required replacing the hose within 50 information is not available to the 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room hours time-in-service (TIS). Finally, AD public pursuant to the Freedom of W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 2019–12–18 prohibited installing hose Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. Washington, DC 20590. P/N A785–31 marked with code 1Q18 (b) SBA or appellant may seek a on any helicopter. • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of protective order over any document or AD 2019–12–18 resulted from 12 Transportation, Docket Operations, M– information exchanged in discovery if reports, including an accident on April 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room permitted in accordance with 4, 2019, of separation between the outer W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, § 134.1209 and any document or and inner layers of the orange silicone Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. information filed pursuant to an appeal hose out of a suspected population of and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, in this subpart L. 100 hoses traced to a specific except Federal holidays. Jovita Carranza, For service information identified in manufacturing batch marked by code this final rule, contact Robinson 1Q18 (1st quarter of 2018). The Administrator. Helicopter Company, 2901 Airport separation of the silicone layers, if not [FR Doc. 2020–17895 Filed 8–25–20; 11:15 am] addressed, could result in blockage of Drive, Torrance, CA 90505; telephone BILLING CODE P 310–539–0508; fax 310–539–5198; or at air flow to the engine, engine stoppage, https://robinsonheli.com/. You may and subsequent loss of control of the view this service information at the helicopter. Accordingly, the FAA issued DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AD 2019–12–18 to address the unsafe FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood condition on these products. Federal Aviation Administration Pkwy, Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX Actions Since AD 2019–12–18 Was 14 CFR Part 39 76177. For information on the Issued availability of this material at the FAA, Since the FAA issued AD 2019–12– [Docket No. FAA–2020–0786; Project call 817–222–5110. Identifier AD–2020–00914–R; Amendment 18, an NTSB report of October 2019 39–21229; AD 2020–18–08] Examining the AD Docket concluded from the accident aircraft’s orange silicone hose marked by code RIN 2120–AA64 You may examine the AD docket on 1Q18, that contamination was the internet at https:// introduced during the manufacturing Airworthiness Directives; Robinson www.regulations.gov by searching for Helicopter Company process between the silicone layers that and locating Docket No. FAA–2020– prevented a satisfactory bond. AGENCY: Federal Aviation 0786; or in person at Docket Operations In addition, a helicopter accident Administration (FAA), DOT. between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday occurred on April 6, 2020, and through Friday, except Federal holidays. preliminary investigation indicated that ACTION: Final rule; request for The AD docket contains this final rule, separation between the outer and inner comments. any comments received, and other layers of the orange silicone hose P/N SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding information. The street address for A785–31 occurred. This hose was traced Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2019–12– Docket Operations is listed above. to the manufacturing batch marked by 18 for Robinson Helicopter Company Comments will be available in the AD code 3Q17 (3rd quarter of 2017). (Robinson) Model R44 II helicopters. AD docket shortly after receipt. Subsequently, the FAA determined 2019–12–18 required inspecting certain FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: that any helicopter with an improved engine air induction hoses (hoses) and Roger Gretler, Aerospace Engineer, Los black neoprene hose P/N A785–31 replacing any hose that was not Angeles ACO Branch, Compliance & installed should not be affected by this airworthy. AD 2019–12–18 also Airworthiness Division, FAA, 3960 AD. The FAA has also determined that, prohibited the installation of certain Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA 90712; for helicopters with an orange silicone hoses. This AD continues to require phone 562–627–5251; email hose, repeating the inspection is inspecting those previously affected roger.gretler@faa.gov. necessary. Accordingly, the FAA is hoses and amends the applicability, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: superseding AD 2019–12–18 to amend clarifies an inspection requirement, the applicability from all Robinson khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES adds a requirement to repeat the Discussion Model R44 II helicopters to Model R44 inspection, and expands the installation The FAA issued AD 2019–12–18, II helicopters with an orange silicone prohibition. This AD was prompted by Amendment 39–19673 (84 FR 32028, hose P/N A785–31 installed. This AD an additional report of separation July 5, 2019) (‘‘AD 2019–12–18’’), for also clarifies that the hose must be between the outer and inner hose layers. Robinson Model R44 II helicopters. AD removed to perform the inspection, adds The FAA is issuing this AD to address 2019–12–18 required, for helicopter a requirement to repeat the inspection, the unsafe condition on these products. serial numbers (S/Ns) 14248 through and expands the installation prohibition VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:18 Aug 26, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM 27AUR1
File and source
- File
- ppr-44cece55bc9175f6-2020-08-27_2020-17895-ab04864100.txt
- Size
- 59,256 bytes
- SHA-256
- a64548900c23aa534d9ba91e7b2d090fab3b7688055a2db2d70429705c029c7b
- Original
- www.federalregister.gov