Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Answer to 28 Amended Complaint — United States ex rel. James R. Berkley v. Ocean State, LLC (Dkt. 36, D.R.I.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Answer to 28 Amended Complaint — United States ex rel. James R. Berkley v. Ocean State, LLC (Dkt. 36, D.R.I.)

Summary

Defendants' Answer to Relator's Second Amended Complaint in United States of America ex rel. James R. Berkley v. Ocean State, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 1:20-cv-00538-JJM-PAS, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, filed 06/06/23 as Document 36. New Harbor Capital Fund LP, New Harbor Capital Fund II LP, New Harbor Capital Management LP, Ocean State, LLC, Blueprint Test Preparation, LLC and Fyzical Acquisition Holdings, LLC respond paragraph by paragraph and deny each allegation except as expressly admitted. They admit their places of organization and business and that certain New Harbor entities have previously made investments in Ocean State, Blueprint and Fyzical, while calling terms such as "owned and controlled" imprecise. The answer demands a jury trial and asks that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice, with fees and costs.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 545 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name36-answer-to-28-amended-complaint-by-blueprint-test-preparation.pdf
SHA-2565cee8f26551836a3a7d4d7464ffe2fea98c474bd1c97283dcc27722df25a58e4
Size557,989 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
36-answer-to-28-amended-complaint-by-blueprint-test-preparation.pdf
Size
557,989 bytes
SHA-256
5cee8f26551836a3a7d4d7464ffe2fea98c474bd1c97283dcc27722df25a58e4
Our copy
36-answer-to-28-amended-complaint-by-blueprint-test-preparation.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top