Source documents · Archived capture
Answer to 28 Amended Complaint — United States ex rel. James R. Berkley v. Ocean State, LLC (Dkt. 36, D.R.I.)
Summary
Defendants' Answer to Relator's Second Amended Complaint in United States of America ex rel. James R. Berkley v. Ocean State, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 1:20-cv-00538-JJM-PAS, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, filed 06/06/23 as Document 36. New Harbor Capital Fund LP, New Harbor Capital Fund II LP, New Harbor Capital Management LP, Ocean State, LLC, Blueprint Test Preparation, LLC and Fyzical Acquisition Holdings, LLC respond paragraph by paragraph and deny each allegation except as expressly admitted. They admit their places of organization and business and that certain New Harbor entities have previously made investments in Ocean State, Blueprint and Fyzical, while calling terms such as "owned and controlled" imprecise. The answer demands a jury trial and asks that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice, with fees and costs.
Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Record facts
| File name | 36-answer-to-28-amended-complaint-by-blueprint-test-preparation.pdf |
|---|---|
| SHA-256 | 5cee8f26551836a3a7d4d7464ffe2fea98c474bd1c97283dcc27722df25a58e4 |
| Size | 557,989 bytes |
| Source site | archive.org |
File and source
- File
- 36-answer-to-28-amended-complaint-by-blueprint-test-preparation.pdf
- Size
- 557,989 bytes
- SHA-256
- 5cee8f26551836a3a7d4d7464ffe2fea98c474bd1c97283dcc27722df25a58e4
- Original
- archive.org