Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Amended Judgment and Commitment Order on Revocation — USA v. Scoggins et al (Dkt. 85)Search ⌕

Amended Judgment and Commitment Order on Revocation — USA v. Scoggins et al (Dkt. 85)

Summary

An amended judgment and commitment order on revocation of probation in United States v. John David Scoggins, No. 5:23-cr-00087-MHH-HNJ, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, filed March 7, 2025 as Document 85 and signed that day by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala. It repeats that the court revoked the 60-month probation imposed May 1, 2024 (Doc. 44) and, as pronounced on August 22, 2024, committed the defendant for time served as of the date an inpatient bed becomes available, followed by 36 months of supervised release. The asterisked changes remove the 12-month location monitoring and home detention condition. They add a condition allowing probation officer searches of the defendant's person, property, computers and devices on reasonable suspicion of a violation, and leave all other conditions in effect.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Amended Judgment and Commitment Order on Revocation — USA v. Scoggins et al (Dkt. 85).” Original at ecf.alnd.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/amended-judgment-and-commitment-order-on-revocation-usa-v-scoggins-et-27400c0143/, SHA-256 b33a6359760e0a4baa5325588e168a1644a816c7308f8aff2e2800397cf61443.

Full text

                Case 5:23-cr-00087-MHH-HNJ                 Document 85      Filed 03/07/25   Page 1 of 2            FILED
                                                                                                           2025 Mar-07 PM 01:50
AO 245 S (Rev. 1/98)(N.D.Ala. rev.) Sheet 1 - Judgment in a Criminal Case                                  U.S. DISTRICT COURT
                                                                                                               N.D. OF ALABAMA


                       UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                          Northern District of Alabama
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

           v.                                                         Case Number 5:23-CR-00087-MHH-HNJ

JOHN DAVID SCOGGINS (2)
    Defendant.


                *AMENDED JUDGMENT AND COMMITMENT ORDER
                      ON REVOCATION OF PROBATION
                    (For Offenses Committed On or After November 1, 1987)

        The defendant, JOHN DAVID SCOGGINS, was represented by Jerry S. Barclay.

     On May 1, 2024, the Court sentenced Mr. Scoggins to probation for a period of 60
months, (Doc. 44). Mr. Scoggins has violated the terms of probation. Therefore, the Court
REVOKES Mr. Scoggins’s probation.

     As pronounced on August 22, 2024, Mr. Scoggins is committed to the custody of
United States Bureau of Prisons for a term of TIME SERVED as of the date a bed
becomes available at an inpatient facility approved by Mr. Scoggins’s supervising officer.
The Court imposes 36 months of supervised release.

        *The Court removes the following special condition of supervised release:

      You will be monitored for a period of 12 months by location monitoring technology,
TO BEGIN ON Tuesday, April 30, 2024, under the administrative supervision of the
probation officer, and you must comply with all requirements of the location monitoring
program. You must pay for the cost of monitoring unless the probation officer determines
you do not have the ability to do so. During the period of monitoring, you are restricted to
your residence at all times except for employment; education; religious services; medical,
substance abuse or mental health treatment; attorney visits; court appearances or other
court-ordered obligations; and other activities pre-approved by the probation officer (Home
Detention). The form of location monitoring technology used to monitor you will be at the
discretion of the probation officer.
         Case 5:23-cr-00087-MHH-HNJ    Document 85    Filed 03/07/25   Page 2 of 2

     *The Court adds the following special condition of supervised release:

      You must submit your person, property, house, residence, vehicle, office, papers,
computers (as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(1)), and other electronic communications
or data storage devices or media, to a search conducted by the probation officer. Failure
to submit to a search may be grounds for revocation of supervision. You must warn any
other occupants that the premises may be subject to searches pursuant to this
condition. The probation officer may conduct a search pursuant to this condition only
when reasonable suspicion exists that you have violated a condition of supervision and
the areas to be searched contain evidence of this violation. Any search must be
conducted in a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner.

     All other standard and special conditions in the original judgment remain in effect.


     Signed this the 7th day of March, 2025.


                                   MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA
                                   U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

File and source

File
85-amended-judgment-and-commitment-order-on-revocation.pdf
Size
114,199 bytes
SHA-256
b33a6359760e0a4baa5325588e168a1644a816c7308f8aff2e2800397cf61443
Our copy
85-amended-judgment-and-commitment-order-on-revocation.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top