Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Affidavit of Hayat Nur Regarding Counsel and In Forma Pauperis Request — United States v. Farah (Dkt. 964, D. Minn.)

Affidavit of Hayat Nur Regarding Counsel and In Forma Pauperis Request — United States v. Farah (Dkt. 964, D. Minn.)

Summary

Affidavit of Hayat Nur Regarding Counsel and In Forma Pauperis Request, filed March 25, 2026 as Doc. 964 in United States of America v. Farah et al., Case No. 0:22-cr-00124-NEB-DTS, in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Hayat Nur identifies as the defendant-appellant and makes the affidavit in support of an in forma pauperis request and for a court-appointed appellate lawyer to prosecute an appeal. The affidavit states that Hayat Nur was found guilty at the first Feeding our Future trial, was remanded shortly before the end of the trial, has remained in custody since, and cannot afford to retain a private lawyer. It reports that the average of the monthly deposits to the commissary account is $218 and the average balance is $30.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Affidavit of Hayat Nur Regarding Counsel and In Forma Pauperis Request — United States v. Farah (Dkt. 964, D. Minn.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/affidavit-of-hayat-nur-regarding-counsel-and-in-forma-pauperis-request-5428294f10/, SHA-256 1d56a51459508a8450e18903ee1c04d0d3afa7be2824581cd26fac6abb482fcd.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Case No.: 0:22-cr-00124-NEB-DTS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintiff, ) AFFIDAVIT OF HAYAT NUR
) REGARDING COUNSEL AND
V. ) IN FORMA PAUPERIS
) REQUEST
Farah et al., (Hayat Nur) )
)
Defendant. )
L, I am the defendant-appellant in the above-captioned case.
2. I make this affidavit in support of my in forma pauperis request and for a court-appointed
appellate lawyer to prosecute my appeal.
3. I was found guilty of charges against me at the first Feeding our Future trial.

4. Shortly before the end of the trial, | was remanded and taken into custody, where I have

remained since.

5. My husband is working and we have some assets. I am obviously unemployed because |
am detained and I have no other income. My husband is shouldering the burden of caring
for our home. We have debt, and I cannot afford to retain a private lawyer. The specifics

of my lack of financial ability are outlined in my attached application.
10.

12.

CASE 0:22-cr-00124-NEB-DTS Doc. 964 _ Filed 03/25/26 Page 2 of 2

My husband and I have tried to gather and borrow funds throughout the time since my

sentencing with no success.

Everything in this affidavit, and in my attached application, is true and accurate to the best

of my knowledge and upon best information and my belief.

Since my detention, while my husband has done his best to put money in my trust account
at my detention facility, also known as my commissary, the average of the monthly

deposits is $218 and the average balance is $30.

With this money, I have bought necessary clothing to stay warm or try to stay warm, and

food to eat.

If I could afford to hire a lawyer, I would, but unfortunately, given my circumstances, I

cannot.
Therefore, I respectfully ask that this Honorable Court grant my application.
The Court’s consideration is greatly appreciated.

Respectfully,

Sworn to before me this" diay of March, 2026

Notary Public

~ KEIS-IA BOBBI NICOLE LANSAW |

NOTARY PUBLIC


File and source

File
964.pdf
Size
430,166 bytes
SHA-256
1d56a51459508a8450e18903ee1c04d0d3afa7be2824581cd26fac6abb482fcd
Our copy
964.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top