Affidavit — Natasha Athens v. Bank of America (No. 1:21-cv-00748, Document 80, January 23, 2022)

Summary

An affidavit by Natasha Athens, owner of Favorite Things, filed January 23, 2022 as Document 80 in No. 1:21-cv-00748 (D.N.H.) and captioned for the First Circuit appeals No 21-1965 and 21-1964, Athens v. Bank of America et al. Athens states that the CARES Act loan was lawfully obtained and used, that Bank of America first offered only partial forgiveness, and that a full-amount forgiveness application was in process when Megan Scholz pulled it out of forgiveness. The affidavit describes the loan as a forgivable loan of $18,625.00, accuses the judges, defense counsel Thomas Pappas and Scholz of bank fraud, and states that counsel has defaulted in the First Circuit. The 6-page affidavit is signed /s/ by Athens.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 80 Filed 01/23/22 Page 1 of 6




                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                            FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                     ________________________________
                                 No 21-1965
                                   21-1964
                              NATASHA ATHENS
                              Plaintiff-Appellant
                                          V
                           BANK OF AMERICA ET AL
                            Defendant –Appellee
AFFIDAVIT

Neon Light into the crime of bank fraud

Please look at exhibit one my blog: showing on 1 computer my DOCUMENTS
and try to grasp the amount of people investigating this case.

https://natashanews18.blogspot.com/2021/07/bank-of-america-ppp-
fraud.html

Almost 3 Million combined postings
406 Thousand documents served

And this court and Thomas Pappas and Megan Scholz think they are able to get
away with this crime. They are not able to, see the blog to understand why.

I, Natasha Athens, owner of Favorite Things lawfully obtained a CARES ACT loan
from the 1st option to do that in 2020.
        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 80 Filed 01/23/22 Page 2 of 6




I Non caucasian Vice President of Bank of America had to redo my loan
application from Bank of America fraud at the onset, and she sought additional
tax documents in order to get it accurately done.

The loan was deposited into my business account, and used lawfully under the
strict conditions set forth under the CARES act in order to be forgiven.

I had my forgiveness application COMPLETED about 3 months after I was given
the money and the application was put on line.

Bank of America failed to ever issue any forgiveness applications despite
constantly saying they were coming. They were never sent until May of 2021,
over a year later.

They only offered partial forgiveness, with a false narrative, which set up the
onslot of phone calls and emails to the PPP set up staff that was billing the
CARES fund by the hour to overbill and delay not only forgiveness, but end their
ability to bill and overcompensate themselves.

After a massive level of phone calls, all recorded by the bank, and multiple
emails, the forgiveness application was sent through for the full amount. I had
to initiate it at the partial forgivenss and then threaten them with criminal
charges in order for them to rectify the forgivable amount matching the loaned
amount.

It was in proccess of forgiveness when a caucasian bank VP, a confessed drinker
at 9:00 am, a devoted charity donor, a married woman that is seen pouring a
liter of liquor into her husband's mouth without a glass at the Kentucky Derby
and a lawyer named Megan Scholz, that pulled the loan out of forgiveness and
changed the forgivable amount to 0.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/hclHdC4omiYP/

I was entitled to a 2nd PPP loan, but for the fraud of Bank of America, I would
have obtained it. Many businesses recieved and have had both sets of loans
forgiven already, but Bank of America targeted the most vulnerable of the
population, the small loans and people that have no means to pay them back.
          Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 80 Filed 01/23/22 Page 3 of 6




I was forced to file a lawsuit only to find to my horror that the court would
entertain, engage, coverup, participate, thwart, impede, and compromise my
right to not only the forgivable loan, but damages or perhaps reparations in
another term.

During 7 months of tyrannical compromise and crimes, including the hired
attorney who particpated in the crime of bank fraud rather than advise his
client that she could not alter any loan amounts due to federal law

18 U.S. Code § 1344 - Bank fraud

to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by, or under
the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses,
representations, or promises;


The penalty for bank fraud is
shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

Despite the 30 year sentence, there have been Magistrate Judge Johnstone,
Judge McAuliffe, Thomas Pappas, Megan Scholz and Brian Moynihan that have
all engaged in fraud of a forgivable loan of $18,625.00.

They have ignored a VP that issued the loan with a calculator and tallied my
payroll over simple basic tax documents and canceled checks. This was not
rocket science, it was ADDITION.

Both Caucasian judges have opted to ignore ADDITION, bank deposits, SBA
approved loan, SBA forgiveness application in process and chosen to listen to a
Caucasian VP Bank of America lawyer that ignored 18 US CODE 1344 and got all
of them to engage in 7 months of imbecillic juvenile stunts like failing to serve a
lawsuit, detering service of US Marshalls, having bias Judge Johnstone use slow
down service to write up her evaluation of the case, fail to hold an emergency
hearing, refuse to move this to a different court, failure to act on a timed loan,
Thomas Pappas failure to serve a single pleading or notice of his appearance
electronically, (default automatically) and lastly, most current, is a judge who
has 0 power to ever undo a financial agreement at all, a loan is a signed
document between two parties, no judge is ever included unless he or she
        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 80 Filed 01/23/22 Page 4 of 6




themselves are the lendee's. And this judge made an illicit order that upon
seeking illicit documents and a sworn document, he "might" consider the loan
as valid.

There is a huge question of WHY all parties are engaging with Megan Scholz,
and it's is not clear if there is actual racism here. However, the initial document
SIGNED OFF BY A BANK VP, carries more weight than a VP at the end that has
NOT turned the small business bank customers over to the Dept of Justice for
having received money (based on canceled payroll checks) and desposits etc
and turned them in for fraud.
Therefore the Judges have to be questioned aside from their bias, as to motive.

Only a couple of things "motivate" people to sell themselves out. Money,
favors, relationships, conflict, those things rise above duty, and sworn oaths.
And only when those needs are met does anyone "risk it all".

The Secret Service is the Gatekeeper to the mission billions. I do not know how
much of that is on the shoulders of Bank of America, but I do know, that I
expected this case to resolve itself in a very comparable settlement for the
losses I have endured and it was rejected and laughed at by Thomas Pappas -
when it was on the bank's payroll, not his own.

In this case, both judges made things up, bypassing all rules, laws and the
Constitution. I used the Constitution, except by example to "make up" my own
rules in response to the insanity that was being put out in public, including my
leaked taxes and the failure to seal them. Or strike them.

However, the judge did not like it when I made up my own rules, and he used
the power to Strike a pleading on himself.

And his ultimate "order" was to try to put an illegal burden on me, rather than
get sworn statements under oath from Megan Scholz and Thomas Pappas that I
did not have a right to the funds, that I misused them etc.

It also would not have ended even if I had complied, the judge's "mission" is to
continue to override his oath and the Constitution and to stay above the law,
which he is not, no one is. And he still would have put in a ruling that did not
        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 80 Filed 01/23/22 Page 5 of 6




align with the "100% forgivable amount" His goal would have been to either
question my sworn statement, all of which he could have obtained in a lawful
hearing where both sides are under oath in front of him via zoom and allowed
to give testimony and be forced to give answers.

His goal was to give himself permission to "rewrite" the loan anyway, and likely
go back to 2/3 forgiveness. Or something of the kind.

The telling part of this truth is that in his whole 13 page answer, where he
dismissed all compensation for infliction of emotional distress, HE FAILED IN 13
PAGES, to even address the right to compensation for the 2nd loan, which I had
to turn down because of the Bank of America fraud.

In 7 months of imbecillic pleadings and stunts, this court has never once held a
hearing.

Their sworn duty before they even make a single ruling or opinion.

We are where we are because the parties above would rather swim in quick
sand, as they have all of their careers, than obey the law.

The bottom line is that if the court upon this latest pleading does not apply the
law on both loans, and deem that I am indeed allowed compensation, I get it
out of this court and also I will get default rulings in appeals court. Thomas
Pappas has already defaulted on all of the interlockatory appeals for failure to
serve.

Judges must be at some point bottomed out when they aid in corruption but the
parties that are asking for the "favors" fail at the most basic task of service, the
first thing you learn in law school.

So if Judge McAuliffe ignores the default here, ignores Bank Fraud laws and
engages in bank fraud, and fails to issue the right to compensation for me, it's
irrelevant because Thomas Pappas has defaulted in the first circuit court of
appeals for $30 million dollars combined.
        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 80 Filed 01/23/22 Page 6 of 6




And the offer is still open for settlement, something which I don't have to do. I
have won.

All of you should choose wisely, as the next moves should include jail and bail.


/s/ Natasha Athens
Favorite Things

Certificate of Service on January 23, 2022

Thomas Pappas and Megan Scholz are only being served, despite default and
non service to me so that they might finally have that epiphany and then pass it
on to the judges.


File and source

File

80-affidavit-in-support-affidavit-to-objection-the-latest-judic.pdf

Size

1,554,477 bytes

SHA-256

bb4fd9798971b77a02de24fb0f7f09415223f855608ada9785769ab2b8fa3fab

Our copy

80-affidavit-in-support-affidavit-to-objection-the-latest-judic.pdf

Original

archive.org