Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment — United States v. Moshe Rosenfeld (September 6, 2024)
Summary
A Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment in United States v. Moshe Rosenfeld, 23 Cr. 65 (CM), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Document 91, filed September 6, 2024. The order recites that on or about November 9, 2022 the defendant was charged in an Indictment with conspiracy to commit bank fraud and wire fraud under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Count One) and conspiracy to make false statements to banks and the SBA under Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 (Count Two). It states that on or about February 20, 2024 the defendant pled guilty to Count One and consents to a money judgment of $310,000 in United States currency. It provides for payment to the United States Marshals Service and authorizes the government to seek substitute assets.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment — United States v. Moshe Rosenfeld (September 6, 2024).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/91-2ab78ef366/
, SHA-256 37da9e6eff62031cf50c8f34d950c72b820aae8473a94dda4ab2ff4ada47884f.Full text
Case 1:23-cr-00065-CM Document 91 Filed 09/06/24 Page 1 of 4
I
:DSLCG N\ I
DOCTJMENT
ELECTRONIC LYFILED
I
I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
~le#:
. FILED:_
II I
qfi ~!'j '
---------- - ----------------------- X ---··--- -
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER
- V. - OF FORFEITURE/
MONEY JUDGMENT
MOSHE ROSENFELD,
Sl 23 Cr. 65 (CM)
Defendant.
- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X
WHEREAS, on or about November 9, 2022 MOSHE ROSENFELD (the
"Defendant"), among others, was charged in an Indictment, S 1 23 Cr. 65 (CM) (the "Indictment"),
with conspiracy to commit bank fraud and wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1349 (Count One); and conspiracy to make false statements to banks and the SBA in
violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371(Count Two);
WHEREAS, the Indictment included a forfeiture allegation as to Counts One and
Two of the Indictment, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States
Code, Section 982(a)(2)(A), of any and all property constituting, or derived from proceeds the
Defendant obtained directly or indirectly, as a result of the commission of the offenses charged in
Counts One and Two of the Indictment, including but not limited to a sum of money in United
States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses
charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment;
WHEREAS, on or about February 20, 2024, the Defendant pied guilty to Count
One of the Indictment, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant
admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Indictment and agreed to forfeit
to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2)(A), a sum of
Case 1:23-cr-00065-CM Document 91 Filed 09/06/24 Page 2 of 4
z
money equal to $310,000 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable
to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment;
WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the
amount of $310,000 in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to
the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained; and
WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the
Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the
Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States
of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States
Attorney Emi ly Deininger, of counsel, and the Defendant and his counsel, Sarah Krissoff Esq. ,
that:
1. As a result of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment to which
the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $310,000 in United States currency
(the "Money Judgment"), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in
Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the
Defendant.
2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this
Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, MOSHE
ROSENFELD, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included
in the judgment of conviction therewith.
3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal
money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals
Case 1:23-cr-00065-CM Document 91 Filed 09/06/24 Page 3 of 4
Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New
York, Attn: Illicit Finance and Money Laundering Unit, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, New York
10278 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.
4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments
on the Money Judgment in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title
to such forfeited property.
5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States
is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount
of the Money Judgment.
6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the
United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate
or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production
of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.
7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order
of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal
Rules of Criminal Procedure.
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Case 1:23-cr-00065-CM Document 91 Filed 09/06/24 Page 4 of 4
8. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money
Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original
but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.
AGREED AND CONSENTED TO:
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York
By: O
Emily Deiningir ~
Assistant United States Attorneys
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
(212) 637-2472
MOSHE ROSENFELD
By: ~
MOSHE ROSENFELD
Cflr/~
DATE
By:
Sarah Krissoff, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Cozen O' Connor
3 WTC, 175Greenwich St, 55th Floor
New York, NY 10007
HONORABLE COLLEEN MCMAHON
9 fr
DATE
/>v 2-9
2>j ljD /> f'V\
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
File and source
- File
- 91.pdf
- Size
- 184,134 bytes
- SHA-256
- 37da9e6eff62031cf50c8f34d950c72b820aae8473a94dda4ab2ff4ada47884f
- Our copy
- 91.pdf
- Original
- archive.org