Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order of Dismissal — W6 Restaurant Group, Ltd v. Small Business Administration (Northern District of Ohio)

Order of Dismissal — W6 Restaurant Group, Ltd v. Small Business Administration (Northern District of Ohio)

Summary

Judge Bridget Meehan Brennan of the Northern District of Ohio ordered on March 25, 2026 that the docket in W6 Restaurant Group, Ltd v. Small Business Administration, No. 1:23-CV-01735, be marked dismissed without prejudice after the parties' Joint Motion to Stay (Doc. 49) reported a tentative agreement to resolve the matter. All pending motions are denied as moot, and the parties must submit an executed Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice by April 24, 2026.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order of Dismissal — W6 Restaurant Group, Ltd v. Small Business Administration (Northern District of Ohio).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/50-order-of-dismissal-for-the-reasons-stated-herein-this-case-i-bc4466ad61/, SHA-256 4fa8367e924e7611f188ff45aabd96636ad36058ce16ab6abb8856c2a467bbb3.

Full text

     Case: 1:23-cv-01735-BMB Doc #: 50 Filed: 03/25/26 1 of 1. PageID #: 4497




                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
                                   EASTERN DIVISION


W6 RESTAURANT GROUP, LTD, et al., )                   CASE NO. 1:23-CV-01735
                                  )
          Plaintiffs,             )                  JUDGE BRIDGET MEEHAN BRENNAN
                                  )
     v.                           )
                                  )
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, )                      ORDER OF DISMISSAL
                                  )
          Defendant.              )




       The Court is in receipt of the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay. (Doc. 49.) In light of the

parties’ representations that they have reached a tentative agreement to resolve this matter, the

docket shall be marked “dismissed without prejudice.” Accordingly, all pending motions are

DENIED as moot.

       On or before April 24, 2026, the parties shall submit a proposed and executed Stipulation

and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, which, if approved, shall supersede this Order.




       IT IS SO ORDERED.


Date: March 25, 2026                                  _________________________________
                                                      BRIDGET MEEHAN BRENNAN
                                                      UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

File and source

File
50-order-of-dismissal-for-the-reasons-stated-herein-this-case-i.pdf
Size
137,802 bytes
SHA-256
4fa8367e924e7611f188ff45aabd96636ad36058ce16ab6abb8856c2a467bbb3
Our copy
50-order-of-dismissal-for-the-reasons-stated-herein-this-case-i.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top