Plea Agreement — United States v. Robert William Burns (Middle District of Florida)
Summary
A plea agreement filed October 21, 2024 as Document 44 in United States of America versus Robert William Burns, Case No. 6:24-cr-87-PGB-RMN, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division. Burns agrees to plead guilty to Count One of the Indictment, wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and Counts Two and Three will be dismissed at sentencing. Burns agrees to make full restitution to the U.S. Small Business Administration of at least $57,186 and to forfeit the $57,186 in proceeds. The factual basis states that Burns obtained three PPP loans, one for RB3 Ventures LLC and two in the name of The Social Wizards, resulting in approximately $57,186 in PPP funds deposited into a Chase Bank account Burns controlled.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Plea Agreement — United States v. Robert William Burns (Middle District of Florida).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/44-plea-agreement-1aa2537816/
, SHA-256 ae03358fb184e1a3c5f111431181358dcb41c67ac6365c426472c6434ee3e443.Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.
Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 1 of 22 PagelD 89 AF Approval _ NMA | Chief Approval __ CAB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Vv. CASE NO. 6:24-cr-87-PGB-RMN ROBERT WILLIAM BURNS PLEA AGREEMENT Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c), the United States of America, by Roger B. Handberg, United States Attorney for the Middle District of Florida, and the defendant, Robert William Burns, and the attorney for the defendant, Katherine Puzone, mutually agree as follows: A. Particularized Terms 1. Count(s) Pleading To The defendant shall enter a plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment. Count One charges the defendant with Wire Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. 2. Maximum Penalties Count One carries a maximum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment, a fine of $250,000, or twice the gross gain or loss caused by the offense, whichever is greater, a term of supervised release of not more than three years, and a special assessment of $100. Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 2 of 22 PagelD 90 3. Elements of the Offense(s) The defendant acknowledges understanding the nature and elements of the offense(s) with which defendant has been charged and to which defendant is pleading guilty. The elements of Count One are: First: the defendant knowingly devised or participated in a scheme to defraud, or to obtain money or property by using false pretenses, representations, or promises; Second: the false pretenses, representations, or promises were about a material fact; Third: the defendant acted with the intent to defraud; and Fourth: the defendant transmitted or caused to be transmitted by wire or radio some communication in interstate commerce to help carry out the scheme to defraud. A, Counts Dismissed At the time of sentencing, the remaining count(s) against the defendant, Counts Two and Three, will be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(0)(1)(A). 5. No Further Charges If the Court accepts this plea agreement, the United States Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Florida agrees not to charge defendant with committing any other federal criminal offenses known to the United States Attorney's Office at the time of the execution of this agreement, related to the conduct giving rise to this plea agreement. fi Defendant’s Initials _’ 2 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 Filed 10/21/24 Page 3 of 22 PagelD 91 6. Mandatory Restitution to Victim of Offense of Conviction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663A and 3663(a) and (b), defendant agrees to make full restitution to the U.S. Small Business Administration in the amount of at least $57,186. 7. Guidelines Sentence Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(B), the United States will recommend to the Court that the defendant be sentenced within the defendant’s applicable guidelines range as determined by the Court pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as adjusted by any departure the United States has agreed to recommend in this plea agreement. The parties understand that such a recommendation is not binding on the Court and that, if it is not accepted by this Court, neither the United States nor the defendant will be allowed to withdraw from the plea agreement, and the defendant will not be allowed to withdraw from the plea of guilty. 8. Acceptance of Responsibility - Three Levels At the time of sentencing, and in the event that no adverse information is received suggesting such a recommendation to be unwarranted, the United States will not oppose the defendant’s request to the Court that the defendant receive a two-level downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility, pursuant to USSG § 3E1.1(a). The defendant understands that Defendant’s Initials 3 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 4 of 22 PagelD 92 this recommendation or request is not binding on the Court, and if not accepted by the Court, the defendant will not be allowed to withdraw from the plea. Further, at the time of sentencing, if the defendant's offense level prior to operation of subsection (a) is level 16 or greater, and if the defendant complies with the provisions of USSG § 3E1.1(b) and all terms of this Plea Agreement, including but not limited to, the timely submission of the financial affidavit referenced in Paragraph B.5., the United States agrees to file a motion pursuant to USSG § 3E1.1(b) for a downward adjustment of one additional level. The defendant understands that the determination as to whether the defendant has qualified for a downward adjustment of a third level for acceptance of responsibility rests solely with the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Florida, and the defendant agrees that the defendant cannot and will not challenge that determination, whether by appeal, collateral attack, or otherwise. 9. Forfeiture of Assets The defendant agrees to forfeit to the United States immediately and voluntarily any and all assets and property, or portions thereof, subject to forfeiture, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), whether in the possession or control of the United States, the defendant or Defendant’s Initials (7 4 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 5 of 22 PagelD 93 defendant's nominees. The assets to be forfeited specifically include, but are not limited to, the $57,186 in proceeds the defendant admits he obtained, as the result of the commission of the offense to which the defendant is pleading guilty. The defendant acknowledges and agrees that: (1) the defendant obtained this amount as a result of the commission of the offense, and (2) as a result of the acts and omissions of the defendant, the proceeds have been transferred to third parties and cannot be located by the United States upon the exercise of due diligence. Therefore, the defendant agrees that, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), the United States is entitled to forfeit any other property of the defendant (substitute assets), up to the amount of proceeds the defendant obtained, as the result of the offense(s) of conviction. The defendant further consents to, and agrees not to oppose, any motion for substitute assets filed by the United States up to the amount of proceeds obtained from commission of the offense(s) and consents to the entry of the forfeiture order into the Treasury Offset Program. The defendant agrees that forfeiture of substitute assets as authorized herein shall not be deemed an alteration of the defendant's sentence. The defendant additionally agrees that since the criminal proceeds have been transferred to third parties and cannot be located by the United States upon the exercise of due diligence, the preliminary and final Defendant’s Initials_/” 5 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 6 of 22 PagelD 94 orders of forfeiture should authorize the United States Attorney’s Office to conduct discovery (including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and the issuance of subpoenas), pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to help identify, locate, and forfeit substitute assets. The defendant also agrees to waive all constitutional, statutory, and procedural challenges (including direct appeal, habeas corpus, or any other means) to any forfeiture carried out in accordance with this Plea Agreement on any grounds, including that the forfeiture described herein constitutes an excessive fine, was not properly noticed in the charging instrument, addressed by the Court at the time of the guilty plea, announced at sentencing, or incorporated into the judgment. The defendant admits and agrees that the conduct described in the Factual Basis below provides a sufficient factual and statutory basis for the forfeiture of the property sought by the government. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4), the defendant agrees that the preliminary order of forfeiture will satisfy the notice requirement and will be final as to the defendant at the time it is entered. In the event the forfeiture is omitted from the judgment, the defendant agrees that the forfeiture order may be incorporated into the written judgment at any time pursuant to Rule 36. Defendant’s Initials _//> Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 Filed 10/21/24 Page 7 of 22 PagelD 95 The defendant agrees to take all steps necessary to identify and locate all substitute assets and to transfer custody of such assets to the United States before the defendant’s sentencing. To that end, the defendant agrees to make a full and complete disclosure of all assets over which defendant exercises control, including all assets held by nominees, to execute any documents requested by the United States to obtain from any other parties by lawful means any records of assets owned by the defendant, and to consent to the release of the defendant’s tax returns for the previous five years. The defendant agrees to be interviewed by the government, prior to and after sentencing, regarding such assets. The defendant further agrees to be polygraphed on the issue of assets, if it is deemed necessary by the United States. The defendant agrees that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and USSG § 1B1.8 will not protect from forfeiture assets disclosed by the defendant as part of the defendant’s cooperation. The defendant agrees to take all steps necessary to assist the government in obtaining clear title to any substitute assets before the defendant’s sentencing. In addition to providing full and complete information about substitute assets, these steps include, but are not limited to, the surrender of title, the signing of a consent decree of forfeiture, and signing of any other documents necessary to effectuate such transfers. Defendant’s Initials (7 7 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 Filed 10/21/24 Page 8 of 22 PagelD 96 Forfeiture of the defendant's assets shall not be treated as satisfaction of any fine, restitution, cost of imprisonment, or any other penalty the Court may impose upon the defendant in addition to forfeiture. The defendant agrees that, in the event the Court determines that the defendant has breached this section of the Plea Agreement, the defendant may be found ineligible for a reduction in the Guidelines calculation for acceptance of responsibility and substantial assistance, and may be eligible for an obstruction of justice enhancement. The defendant agrees that the forfeiture provisions of this plea agreement are intended to, and will, survive the defendant, notwithstanding the abatement of any underlying criminal conviction after the execution of this agreement. The forfeitability of any particular property pursuant to this agreement shall be determined as if the defendant had survived, and that determination shall be binding upon defendant’s heirs, successors and assigns until the agreed forfeiture, including the forfeiture of any substitute assets, is final. B. Standard Terms and Conditions 1. Restitution, Special Assessment and Fine The defendant understands and agrees that the Court, in addition to or in lieu of any other penalty, shall order the defendant to make restitution Defendant’s Initials _/” 8 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 Filed 10/21/24 Page 9 of 22 PagelD 97 to any victim of the offense(s), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, for all offenses described in 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(c)(1); and the Court may order the defendant to make restitution to any victim of the offense(s), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663, including restitution as to all counts charged, whether or not the defendant enters a plea of guilty to such counts, and whether or not such counts are dismissed pursuant to this agreement. The defendant further understands that compliance with any restitution payment plan imposed by the Court in no way precludes the United States from simultaneously pursuing other statutory remedies for collecting restitution (28 U.S.C. § 3003(b)(2)), including, but not limited to, garnishment and execution, pursuant to the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, in order to ensure that the defendant’s restitution obligation is satisfied. On each count to which a plea of guilty is entered, the Court shall impose a special assessment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013. To ensure that this obligation is satisfied, the Defendant agrees to deliver a cashier’s check, certified check, or money order to the Clerk of the Court in the amount of $100 payable to "Clerk, U.S. District Court" within ten days of the change of plea hearing. The defendant understands that this agreement imposes no limitation as to fine. \ Defendant’s Initials_/” 9 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 10 of 22 PagelD 98 2. Supervised Release The defendant understands that the offense(s) to which the defendant is pleading provide(s) for imposition of a term of supervised release upon release from imprisonment, and that, if the defendant should violate the conditions of release, the defendant would be subject to a further term of imprisonment. 3. Immigration Consequences of Pleading Guilty The defendant has been advised and understands that, upon conviction, a defendant who is not a United States citizen may be removed from the United States, denied citizenship, and denied admission to the United States in the future. 4. Sentencing Information The United States reserves its right and obligation to report to the Court and the United States Probation Office all information concerning the background, character, and conduct of the defendant, to provide relevant factual information, including the totality of the defendant's criminal activities, if any, not limited to the count(s) to which defendant pleads, to respond to comments made by the defendant or defendant's counsel, and to correct any misstatements or inaccuracies. The United States further reserves its right to Defendant’s Initials fe We 10 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 11 of 22 PagelD 99 make any recommendations it deems appropriate regarding the disposition of this case, subject to any limitations set forth herein, if any. 5. Financial Disclosures Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(d)(3) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(d)(2)(A)(i), the defendant agrees to complete and submit to the United States Attorney's Office within 30 days of execution of this agreement an affidavit reflecting the defendant's financial condition. The defendant promises that his financial statement and disclosures will be complete, accurate and truthful and will include all assets in which his has any interest or over which the defendant exercises control, directly or indirectly, including those held by a spouse, dependent, nominee or other third party. The defendant further agrees to execute any documents requested by the United States needed to obtain from any third parties any records of assets owned by the defendant, directly or through a nominee, and, by the execution of this Plea Agreement, consents to the release of the defendant's tax returns for the previous five years. The defendant similarly agrees and authorizes the United States Attorney's Office to provide to, and obtain from, the United States Probation Office, the financial affidavit, any of the defendant's federal, state, and local tax returns, bank records and any other financial information concerning the defendant, for the purpose of making any recommendations to Defendant’s Initials_//” 11 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 12 of 22 PagelD 100 the Court and for collecting any assessments, fines, restitution, or forfeiture ordered by the Court. The defendant expressly authorizes the United States Attorney's Office to obtain current credit reports in order to evaluate the defendant's ability to satisfy any financial obligation imposed by the Court. 6. Sentencing Recommendations It is understood by the parties that the Court is neither a party to nor bound by this agreement. The Court may accept or reject the agreement, or defer a decision until it has had an opportunity to consider the presentence report prepared by the United States Probation Office. The defendant understands and acknowledges that, although the parties are permitted to make recommendations and present arguments to the Court, the sentence will be determined solely by the Court, with the assistance of the United States Probation Office. Defendant further understands and acknowledges that any discussions between defendant or defendant's attorney and the attorney or other agents for the government regarding any recommendations by the government are not binding on the Court and that, should any recommendations be rejected, defendant will not be permitted to withdraw defendant's plea pursuant to this plea agreement. The government expressly reserves the right to support and defend any decision that the Court may make Defendant's Initials fo 12 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 13 of 22 PagelD 101 with regard to the defendant's sentence, whether or not such decision is consistent with the government's recommendations contained herein. 7. Defendant's Waiver of Right to Appeal the Sentence The defendant agrees that this Court has jurisdiction and authority to impose any sentence up to the statutory maximum and expressly waives the right to appeal defendant's sentence on any ground, including the ground that the Court erred in determining the applicable guidelines range pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, except (a) the ground that the sentence exceeds the defendant's applicable guidelines range as determined by the Court pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines; (b) the ground that the sentence exceeds the statutory maximum penalty; or (c) the ground that the sentence violates the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution; provided, however, that if the government exercises its right to appeal the sentence imposed, as authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3742(b), then the defendant is released from his waiver and may appeal the sentence as authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). 8. Middle District of Florida Agreement It is further understood that this agreement is limited to the Office of the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Florida and cannot bind other federal, state, or local prosecuting authorities, although this Defendant’s Initials fb 13 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 14 of 22 PagelD 102 office will bring defendant's cooperation, if any, to the attention of other prosecuting officers or others, if requested. 9. Filing of Agreement This agreement shall be presented to the Court, in open court or in camera, in whole or in part, upon a showing of good cause, and filed in this cause, at the time of defendant's entry of a plea of guilty pursuant hereto. 10. Voluntariness The defendant acknowledges that defendant is entering into this agreement and is pleading guilty freely and voluntarily without reliance upon any discussions between the attorney for the government and the defendant and defendant's attorney and without promise of benefit of any kind (other than the concessions contained herein), and without threats, force, intimidation, or coercion of any kind. The defendant further acknowledges defendant's understanding of the nature of the offense or offenses to which defendant is pleading guilty and the elements thereof, including the penalties provided by law, and defendant's complete satisfaction with the representation and advice received from defendant's undersigned counsel (if any). The defendant also understands that defendant has the right to plead not guilty or to persist in that plea if it has already been made, and that defendant has the right to be tried by a jury with the assistance of counsel, the right to confront Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 15 of 22 PagelD 103 and cross-examine the witnesses against defendant, the right against compulsory self-incrimination, and the right to compulsory process for the attendance of witnesses to testify in defendant's defense; but, by pleading guilty, defendant waives or gives up those rights and there will be no trial. The defendant further understands that if defendant pleads guilty, the Court may ask defendant questions about the offense or offenses to which defendant pleaded, and if defendant answers those questions under oath, on the record, and in the presence of counsel (if any), defendant's answers may later be used against defendant in a prosecution for perjury or false statement. The defendant also understands that defendant will be adjudicated guilty of the offenses to which defendant has pleaded and, if any of such offenses are felonies, may thereby be deprived of certain rights, such as the right to vote, to hold public office, to serve on a jury, or to have possession of firearms. 11. Factual Basis Defendant is pleading guilty because defendant is in fact guilty. The defendant certifies that defendant does hereby admit that the facts set forth in the attached "Factual Basis," which is incorporated herein by reference, are true, and were this case to go to trial, the United States would be able to prove those specific facts and others beyond a reasonable doubt. Defendant’s Initials LE 15 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 16 of 22 PagelD 104 12. Entire Agreement This plea agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the government and the defendant with respect to the aforementioned guilty plea and no other promises, agreements, or representations exist or have been made to the defendant or defendant's attorney with regard to such guilty plea. 13. Certification The defendant and defendant's counsel certify that this plea agreement has been read in its entirety by (or has been read to) the defendant and that defendant fully understands its terms. DATED this 2!**_ day of October, 2024. ROGER B. HANDBERG United States Attorney Robert William Burns Richard Varadan Defendant Assistant United States Attorney Katherine P Puzone/ Ex Chauncey A. Bratt Attorney for Defendant Assistant United States Attorney Deputy Chief, Orlando Division Defendant’s Initials /~ 16 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 17 of 22 PagelD 105 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 6:24-cr-87-PGB-RMN ROBERT WILLIAM BURNS Second: Third: Fourth: Defendant’s Initials _/ PERSONALIZATION OF ELEMENTS Did you knowingly devise or participate in a scheme to defraud, or to obtain money or property, by using false pretenses, representations, or promises? Were the false pretenses, representations, or promises about a material fact? Did you act with the intent to defraud? Did you transmit or cause to be transmitted by wire or radio some communication in interstate commerce to help carry out the scheme to defraud? 17 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 18 of 22 PagelD 106 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 6:24-cr-87-PGB-RMN ROBERT WILLIAM BURNS FACTUAL BASIS The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act was a federal law enacted in or around March 2020 designed to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions of Americans who were suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. One source of relief provided by the CARES Act was the authorization of forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses, through a program referred to as the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). To obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business was required to submit a PPP loan application, which was signed by an authorized representative of the business. The PPP loan application required the business (through its authorized representative) to acknowledge the program rules and make certain affirmative certifications in order to be eligible to obtain the PPP loan. In the PPP loan application (SBA Form 2483), the small business (through its Defendant’s Initials / 18 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 19 of 22 PagelD 107 authorized representative) was required to state, among other things, its: (a) average monthly payroll expenses; and (b) number of employees. These figures were used to calculate the amount of money the small business was eligible to receive under the PPP. In addition, businesses applying for a PPP loan were required to provide documentation showing their payroll expenses. PPP loan applications were processed by a participating lender. If a PPP loan application was approved, the participating lender funded the PPP loan using its own monies, which were 100% guaranteed by the SBA. Data from the application, including information from the borrower, the total amount of the loan, and the listed number of employees, was transmitted by the lender to the SBA in the course of processing the loan. PPP loan proceeds were required to be used for certain permissible expenses, including payroll costs, mortgage interest, rent, and utilities. Under the applicable PPP rules and guidance, the interest and principal on the PPP loan was eligible for forgiveness if the business spent the loan proceeds on these expense items within a designated period of time and used a certain portion of the loan towards payroll expenses. Lender 1 was a financial institution based in Bedford, Texas that participated in the SBA’s PPP as a lender and was authorized to lend funds to eligible borrowers under the terms of the PPP. Defendant’s Initials_/“?__ 19 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 20 of 22 PagelD 108 Beginning on an unknown date, but no later than on or about April 1, 2021, and continuing through on or about June 1, 2021, in the Middle District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, knowingly devised and intended to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud, and to obtain money and property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises in order to obtain PPP loans. A copy of the PPP loan application for RB3 Ventures LLC, was obtained from the loan provider, which shows that on or about March 30, 2021, ROBERT WILLIAM BURNS (“BURNS”) submitted a PPP loan application to Provider 1, which was a non-bank small business lender service provider. Provider 1 participated in the SBA’s PPP as a lender service provider and approved PPP loans on behalf of Lender 1. The PPP loan application listed the business address for RB3 Ventures as xxxx Duskywing Dr, Rockledge, FL 32955. The application listed the defendant as self-employed, with an average gross income of $114,000. Based on this information, the loan was approved, and funds were dispersed into Chase Bank account ending in 5017 on April 14, 2021, in the amount of $20,832.00. The application and supporting documentation submitted by the defendant shows materially false representations. The defendant falsely certified Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 21 of 22 PagelD 109 that the information provided in the application and supporting documents were true and accurate in all material respects. Supporting documents submitted by the defendant in the form of IRS tax documents were fictitious, and the defendant inflated the amount of gross income listed to obtain a larger loan amount. Tax records obtained from the IRS revealed no reported tax filings from the defendant or RB3 Ventures for the 2020 tax year. On the application, the defendant certified that the funds would be used towards expenses related to his business. Once the loan was deposited by Lender 1, the funds were not used for business purposes. The IP address which was utilized and captured to complete the PPP loan application identified the defendant with a home address of xxxx Duskywing Drive, Rockledge, Florida. The defendant was located in the Middle District of Florida when he submitted his PPP loan application to Provider 1 servers which were located in Iowa and South Carolina data centers at the time. In addition to the PPP loan that the defendant fraudulently obtained for RB3 Ventures LLC, the defendant also applied and obtained two additional fraudulent loans through Lender 2. A summary of all three of the PPP loans fraudulently obtained by the defendant is below: Defendant’s Initials Lé 21 Case 6:24-cr-00087-PGB-RMN Document 44 _ Filed 10/21/24 Page 22 of 22 PagelD 110 Loan | Applicant(s) Lender/ Provider Date Amount Submitted A RB3 Ventures LLC | Lender 1/Provider 1 3/30/2021 | $20,832.00 B Robert Burns dba | Lender 2 4/4/2021 | $18,177.00 The Social Wizards Cc Robert Burns dba | Lender 2 4/13/2021 | $18,177.00 The Social Wizards The defendant’s materially false, fraudulent, and misleading representations caused Provider 1 and Lender 2 to approve at least three fraudulent PPP loan applications, resulting in Lender 1 and Lender 2 depositing approximately $57,186 in PPP funds into a Chase Bank account controlled by the defendant. All of the PPP loan proceeds have since been used and spent on various transactions not related to the intended purpose for the loans. The above is merely a summary of some of the events, some of the persons involved, and other information relating to this case. It does not include, nor is it intended to include, all the events, persons involved, or other information relating to this case. Defendant’s Initials [HB 22
File and source
- File
- 44-plea-agreement.pdf
- Size
- 904,328 bytes
- SHA-256
- ae03358fb184e1a3c5f111431181358dcb41c67ac6365c426472c6434ee3e443
- Our copy
- 44-plea-agreement.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.