Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Preliminary Order of Forfeiture for Proceeds, United States of America v. Marcus Eichelberger

Preliminary Order of Forfeiture for Proceeds, United States of America v. Marcus Eichelberger

Summary

This Preliminary Order of Forfeiture for Proceeds in United States of America v. Marcus Eichelberger (Case No. 3:25-cr-241-TJC-PDB, Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division) was filed 09/24/26 as Document 36 and grants the United States' consent motion (Doc. 35). The court finds that the defendant obtained $19,000 as a result of the wire fraud offenses charged in Counts Three and Four of the Indictment, to which he has pleaded guilty. It finds that the proceeds were transferred to third parties and cannot be located, so the United States may seek forfeiture of any of the defendant's property as a substitute asset up to the $19,000 order. Upon entry the order is a final order of forfeiture as to the defendant.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Preliminary Order of Forfeiture for Proceeds, United States of America v. Marcus Eichelberger.” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/36-order-on-motion-for-forfeiture-6250a75fdf/, SHA-256 659264499e2a1504b085edfb91d328d25bc5659701cb4df7c8e83b5870f5f555.

Full text

Case 3:25-cr-00241-TJC-PDB    Document 36    Filed 09/24/26   Page 1 of 2 PageID 125




                      UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                       MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
                         JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 v.                                          Case No. 3:25-cr-241-TJC-PDB

 MARCUS EICHELBERGER

      PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE FOR PROCEEDS

       THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the United States’ Consent

 Motion for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture of Proceeds in the amount of

 $19,000, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and Fed.

 R. Crim. P. 32.2.(b)(2), which upon entry shall be a final order of forfeiture as

 to the defendant.

       Being fully advised of the relevant facts, the Court finds that the

 United States has established that the defendant obtained $19,000 as a

 result of the wire fraud offenses in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, as charged

 in Counts Three and Four of the Indictment, to which he has pleaded guilty.

       Accordingly, it is hereby:

       ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that for good cause shown,

 the United States’ consent motion, Doc. 35, is GRANTED.

       It is FURTHER ORDERED that the proceeds of the offense were

 transferred to third parties, and the United States cannot locate the proceeds

 upon the exercise of due diligence. Accordingly, under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), as
Case 3:25-cr-00241-TJC-PDB    Document 36    Filed 09/24/26   Page 2 of 2 PageID 126




 incorporated by 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), the United States may seek, as a

 substitute asset in satisfaction of this judgment, forfeiture of any of the

 defendant’s property up to the $19,000 order of forfeiture. The Court retains

 jurisdiction to enter any further order necessary for the forfeiture and

 disposition of any substitute asset.

             DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida this 24th day of

 September, 2026.




 Copies to:
 Clint J. Locke, AUSA
 Counsel of Record




                                         2

File and source

File
36-order-on-motion-for-forfeiture.pdf
Size
175,461 bytes
SHA-256
659264499e2a1504b085edfb91d328d25bc5659701cb4df7c8e83b5870f5f555
Our copy
36-order-on-motion-for-forfeiture.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top