Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order of Dismissal — Mikayla Hill v. LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc (District of South Carolina)

Order of Dismissal — Mikayla Hill v. LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc (District of South Carolina)

Summary

An Order of Dismissal in Mikayla Hill v. LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc, Civil Action No. 8-24-cv-2643-TMC, in the District Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina, Anderson/Greenwood Division, dated December 3, 2024 (Entry Number 34). The order recites that counsel have advised the Court that the action has been settled and orders that the action is dismissed without costs and without prejudice. If settlement is not consummated within sixty (60) days, either party may petition the Court to reopen the action, or may petition to enforce the settlement. The order states that the dismissal is with prejudice if no action is taken within sixty (60) days from the filing date. It is signed by Timothy M Cain, Chief United States District Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order of Dismissal — Mikayla Hill v. LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc (District of South Carolina).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/34-63b059d97e/, SHA-256 fa06e7e1bc2d40552e27c27566d76839b3a2329fef9f1c5daaa544218234c817.

Full text

8:24-cv-02643-TMC          Date Filed 12/03/24     Entry Number 34         Page 1 of 1



                   IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
                       FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
                         ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION


Mikayla Hill,                               )
                                            )      Civil Action No. 8-24-cv-2643-TMC
                             Plaintif f,    )
                                            )           ORDER OF DISMISSAL
          vs.                               )
                                            )
LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc,              )
                                            )
                             Defendant.     )
                                            )


                The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above

action has been settled,

                IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without

prejudice. If settlement is not consummated within sixty (60) days, either party may petition

the Court to reopen this action and restore it to the calendar. Rule 60(b)(6), F.R.Civ.P. In

the alternative, to the extent permitted by law, either party may within sixty (60) days petition

the Court to enforce the settlement. Fairfax Countywide Citizens v. Fairfax County, 571

F.2d 1299 (4th Cir. 1978). By agreement of the parties, the court retains jurisdiction to

enforce the settlement agreement. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 381-

82 (1994).

                The dismissal hereunder shall be with prejudice if no action is taken under

either alternative within sixty (60) days from the filing date of this order.

                IT IS SO ORDERED.



                                            s/Timothy M Cain
                                            Chief United States District Judge

December 3, 2024
Anderson, South Carolina


File and source

File
34.pdf
Size
49,770 bytes
SHA-256
fa06e7e1bc2d40552e27c27566d76839b3a2329fef9f1c5daaa544218234c817
Our copy
34.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top