Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Agreed Order on Application to Employ Special Counsel for ERTC Matters — In re Express Grain Terminals, LLC

Agreed Order on Application to Employ Special Counsel for ERTC Matters — In re Express Grain Terminals, LLC

Summary

An agreed order in In re: Express Grain Terminals, LLC, Chapter 11 Case No. 21-11832-SDM, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, filed October 24, 2022 as Doc 3017. It resolves the objection of the Office of the United States Trustee [DKT # 2978] to the Debtor's Application to Employ Special Counsel for ERTC Matters [DKT # 2963]. The order approves hiring Dallas, Anthony & Jeffords, PLLC and Rawlings & MacInnis, P.A. to calculate the Employee Retention Tax Credit and deliver the documents to the Internal Revenue Service to apply for it. Pay is on a contingency fee basis only, with each firm receiving one-half of the 20% contingency fee. Counsel for the Debtor and for the United States Trustee sign it with /s/ as approved for entry, and it is entered under Judge Selene D. Maddox.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Agreed Order on Application to Employ Special Counsel for ERTC Matters — In re Express Grain Terminals, LLC.” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/3017-agreed-order-ust-objection-ertc-counsel-0cc1ba5092/, SHA-256 8211db6fdb8bf0729f63bd295975fbc411e8b0c164b192ad9f5c11f898dac265.

Full text

Case 21-11832-SDM         Doc 3017      Filed 10/24/22 Entered 10/24/22 14:50:12                   Desc Main
                                      Document      Page 1 of 5

 ____________________________________________________________________________
                                                        SO ORDERED,




                                                        Judge Selene D. Maddox

                                                        United States Bankruptcy Judge

          The Order of the Court is set forth below. The case docket reflects the date entered.
 ____________________________________________________________________________

                      IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
                          NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI


 IN RE:         EXPRESS GRAIN TERMINALS, LLC1                                          CHAPTER 11
                Debtor                                                        CASE NO. 21-11832-SDM

                                           AGREED ORDER

        THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Application of Express Grain Terminals, LLC

 (the “Debtor”) to Employ Special Counsel for ERTC Matters [DKT # 2963], and upon the

 objection and response thereto [DKT # 2978] filed by the Office of the United States Trustee (the

 "UST"), the parties having advised the Court that they have reached a resolution of the issues

 presented, and the Court being otherwise advised in the premises is of the opinion that this

 Agreed Order should be entered memorializing the agreement of the parties. The Court does

 hereby order, find and adjudicate as follows:

        1.      On September 29, 2021, the Debtor herein filed with this Court its Voluntary

 Petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (the "Petition").

        2.      The Debtor, with Court approval after notice and a hearing, sold substantially all

 of its assets in this case to third parties. The remaining business of the Debtor has to do with the

 prosecution and collection of claims and causes of action, including avoidance claims and causes


        1
         Jointly administered with In re Express Biodiesel, LLC, Case No. 21-11834-SDM and In re Express
        Processing, Case No. 21-11835-SDM.
Case 21-11832-SDM        Doc 3017      Filed 10/24/22 Entered 10/24/22 14:50:12              Desc Main
                                     Document      Page 2 of 5



 of action, objections to claims, finalizing its disclosure statement, prosecuting its plan of

 liquidation and establishing a trust to administer the assets of the Debtor, post-confirmation.

        3.      In order to facilitate the prudent performance of its duties and the successful

 operation of its affairs under this Chapter 11 proceeding, the Debtor requires the services of

 Dallas, Anthony & Jeffords, PLLC, 213 Katherine Drive, Flowood, Mississippi 39232, and

 Rawlings & MacInnis, P.A., P.O. Box 1789, Madison, Mississippi 39130 (the “Law Firms”), to

 act as its special counsel in gathering application information and conduct the analysis necessary

 to calculate the Employee Retention Tax Credit (“ERTC”) as well as delivery of the necessary

 documents to the Internal Revenue Service to apply for such federal tax credits on behalf of the

 Debtor. The work being performed by the Law Firms, and their compensation, is more

 particularly described in the Client Services Agreement, a copy of which is attached to the

 Application as Exhibit “A”.

        4.      The Law Firms are experienced in, and are familiar with, the work being

 performed and are fully qualified to represent the interests of the Debtor therein.

        5.      The Debtor is informed and believes that the Law Firms have the appropriate

 skills and expertise needed to serve as the Debtor’s special counsel in the connection with the

 ERTC. The Law Firms have agreed to perform these services on a contingency fee basis which

 is more particularly described in Paragraph 8 of the Client Services Agreement attached to the

 Application as Exhibit “A”.

        6.      As set forth in the Affidavits of Jeff Rawlings and Dustin Jeffords attached to the

 Application, both Jeff Rawlings, Dustin Jeffords and the Law Firms are “disinterested persons”

 as contemplated by the applicable statutory authority under which they are to be employed and

 applicable Bankruptcy Rules. Jeff Rawlings has disclosed his prior representation of Guaranty

 Bank and Trust Company in this case; both the Debtor and Guaranty Bank and Trust Company
                                                   -2-
Case 21-11832-SDM       Doc 3017     Filed 10/24/22 Entered 10/24/22 14:50:12               Desc Main
                                   Document      Page 3 of 5



 have knowingly consented to this representation of the Debtor and agree Jeff Rawlings may be

 engaged as special counsel.

        7.     Debtor is in need of the Law Firms to pursue the ERTC claims and seeks Court

 approval of the engagement and employment of the Law Firms and the contingent fee

 arrangement outlined herein.

        8.     As noted, the parties have resolved the objection of the UST as follows:

               a.      The Debtor is permitted to hire the Law Firms to act as its special counsel

                       in gathering application information and conduct the analysis necessary to

                       calculate the Employee Retention Tax Credit as well as delivery of the

                       necessary documents to the Internal Revenue Service to apply for such

                       federal tax credits on behalf of the Debtor.

               b.      The Law Firms have agreed to perform these services on a contingency

                       fee basis which is more particularly described in Paragraph 8 of the Client

                       Services Agreement attached to the Application as Exhibit “A”. The Law

                       Firms agree that compensation is on a contingency fee basis only. The

                       referenced invoices are merely to notify the Debtor of the contingent fees

                       due upon payment from the IRS. The Law Firms agree that each will

                       receive one-half of the 20% contingency fee: 10% to each.

               c.      In the event that the confirmed Plan of Liquidation provides for a

                       Liquidating Trustee or other replacement for the Debtor-in-Possession

                       (i.e., a Post-Confirmation Entity), said employment of the Law Firms shall

                       be governed by the terms of the Confirmed Plan addressing the hiring of

                       professionals by the Post-Confirmation Entity.



                                                -3-
Case 21-11832-SDM       Doc 3017      Filed 10/24/22 Entered 10/24/22 14:50:12          Desc Main
                                    Document      Page 4 of 5



                d.     If the Confirmed Plan does not address the hiring of professionals by the

                       Post-Confirmation Entity, then any special counsel hired by the Post-

                       Confirmation Entity shall be employed pursuant to Section 327 of the

                       Bankruptcy Code, and the Post-Confirmation Entity shall file a separate

                       application to employ on or before the Effective Date of the confirmed

                       plan.

 9.     The Application of the Debtor to Employ Special Counsel for ERTC Matters is hereby

 approved pursuant to the terms stated herein.

                                    # # END OF ORDER # #

 APPROVED FOR ENTRY:


 /s/ Craig M. Geno
 Craig M. Geno
 Counsel for Express Grain Terminals, LLC


 /s/ Abigail M. Marbury
 Abigail M. Marbury
 Counsel for the United States Trustee


 /s/ Jeff Rawlings
 Jeff Rawlings, Rawlings
 & MacInnis, P.A.


 /s/ Dustin Jeffords
 Dustin Jeffords, Dallas, Anthony
 & Jeffords, PLLC

 Submitted by:
 Craig M. Geno, Esq. - MSB No. 4793
 Law Offices of Craig M. Geno, PLLC
 587 Highland Colony Parkway
 Ridgeland, MS 39157
 (601) 427-0048 - Telephone (601) 427-0050 Facsimile\
 cmgeno@cmgenolaw.com
                                                 -4-
Case 21-11832-SDM   Doc 3017     Filed 10/24/22 Entered 10/24/22 14:50:12   Desc Main
                               Document      Page 5 of 5




                                         -5-


File and source

File
3017-agreed-order-ust-objection-ertc-counsel.pdf
Size
1,194,132 bytes
SHA-256
8211db6fdb8bf0729f63bd295975fbc411e8b0c164b192ad9f5c11f898dac265
Our copy
3017-agreed-order-ust-objection-ertc-counsel.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top