Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Proposed Order, Motion to Lift Stay, DENIED — Feds for Medical Freedom v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. (Document 52-1)

Proposed Order, Motion to Lift Stay, DENIED — Feds for Medical Freedom v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. (Document 52-1)

Summary

This proposed order in Feds for Medical Freedom, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Civil Action 3:21-cv-00356 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, would deny the plaintiffs' opposed motion to lift stay, grant summary judgment and declaratory relief in part, and issue permanent injunctive relief (ECF No. 44). It recites that the court considered the motion and the defendants' response in opposition, leaves the signing date blank for Jeffrey Vincent Brown, United States District Judge, and was filed on June 2, 2023 as Document 52-1.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Proposed Order, Motion to Lift Stay, DENIED — Feds for Medical Freedom v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. (Document 52-1).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/3-21-cv-00356-recap-gov-uscourts-txsd-1855108-52-1-3f1f6ac78f/, SHA-256 722261d7156e40bdedb4221e28999607a65cd35513707142c04d08b1acbcbcbd.

Full text

    Case 3:21-cv-00356 Document 52-1 Filed on 06/02/23 in TXSD Page 1 of 1




                  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                  FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                          GALVESTON DIVISION



 FEDS FOR MEDICAL FREEDOM, et al.,

    Plaintiffs,                                  Civil Action 3:21-cv-00356

        v.

 JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official
 capacity, et al.,

    Defendants.


                                 [PROPOSED] ORDER

       Before the Court is the Plaintiffs’ Opposed Motion to Lift Stay, Grant Summary

Judgment and Declaratory Relief in Part, and Issue Permanent Injunctive Relief. ECF No. 44.

Having considered Plaintiffs’ Motion and Defendants’ Response in Opposition, the Plaintiffs’

Motion is DENIED.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

       Signed on Galveston Island this ________ day of ________, 2023.



                                                 _________________________________
                                                 JEFFREY VINCENT BROWN
                                                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE




                                             1

File and source

File
3-21-cv-00356_RECAP_gov.uscourts.txsd.1855108.52.1.pdf
Size
100,339 bytes
SHA-256
722261d7156e40bdedb4221e28999607a65cd35513707142c04d08b1acbcbcbd
Our copy
3-21-cv-00356_RECAP_gov.uscourts.txsd.1855108.52.1.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top