Unpublished Order — Feds for Medical Freedom v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., No. 22-40043 (Fifth Circuit, Document 344-1)
- Date
- 2024-01-21
Summary
An unpublished order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Feds for Medical Freedom, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States, et al., No. 22-40043, filed January 21, 2024. The case is an appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, USDC No. 3:21-CV-356, and the order is Document 344-1 on the appellate docket. The per curiam order denies the appellees' opposed motion for an order clarifying the effect of the Supreme Court's vacatur of the court's en banc judgment dated March 23, 2023. The order lists the chief judge and circuit judges sitting and notes that two judges who joined the court after en banc submission did not participate.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Unpublished Order — Feds for Medical Freedom v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., No. 22-40043 (Fifth Circuit, Document 344-1).”
Dated 2024-01-21. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/22-40043-recap-gov-uscourts-ca5-206309-344-1-3e7020738a/
, SHA-256 f381fcbeb610d18b6529c0b253ea0b56e92355034d3c5deb474d7c0645f25f79.Full text
Case: 22-40043 Document: 344-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/21/2024
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
___________
No. 22-40043
___________
Feds for Medical Freedom; Local 918, American
Federation of Government Employees; Highland
Engineering, Incorporated; Raymond A. Beebe, Jr.; John
Armbrust; Et al.,
Plaintiffs—Appellees,
versus
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United
States; The United States of America; Pete Buttigieg, in
his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation; Department of
Transportation; Janet Yellen, in her official capacity as Secretary
of Treasury; Et al.,
Defendants—Appellants.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:21-CV-356
______________________________
UNPUBLISHED ORDER
Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Barksdale,
Stewart, Dennis, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves,
Higginson, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham,
and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
Case: 22-40043 Document: 344-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/21/2024
No. 22-40043
Per Curiam: *
IT IS ORDERED that Appellees’ opposed motion for an order
clarifying the effect of the Supreme Court’s vacatur of this court’s en banc
judgment dated March 23, 2023, is DENIED.
*
Judges Douglas and Ramirez joined the court after this case was submitted to the
court en banc and did not participate in this decision.
2File and source
- File
- 22-40043_RECAP_gov.uscourts.ca5.206309.344.1.pdf
- Size
- 61,761 bytes
- SHA-256
- f381fcbeb610d18b6529c0b253ea0b56e92355034d3c5deb474d7c0645f25f79
- Original
- No public link identified.