Factual Proffer — United States v. Philossaint (Southern District of Florida)
Summary
A factual proffer in the criminal case of the United States of America against defendant Philossaint, Case No. 9:22-cr-80144-RS, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered on the docket 02/15/2023 as Document 204-54. The United States Attorney's Office and the defendant agree that the statement of facts provides a factual basis for the defendant's plea of guilty. The proffer states that Philossaint assisted conspirators in submitting PPP loan and EIDL applications for businesses and prepared loan forgiveness applications. It describes Unfold and Royal Elite Trans, LLC as examples and wire transfers through Tollinchi Law's IOTA account. It ends with signature blocks for the United States Attorney and the defendant.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Factual Proffer — United States v. Philossaint (Southern District of Florida).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/204-att54-69a0009d77/
, SHA-256 d16610ec2198bd626e885bfb4faaf4c3a49cdf30880b60c4379a96be7abcc783.Full text
Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-54 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 9
' case 9'.22-ct-80144-RS Document 94 Entered on FLSD Dockel tLl!412022 Paqe I of I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 22-CR.80 I 44-SM ITH,/MAYNARD(s)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JOFF STENN \7ROY PHILOSSAINT,
Defendant.
FACTUAL PROFFER
The United States Attornds Office for the Southem District of Florida ("this Office") and
the defentlant, Joff Stenn \Uroy Philossaing agree that the following statement of facs is accurate
and provides a facrual basis for the defendzrnt's plea ofguilty. All 6cts were true at all times relevant
to the offense conduct unless a more specific date or time is specified. The defendant understands
that the government may present e'r,idence at 6lnrrc procccdings that his criminal conduct was more
extensive than is describetl in this proffer.
1. Paragraphs 1-9 ofthe General Ailegations ofthe Superseding Indictment accurarely
describe the Palroll Protection Program ("PPP") and the Economic Injury Disaster Loan ("EIDL')
progtam. They are incorporated into this statement of facs as if fully set fonh herein.
General Summary of Offerue Conduct
2. Beginning no Iater than in or around May orJune 2020 and conrinuing through no
earlier than in or aiound June 2021, Plrilosaint xsisted numerous conspimtors to submit
ftaud,lent applications for PPP loans and EIDts on behalf of businesses <.rwnctl antl concolled by
the conspirators, At first, Philossaint carried out this scheme while working for Company 1, which
Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-54 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 2 of 9
'Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 94 Entered on FLSD Dockel 1,L11,412022 Page 2 ot I
was operated by Conspirator l. Later, Philossaint began working for himself and carrying out the
same scheme.
3. Philossaint prepared loan applicarions for the conspirator business owners and
caused the applications rc be sent to his conspirators to digitally sign and elecuonicatly submit to
various financial instiotions arrd the Small Business Adnrinistmtion ("SBA"). The applications
contained material misrepresenhtions about the businesses, such as substantial oversatemenrs of
the businesses' gross revenucs! rurrrber of cmployees, and avcrage monthly payroll. Based on these
fraudulent applications, various priwate financial institutions and SBA loaned money, generally
hundreds of thousancls of dollars, to the conspirators' businesses. Philossaint later prepared
applications on behalf of the conspirator businesses for forgiveness of the PPP loans. These
applications falsely stated that the businesses had met the preconditions of loan forgiveness by using
the loans to pay payroll and/or for other permissible expenses.
4. Aniorrratic Dam Processing, Inc. ("ADP") provided papoll and other sen,ices to
businesses. Conspirator 1 and,/or Philossaint operred ADP accounts on behalfoftheir conspirators,
widr themselves (Conspirator I or Philossaint) as the accounr adminisrators. They caused ADP to
make palnnents pnrportedly for payroll to individuals with dre loan proceeds, although tlrese
individuals either did not work fbr the loan recipienm or were nor entitled to payroll in the amounts
paid. Philossaint attempted to obtain antl use ADP records to support the applications tbr loan
forgi, .eness.
5. Brianna Monique Gayle had previously worked for ADP. During the conspiracy, she
worked as an assistant to Philossaint. Records obrainecl ftour ADP showcd that Gayle, while working
Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-54 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 3 of 9
. 'Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 94 Entered on FLSD Dockel lUL4l2022 Page 3 of 9
for Philossaint, conLrcted ADP on multiple occasions benveen May 2021 and April 2022. Cayle
contacted ADP to manage pa1'roll accounts enrolled by EIVC, such as adding ot renoving accounts.
6. Gayle also contacted ADP to reaieve payroll documents and W-2's for d.re payroll
accounr. Cayle called ADP on January 26, 2027, and conferenced Philossaint into tl're cal[. They
stated that their entire client Iist should have been ternrinated as going out ofbusiuess and therefore
should ha.,e received W-Z's for 2021. Gayle continued to make calls to ADP on behalf of the
companies enrolled by EIVC to obtain W-Z's.
7. Shortly after the conspirator business owners received their loan proceeds, they paid
either Conspirator 1 or Philossaint a fee of approximately 10% of the value of the loans. In many
cases, the fee u,as paid to shell companies that Philossaint controlled, which did no true business, or
inaccurate notations were made on ihe checks or other instruments of payment. These payments
were nrade from aud to financial irutinrtions, that is, banks the deposits of which were insured by
the Federal Deposit lnsurance Corporation.
8. Philossaint assiited codefendants and conspiraton to apply for ftaudt eirt loans and
applied for such loans himself. f1le corrspirators applied on behalf of', Gayle, applying as a sole
proprietor; Cinda Foundation Inc; DDZ Family Enterprises LLC; Ferro's Entertainment and
Production LLC; JREAM Vision TV LLC; One Solution Group LLC; Royal Elite tans, LLC;
Sunrise City Construction DevelopmentLLC; Untbld Perception, LLC; and other businesses. Based
on tlese applications, Ienden and SBA paid at least $2,020,328.17 ' in loans to which the
cotxpitators were not enticled. The conspirators lvho received these loans paid Philossaint
approxirnately 1096 of rhe valuc of the loans.
l
Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-54 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 4 of 9
, 'Case 9:22-cr80144-RS Document 94 Entered on FLSD Dockel 7711412022 Page 4 ot 9
9. The {raudulent PPP loan and EIDL applications involved in the scheme wete
submitted electronically to servers located outside Florida. Philossaint, Tollinchi, Rene, Gayle,
Shazier, Johnson, and most of rhe other coDspirators resided and worked in the Soudrern District
of Florit{a and submitted their applications ftom this district.
Unlold Perception, LLC
10. The applications for PPP loans subruiced by Unf<.,[d Perception, LLC are a
rcpresentatiye example of rlre scherne and conspiracy. Unf,rld was a Florida lirired liability
company. It was organized on May 28, 2019. Rene was the sole managing mernber. Unfold's
principal place ofbusiness was in West Palm Beach, Florida.
1 1. On June 18, 2020, Unfold applied for a PPP loan- The loan application was digitally
signed by RelLe. The application was electronically trrnsmitted to Celtic Bank's servers, which were
located in Utah. The application stated that Unfold had three employees and average monthly
payroll of$32,781.66. For the twelve montlx preceding this app)ication, records of Unfold's bank
account reveal that the company had gross rwenue of approximately $ 10,000 and no payroll. A copy
of an IRS Form 941 (Enrpl-ryer's Quarterly Tax Rentrns) was submitted wirh the application. This
fonn appeared to corroborate the pal.roll figure on the application. However, Unfold did not sutrrnit
the fornr to the IRS. Based on this application, on June 2L,2020, Celtic Bank trar.rsferred a PPP
Ioan to Unfold's Wells Fargo bnnk accounr in the anrorrnt of $81,954-
lZ. Trust Alliance Enterprises Inc. ("Trust") was a Florida corporation. It was
incorporated on ]une 15, 2020. Conspirator 1 was the sole officer. On June 25, ZOZO, Rene signed
a check.from the Unfold bank account made out to Trusr in the amount of $ 10,654-02.
+
Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-54 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 5 of 9
.' Case 9'.22-ct-80L44-Rs Document 94 Entered on FLSD Docket 1111,412022 Page 5 of I
13. On June 30, 2020, eightdays after Unfold received its PPP loan, a payroll account
was created at ADP for Unfold. Conspirator 1 rvas the primary contact. From July through
December 2020, using proceeds ofthe PPP loan, Unfold paid $49,172.24 in paymens purportedty
for payroll via ADP, including $29,999.97 to Rene.
14, On February 22,2021,Un{old applied for n second PPP loan. The application rvas
electronically transmitted to Celtic Bank's sewers, which were located in Utah. The application
statcd drat Unfold had thrce ernployees and average monthly payroll ot $12,781. For dTc twelve
months preceding tiris application, Unfold had gross revenu€ of approximately $24,000 (not
including PPP and EIDL funds) and payroll of approximately $2,300 (not including the ADP
payments). A copy ofthe same IRS Form 941 that had accompanied Unfold's previous application,
which had not been sr.lbnrined to tlre IRS, was submirred rvith the new application. Based on this
application, on February 23, 2021, Celtic Bank tansferred a PPP loan to Unfold's Wells Fargo bank
account in the arnount of$81,952,
15. Dad Morrey lnvestment Group, LLC and Elite lnterrratiolral Vehture Capital, I-LC
(.EIVC) rvere Florida limited liability companies, They were botlr organized on July 6, 2020.
Plrilossaint was the President of Dad Mouey- Dad Money was EIVC's sole managing member. The
companies principai places of business were two different sr.rites in the same office building in
Hallandale Beach, Florida.
16. On March 5, 2021, Rene signed a check from the Uniold ri/ells Fargo bank account
made ouc to EIVC in the amount of $5j97-somcwhat less than 1096 of the amounr of Unfold's
second PPP loan. In t[re menro linc of thc check was wrirten the word "accor.rnting."
5
Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-54 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 6 of 9
Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 94 Entered on FLSD Dockel I71t412022 Page 6 of 9
l?. On May 6, 2021, Unfold opened a new ADP accounr Philossaint was the only
authorized firm representative listecl on the account. From May through August, 2021, using
proceeds of the PPP loan, Unfold paid $49,194.05 in payments purportedly for ;:ayroll via ADP,
including $30,044.28 to Rene. The lasc payment was made on August 25, 2021.
18. On August 6, 2021, Rene sent Philossaint a voice recording over \UhatsApp. She
stated that she wls "wondering when is the last date ofthe payroll so *rac way I can call them so they
can pause it. Please ler me know.' On August t8, 2021, Renc wrotc to Philossaint by VhatsApp,
"Please inform me ofwhen the date payrotl ends. I beliwe it has been six montlrs." [-aw enforcement
agents subsequendy recovered these messages fiom Philossaint's phone.
19. On May 24, 2O?,7, Unfold applied for forgiveness of its 6rst PPP loan. The
application claimed that Unfold had three employees at the time ofthe application and that Unfold
had spent $49,1?2.24 of the loan on payroll expenses. As a result of Unfold's applicadon, the loan
was forgiven.
ZO. On September 8, 2021, Unfold applied for forgiveness of its second PPP loan. The
application claimed that Unfold had three employees at the time of the application anci that Ulrfold
hed spent $49,761.07 of the loan on payroll expenses. As a result of Unlbld's application, dre loan
was forgiven,
Royal Elite Trans
77. Royal Elite Trans, LLC was a Florida limited liability company. Philossaint was the
sole managing member. Its principal place of business changed several times, but was always in
Miarni-Dade or Broward County, Florida. Philossaint was the only signatory on Royal Elite Trans's
bank accounts-
6
Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-54 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 7 of 9
. Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document94 Entered on FLSD Dockelllll4l2o22 PageT ol I
22. On April l, 2020, Royal EIie Trans applied for an EIDL. The application was
electronically transmitted to the servers of the Small Business Administration ("SBA"), which were
located outside of Florida. The application required Royal Elite Trans to describe its "detatled
business activity." The application listed "Limosine [sicl & Transportation." SBA initially declinetl
the application, but Philossainr requested recorrsideration ofthat decision and ther.r adnrinistratively
appealed it, and the loan w:s granted On December 16, Z0Zl, Philossaint ele*ronically signed a
Loan Audrorization and Agreement \yidr SBA. The agrecment irrcluded the requirement that
'lb]orrowet will use a[[ the proceeds of this Loan solely as working capital to alleviate economic
injury caused by disaster occuming in the month oflanuary 31, Z0ZO and continuing thereatter."
On December 21, 2021, SBA transferred an EIDL to Royal Elite Trans' Bank of America checking
account in the amotlnt of $289,400. Philossaint is the on\' signatory on this accottttt.
23, Royal Elite Trans had not strffered econonric iujury in 2020. Royal Elite Trans's bank
rec<.,rtls indirate that the courpany's gross revenue increascd frour $136,766.93 in 2019 to
$231,7 55.07 in 2020 (excluding PPP and EIDL funds). The record^s conhtin no indications drat
Royal Elite Trans operated a limousine or similar ransportation husiness and no inriications rhnt
Royal Elite Trans paid any signilicant business expenses.
74. An attorney's lnrerest on Trust Account ("IOTA') is an interest bearing trust account
used by members ofthe Florida Bar to hold nominal or short term fr]nds in trust for a client or thirtl
party when ir would not be feasible to earn income on the 6.rnds for the client or third parry. The
incorue on the IOTA account benefits chariurble causes llesignated by the Florida Bar. Tollinchi
Law, PA was a Florida corporatiou engagcd in dre practicc of [aw. The sole officcr was Mariel
7
Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-54 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 8 of 9
i
Case 9:22-cr80144-RS Document 94 Entered on FLSD Dockel LU7412022 Page I of 9
Tollinchi. Tollinchi was an attorney and was in a romantic relationship with P[rilossaint. Tollinchi
[-aw maintained an IOTA accotnrt at Chase Bank.
75. On December 22, 2021, two checks were writteu {rom dre Royal Elite Trans account,
one to Tollinchi l-aw for $34,000 and the other to Tollinchi personally for $6,573.63. On January 5,
2072, $26,J71.30 was wired from Royal Elite Trans' Bank ofAnerica checking account to Tollinchi
Law's IOTA account. On ]anuary 6, 2022, Tollirchi law rvired the sarme sum, $26,371.30, from the
sirme accolult to an account in thc Domilrican Republic. Tbe notation associated with the wire read,
"Joff Philossaint rcal estate purchase." On January 20,2A21-, tlre same Royal Elite Tratrs accounr
rvired $190,000.00 to the same Tollinchi Larv IOTA account. On January 25,7022, Toliinchi Law
wired $200,000 from irs IOTA account to an flccounc in the Dominican Republic. The notation
associated with the wire included Joff Philossailrt's name and the words, "Real estate." Royal Elite
Trans's banl< records contain r1o indiaation that its business involvell real estate nansactions before
it obtained the EIDL.
26. Before the EIDLwas deposited into Royal Elite Trans' Bank ofAmerica account, the
balance in the account was $2,039.50- Benveen tlre tirne of the deposit of the EIDL and the wire of
January 20, 2022, the account received approximately $11,650 io deposits. Therefore, Royal Elite
Trans could not have transferred the fuuds to Tollinchi described above without the EIDL.
tJ
Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-54 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 9 of 9
t I' Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 94 Entered on FLSD Dockel7tl1,4l2022 Page 9 of I
Financial Institutions
27. Wells Fargo, Bank ofAmerica, and Chase Bank were ftnancial institutions, that is,
banks the deposis of which were imuted by rhe Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Date'
t lt hr.* Bv, tu&ot
j
MARC OSBORNE
ASSISTANT UNITED SIATES ATTORNEY
Date,
4ulyz* IAN GO
ATTORN R DEFENDANT
L)ate: tl u4/ tu
lode SidNn wnoY PHILossAINT
DEFENDANT
C6r fled to b€ a true
correct coov ot the and
doc umonl on file
AnS.li E. Nobt e, Clerk
u.s. Bistrict Cou rt
Soulhern District_ ol
Florida
By
Date NO l5 IfrY uty Cterh
9
File and source
- File
- 204-att54.pdf
- Size
- 2,128,615 bytes
- SHA-256
- d16610ec2198bd626e885bfb4faaf4c3a49cdf30880b60c4379a96be7abcc783
- Our copy
- 204-att54.pdf
- Original
- archive.org