Senate Bill Report - SB 6111, Protecting Children Online (As of January 26, 2026)
Summary
This Senate Bill Report on SB 6111, protecting children online, is dated as of January 26, 2026, and records Business, Trade & Economic Development committee activity on 1/29/26. The brief summary says the bill requires providers offering certain social media services to register and verify the ages of users creating accounts and requires parental consent for a minor under 17 to create an account. Providers must develop and implement a harm mitigation strategy. The Office of the Attorney General may bring actions, and a court must impose a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 per violation if an injunction is violated. The report lists the fiscal note as requested on January 23, 2026.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Senate Bill Report - SB 6111, Protecting Children Online (As of January 26, 2026).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2026-01-29-a33770-d292974-6111-sba-bte-26-f27f9b75d6/
, SHA-256 9dc1437d6c162726526f5d7d914d3b7ec3b9bd5308ae86c73541027cb7c2144a.Full text
SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 6111
As of January 26, 2026
Title: An act relating to the protection of children online.
Brief Description: Protecting children online.
Sponsors: Senators Salomon, Cortes, Liias, Nobles, Saldaña and Trudeau.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Business, Trade & Economic Development: 1/29/26.
Brief Summary of Bill
• Requires providers offering certain social media services to register and
verify the ages of users creating accounts.
• Requires parental consent for a minor under 17 to create an account with
the provider.
• Specifies restrictions on use of information of a known minor and
requires providers to develop and implement a harm mitigation strategy.
• Provides for enforcement by the attorney general and declaratory or
injunctive relief to parents of minors under 17.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Staff: John Kim (786-7453)
Background: 2025 Legislation on Internet Use by Children. According to the National
Conference of State Legislatures, as of October 2025, 45 states and Puerto Rico introduced
over 300 bills and measures relating to children while using the Internet and Internet-based
forms of communication, including social media, and at least 20 states enacted new laws in
2025.
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative
members in their deliberations. This analysis is not part of the legislation nor does it
constitute a statement of legislative intent.
Senate Bill Report -1- SB 6111
Such legislation included, in part, the creation of study commissions and task forces;
establishing age-appropriate design codes and requiring impact assessments; requiring age
verification or parental consent to open social media accounts; adding digital and media
literacy courses or curriculum for K-12 students; and regulating the use of cellphones in
schools.
2024 Mississippi Law and Litigation. In 2024, Mississippi enacted HB 1126, entitled the
Walker Montgomery Protecting Children Online Act (Mississippi Act). The Mississippi Act
contains provisions substantially similar to the current bill.
In June 2024, NetChoice, LLC (NetChoice), a trade association for Internet companies,
filed a complaint and request for preliminary injunction in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi (District Court) against the Attorney General of
Mississippi, seeking to enjoin enforcement of the Mississippi Act on First Amendment
protected speech grounds, as well as alleging that the Mississippi Act was
unconstitutionally vague under the First and Fourteenth Amendments and preempted by
Section 230 of the federal Communications Act of 1934.
In July 2024, the District Court granted NetChoice's request for preliminary injunction.
Mississippi appealed the District Court's ruling to the United States District Court of
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Fifth DCA). In April 2025, the Fifth DCA vacated the
preliminary injunction and remanded the case back to the District Court, finding it did not
conduct an analysis required by a United States Supreme Court decision and Fifth Circuit
precedent.
In June 2025, the District Court again granted NetChoice a preliminary
injunction. Mississippi again appealed to the Fifth DCA, which in July 2025 granted
Mississippi's request to stay NetChoice's preliminary injunction.
In August 2025, NetChoice filed an emergency application to the United States Supreme
Court to reinstate the preliminary injunction. In the same month, the United States Supreme
Court denied NetChoice's application. The Mississippi Act currently remains in effect,
pending judicial review.
Summary of Bill: Digital Service Providers. A digital service is defined as a website, an
application, a program, or software that collects or processes personal identifying
information with Internet connectivity. A digital service provider is defined as a person
who:
• owns or operates a digital service;
• determines the purpose of collecting and processing the personal identifying
information of users of the digital service; and
• determines the means used to collect and process the personal identifying information
of users of the digital service.
Senate Bill Report -2- SB 6111
Personal identifying information means any information, including sensitive information,
that is linked or reasonably linkable to an identified or identifiable individual. It includes
pseudonymous information when the information is used by a controller or processor in
conjunction with additional information that reasonably links the information to an
identified or identifiable individual. It does not include de-identified information or publicly
available information.
The bill states it applies only to a digital service provider who provides a digital service
that:
• connects users in a manner that allows users to socially interact with other users on
the digital service;
• allows a user to create a public, semipublic, or private profile for purposes of signing
into and using the digital service; and
• allows a user to create or post content that can be viewed by other users of the digital
service, including sharing content on a message board, a chat room, or a landing page,
video channel, or main feed that presents to a user content created and posted by other
users.
The bill states it does not apply to:
• a digital service provider who processes or maintains user data in connection with the
employment, promotion, reassignment, or retention of the user as an employee or
independent contractor, to the extent that the user's data is processed or maintained
for that purpose;
• a digital service provider's provision of a digital service that facilitates e-mail or
direct messaging services, if the digital service facilitates only those services;
• a digital service provider's provision of a digital service that primarily functions to
provide a user with access to news, sports, commerce, online video games, or content
primarily generated or selected by the digital service provider; and allows chat,
comment, or other interactive functionality that is incidental to the digital service; or
• a digital service provider's provision of a digital service that primarily functions to
provide a user with access to career development opportunities, including
professional networking, job skills, learning certifications; job posting, and
application services.
The bill further excludes from a digital service provider an Internet service provider,
Internet service provider's affiliate or subsidiary, search engine, or cloud service provider
that solely provides access or connection, including through transmission, download,
intermediate storage, access software or other service, to an Internet website or to other
information or content on the Internet or on a facility, system, or network not under the
control of the Internet service provider, provider's affiliate or subsidiary, search engine, or
cloud service provider.
Age Registration and Verification for Creating an Account with a Digital Service Provider.
Senate Bill Report -3- SB 6111
A digital service provider may not enter into an agreement with a person to create an
account with a digital service unless the person has registered the person's age with the
digital service provider.
A digital service provider shall make commercially reasonable efforts to verify the age of
the person creating an account with a level of certainty appropriate to the risks that arise
from the information management practices of the digital service provider.
Parental Consent for Minors Under the Age of 17. A digital service provider may not
permit an account holder who is a known minor to be an account holder unless the known
minor has the express consent from a parent or legal guardian of the known minor.
Acceptable methods of obtaining express consent of a parent or legal guardian include the
following:
• coordinating a call with a known minor's parent or legal guardian over
videoconferencing technology; or
• any other method of obtaining express consent as defined in rule adopted by the
attorney general.
A known minor is defined as a child who is 16 years of age or younger and who the digital
service provider knows to be under the age of 17 years.
Restrictions on the Use of Information of a Known Minor. A digital service provider that
enters into an agreement with a known minor for access to a digital service must limit:
• collection of the known minor's personal identifying information to information
reasonably necessary to provide the digital service; and
• use of the known minor's personal identifying information to the purpose for which
the information was collected.
A digital service provider that enters into an agreement with a known minor for access to a
digital service may not:
• use the digital service to collect the known minor's precise geolocation data;
• use the digital service to display targeted advertising involving unlawful material to
the known minor; or
• share, disclose, or sell the known minor's personal identifying information unless
required to:
1. comply with a civil, criminal, or regulatory inquiry, investigation, subpoena, or
summons by a governmental entity;
2. comply with a law enforcement investigation;
3. detect, block, or prevent the distribution of unlawful or obscene material to a
known minor;
4. block or filter spam;
5. prevent criminal activity; or
6. protect the security of a digital service.
Senate Bill Report -4- SB 6111
Requirement to Develop and Implement a Harm Mitigation Strategy. In relation to a known
minor's use of a digital service, a digital service provider must make commercially
reasonable efforts to develop and implement a strategy to prevent or mitigate the known
minor's exposure to content that promotes or facilitates the following harms to minors:
• consistent with evidence-informed medical information, self-harm, eating disorders,
substance use disorders, and suicidal behaviors;
• patterns of use that indicate or encourage substance abuse or use of illegal drugs;
• stalking, physical violence, online bullying, or harassment;
• grooming, trafficking, child pornography, or other sexual exploitation or abuse;
• incitement of violence; or
• any other illegal activity.
The bill states this requirement does not require a digital service provider to prevent or
preclude:
• any minor from deliberately and independently searching for, or specifically
requesting, content; or
• the digital service provider or individuals on the digital service from providing
resources for the prevention or mitigation of the above-described harms, including
evidence-informed information and clinical resources.
Enforcement. The Office of the Attorney General may investigate violations and bring
actions to enforce compliance and enjoin further violations. If a court finds a person violates
the terms of an injunction issued pursuant to this section, it must impose a civil penalty of
not more than $10,000 per violation.
The bill specifies it does not provide a private right of action for violations, except that if a
digital service provider violates provisions created by the bill, the parent or legal guardian
of a known minor affected by the violation may bring a cause of action seeking declaratory
or injunctive relief against the digital service provider.
Short Title. The chapter created by the bill may be known and cited as the Washington
Protecting Children Online Act.
Severability. The bill provides that if any of its provisions or its application to any person or
circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the bill or the application of the provision to
other persons or circumstances is not affected.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 23, 2026.
Creates Committee/Commission/Task Force that includes Legislative members: No.
Senate Bill Report -5- SB 6111
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Senate Bill Report -6- SB 6111
File and source
- File
- 2026-01-29_a33770_d292974_6111-sba-bte-26.pdf
- Size
- 87,665 bytes
- SHA-256
- 9dc1437d6c162726526f5d7d914d3b7ec3b9bd5308ae86c73541027cb7c2144a
- Original
- No public link identified.