Presentation on Home Equity Sharing Agreements to the Washington State Senate, December 4, 2025
- Issuer
- Congressional materials
- Date
- 2025-12-04
Summary
A slide presentation on Home Equity Sharing Agreements to the Washington State Senate Business, Financial Services & Trade Committee, dated December 4, 2025, from the Coalition for Home Equity Partnership (CHEP), described as the HESA industry group. It explains that a HESA is a form of equity financing in which a homeowner receives a lump sum in exchange for an investor's economic interest in the home, with no interest or monthly payments over a typical term of 10 or 30 years. The deck states that CHEP seeks regulation through the Department of Financial Institutions, including disclosures, caps on costs and licensing. It argues that mortgage rules such as TILA cost disclosures, ability to repay rules, high-cost home loan rules and MCR reporting do not fit HESAs, and asks the Legislature to clarify that HESAs are not reverse mortgages, citing Olson v. Unison.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Presentation on Home Equity Sharing Agreements to the Washington State Senate, December 4, 2025.”
Original at app.leg.wa.gov, dated 2025-12-04. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2025-12-04-2025-12-04-a33537-d289990-chep-presentation-on-home-equity-sharing-ppt/
, SHA-256 34e267b426d672ead8f51f408b03a2c6a2a3cf2de583f450219f9b93710298ea.Full text
Presentation on Home Equity Sharing
Agreements to the Washington State Senate
Business, Financial Services & Trade
Committee
December 4, 2025
1. Background
Table of 2. What is a HESA?
Contents 3. How to Regulate HESAs
2
Background
3
● There is a new type of home finance product available to
Washington homeowners seeking access to their home’s
equity. It’s called a Home Equity Sharing Agreement or
HESA.
● HESA originators want to be regulated, and this regulation
should:
○ protect consumers,
○ exclude bad actors, and
○ be clear and compatible with the structure of HESAs.
4
● At first glance, HESAs appear similar to mortgage loans,
making sense to regulate it under existing mortgage laws.
● However, structurally HESAs are very different from
traditional mortgage loans, making it impossible to fully
comply. It’s a classic “square peg in a round hole.”
5
● The Coalition for Home Equity Partnership (CHEP), the
HESA industry group, is seeking regulations that are similar
in scope and spirit to existing mortgage regulations, such
as:
○ Required disclosures
○ Consumer education
○ Caps on costs & fees
○ Licensing, reporting, examination and enforcement
authority with the Department of Financial Institutions
(DFI).
6
● The DFI has begun drafting regulations for HESAs, and
CHEP members have been engaged in providing feedback,
sample disclosures and financial information to the
Department.
7
What is a HESA?
8
● A HESA is a fundamentally different approach to providing
home equity. It is a form of equity financing, as opposed to
a traditional mortgage, which is a form of debt financing.
● Although relatively new to residential real estate, equity
financing is widely used in the rest of the economy.
9
● Debt Financing
○ Capital in exchange for periodic principal and interest payments
○ Absolute promise to repay the principal amount
○ Primarily underwritten based on creditworthiness and ability to service debt
payments.
● Equity Financing
○ Capital in exchange for an economic interest in an asset
○ No periodic payments, no promise to repay the investment amount
○ Investment return is deferred to a future settlement event
○ Primarily underwritten based on asset characteristics and future value.
10
● How a HESA works:
○ The homeowner receives a lump sum of cash from the HESA originator,
funded by an investor.
○ The investor receives an economic interest in the property (either a
percentage of the home’s final value or change in value). The homeowner
remains the sole owner of the home. The HESA originator records a lien,
but does not appear on title and has no right of occupancy.
○ The homeowner can use the funds for the full term of the HESA (typically
10 or 30 years) without any interest charges or monthly payments.
○ During the term, the homeowner can settle the contract at a time of their
choosing, usually upon sale of the home or upon a refinance.
11
● How a HESA works:
○ In exchange for the cash investment, at settlement the investor will receive a return.
There are currently two basic product types in the market, so the return will be either:
■ The initial invested amount plus a percentage of the home’s change in value (up
or down)
■ A percentage of the home’s entire value
○ Some “change in value” products apply a discount to the starting home value. Most
products have a built-in cost cap.
○ The homeowner pays an origination fee and transaction expenses at closing. The
homeowner pays transaction expenses when they exit from the agreement.
○ In general, if the home value increases, the settlement payment increases, and if the
home value decreases, the settlement decreases.
12
● How a HESA works:
○ Initial home values are established by an appraisal, identical to those used
in traditional mortgage transactions.
○ Generally, if the home is sold, the ending home value is the sales price.
Otherwise, the value is established by a third-party appraisal.
13
● Homeowner Benefits:
○ Access to home equity without incurring interest charges or needing to
make periodic payments. HESAs are also not reported as debt to credit
agencies.
○ For most homeowners, home equity is their largest but least accessible
source of wealth. HESAs allow easier access to meet important financial
needs like paying down expensive debt, medical or college expenses, or
funding a small business.
○ HESAs are generally available to more homeowners than HELOCs or other
mortgage products, especially those with lower credit.
14
HESAs
550-500
15
Regulating HESAs
16
● Key Differences Between HESAs and Mortgage Loans:
○ No interest rate or principal balance, no periodic payments
○ No promissory note, no promise to repay an absolute amount
○ Amount of future repayment unknown at origination and based on the
home’s future value
○ Shared risk and reward between homeowner and investor
○ Non-recourse, the investor cannot look to the homeowner to recover any
deficiency
○ No reporting to credit agencies
○ Asset-based underwriting versus credit-based
17
● Existing mortgage regulations were designed for loans,
which assume product features absent in HESAs like an
interest rate and set periodic payments.
● Regulating HESAs under these provisions can create
unintended consequences, consumer confusion, and
significant regulatory uncertainty.
18
19
● Examples of Regulatory Incompatibility
○ Basic Cost Disclosures
○ Ability to Repay (ATR) Rules
○ High-Cost Home Loan Rules
○ MCR Reporting
20
● Basic Cost Disclosures:
○ Under TILA, mortgage loans disclose a singular interest rate & APR to
consumers up front.
○ HESAs don’t charge interest and because the amount of repayment will
depend upon the home’s future value, it is impossible to provide a single
annualized cost value.
○ We suggest allowing disclosures be made in tables showing multiple
specific scenarios for given home appreciation and term length.
21
● Ability to Repay Rules:
○ Under TILA, mortgage lenders are required to analyze a homeowner’s
ability to make their monthly payment. This analysis assumes there is a
periodic payment to be made, which HESAs do not have.
○ HESA underwriting is focused on ensuring there is enough equity in the
home. In addition, typical HESA term lengths are 10 or 30 years, and it is
not possible to predict a homeowner’s ability to repay that far into the
future.
○ Like HELOCs and reverse mortgages, HESAs should be exempted from
traditional ATR rules.
22
● High-Cost Home Loan Rules:
○ Under state and federal law, mortgages with interest rates above a certain
threshold are considered “high-cost” and subject to additional regulation.
As HESAs have no interest rate, there is no way to make this
determination.
● MCR Reporting
○ Reporting in accordance with required fields, especially as it relates to
payments and delinquencies, is impossible for the HESA product.
23
● Classification as a Reverse Mortgage
○ Earlier this year, the 9th Circuit released an unpublished opinion in Olson v.
Unison, which held that HESAs could be considered a reverse mortgage
under Washington law. Although this decision was vacated upon
settlement, it can still cause confusion to Washington homeowners.
○ Neither the HESA industry nor the DFI agree with this conclusion, and the
DFI does not regulate HESAs as reverse mortgages.
○ However else the Legislature wishes to address HESAs, we ask you to
clarify that HESAs are distinct from reverse mortgages and should not be
regulated as such.
24
File and source
- File
- 2025-12-04_a33537_d289990_chep-presentation-on-home-equity-sharing-ppt.pdf
- Size
- 630,935 bytes
- SHA-256
- 34e267b426d672ead8f51f408b03a2c6a2a3cf2de583f450219f9b93710298ea
- Original
- app.leg.wa.gov