Order Vacating Mediation And — sba-materials

Summary

Order Vacating Mediation and Denying as Moot Motion for Mediation via Videoconference and Attendance Exception (ECF No. 69), dated October 17, 2025 and filed as Document 76 in United States of America ex rel Bryan Quesenberry v. Bul Connections, LLC, et al., No. 2:20-cv-01537-RFB-MDC, U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, signed by Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier III. Under Chief Judge Andrew P. Gordon's General Order 25-007, the court vacates the mediation set for 9:00 AM on November 14, 2025 and stays all pretrial matters and deadlines. It denies the government's ECF No. 69 motion as moot and orders a Stipulated Status Report by December 16, 2025 on federal funding, resumed government operations and availability of a representative with settlement authority. The second page is a standard notice on objections.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
United States of America ex rel Bryan
Quesenberry,
                                  Plaintiffs,
vs.
Bul Connections, LLC, et al.,
                                   Defendants.
No. 2:20-cv-01537-RFB-MDC

ORDER VACATING MEDIATION AND
DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR
MEDIATION VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE
AND ATTENDANCE EXCEPTION (ECF
NO. 69)
IT IS ORDERED that Pursuant Chief Judge Andrew P Gordon’s General Order [25-007], the
Court VACATES the Mediation currently set in this matter for 9:00 AM on November 14, 2025, and
STAYS all pretrial matters and deadlines. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court also DENIES
as moot plaintiff United States of America’s Motion for Mediation via Videoconference and Attendance
Exception (ECF No. 69).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a Stipulated Status Report by December
16, 2025, regarding:
1.
the status of federal government budget and funding;
2.
resumption of the federal government operations; and
3.
availability of a representative of the United States with binding settlement authority to
participate in, or be available during, the settlement conference remotely.
IT IS SO ORDERED
DATED October 17, 2025.

____ ____________________

Hon. Maximiliano D. Couvillier III
United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:20-cv-01537-RFB-MDC     Document 76     Filed 10/17/25     Page 1 of 2

2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NOTICE
Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and
recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk
of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal
may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified
time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file
objections within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues
waives the right to appeal the District Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the
District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch.
Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Pursuant to LR IA 3-1, plaintiffs must immediately file written
notification with the court of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon
each opposing party’s attorney, or upon the opposing party if the party is unrepresented by counsel.
Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action.
Case 2:20-cv-01537-RFB-MDC     Document 76     Filed 10/17/25     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

quesenberry_bul_connections__docket-68984054__doc-76__id-456020305__Order_AND_Order_on_Unopposed_Motion_AND_Util_-_Ter.pdf

Size

174,235 bytes

SHA-256

3b7ad65e6240d0f935082fa2e1d54201d5be7d3fd3f2fe4060e8527a9a213097

Our copy

quesenberry_bul_connections__docket-68984054__doc-76__id-456020305__Order_AND_Order_on_Unopposed_Motion_AND_Util_-_Ter.pdf

Original

storage.courtlistener.com