Testimony on SB 50 — Heather Smith, Policy Matters Ohio (November 4, 2025)

Summary

Testimony dated November 4, 2025, from Heather Smith, a researcher with Policy Matters Ohio, to the House Commerce and Labor Committee on SB 50. The testimony urges a no vote on Senate Bill 50, which it says would allow employers to schedule children ages 14 and 15 for work as late as 9:00 p.m., beyond the 7:00 p.m. limit set by federal law. It states that the number of children affected by child labor violations verified by the USDOL has increased 31% since pre-COVID. It cites a 2023 fine of $22,000 paid by an Ohio lathe mill and a $30,000 fine for a Cincinnati pizza restaurant.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                         TESTIMONY
November 4, 2025
Heather Smith

Testimony to the House Commerce and Labor
Committee on SB 50
Good morning, Chair Johnson, Vice Chair Lear, Ranking Member McNally, and members of the
committee. My name is Heather Smith and I am a researcher with Policy Matters Ohio, a non-
partisan nonprofit think tank. Thank you for the opportunity to testify.

I am here today to urge you to vote no on Senate Bill 50 (SB 50), which would allow employers
to schedule children ages 14 and 15 for work as late as 9:00 p.m., beyond the 7:00 p.m. limit set
by federal law.

Children’s success in school depends on them being rested and ready to learn, having had time
to complete their homework. Provisions of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act that limit
working hours for teens under 16 to three hours per day, before 7:00 p.m., are designed to
make sure students can spend their time learning.1

SB 50 would dismantle the 7:00 p.m. protection, if it were allowed to supersede federal law.
And though SB 50 does not provide for an extension of the three-hour limit, it opens the door to
skirting this requirement.

Such legal safeguards help protect children from abusive labor conditions. Loosening
restrictions on hours worked reduces agencies’ chances of intervening before abuse gets even
worse, as it recently has: The number of children impacted by child labor violations verified by
the USDOL have increased 31% since pre-COVID 19.2 In 2023, an Ohio lathe mill paid $22,000 in
fines for employing a 15-year-old to operate a wood processing machine, when he “became
entangled in the gears,” and employed four minors under the age of 16 outside of the allowed
hours.3 A Cincinnati pizza restaurant was fined $30,000 for allowing children under the age of 16
to operate gas ovens and open flames, and assigning 16 minors to shifts in violation of FLSA.4

1
    U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, “The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended,” Revised
May 2012, https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/WHD/legacy/files/FairLaborStandAct.pdf
2
  U.S. Department of Labor. “Child Labor.” https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/data/charts/child-labor
3
  U.S. Department of Labor. “Ohio Lathe Mill Pays $22K in Child Labor Penalties After 15-Year-Old Suffers Injury While
Working in a Sawmill.” https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/whd/whd20230405-0
4
  U.S. Department of Labor “Labor Department Fines Pizza Restaurants $30K for Child Labor Violations, Recovers
$12k for Two Managers Illegally Denied Overtime Wages.” February 22, 2023.
https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/whd/whd20230222

                                         policymattersohio.org
Policy Matters Ohio is a nonprofit, nonpartisan state policy research institute with offices in Cleveland and Columbus.
Restaurants employ the largest share of youth and are the most prevalent violators of child
labor laws of any industry.

Dismantling long-settled laws designed to protect children from abuse clears the way for
corporations to access and exploit children in desperate situations, instead of paying livable
wages that would attract adult workers. It may be appropriate for young teenagers to work a
few hours a week to earn spending money or gain job experience. Current law allows this
already. Limiting young teenagers to three hours per night and not past 7:00 p.m. on school
nights ensures that they are able to go to school ready to learn. Teenagers need evening hours
to do their homework, participate in extracurricular activities, and rest.

The fact that some families depend on the earnings of children is a problem — one that reflects
the failure of our labor market to deliver livable wages to adults in the workforce, and of
policymakers to implement a minimum wage that meets the cost of living.

Like the three-hour school-day work limitation, the ban on children working in certain food
processing and manufacturing facilities would remain if SB 50 becomes law. However, state and
federal governments allocate far too few resources to wage and hour enforcement. Lifting the
7:00 p.m. work limitation would remove an enforcement tool now available to oversight
agencies in the USDOL and Ohio’s Department of Commerce, making it less likely that violations
of this type are discovered and stopped. This body ought to consider strengthening
enforcement mechanisms at the state-level, like instituting a graduated fine for offending
businesses.

Lucy Manning wrote for the USDOL that “laws preventing child labor, like other laws for the
protection of workers, help to improve working and living conditions for all the people.” She
wrote those words in 1946. That’s how far back I had to look to find discussion on the need for
child labor protections, because these points have long been settled law — codified in the Fair
Labor Standards Act since 1938 — and common sense.

It’s never worth compromising kids’ education or safety to boost employer profits. Ohio
lawmakers must not condone the commodification of children. I urge you to not vote this bill
out of committee.




                                                                                                  2
3


File and source

File

2025-11-05_commerce-labor_testimony_testimony-12643.pdf

Size

219,817 bytes

SHA-256

ca0f677d0217ad6b689c2d45212699c8ace7ae2563ab2281c13aa5ae4d197511

Our copy

2025-11-05_commerce-labor_testimony_testimony-12643.pdf

Original

No public link identified.