Swanson Testimony
- Issuer
- Congressional materials
- Document type
- Swanson Testimony
- Date
- 2025-09-17
- Case
- Swanson Testimony
Summary
Written testimony of Karl E. Swanson, President of PCT Ebeam and Integration in Davenport, Iowa, submitted to the U.S. Senate Committee on Small Business & Entrepreneurship on September 17, 2025, titled Using the 504 Program to Build America's Manufacturing Future. The testimony describes the company's buyback by a group of long-term co-workers and its use of SBA 504 loans to buy and expand its building. It identifies program limitations: the SBA 7(a) guarantee cap of $3.75 million, which left $794,000 available after $2.956 million in 504 financing; loan approval times of more than 30 days; and rent limits under the EPC/OC structure. It supports the Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act of 2025 (S. 1555), which would raise the maximum total loan size to $10 million.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
Using the 504 Program to Build America’s
Manufacturing Future
Written Testimony before the
U.S. Senate Committee on Small Business & Entrepreneurship
September 17, 2025
Submitted by:
Karl E. Swanson
President
PCT Ebeam and Integration
Davenport, IA
Testimony of Karl E. Swanson, President, PCT Ebeam and Integration
Chair Ernst, Ranking Member Markey, and distinguished members of the Committee:
I appreciate the opportunity to testify today, and I am humbled by the responsibility to represent
the interests of the hundreds of thousands of small manufacturers that fuel the American
economy.
My name is Karl Swanson and I, like SBA Administrator Loeffler, grew up on my
family’s farm near Rio, Illinois. I graduated from the University of Illinois with a degree in
Electrical Engineering and from Saint Ambrose University with an M.B.A. Today I am the
President of PCT Ebeam and Integration located in Davenport, Iowa. In that role, I have the
privilege of leading a talented team of outstanding individuals.
PCT was founded in 1986 by three engineers working at a local aluminum factory. When
the original President and majority owner was looking to retire, the most attractive option was to
be acquired by a Swiss company, which took place in 2015. The integration of the two
companies was not successful, and the business declined to the point that it was decided to shut
down our location. While considering what to do, I found eight of my long-term co-workers
willing to join me in an effort to buy the company back. We shared a common belief that if we
were allowed to make sensible decisions there was still a viable business opportunity. In
November of 2018 we reached an agreement to make this a reality and embarked upon what has
been a challenging and rewarding journey.
I am proud to be here today on behalf of my valued teammates. We have experienced
first-hand the advantages of once again being an American-owned small business. In seven
years, we have grown from 45 to 65 employees, and we have also re-acquired many of the
critical manufacturing capabilities that were divested by the previous owner.
2
Testimony of Karl E. Swanson, President, PCT Ebeam and Integration
PCT is both a systems integrator and a manufacturer of industrial electron beam systems.
Our ebeam machines are used in a variety of different industries where they enable energy
efficient production of pre-painted steel, are used in the manufacturing of advanced medical
materials, and can be used to achieve more sustainable production of lithium-ion batteries.
Building these specialized machines requires a skilled workforce and specific manufacturing
capabilities.
Fifty percent of the ebeam systems we build are exported. Our foreign customers often
require their advance payments to be secured by local bank guarantees. The options for a small
U.S. manufacturer to comply with these requirements are limited. For PCT it is critical that we
have access to funds to support our material and labor expenses throughout the lengthy
production schedule. The Small Business Administration has been a major source of support for
our business from purchasing our commercial real estate to expanding our export efforts. While
we are grateful for the opportunities provided, this hearing provides the opportunity to discuss
ways the SBA programs, and particularly the 504 Loan Program, can be further leveraged for
small manufacturers across the country.
Use of the SBA 504 Program. Following our purchase of the business, we had the
opportunity to purchase our building and thus secure our company’s long-term future in our
current location. The SBA 504 Loan Program was recommended by our local bank and made this
purchase possible. The favorable interest rate and long-term fixed rate financing allowed us to
not only purchase the property, but to also continue investing in the growth of our business.
Following further success in building back the business, we decided to expand our
manufacturing shop. Once again, the SBA 504 was critical in helping us finance this expansion.
With the new space, we were able to add more production capabilities, facilitate better material
3
Testimony of Karl E. Swanson, President, PCT Ebeam and Integration
flow, and increase our capacity to assemble and test more ebeam systems. Each time we looked
to invest in our long-term future, the SBA 504 gave us a financing solution that was both
accessible and affordable.
Our experience shows how central the SBA 504 is to long-term business growth and
competitiveness. But as that growth leads to bigger opportunities, and our business takes on
larger and more complex projects, we have experienced limitations in SBA’s financing programs
that impose undue constraints on the organic and profitable growth of manufacturing firms like
ours.
Program Limitations and Improvements. The first limitation we faced was when our
financing needs intersected with SBA aggregate program caps. For example, when we recently
received a multi-million-dollar order from a customer in Brazil, we needed to provide bank
guarantees equal to the value of advance payments received before shipment. The SBA 7(a)
Export Working Capital Program would have been the ideal solution, but after securing $2.956
million in SBA 504 financing, only $794,000 remained available under the SBA 7(a) guarantee
cap, which is $3.75 million for a single borrower and their affiliates. As a result, we had to
pursue more expensive alternatives, which significantly increased our costs for that contract.
These limitations create constraints not only for our business, but also for lenders who want to
support U.S. manufacturers competing in global markets.
The Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act of 2025 (MAMFA) (S. 1555)
introduced by Chair Ernst, and cosponsored by Senator Coons, Senator Young, and Senator
Hickenlooper, to increase the maximum total loan size to $10 million would directly address our
situation. Having access to this additional loan capacity would provide PCT with a cost-effective
means of supporting more export business, which in turn improves our competitiveness in
4
Testimony of Karl E. Swanson, President, PCT Ebeam and Integration
foreign markets and enables us to accelerate further investments in additional staff and
production equipment domestically. I strongly support this effort and hope Congress passes this
legislation.
Another limitation we experienced was SBA loan approval times. With the first 504 loan
PCT received in 2021, delays during the pandemic were understandable given the record-high
loan volume. However, an approval time of more than 30 days can place a significant burden on
small businesses. By comparison, our 504 Loan for the expansion was processed in roughly half
that time—an improvement, but still a reminder of how critical speed is in today’s business
environment. The pace of business is fast, and America’s small businesses must be able to move
quickly to remain competitive. An agile SBA, equipped to scale staffing in response to loan
volume and deliver timely approvals, is essential to supporting the growth and success of our
nation’s entrepreneurs.
The last limitation I will address is regarding the EPC/OC structure. Under the EPC/OC
structure, SBA allows small business owners to hold title to project property passively and lease
it to their operating company. I understand the intent of the SBA is to ensure buildings are not
purchased for investment purposes. However, SBA has imposed limits on the rent an Operating
Company (OC) may pay to the Eligible Passive Company (EPC), capping it to the level of debt
service plus building-related expenses. While this safeguard is logical, it presents unintended
challenges for the owners of small businesses like PCT. For many of us, our real estate purchase
serves as a cornerstone of our long-term retirement plan. By preventing owners from collecting
market-rate rent, the policy reduces rental income and, ultimately, diminishes the value of the
real estate asset itself. This restriction not only impacts retirement planning but also erodes an
important component of wealth-building for America’s small business owners. I encourage the
5
Testimony of Karl E. Swanson, President, PCT Ebeam and Integration
Committee to consider removing this constraint to make this structure more user friendly for
small businesses using the program.
Conclusion. I respectfully request that you continue your efforts to strengthen and
simplify the SBA 504 Loan Program to ensure that growing manufacturers can expand capacity,
compete internationally, and create more U.S. jobs – without lengthy delays or undue limitations.
It is an honor to submit this testimony. Thank you for considering these requests to improve the
valuable support the SBA provides to American manufacturers through the 504 Loan Program.
6
File and source
- File
- Swanson_Testimony.pdf
- Size
- 189,369 bytes
- SHA-256
- c78e2a34547310e8902188badbd26fc95cf299e19249e84b669ca2180db8aaa5
- Our copy
- Swanson_Testimony.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.