Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Testimony on HB 225 — Jules Patalita, The Ability Center of Greater Toledo (May 21st, 2025)

Testimony on HB 225 — Jules Patalita, The Ability Center of Greater Toledo (May 21st, 2025)

Summary

Testimony on HB 225 dated May 21st, 2025, addressed to Chairman Johnson, Vice Chair Lear, Ranking Member McNally and members of the House Commerce and Labor Committee, by Dr. Jules Patalita, a Disability Rights Advocate for The Ability Center of Greater Toledo. The testimony states that the witness's proponent testimony focused on the economic benefits of phasing out subminimum wage and that this testimony presents the ethical argument for paying all Ohioans a fair wage. It cites a 2023 report of the Ohio Employment First Task Force on pay for those in facility-based work. It states that the Ohio Association of County Boards signed a resolution supporting the phase out of subminimum wage, and it asks the committee to work towards the passing of HB 225.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Testimony on HB 225 — Jules Patalita, The Ability Center of Greater Toledo (May 21st, 2025).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2025-05-21-commerce-labor-testimony-testimony-8015-5f011008aa/, SHA-256 1fc88d43dfbc08e4cd9f559056aaee470ebc76411d4620284769b03eec625ebd.

Full text

All Testimony on HB 225

May 21st, 2025

Thank you Chairman Johnson, Vice Chair Lear, Ranking Member McNally, and members of
the House Commerce and Labor Committee for the opportunity to testify once again on
House Bill 225. My name is Dr. Jules Patalita and I am a Disability Rights Advocate for The
Ability Center of Greater Toledo. We are a Center for Independent Living that has worked
for the last century towards our mission, to make our community the most disability
friendly in the nation by increasing independence for people with disabilities, discovering
true passions, and changing the community’s perception of disability. In fulfillment of that
mission, to increase the independence of those with disabilities, and to fight for the dignity
of fellow Ohioans, I come today to speak in favor of HB 225. While I focused my proponent
testimony on the economic benefits of phasing out subminimum wage, and the way that
HB 225 functions as a work incentive, I will speak today on the ethical argument for paying
all Ohioans a fair wage for their labor.


I want to begin today by pointing out how 14(c) does nothing to reflect the culture around
disability in 2025. As is a creed for Centers of Independent Living, it is not the disability that
stops someone from integrating with society, but society that stops a person with a
disability from integrating. It does strikes me as ironic that that the origins of subminimum
wage came from the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Not only is subminimum wage not a
fair standard for labor, but it was signed into law by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt,
one of the most famous examples of an American with a disability. Yet we know that that
President Roosevelt hid his disability from the public, fearing that the sight of him using a
wheelchair would make him appear weak and unfit to lead. Can you imagine if the
president who helped America escape the Great Depression and lead us during WWII was
told he wasn’t worthy of his position because of his illness? We can tally this up to the
prejudice and bias of our society from 80 years ago, but is this so different from the culture
at play in our state today? How is that case so far removed from the reality of 2025 for more
than 13,000 Ohioans?i

Another issue is that subminimum wage does not reward fair work with fair pay, while
those benefiting from the services are not the workers themselves. It’s important to
understand the full scope of this inequity in pay, as the Ohio Employment First Task Force
reported in 2023 that more than 50% of those in facility-based work earned less than $5 an
hour.ii One of the biggest 14(c) employers in Ohio is Fairhaven Industries, Inc., who
employees almost 600 people for less than subminimum wage, while their CEO reported
making more than $100,000.iii For a nonprofit to show this level of disparity between their
CEO and the 600 people being paid a subminimum wage because of their disability is
condemnable. The ability to pay any citizens less than the minimum wage is a statement
that their efforts are lesser than others, that their contributions to our state are lesser, on
account of their disability.

The simple fact is that the conditions that caused the creation of 14(c) are nonfactors in
Ohio today, hampering instead of assisting. The state of Ohio is fully equipped to integrate
14(c) workers into society, but this change will not fully occur until employers lose
financial incentive to underpay the workers they have taken advantage of for decades. In
1938, when the Fair Labor Standards Act was passed, common positions included day
laborers and factory workers. These positions do not have to disfranchise workers with
disabilities if provided reasonable accommodations, but that was not the mindset in the
30s. Rather than providing the means for all Americans to contribute equally to the
economy, legislation deemed certain workers as less equal than others. In 2025, however,
the job market has never been more diverse in regard to what positions one can hold. The
Americans with Disabilities Act also serves as a federal civil rights law to defend against
employer discrimination, while state agencies offer job coaching and vocational supports
that ensure those with disabilities can find success working within the community for a
competitive wage. The Ohio Association of County Boards signed a resolution this year
supporting the phase out of subminimum wage. They believe that this change is good for
the independence of Ohioans with disabilities, and that they can assist those transitioning
to community employment, a function they already serve and will continue to serve during
the five-year transition.

 In summary, Ohio must provide equal rights to all of its citizens, including those with
disabilities, by guaranteeing fair wages for all. The presence of a disability does not make
an American any less American, so why are they protected any less in regard to wages? It
saddens me that in 2025, the main groups that the law allows to be paid less than the
minimum wage are people with disabilities and prison inmates. One group has seen
certain protections taken away in an attempt to punish within the justice system, the other
makes up one in every four Ohioans. What we ask for is fair wages for fair labor. Regardless
of background, ability, or identity, Americans have been guaranteed a minimum wage that
fairly compensates the work and time they put into their role. People with disabilities are a
quarter of our state’s population and are responsible for some of our nation’s greatest
moments. President Roosevelt was one of the most impactful men to hold his position and
his disability did nothing to lower the quality of his contributions. Unless we assume that
Ohioans with disabilities are not equally up to the task, I ask that you side with this
legislation and work towards to the passing of HB 225.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide testimony today, please let me know if you have
any additional questions or concerns.



Sincerely,



Jules Patalita, PhD

The Ability Center of Greater Toledo, Disability Rights Advocate

jpatalita@abilitycenter.org

i
   14(c) Certificate Holders. US Department of Labor. (2025, May 1).
https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/workers-with-disabilities/section-14c/certificate-holders
ii
    Facility-based Employment. Ohio Employment First. https://ots.ohioemploymentfirst.org/facility-based-
employment
iii
    ProPublica. (n.d.). Fairhaven Industries Inc. ProPublica.
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/341023491


File and source

File
2025-05-21_commerce-labor_testimony_testimony-8015.pdf
Size
93,648 bytes
SHA-256
1fc88d43dfbc08e4cd9f559056aaee470ebc76411d4620284769b03eec625ebd
Our copy
2025-05-21_commerce-labor_testimony_testimony-8015.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top