Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Defendant-Appellant’S Unopposed Motion For Extension Of

Defendant-Appellant’S Unopposed Motion For Extension Of

Date
2025-05-15

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

112 GENESEE STREET, LLC, et. al, )

)
Plaintiff-Appellee,
)

No. 25-1373
)
v.
)
)
THE UNITED STATES,
)
)
Defendant-Appellant.
)

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE REPLY
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26(b), Defendant-Appellant, the Department of
State, respectfully requests that the Court grant a brief extension of one day, to and
including May 15, 2025, within which to finalize and to file our reply brief.  The
current deadline to submit our reply brief is May 14, 2025.  This is our first request
for an extension of time for this purpose.  Counsel for plaintiff-appellee indicated
that plaintiffs do not oppose this motion.
As explained in the attached declaration of Margaret J. Jantzen, Senior Trial
Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, the
extension is necessary because of unexpected system outages which arose during
the time that the brief needs to be prepared.
Good cause and extraordinary circumstances support this extension.  In the
past couple days, the online network that undersigned counsel must access to
Case: 25-1373      Document: 25     Page: 1     Filed: 05/12/2025

2

conduct research, draft and finalize briefs has experienced outages.  Some of these
outages have lasted for several hours, while others have resulted in counsel being
sporadically logged out of the system and delayed from logging back.  In all
instances, however, counsel has been prevented from accessing the system and
resources needed to complete the brief.  The delay in completing the brief impacts
our ability to finalize it, in consultation with the agency, and secure the necessary
supervisory approval at the Department of Justice.
An extra day will provide the time necessary to finalize the brief in addition
to consulting with the agency and securing supervisory approval.  For these
reasons, we respectfully request that the Court grant our unopposed motion for an
extension of one day, to and including May 15, 2025, within which to file our reply
brief.
Respectfully submitted,
YAAKOV M. ROTH
Acting Assistant Attorney General
Case: 25-1373      Document: 25     Page: 2     Filed: 05/12/2025

3

PATRICIA M. McCARTHY
Director

/s/William J. Grimaldi
WILLIAM J. GRIMALDI
Assistant Director

/s/Margaret J. Jantzen
MARGARET J. JANTZEN
Senior Trial Counsel
Commercial Litigation Branch
Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 480
Ben Franklin Station
Washington D.C.  20044
Tel.: (202) 353-7994
Fax: (202) 307-0972
Margaret.j.jantzen@usdoj.gov

May 12, 2025
Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant

Case: 25-1373      Document: 25     Page: 3     Filed: 05/12/2025

4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

112 GENESEE STREET, LLC, et.
al.,

                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

                         v.

THE UNITED STATES,

                         Defendant-Appellant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 25-1373

 DECLARATION OF MARGARET J. JANTZEN IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT’S UNOPPOSED
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

I, Margaret J. Jantzen, state the following:
1. I am a senior trial counsel with the Department of Justice, Civil Division,
Commercial Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., and I am defendant-
appellant’s attorney of record in this case.  I submit this declaration pursuant to
Federal Circuit Rule 27(b)(1), in support of our request for an extension of time.
2. This extension is necessary because of unexpected system outages which
arose during the time that the brief needs to be prepared.
3. In the past couple days, the online network that I must access to conduct
research, draft and finalize briefs has experienced outages.  Some of these
outages have lasted for several hours, while others have resulted in being
Case: 25-1373      Document: 25     Page: 4     Filed: 05/12/2025

−3−
sporadically logged out of the system and delayed from logging back.  In all
instances, however, I have been prevented from accessing the system and
resources needed to complete the brief.
4. The delay in completing the brief impacts my ability to finalize it, in
consultation with the agency, and secure the necessary supervisory approval at
the Department of Justice.
5. An extra day will provide me with the time necessary to finalize the brief in
addition to consulting with the agency and securing supervisory approval.
6. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Executed on May 12, 2025

/s Margaret J. Jantzen
Case: 25-1373      Document: 25     Page: 5     Filed: 05/12/2025

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I hereby certify that the foregoing complies with the Rules of this Court in
that it contains 713 words.  This is within the limit of 5,200 words set by Federal
Rule of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) Rule 27(d)(2)(A).
/s/Margaret J. Jantzen
MARGARET J. JANTZEN
Case: 25-1373      Document: 25     Page: 6     Filed: 05/12/2025

File and source

File
112_genesee_street_us__docket-70304763__doc-25__id-439917590__document.pdf
Size
151,760 bytes
SHA-256
3e65d2fca4ed8d329643c5e12dadd5618b1b0b6b4ae908c030f4a46b833c675c
Our copy
112_genesee_street_us__docket-70304763__doc-25__id-439917590__document.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top