Testimony — John Ehrnfelt, JW4 Environmental, on House Bill 96 (March 5, 2025)

Summary

Interested party testimony to the House Development Committee on House Bill 96, the main operating budget for fiscal years 2026 and 2027, from John Ehrnfelt, PE, Principal with JW4 Environmental, dated Wednesday, March 5, 2025. The testimony asks for continued funding for the Ohio Brownfield Remediation Program (BRP) and says the General Assembly created the program in 2021 with an initial appropriation of $350 million and renewed it with a second appropriation of $350 million. It states that the first come, first serve nature of the BRP leaves smaller counties at a disadvantage. It asks the committee to support the changes proposed by Representatives Hall and Sweeney, which would move the program to a merit-based system.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                                 House Development Committee
                       Interested Party Testimony, House Bill 96 (Stewart)
                          John Ehrnfelt, PE, Principal, JW4 Environmental
                                   Wednesday, March 5, 2025
Chair Hoops, Vice Chair Lorenz, Ranking Member Abdullahi and members of the House
Development Committee, thank you for the opportunity to present Interested Party Testimony on
House Bill 96, the main operating budget for fiscal years 2026 and 2027.


My name is John Ehrnfelt and I am a Principal with JW4 Environmental, as well as other related
roles in the environmental remediation industry. I am testifying today to respectfully request the
inclusion of continued funding for the Ohio Brownfield Remediation Program (BRP) in House Bill
96, the state’s Main Operating Budget.

The Ohio General Assembly created the BRP in 2021 with an initial appropriation of $350
million. Two years later, lawmakers renewed the program with a second appropriation of $350
million. To date, the program has been responsible for the clean-up or assessment of more than
600 brownfield sites in 86 of Ohio’s 88 counties. Importantly, 285 of these projects are underway
in counties with a population of fewer than 70,000 people, and 355 are in counties with a
population of less than 150,000.

These results not only show that brownfields are indeed a statewide problem but also show that
there are opportunities for new economic development and revitalization in every region of Ohio.

My career has included remediation engineering and contracting and I have contributed to the
successful cleanup and redevelopment of several blighted and unsafe sites in Ohio. There are
many examples of projects that are currently underway across the state of Ohio that will realize
the same benefits to the communities in which they are located, both in terms of financial
redevelopment and health and safety improvements.

As impressive as this work has been, the progress made over the past four years has just
barely scratched the surface of what is needed to address brownfield remediation in Ohio. Of
the grants that have been awarded since 2021, 279 have been assessment grants.
Assessments just determine the scope of contamination that may exist on a site. The majority of
these locations will need clean-up funds in order to ensure they are made available for future
redevelopment opportunities.

This is why it is critical to continue funding for the Brownfield Remediation Program for at least
the next two years.

As proud as we are with the work that we have been able to accomplish with the BRP, there
have been issues with the current operation of the program. The first come, first serve nature of
the BRP leaves Ohio’s smaller counties at a disadvantage when seeking funding for remediation
projects in their communities. This is why a majority of the sites that will need clean-up funds in
the future (170) are in counties with a population under 150,000.

State Representatives Thomas Hall and Bride Sweeney have proposed important programmatic
changes to the BRP which will shift the program from a first come, first serve model to a merit-
based system, which scores applications reviewed by a panel of experts working with the Ohio
Department of Development. This model mirrors Ohio’s first brownfield program, the Clean Ohio
Revitalization Fund (CORF). CORF was responsible for producing $1.16 billion in one-time
contributions and contributing $1.4 billion annually to the state’s Gross Domestic Product.

As someone who is directly involved in this work, I strongly believe it is imperative for Ohio to
adopt these changes to help ensure that Ohio can maintain its competitive advantage as a great
place to do business.

Please support a continued appropriation for the brownfield remediation program of at least
$100-$150 million per year, along with the programmatic changes being proposed by
Representatives Hall and Sweeney. This investment will unlock untold potential on the 9,000
plus former commercial and industrial brownfield sites across, while preserving agricultural land
and green space from unnecessary development.

Chair Hoops and members of the House Development Committee, thank you for the opportunity
to provide interested party testimony and for GOPC to share our views on what it will take to
create the tools and policy environment Ohio needs to thrive in the years to come.

Respectfully,
John Ehrnfelt, PE


File and source

File

2025-03-05_development_testimony_testimony-2111.pdf

Size

77,258 bytes

SHA-256

978dde7dcac296278184e4e9ecf6929ae3c06887edec8e3ee3dd296d9b7c45e0

Our copy

2025-03-05_development_testimony_testimony-2111.pdf

Original

No public link identified.