Proposed order for: Motion to Void Original Removal from State of California court
- Document type
- order
- Date
- 2024-12-30
Summary
A one-page proposed order filed February 19, 2025 as Document 35-1 in Brandon Joe Williams v. United States Small Business Administration, No. 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Submitted by the plaintiff's attorney-in-fact, it would grant the plaintiff's motion to void the original removal from State of California court and the judgment of December 30, 2024 (Dckt #1 and #23). The proposed text would have the court find that removal was accepted on incorrect grounds, citing 4 USC 72, and would remand the case to the State of California. The signature line for United States District Judge R. Gary Klausner and the date are left blank.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Proposed order for: Motion to Void Original Removal from State of California court.”
Original at storage.courtlistener.com, dated 2024-12-30. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2024-12-30-plaintiff-v-united-states-small-business-administration-240448ae-1/
, SHA-256 240448ae93e7e0453b72222088e7c78cce7596cf61471c67fdb0372ada658693.Full text
Case 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK Document 35-1 Filed 02/19/25 Page 1 of 1 Page ID
#:266
Brandon Joe Williams
747-273-0799
brandon@williamsandwilliamslawfirm.com
PO Box 1962
Glendale, CA 91209
Attorney-in-fact for Plaintiff
BRANDON JOE WILLIAMS®
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRANDON JOE WILLIAMS®, No. 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
v.
VOIDING THE ORIGINAL REMOVAL
UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS FROM STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ADMINISTRATION, COURT AS WELL AS THE
JUDGEMENT FROM 12/30/24 [DCKT
Defendant. #1 AND #23]
Honorable R. Gary Klausner
United States District Judge
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD
Having reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion to void the original removal from State of
California court, the Court finds that it erred in allowing this most Honorable court to accept removal
under incorrect grounds. State of California is not under the exclusive jurisdiction of the national
government and cannot be exercised in the District of Columbia under 4 USC 72.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to void the original removal from State of
California is GRANTED. This case is to be immediately remanded back to State of California for
foreign adjudication under foreign jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: ________________ BY: _____________________________
Honorable R. Gary Klausner
United States District Judge
File and source
- File
- williams_sba_eidl__docket-69344443__doc-35_att-1__id-430760327__Proposed_Order.pdf
- Size
- 83,775 bytes
- SHA-256
- 240448ae93e7e0453b72222088e7c78cce7596cf61471c67fdb0372ada658693
- Original
- storage.courtlistener.com