Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Joint Status Report — Air Force Officer v. Austin (Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES, Document 131)

Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Joint Status Report — Air Force Officer v. Austin (Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES, Document 131)

Date
2024-06-13

Summary

A joint status report of plaintiffs and defendants, filed June 28, 2024 as Document 131 in Air Force Officer, et al. v. Lloyd J. Austin, III, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-00009-TES, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division. It is submitted under the Court's June 13, 2024 Order [Doc. 129] and states that the parties disagree about whether the case is moot in its entirety. The parties propose mootness briefs by July 26, 2024 and responses by August 16, 2024, and a further joint status report within fourteen days of the Court's mootness ruling if any part of the case remains live. They also state that they disagree on attorneys' fees, propose deferring fee arguments, and ask the Court to stay the deadlines in its order at Doc. 130, including the July 13, 2024 deadline for a proposed scheduling and discovery order.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Joint Status Report — Air Force Officer v. Austin (Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES, Document 131).” Original at archive.org, dated 2024-06-13. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2024-06-13-covid-era-misc/, SHA-256 8470978d31c75119537c995bfc803311acb5f1f03120f2f0dbc6a4b5d0e39b16.

Full text

       Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES              Document 131         Filed 06/28/24       Page 1 of 4



                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                          FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
                                   MACON DIVISION


AIR FORCE OFFICER, AIR FORCE NCO,                          )
AIR FORCE SPECIAL AGENT, and                               )
AIR FORCE ENGINEER, on behalf of                           )
themselves and all others similarly situated,              )
                                                           )      Case No. 5:22-cv-00009-TES
                          Plaintiffs,                      )
v.                                                         )
                                                           )
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his                               )
official capacity as Secretary of Defense;                 )
FRANK KENDALL, III, in his                                 )
official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force; and       )
ROBERT I. MILLER, in his                                   )
official capacity as Surgeon General of the                )
Air Force,                                                 )
                                                           )
                          Defendants.                      )


                 PLAINTIFFS’ AND DEFENDANTS’ JOINT STATUS REPORT

        Pursuant to the Court’s June 13, 2024 Order [Doc. 129], the parties hereby submit this joint

status report:

        1.        The parties disagree about whether the case is moot in its entirety. Plaintiffs maintain

that Defendants have not demonstrated this case is moot in its entirety. Defendants maintain that

the case is moot in its entirety and should be dismissed.

        2.        The parties propose that they file briefs on their respective positions on mootness by

July 26, 2024, and then file responses to each other’s briefs three weeks later (by August 16, 2024).

        3.        The parties further propose that, if any part of this case remains live following this

Court’s resolution of mootness, the parties submit a joint status report proposing next steps within

fourteen days of the Court’s order regarding mootness.




                                                       1
       Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES            Document 131         Filed 06/28/24       Page 2 of 4



        4.      The parties also disagree on whether Plaintiffs are entitled to attorneys’ fees but

agree in proposing that the parties not present any arguments about fees at least until after the issue

of mootness is resolved.

        5.      The parties further propose that the Court stay, pending resolution of the mootness

issue, all deadlines in its Rules 16 and 26 Order [Doc. 130] including (among other deadlines) the

July 13, 2024 deadline to submit a Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order.




                                                   2
       Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES     Document 131              Filed 06/28/24   Page 3 of 4



Dated: June 28, 2024


Respectfully submitted,


/s/ Adam S. Hochschild

 Stephen Crampton, pro hac vice                  Michael R. Hirsh, GA #357220
 THOMAS MORE SOCIETY – Senior Counsel            Hirsh Law Office, LLC
 PO Box 4506                                     2295 Towne Lake Parkway, Suite 116-181
 Tupelo, MS 38803                                Woodstock, GA 30189
 (662)255-9439                                   (678)653-9907
 scrampton@thomasmoresociety.org                 michael@hirsh.law

 Adam S. Hochschild, pro hac vice                Mary Catherine Hodes, pro hac vice
 Hochschild Law Firm                             THOMAS MORE SOCIETY – Senior Counsel
 THOMAS MORE SOCIETY – Special Counsel           112 S. Hanley Rd., Second Floor
 PO Box 401                                      Clayton, MO 63105
 Plainfield, VT 05667                            (314)825-5725
 (314)503-0326                                   mchodes@thomasmoresociety.org
 adam@hochschildlaw.com

 Michael McHale, pro hac vice                    Paul M. Jonna, pro hac vice
 THOMAS MORE SOCIETY – Senior Counsel            LiMandri & Jonna LLP
 10506 Burt Circle, Ste. 110                     THOMAS MORE SOCIETY – Special Counsel
 Omaha, NE 63114                                 P.O. Box 9120
 (402)501-8586                                   Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067
 mmchale@thomasmoresociety.org                   (858)759-994
                                                 pjonna@limandri.com

                                   Counsel for Plaintiffs




                                             3
      Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES         Document 131           Filed 06/28/24       Page 4 of 4



PETER D. LEARY                                      BRIAN M. BOYNTON
United States Attorney                              Principal Deputy Assistant
Middle District of Georgia                          Attorney General

LANCE SIMON                                         ALEXANDER K. HAAS
Assistant United States Attorney                    Director, Federal Programs Branch
Georgia Bar No. 447643
300 Mulberry St., Suite 400                         JOSHUA E. GARDNER
P.O. Box 1702                                       Special Counsel
Macon, GA 31202
Tel: (478) 621-2663
Email: lance.simon@usdoj.gov

/s/ Cassandra M. Snyder
ANDREW E. CARMICHAEL
Senior Trial Counsel
CODY T. KNAPP
CASSANDRA M. SNYDER
Trial Attorneys
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
1100 L Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Tel: (202) 451-7729
email: cassandra.m.snyder@usdoj.gov

                                      Counsel for Defendants




                                                4


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gamd.123364.131.0.pdf
Size
130,548 bytes
SHA-256
8470978d31c75119537c995bfc803311acb5f1f03120f2f0dbc6a4b5d0e39b16
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gamd.123364.131.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top