Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Senate Bill Report — SB 6025, Protecting Consumers From Predatory Loans, with Testimony (as of January 16, 2024)

Senate Bill Report — SB 6025, Protecting Consumers From Predatory Loans, with Testimony (as of January 16, 2024)

Summary

Senate Bill Report on SB 6025, as of January 16, 2024, an act relating to protecting consumers from predatory loans, with a Staff Summary of Public Testimony. The bill expands the definition of the term loan in the Consumer Loan Act and makes any attempt to evade the act a violation. Testimony in favor says the definition of a loan needs to keep up with new lending products created by fintech companies. Testimony against, from an earned wage access company, says those advances are not loans, and other testimony says Earned Wage Access is not a loan. Persons testifying include Senator Derek Stanford, Prime Sponsor.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Issuer
Congressional materials
Document type
Report
Date
2024-01-18
Case
2024 01 18 A31645 D265057 Bill Report 6025 Sbr Bfgt Ta 24

Cite this document

“Senate Bill Report — SB 6025, Protecting Consumers From Predatory Loans, with Testimony (as of January 16, 2024).” Original at app.leg.wa.gov, dated 2024-01-18. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2024-01-18-2024-01-18-a31645-d265057-bill-report-6025-sbr-bfgt-ta-24/, SHA-256 16157a077379c92938d052c169f6713899792fdf7668ac22b1987641e23e8692.

Full text

                            SENATE BILL REPORT
                                  SB 6025

                                      As of January 16, 2024

Title: An act relating to protecting consumers from predatory loans.

Brief Description: Protecting consumers from predatory loans.

Sponsors: Senators Stanford, Dhingra, Frame, Hasegawa, Kuderer, Nguyen, Saldaña, Trudeau,
    Valdez and Wilson, C..

Brief History:
     Committee Activity: Business, Financial Services, Gaming & Trade: 1/16/24.


                                     Brief Summary of Bill
           • Expands the definition of the term loan in the Consumer Loan Act.
           • Makes any attempt to evade the provisions of the Consumer Loan Act a
             violation of the act.


SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, FINANCIAL SERVICES, GAMING & TRADE

     Staff: Clint McCarthy (786-7319)

     Background: The Consumer Loan Act. The Consumer Loan Act (CLA) regulates
     consumer loans in Washington by providing various requirements for lenders and
     protections for borrowers. The CLA authorizes the Department of Financial Institutions to
     regulate consumer loan companies doing business in Washington. The CLA is applicable to
     each loan made to a resident of Washington by a licensee.

     The Definition of a Loan. Under the CLA, the term loan is currently defined as a sum of
     money lent at interest or for a fee or other charges and includes both open-end and closed-
     end loan transactions.




     This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative
     members in their deliberations. This analysis is not part of the legislation nor does it
     constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Senate Bill Report                              -1-                                             SB 6025
     Applicability of the Consumer Loan Act. The CLA is applicable to each loan made to a
     resident of Washington by a licensee and subject to its authority and restrictions. There are
     a number of entities exempt from the CLA, some of which include:
         • pawnbrokers;
         • retail installment sales of goods and services;
         • check cashers or sellers; and
         • various federal government loan programs.

     Violations of the Consumer Loan Act. The CLA has a number of violations listed in
     statute. Some of which include:
         • employing a scheme to defraud or mislead any lender or person;
         • obtain property by fraud or misrepresentation;
         • engage in any unfair or deceptive practice towards any person;
         • soliciting or entering into a contract where a borrower has to pay a fee or commission
            when the borrower does not obtain a loan;
         • soliciting rates, points, or finance terms that are not available at the time of
            advertisement; and
         • failing to make disclosures to loan applicants as required.

     Engaging in any device, subterfuge, or pretense to evade the requirements of the CLA in
     order to circumvent CLA requirements is not explicitly referenced as a violation of the
     CLA.

     Summary of Bill: Expands the Definition of Loans. The term loan is expanded to include
     money or credit to a borrower in exchange for a borrower to agree to a set of terms
     including, but not limited to:
         • finance charges;
         • interest or other charges;
         • conditions; or
         • other considerations.

     The term continues to include open-end and closed-end credit. The term also includes any
     transaction conducted via any medium. Any transaction under the term loan is subject to the
     CLA.

     Anti-Evasion Provisions in the Consumer Loan Act. Individuals attempting to evade the
     requirements of the CLA through any device, subterfuge, or pretense to make, offer, or
     assist a borrower obtain a loan with a greater rate of interest, consideration, or charge is in
     violation of the CLA.

     Appropriation: None.

     Fiscal Note: Not requested.



Senate Bill Report                              -2-                                         SB 6025
     Creates Committee/Commission/Task Force that includes Legislative members: No.

     Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

     Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: The definition of a loan needs to keep up
     with new lending products that are being created by fintech companies. There are entities
     using various schemes to evade regulation under Washington's consumer loan laws. Utah
     has no usury limits, and these fintech companies are using these banks to offer high interest
     loans. This act will protect our most vulnerable population. The interest rates on some of
     these unregulated products can ultimately add up to well over 100 percent. These entities
     need to be regulated and play by the same rules that other entities do. Earned Wage Access
     (EWA) companies share fundamental similarities with payday products. This bill does not
     prevent EWA's from existing in Washington- it just makes them subject to regulation.

     CON: We are an earned wage access company. We do payday advances for low fees.
     These aren't loans because they have a legal right to this money. Earned Wage Access is a
     high quality alternative to a loan. 30 percent of consumers in Washington State have
     difficulty accessing the banking system. In Illinois, many people's financial well-being got
     worse after the bill that SB 6025 is modeled after passed. This definition of loan will
     reduce access to credit, rather than promote it.

     OTHER: This can help manage employee finances. Placing restrictions on EWA
     companies is problematic. Legislation should legitimize this benefit and be focused in on
     how EWA's work. EWA products are not a loan- they make earned but not paid wages
     available to our customers. Earned Wage Access is not a loan. This would adversely
     impact the hundreds of Washington employers that offer EWA to their employees. Some
     states are passing EWA specific legislation. We are in support of regulation, but we want
     one that is in line with how EWA's work. More than 250,000 employees in Washington
     have used EWA products. EWA's don't charge interest or late fees. The risk is only on the
     employer not making payroll. There are ways we can work together, but we have concerns
     about EWA products being included in the definition of loan. EWAs prevent consumers
     from taking out high interest loans.

     Persons Testifying: PRO: Senator Derek Stanford, Prime Sponsor; Lauren Saunders; Sam
     Leonard, Northwest Consumer Law Center; Julia Kellison.

     CON: Matt Pierce, Immediate; Joe Rubin, Opportunity Financial; Phil Goldfeder, American
     Fintech Council.

     OTHER: Alice Jacobsohn, PayrollOrg; Brian Tate, Innovative Payments Association; Drew
     Bouton, Washington State Department of Financial Institutions; Ali Higgs, Washington
     State Department of Financial Institutions; Molly Jones, Payactiv; Ryan Naples, DailyPay;
     Angelena Bradfield.

     Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: No one.

Senate Bill Report                             -3-                                        SB 6025


File and source

File
2024-01-18_a31645_d265057_bill-report-6025-sbr-bfgt-ta-24.pdf
Size
10,366 bytes
SHA-256
16157a077379c92938d052c169f6713899792fdf7668ac22b1987641e23e8692
Our copy
2024-01-18_a31645_d265057_bill-report-6025-sbr-bfgt-ta-24.pdf
Original
app.leg.wa.gov
Back to top