Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Financial Fraud and Identity Theft Investigation and Prosecution Program: Annual Report on Performance and Recommendations, February 2023

Financial Fraud and Identity Theft Investigation and Prosecution Program: Annual Report on Performance and Recommendations, February 2023

Issuer
Congressional materials
Document type
Report

Summary

The 2022 annual report on the Financial Fraud and Identity Theft Investigation and Prosecution Program, issued to the Washington State Legislature in February 2023 by the Department of Commerce under RCW 43.330.300(1)(c). It describes the program, created in 2008, and the two regional task forces it supports, covering King, Pierce, Snohomish and Spokane counties. For state fiscal year 2022 it reports 1,142 investigations, 281 cases charged, 665 counts charged and 375 convictions, with cumulative totals of 13,199 investigations and 5,866 convictions since 2011. It states that Uniform Commercial Code-1 filing surcharges fund the program, that the fee rose to $15 on July 1, 2021, and that 111,968 filings produced $1.5 million. The recommendations ask the Legislature to change identity theft charging thresholds under RCW 9.35.020 and to make possession of a skimming device a felony.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Financial Fraud and Identity Theft Investigation and Prosecution Program: Annual Report on Performance and Recommendations, February 2023.” Original at app.leg.wa.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2023-commerce-reports-2022-ffit-report-final-89914604-1e95-4145-b4a1-121447/, SHA-256 0fff4f506f1c2762c8084004906d6a529070e776f0571337fc73acabf8e29ff4.

Full text

 Financial Fraud and
 Identity Theft Investigation
 and Prosecution Program



Annual report on performance and recommendations pursuant to
RCW 43.330.300(1)(c)




                                           February 2023
       OFFICE OF FIREARM SAFETY
       AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION /
       COMMUNITY SAFETY UNIT               Report to the Legislature

                                           Kendrick Stewart, Interim Director
V3.1
Acknowledgments

Washington State Department of Commerce
Diane Klontz, Deputy Director of Division and
Program Alignment

Jasmine Vasavada, Legislative and Policy Director

Kate Kelly, Executive Director, Office of Firearm
Safety and Violence Prevention/Community Safety
Unit

Greater Puget Sound Financial Fraud and Identity
Theft Task Force
Mitch Mondala, Task Force Co-Chair, Boeing
Employees Credit Union

Patrick Hinds, Task Force Co-Chair, Senior Deputy
Prosecuting Attorney, King County Prosecutor's
Office

Spokane County Financial Fraud and Identity Theft
Task Force
Inspector John Nowels, Task Force Chair, Spokane
County Sheriff's Office




Washington State Department of Commerce
Kate Kelly
Kate.kelly@commerce.wa.gov
Phone: 360-628-6846

OFFICE OF FIREARM SAFETY AND VIOLENCE
PREVENTION/COMMUNITY SAFETY UNIT

1011 Plum St. SE
P.O. Box 42525
Olympia, WA 98504-2525

www.commerce.wa.gov

For people with disabilities, this report is available
on request in other formats. To submit a request,
please call 360-725-4000 (TTY-360-586-0772)




 2022 FINANCIAL FRAUD AND IDENTITY THEFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAM REPORT
Table of contents
Executive summary...................................................................................................................................... 2

Program revenue and funding allocation ...................................................................................................... 5

Task force goals and performance ............................................................................................................... 7

Recommendations ..................................................................................................................................... 10

Appendix A: Task force members .............................................................................................................. 12




  2022 FINANCIAL FRAUD AND IDENTITY THEFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAM REPORT                                                               1
Executive summary
Overview
The Legislature created the Financial Fraud and Identity Theft Crime Investigation and Prosecution Program
(FFIT) in 2008 in the Department of Commerce (Commerce). The program strengthens cooperation between
law enforcement and financial industry investigators and increases the capacity to respond to financial fraud
and identity theft crimes. This report meets the statutory requirements in RCW 43.330.300(1)(c):

    By December 31st of each year submit a report to the appropriate committees of the legislature and the governor
    regarding the progress of the program and task forces. The report must include information regarding the use of
    funds and funding needs to facilitate a biennial review of the program's funding. The report must also include
    recommendations on changes to the program, including expansion.

Financial fraud and identity theft crimes are defined in RCW 43.330.300(4) as "check fraud, chronic unlawful
issuance of bank checks, embezzlement, credit/debit card fraud, identity theft, forgery, counterfeit instruments
such as checks or documents, organized counterfeit check rings, and organized identification theft rings."

Commerce supports two regional FFIT task forces comprising the state's four largest counties: the Greater
Puget Sound Task Force, including King, Snohomish and Pierce counties, and the Spokane County Task Force.
The task forces include representatives from the Attorney General's office, county prosecutors, law
enforcement agencies and financial institutions.

Both task forces direct grant funds to law enforcement investigations, forensic analysis and prosecutorial staff
dedicated to cases generated by the investigations. Fees on Uniform Commercial Code-1 (UCC-1) filings fund
the FFIT program. The Department of Licensing collects and deposits the UCC-1 fee payments into a dedicated
FFIT account.

Key findings
State fiscal year 2022 (July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022)
   1,142 investigations were conducted (1,334 fewer than the previous fiscal year)
   281 cases charged (304 fewer than the previous fiscal year)
   665 counts charged (1,102 fewer than the previous fiscal year)
   375 convictions (54 fewer than the previous fiscal year)
   Task forces are identifying and prosecuting significantly more sophisticated multi-person criminal
   organizations spanning multiple jurisdictions

Cumulative findings in fiscal years 2011-2022
The FFIT task forces report performance quarterly to Commerce. In the years of active investigatory work
(2011 through 2022), the task forces have:

   Conducted 13,199 investigations
   Charged 6,212 cases
   Charged 18, 662 counts
   Obtained 5,866 convictions




 2022 FINANCIAL FRAUD AND IDENTITY THEFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAM REPORT                                 2
Statewide trends
State-level data on identity theft and fraud
The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs 2021 Crime in Washington report indicated that in
2021 there were 24,561 fraud offenses reported throughout the state.1 Identity Theft and Swindle/Con Games
totaled 14,321, or 58.3% of all financial crimes in Washington.

Where Washington fits among national trends
According to the Federal Trade Commission's Consumer Sentinel Network 2021 Data Report,2 there were 5.7
million cases of reported financial fraud. Identify theft cases totaled 1.43 million cases. Imposter scams
accounted for over 984,000 cases, costing $2.33 million. Washington ranks 37th with 170 identity theft reports
per 100,000 people, meaning 36 states had more reports per 100,000 people. Total identity theft cases in
Washington totaled 12,917, with an estimated total loss of $135.7 million for the state. A typical fraud case in
Washington resulted in a loss of $500 per case.

Figure 1 charts Washington's ranking from 2010 to 2020 among states by reported identity theft and fraud
crimes with trend lines. A lower ranking indicates a higher reported crime rate (50 would be the best-ranked
state, and 1 would be the worst). Although Washington's rankings have fluctuated significantly over 10 years,
Washington's rankings improved dramatically from 2020 to 2021, especially for reported identity theft.

Figure 1: Washington's state ranking, ID theft and fraud - 2010 to 2020
 40
                                                                                                                                        37
 35
                                                                   31                                                34
                                                                               29
 30
                                25                                                            25   25
 25                                                   23
                                                 23

 20                  18                                                                             23                                  21
          17

 15                                                                                                                       13
                                                                                              16
                                                 14                  15       14
 10
                                 12
                                                                                                              11
  5       7               8                                                                                                    5
                                                            2
  0
         2010       2011       2012        2013       2014         2015      2016        2017      2018      2019         2020     2021

                                      ID Theft             Fraud          Linear (ID Theft)         Linear (Fraud)


Source: Federal Trade Commission, Consumer Sentinel Network Data Books, 2010-2021, https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/consumer-sentinel-
network/reports




1 Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs, "Crime in Washington 2021 Annual Report," https://www.waspc.org/crime-

statistics-reports
2 Federal Trade Commission, "Consumer Sentinel Network 2021 Data Report," https://www.ftc.gov/reports/consumer-sentinel-network-

data-book-2021


  2022 FINANCIAL FRAUD AND IDENTITY THEFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAM REPORT                                                       3
Other data points include:

     Younger people reported losing money to fraud more often than older people. Those aged 20-29 reported
     losing money in 41% of reports to the FTC. When people aged 70+ have a loss, the median loss was
     much higher, from $500 to $1,500.

     Government documents or benefits fraud tops the list of identity theft-type crimes. The FTC reported
     receiving 395K reports from people who said their information was used to obtain government benefits.

     Military consumers reported over 110K fraud complaints, including 449K imposter scams that cost them
     over $103 million in losses.

     Identity theft, imposter scams, and stolen data from credit bureaus are the top three types of financial
     fraud. Washington ranks 3rd in imposter scams with 8,372 reported cases and a loss of $1.1 million.




 2022 FINANCIAL FRAUD AND IDENTITY THEFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAM REPORT                           4
Program revenue and funding allocation
The state's FFIT task forces direct grant funds to law enforcement investigations, forensic analysis and
prosecutorial staff dedicated to financial fraud and identity theft cases.

Fees on Uniform Commercial Code Financing Statement filings, also known as UCC-1 filings, fund the FFIT
program. The Department of Licensing collects the fees as surcharges on personal and corporate UCC-1
filings.3 Collected funds are transferred to Commerce monthly for the exclusive support of the activities of the
FFIT program.

History of UCC-1 fee collection
Fees collection began when the FFIT program was created in 2008. After accumulating fees for a year, the task
forces spent two years organizing, hiring and training staff before becoming operational. The three-year ramp-
up period explains why investigation and prosecution data began in 2011 while revenue collection began in
2008.

When the Legislature reauthorized the FFIT Program in 2015, UCC-1 fees were raised to $10. When the
program was reauthorized again in 2020, UCC-1 fees were increased to $15, beginning July 1, 2021.
Collections from the new $15 surcharge started in November 2021. The chart below explains the fillings and
UCC Revenue collected from 2008-2022. For SFY 22, the state reported 111,968 filings and collected $1.5
million in UCC fees to support the FFIT Program.

Figure 2: Uniform Commercial Code-1 filings, SFY 2008 - 2022
 120,000
                                                                                                                     111,580
                                                                                                          104,381
                                                                                                                               111,968
 100,000                                                                                88,668
                87,448            87,914            85,303
                                                                      82,926
  80,000                                                                                                    89,763
                         86,586            87,545                              87,129            88,810
                                                             83,531

  60,000


  40,000


  20,000

            8,798
       0
        2008             2010               2012             2014              2016              2018               2020            2022




3 Washington State Department of Licensing, "Paper filing and search fees: UCC,"

https://www.dol.wa.gov/business/UCC/uccpaperfees.html


 2022 FINANCIAL FRAUD AND IDENTITY THEFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAM REPORT                                                    5
Figure 3: Uniform Commercial Code-1 revenue, SFY 2008 - 2022

   $1,600,000                                                                                                                            $1,504,060

   $1,400,000

   $1,200,000
                                                                                                                       $1,043,810
   $1,000,000                                                                        $871,290         $888,100
                                                                                                                                   $1,115,800
    $800,000                                                                                                     $897,630
                                                                                               $886,680
    $600,000
                     $383,179          $392,095                       $326,223
                                                         $346,319
    $400,000
                              $388,428        $362,885
    $200,000                                                        $331,878
                    $39,409
           $0
             2008               2010              2012               2014               2016              2018              2020             2022

Source: Washington State Department of Licensing Monthly UCC-1 Surcharge Reports


Program revenue allocation
Commerce retains 10% of FFIT program revenue for administration. The remaining funding is divided between
the task forces in a manner agreed upon by the program partners and Commerce. The Greater Puget Sound
Task Force includes three counties (King, Pierce and Snohomish). The Spokane County Task Force includes
only Spokane County, resulting in a 3-to-1 ratio between the two task forces. After the 10% for administration,
67.5% of program funding is allocated to the Greater Puget Sound Task Force, and 22.5% is allocated to the
Spokane County Task Force. Figure 3 shows the allocation of the total funding.

Figure 4: Program revenue allocation


                                                                               10%
                                                           22.5%




                                                                                67.5%




                Department of Commerce Administration           Greater Puget Sound Task Force             Spokane Regional Task Force


Source: Department of Commerce




  2022 FINANCIAL FRAUD AND IDENTITY THEFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAM REPORT                                                          6
Task force goals and performance
The FFIT task forces submit quarterly performance reports to Commerce and follow up with two semi-annual
narrative reports of ongoing operational successes and accomplishments. These reports describe the
planning and staffing of investigations, apprehension of suspects, prosecution of financial fraud and identity
theft crimes, and new and best practices.

Statewide performance goals
Statewide, the performance goal of the task forces is to achieve 92 convictions per quarter. Since establishing
this performance measure in 2011, the task forces have achieved an average of 125 convictions each quarter
over 48 quarters, with 5,866 individuals convicted.

This data shows the task forces are far exceeding their original goal.

Task force performance
The FFIT task forces continue to improve in identifying, arresting and prosecuting individuals and groups
engaged in the criminal enterprise of financial fraud and identity theft. Each year, both task forces have
incrementally increased the scope of their investigations, pursuing larger and more complex criminal
enterprises.

In fiscal year 2022, the FFIT task forces produced a combined:

    1,142 investigations
    281 cases charged

Combined task force performance from state fiscal year 2011 through 2022 is presented in Figure 4. Data for
the two task forces are shown separately in Figures 5 and 6.

Figure 5: Statewide Task Force performance, SFY 2011-2022
  3,500

  3,000

  2,500

  2,000

  1,500

  1,000

    500

      -
              2012        2013        2014   2015    2016       2017      2018     2019   2020     2021   2022

                            INVESTIGATIONS      CASES CHARGED          COUNTS CHARGED     CONVICTIONS


Source: FFIT Task Force Quarterly Reports




  2022 FINANCIAL FRAUD AND IDENTITY THEFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAM REPORT                           7
During state fiscal year 2022, the Greater Puget Sound Task Force conducted 97 investigations, prosecuted
111 cases involving 258 counts, and obtained 202 convictions. Pierce and Snohomish County do not report
investigation numbers as they do not have dedicated investigators assigned to the task force. Pierce and
Snohomish County only report when the prosecutor's office charges cases. Due to COVID-19, court operations
continue to be impacted, resulting in fewer cases processed through the court.

Figure 5: Greater Puget Sound Task Force performance, SFY 2011 – 2022

 2,500


 2,000


 1,500


 1,000


   500


      0
             2012        2013        2014        2015        2016       2017      2018     2019   2020     2021   2022

                            INVESTIGATIONS              CASES CHARGED          COUNTS CHARGED     CONVICTIONS


Source: Greater Puget Sound Task Force Quarterly Reports

During state fiscal year 2022, the Spokane County Task Force conducted 1,045 investigations, prosecuted 170
cases involving 407 counts and obtained 173 convictions.

Figure 6: Spokane County FFIT Task Force performance by SFY 2011-2022

 4,000

 3,500

 3,000

 2,500

 2,000

 1,500

 1,000

   500

      0
             2012        2013        2014        2015        2016       2017      2018     2019   2020     2021   2022

                            INVESTIGATIONS              CASES CHARGED          COUNTS CHARGED     CONVICTIONS


Source: Spokane County FFIT Task Force Quarterly Reports




  2022 FINANCIAL FRAUD AND IDENTITY THEFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAM REPORT                                   8
Note on change in data collection for counts changed
In 2017, prosecutors began reporting all counts-charged data. Previously, law enforcement reported some of
the counts-charged data. Since prosecutors do not always prosecute every charge identified by law
enforcement, this change results in more accurate data beginning in state fiscal year 2017. It also accounts for
the reduced number of counts charged for both task forces in 2017 (Figures 5 and 6).




 2022 FINANCIAL FRAUD AND IDENTITY THEFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAM REPORT                        9
Recommendations
FFIT task forces developed the following recommendations to strengthen law enforcement and criminal
justice response to financial fraud and identity theft crimes.

Elevate non-financially motivated identity theft to a first-degree
charge
The FFIT task forces recommend a first-degree charge for identity theft motivated by the intent to avoid
apprehension by law enforcement. Currently, this crime is charged as Identity Theft in the Second Degree
under RCW 9.35.020. An increased penalty for this charge should deter individuals from using stolen identities
to avoid arrest for other, more serious crimes.

A suspect will sometimes give an identity theft victim's name to police to avoid arrest. Unless law enforcement
books the suspect into jail where fingerprints can confirm identity, the victim – rather than the suspect – may
receive a criminal citation. This deception could result in an arrest warrant, creating a criminal history for the
victim of identity theft. However, so long as the "loss" is less than $1,500, only a charge of Identity Theft in the
Second Degree under RCW 9.35.020 is currently allowable against the suspect for this type of crime.

Create penalty enhancements when a victim is a vulnerable
individual
The task forces recommend the Legislature create penalty enhancements that may be added for financial
fraud and identity theft crimes when the victim is a senior or vulnerable individual.

Base the financial threshold for first-degree identity theft on the
amount the suspect attempted to obtain
The task forces recommend the Legislature change the financial threshold for Identity Theft in the First
Degree. The current threshold is "credit, money, goods, services, or anything else of value over $1,500 obtained
from identity theft [RCW 9.35.020(2)]." The task forces recommend changing the first-degree charge to be
based on what the defendant attempted to obtain by misusing the victim's identity rather than what they
obtained.

Currently, a defendant who uses a stolen identity to attempt an unsuccessful high-dollar value crime can only
be charged with Identity Theft in the Second Degree. Basing the level of identity theft on the amount the
defendant attempted to obtain rather than on the amount the defendant obtained avoids rewarding suspects
who use stolen identities to attempt to commit the most serious crimes and are unsuccessful only because
they are caught or because their plans otherwise fail.

Make possession of a skimming device a felony
The task forces recommend making possession of a skimming device with criminal intent to commit identity
theft a felony under RCW 9.35.020. This statutory change will strengthen prosecutorial tools in all jurisdictions
in Washington. Increasingly, skimming is a problem in identity theft cases. Skimming devices allow people to
obtain financial and personal information directly from credit and debit card magnetic stripes. There are
legitimate reasons to use skimmers, such as when small businesses use such devices on mobile phones to
sell goods and services. However, identity thieves use skimming devices and card re-encoders to retrieve an


 2022 FINANCIAL FRAUD AND IDENTITY THEFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAM REPORT                           10
individual's financial information to make counterfeit credit cards. Currently, the only charge available for
possessing a skimmer with intent to commit a crime is Attempted Identity Theft in the Second Degree, a gross
misdemeanor. The task forces believe this is an inadequate charge for such a sophisticated crime.




 2022 FINANCIAL FRAUD AND IDENTITY THEFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAM REPORT                    11
Appendix A: Task force members
Table 1: Greater Puget Sound FFIT Task Force members

Entity                            Representative
King County Prosecuting           Patrick Hinds, Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, GPS-FFIT Executive Board Co-
Attorney's Office                 Chair, Grantee Representative
King County Prosecuting
                                  Margo Marin, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
Attorney's Office
                                  Mitch Mondala, BECU Security - Financial Crimes Unit, GPS-FFIT Executive Board
Boeing Employees Credit Union
                                  Co-Chair

Redmond Police Department         Martin Fuller, Lieutenant

Redmond Police Department         Nicole Perry, Analyst

Pierce County Sheriff's Office    Doug Shook, Sergeant

Pierce County Sheriff's Office    Bill Foster, Detective

Pierce County Prosecuting
                                  Brook Burbank, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney/Assistant Chief Criminal Deputy
Attorney's Office

Pierce County Prosecuting
                                  Matt Thomas, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
Attorney's Office

Columbia Bank                     John Fick, Vice President/Fraud Investigations Unit Manager
Snohomish County Prosecutor's
                                  Michael Held, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney/Chief of Staff
Office
Snohomish County Prosecutor's
                                  Hall Hupp, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
Office
Sound Credit Union                Angie May, Senior Fraud Investigator, GPS-FFIT Executive Board Secretary
Washington State Attorney
                                  Barbara Serrano, Assistant Attorney General
General's Office
JP Morgan Chase                   Barbara VanArshall, JPMC Security - National Vulnerable Adult Investigations

Bank of America                   Tim Whitesitt, Vice President/Senior Investigator

King County Sheriff's Office      Jon Mattsen, Major

King County Sheriff's Office      Robin Fry, Detective

United States Attorney's Office   Vacant (TBD)

Federal law enforcement           Vacant (TBD)

Salal Credit Union                John Fick, Fraud Manager




 2022 FINANCIAL FRAUD AND IDENTITY THEFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAM REPORT                            12
Table 2: Spokane County FFIT Task Force members

 Entity                            Representative

 Spokane County Sheriff's Office   John Nowels, Undersheriff/Chair


 Spokane County Sheriff's Office   Thomas Hendren, Captain

 Spokane County Prosecutor's       Mark Lindsay, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
 Office
 Spokane Police Department         Vacant (TBD)

 Numerica Credit Union             Roger Fitzpatrick, Legal/Compliance Manager

 Washington State Attorney         Lisa Jangaard, Investigator/Analyst

 Small towns and cities            Vacant (TBD)
 Representative




 2022 FINANCIAL FRAUD AND IDENTITY THEFT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION PROGRAM REPORT   13


File and source

File
2023_commerce-reports-2022-ffit-report-final-89914604-1e95-4145-b4a1-121447.pdf
Size
448,770 bytes
SHA-256
0fff4f506f1c2762c8084004906d6a529070e776f0571337fc73acabf8e29ff4
Our copy
2023_commerce-reports-2022-ffit-report-final-89914604-1e95-4145-b4a1-121447.pdf
Original
app.leg.wa.gov
Back to top