True Lender Developments — Home Equity — Senate Committee on Business, Financial Services, Gaming & Trade (November 30, 2023)
- Issuer
- Congressional materials
- Date
- 2023-11-30
Summary
A slide deck titled Home Equity Share Agreements and True Lender Developments, given to the Senate Committee on Business, Financial Services, Gaming & Trade on November 30, 2023 by two directors of the Department of Financial Institutions. The first part compares home equity share agreements with home equity lines of credit and lists their termination terms, consumer benefits, consumer concerns and regulatory treatment, noting that Connecticut and Maryland have passed legislation to treat them as residential mortgage loans. The second part addresses the true lender question in FinTech and bank loan programs and reports results of an inquiry report issued September 1, 2023, including at least $18.9 million loans to 6,763 consumers. It closes with options such as litigation, opting out of DIDMCA, and legislation.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“True Lender Developments — Home Equity — Senate Committee on Business, Financial Services, Gaming & Trade (November 30, 2023).”
Original at app.leg.wa.gov, dated 2023-11-30. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2023-11-30-2023-11-30-a31494-d263015-dfi-home-equity-share-agreements-and-true-lender-development/
, SHA-256 d201637b0f96f5b4298a154d61c9f19cfe1e33c5b49ac7f5b61fbe3b4a8c6c57.Full text
Home Equity Share Agreements
and True Lender Developments
Senate Committee on Business,
Financial Services, Gaming & Trade
November 30, 2023
Drew Bouton, Director of Policy and Legislative Relations
Ali Higgs, Director of Consumer Services
Home Equity Sharing Agreement
May also be known as shared appreciation agreements or home
equity investment options.
Contract between a homeowner and an investor.
Homeowner receives a sum of money in exchange for granting a
percentage of equity interest in the home to the payer.
Different than a home equity loan.
Home Equity Line of Credit Home Equity Share Agreement
Requires regular installment
Requires regular installment payments toward repayment of
payments toward repayment of principal and interest.
principal and interest.
May or may not entail monthly
Market value appraisal or valuation payments by homeowner to payer.
used to determine loan eligibility.
Appraisal is discounted from
Payments may be fixed or variable current market value to create a
with respect to interest amount. risk adjustment for payer.
Amount to be repaid over time is Payment of equity share due at
termination or event in contract,
set in the loan agreement.
such as home sale.
Secured by a deed of trust. Upfront payment that the
consumer receives is usually less
than the value of the percentage
equity consigned to the payer.
Secured by a lien.
HESA
Contract Termination
Termination occurs if:
Homeowner notifies Investor that they wish to repurchase the
option; or
Homeowner sells home.
Determine Homeowner’s Final Payment to Investor:
Equals the Final Home Value * Investor Percentage and fees.
Can be a costly outcome for homeowners.
HESA
Consumer Benefits
Access to home equity liquidity if consumers cannot find
conventional home loans.
No monthly payments.
HESA
Consumer Concerns
Agreements structured as option contracts:
Exempt from mortgage loan disclosure requirements.
No foreclosure protections.
Home improvements must be approved by payer.
Payment received by homeowner not equal to present value of
equity consigned in the agreement.
Contracts are complex lengthy.
Clouds title, making conventional refinancing difficult or
impossible.
Consumers have complained that they thought they were taking
out a loan, rather than selling their equity.
HESA
Regulatory Treatment
HESA is modeled as a real estate options contract.
Courts tend not to view option contracts as loans.
Recent ruling in an active case in Western Washington District
Federal Court found that the agreement is not a loan.
Connecticut and Maryland have passed legislation to treat
HESAs as residential mortgage loans.
California limits use of HESAs only to curing of deficient
mortgages by primary mortgage lender in loan modifications.
The True Lender Question
Why is the true lender question important?
The lending partnership between a non-depository loan
company (FinTech) and a depository institution (a bank or
credit union) can make it difficult to determine who is the
“true lender” of a loan.
Non-depository loan companies (FinTechs) and depository
institutions (banks and credit unions) are subject to different
regulations and interest rate limits.
The True Lender Question
Lifecycle of Loans made through FinTech and Bank Loan Programs
Submits
loan application
Consumer
online FinTech’s Bank
website
The True Lender Question
Lifecycle of Loans made through FinTech and Bank Loan Programs
Approve/deny
Consumer
FinTech’s Bank
website
Execute loan
documents
Disburses loan
The True Lender Question
Lifecycle of Loans Made through FinTech and Bank Loan Programs
Makes loan
payments
FinTech’s
website
Consumer Bank
FinTech acts as
servicer or
subservicer
The True Lender Question
Who is the “True Lender”?
The Bank?
Or the FinTech?
What is the Concern?
The FinTech is not necessarily licensed or regulated as it is connected
to the depository.
The depository is permitted to “export” its home state’s interest rate.
Lending partnerships may result in higher interest rates charged to
Washington consumers.
The True Lender Question
Inquiry Report issued September 1, 2023
The True Lender Question
Inquiry Report issued September 1, 2023
Results of the Inquiry
Partner banks are primarily located in Utah.
FinTech (or affiliate) will generally purchase a 95-99% interest of
the loan receivables from the partner bank.
FinTech will generally act as servicer for the loan.
Exact data for Washington could not be ascertained.
At least $18.9 million loans
6,763 consumers
**Based on YE 2022 from three companies.
The True Lender Question
Options to address the issue
Engage in litigation
California
Opt-out of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and
Monetary Control Act (DIDMCA)
Iowa - 1980
Colorado (HB23-1229) - 2023
Pass legislation
Hawaii, Georgia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico,
Nevada, New Hampshire, and Wyoming
The True Lender Question
Legislative Option – General Features
Anti-evasion principles
Predominant economic interest of the loan
Other factors to determine who the true lender is
Who markets, brokers, facilitates, or services the loan?
Who holds the right to acquire the loan?
Totality of the circumstances indicates the person is the lender
Questions
Drew Bouton
Director of Policy and Legislative Relations
Department of Financial Institutions
Drew.Bouton@dfi.wa.gov
Ali Higgs
Director of Consumer Services
Department of Financial Institutions
Ali.Higgs@dfi.wa.gov
File and source
- File
- 2023-11-30_a31494_d263015_dfi-home-equity-share-agreements-and-true-lender-development.pdf
- Size
- 146,796 bytes
- SHA-256
- d201637b0f96f5b4298a154d61c9f19cfe1e33c5b49ac7f5b61fbe3b4a8c6c57
- Original
- app.leg.wa.gov