Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Sponsor Testimony — Representative Bill Roemer on House Bill 158 (May 16th, 2023)

Sponsor Testimony — Representative Bill Roemer on House Bill 158 (May 16th, 2023)

Summary

Representative Bill Roemer gave sponsor testimony on House Bill 158 to the House Commerce and Labor Committee, dated May 16th, 2023. The testimony says the bill does not alter the required hours of education to obtain a cosmetology or barbering license. It says the bill creates a unified barbering/cosmetology school license and an independent contractor license that eliminates "shop within a shop" licenses. It says the bill lowers the first time offense fine to $250 and lowers the age to apply for a barber license to 16 years of age. It also says the bill eliminates a requirement of 200 additional hours of training before re-taking the licensing exam.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Sponsor Testimony — Representative Bill Roemer on House Bill 158 (May 16th, 2023).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2023-05-16-commerce-labor-testimony-testimony-4781-027e764f7d/, SHA-256 ac652948cf8fd97d4976dd9e7ad55d747ae1fe11f5326a19f0a6e841a8b4d464.

Full text

                           Representative Bill Roemer
                       House Commerce & Labor Committee
                        House Bill 158 Sponsor Testimony
                                 May 16th, 2023


      Chairman Johnson, Vice Chair Manchester, Ranking Member McNally, and
members of the House Commerce and Labor Committee, thank you for the
opportunity to testify on House Bill 158. This legislation contains a comprehensive
update to our cosmetology and barbering statutes, with two goals in mind: (1) to
better reflect the current standards, procedures, and terminology used by the Board
of Cosmetology and Barbering and (2) to better serve aspiring cosmetologists and
barbers who may be unduly burdened when trying to enter the field.
      Before addressing what is in the bill, we want to make abundantly clear what
is not in the bill. This bill purposefully does not in any way alter the required hours
of education to obtain a cosmetology or barbering license. This issue has been the
source of much debate over many years, and we very intentionally did not address
it in this bill. Rather than focus on this contentious issue, we have crafted a bill in
consultation with Board officials representing common-sense reforms that are
widely supported. It is our preference to pass this bill and provide these reforms for
the Board and industry members now rather than further delay reform and continue
to debate over training hours. We sincerely hope that the committee will look
favorably upon this approach, as the process to draft the bill before you represents
many months of work and resulted in near-unanimous support from the House of
Representatives.
      In 2017, under Governor Kasich, the Cosmetology Board and Barber Board
were merged into one consolidated Board of Cosmetology and Barbering.
However, when the two boards were merged, their statutes were not adequately
harmonized. Therefore, despite the two boards being merged, two different sets of
procedures exist for their respective professions, creating unnecessary duplicity
and red tape. While this bill keeps these two sections of law separate, it harmonizes
the law to streamline administration and enforcement for the Board. Today I will
go through the highlights of the changes contained in the bill, and I would also
urge all members of the committee to examine the bill analysis provided by LSC as
the bill is very lengthy.
   1. The bill creates a unified barbering/cosmetology school license, to
      eliminate duplicative application for facilities that teach both
      cosmetology and barbering. Currently, cosmetology schools and barbering
      schools must be licensed by the Board, but their licenses are administered
      separately and have different renewal due dates. For schools that teach both,
      this creates unnecessary paperwork and duplicative enforcement for the
      board. The bill thus creates a unified school license for those facilities.
   2. The bill loosens regulations on license reciprocity from other states.
      Under current law, for an out-of-state applicant to be granted a license by
      reciprocity, the licensee’s state of residence must also extend reciprocity to
      Ohio licensees. The bill eliminates this requirement, giving the board more
      flexibility to issue licenses to out-of-state applicants.
   3. The bill reduces fines for disciplinary actions. Under current law, the
      board may impose a maximum disciplinary fine of $500 for a first offense,
      and $1,000 for subsequent offenses. The bill lowers the first time offense
      fine to $250 and not more than $100 for each additional violation during an
   inspection. On the second offense, $500 and $200 fines apply, respectively.
   And, after two or more offenses, $1,000 and $300 fines apply, respectively.
   Providing this additional flexibility allows the board to enforce its rules in a
   less punitive nature. After a House amendment, the bill also makes
   violations of both the cosmetology and barber laws a civil offense rather
   than a criminal offense.
4. The bill establishes temporary pre-examination work permits for
   barbers. Under certain conditions, the bill allows someone eligible for the
   barber license examination to receive a temporary work permit prior to the
   exam. This is consistent with current practice for cosmetologists.
5. The bill lowers the age to apply for a barber license or to start
   barbering school to 16 years of age. This provision allows students to get a
   jump start on their licensure through career technical education programs,
   cutting out unnecessary and duplicative education after high school.
6. The bill eliminates a requirement that a barber student complete 200
   additional hours of training before re-taking the licensing exam. This
   requirement places an unnecessary burden on license applicants which we
   wish to end.
7. The bill prevents the board from charging interest or penalty fees for
   unpaid fines. This is one additional step to lessen the burden of disciplinary
   measures on salons, barbershops, and workers.
8. The bill creates an independent contractor license, eliminating “shop
   within a shop” licenses. Under current law, if a barber or cosmetologist
   rents their own space within a shop (a place like Salon Lofts, for example),
   they must also have their own shop license in addition to their license to
      practice. The bill eliminates that requirement and creates an independent
      contractor license for individual cosmetologists and barbers.
   9. The bill creates a process to designate a barber license as “inactive”.
      Cosmetologists currently have the option to de-activate their license to avoid
      paying licensure fees if they are not actively working. This way, if they
      choose to return to work later, they do not have to go through the entire
      licensure process again. The bill extends the same opportunity to barbers.
   10. The bill allows the board to independently set the passing score for the
      barber exam, rather than keeping it in statute. This provision is more
      appropriate for rule than statute because the Board controls all other aspects
      of the examination. The bill requires the Board to set a passing score in rule.
   11. The bill explicitly allows for practicing a branch of cosmetology or
      barbering on a dead body in a funeral home or embalming facility.


   Chairman Johnson and members of the committee, thank you again for the
opportunity to testify on House Bill 158. As you can see, this bill contains
numerous provisions to improve processes for the Board and for licensees. Again,
due to the lengthy nature of the bill, I would highly recommend reading the bill
analysis for additional details. I am happy to take any questions you may have at
this time, and if there are any I cannot answer immediately, my office would be
happy to assist.


File and source

File
2023-05-16_commerce-labor_testimony_testimony-4781.pdf
Size
243,804 bytes
SHA-256
ac652948cf8fd97d4976dd9e7ad55d747ae1fe11f5326a19f0a6e841a8b4d464
Our copy
2023-05-16_commerce-labor_testimony_testimony-4781.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top