Transcript of Electronically Recorded Proceedings — DarkOwl, LLC v. ArkOwl, LLC, Case 1:21-cv-02163, Doc. 72-1 (Filed 06/06/23)
- Date
- 2023-05-15
Summary
A transcript of an evidentiary hearing in DarkOwl, LLC v. ArkOwl, LLC, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM, before Kristen L. Mix, United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court for the District of Colorado, commencing at 1:27 p.m. on May 15, 2023 and docketed as Document 72-1 filed June 6, 2023. The hearing concerns the plaintiff's motion to exclude evidence and testimony under Rule 702, on two issues: whether the parties are competitors and whether the challenged survey captured the proper universe of respondents. The opening pages record appearances of counsel and preliminary rulings on time limits, hard-copy exhibits, reading deposition testimony into the record, and the handling of confidential documents. The transcript ends with the hearing in recess at 5:50 p.m. pending a further video session and carries a transcriber's certificate dated May 26, 2023.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Transcript of Electronically Recorded Proceedings — DarkOwl, LLC v. ArkOwl, LLC, Case 1:21-cv-02163, Doc. 72-1 (Filed 06/06/23).”
Original at www.courtlistener.com, dated 2023-05-15. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2023-05-15-darkowl-llc-v-arkowl-llc-let-s-have-counsel-enter/
, SHA-256 d305465dc9768bfada0ec698b35c14660b5099cdb78a1678a90adc8d41452faa.Full text
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 181
1
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
2
Case No. 21-cv-02163-KLM
3 ___________________________________________________________________
4 DARKOWL, LLC,
5 Plaintiff,
6 vs.
7 ARKOWL, LLC, et al.
8 Defendants.
___________________________________________________________________
9
10 Proceedings before KRISTEN L. MIX, United States
11 Magistrate Judge, United States District Court for the
12 District of Colorado, commencing at 1:27 p.m., May 15, 2023,
13 in the United States Courthouse, Denver, Colorado.
14 ___________________________________________________________________
15 WHEREUPON, THE ELECTRONICALLY RECORDED PROCEEDINGS
16 ARE HEREIN TYPOGRAPHICALLY TRANSCRIBED. . .
17 ___________________________________________________________________
18 APPEARANCES
19 JEREMY BUXBAUM, THOMAS HOLT, JR., and SABRINA
20 DANIELSON, Attorneys at Law, appearing for the Plaintiff.
21 MICHAEL FRASIER, Attorney at Law, appearing for
22 the Defendant.
23 ____________________________________________________________
24 EVIDENTIARY HEARING
25
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 181
2
1 I N D E X
2 WITNESS PAGE
3 Plaintiff:
4 Robert Daline
Examination by Mr. Holt 21,70
5 Examination by Mr. Frasier 44
6 Mark Turnage
Examination by Mr. Buxbaum 76
7 Examination by Mr. Frasier 107
8 Hal Poret
Examination by Mr. Buxbaum 152
9 Examination by Mr. Frasier 168
10 Defendant:
11 Russell Cohen
Examination by Mr. Frasier 149
12
13
14 EXHIBITS ADMITTED
15 1 70
16 2 57
17 3 58
18 4 62
19 5 66
20 6 67
21 7 79
22 8 84
23 9 84
24 10 86
25 11 87
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 181
3
1 EXHIBITS (continued) ADMITTED
2 12 89
3 13 91
4 14 93
5 15 95
6 16 121
7 17 125
8 18 133
9 19 139
10 20 143
11 21 155
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 4 of 181
4
1 P R O C E E D I N G S
2 (Whereupon, the within electronically recorded
3 proceedings are herein transcribed, pursuant to order of
4 counsel.)
5 THE COURT: Good afternoon. This is 21-cv-02163
6 DarkOwl, LLC, vs. ArkOwl, LLC. Let's have counsel enter
7 appearances, please, starting with counsel for the
8 plaintiff.
9 MR. HOLT: Yeah. Thomas Holt of Perkins Coie,
10 Jeremy Buxbaum of Perkins Coie and Sabrina Danielson of
11 Holland & Hart.
12 THE COURT: Good afternoon.
13 MR. HOLT: Good afternoon.
14 MR. FRASIER: Thank you, Your Honor. It's Michael
15 Frasier from Rubric Legal on behalf of the defendant ArkOwl.
16 THE COURT: Good afternoon.
17 MR. FRASIER: Good afternoon.
18 THE COURT: And who is this gentleman sitting with
19 you?
20 MR. FRASIER: This is Mr. Rob Daline, the owner of
21 ArkOwl.
22 THE COURT: All right, thank you.
23 All right, we're here for a hearing on plaintiff's
24 motion to exclude evidence and testimony under Rule 702.
25 Counsel prepared to proceed for the plaintiff?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 5 of 181
5
1 MR. HOLT: We are, Your Honor. We were hoping to
2 address a few preliminary matters if we could.
3 THE COURT: You may. Just let me ask defense
4 counsel if defendant is also prepared to proceed?
5 MR. FRASIER: Yes, Your Honor.
6 THE COURT: All right, thank you.
7 Go ahead with your preliminary matters, Mr. Holt.
8 MR. HOLT: Yes, Your Honor.
9 We want to be respectful of the Court's time.
10 We've brought in a number of witnesses for the hearing and I
11 just want to have an idea of how much time we're permitted
12 to present the evidence. We're trying to work with opposing
13 counsel to make sure that, you know, each party has roughly
14 the same amount of time. I'm just trying to figure out how
15 that would --
16 THE COURT: Well, I have to get you out of here by
17 6:00 p.m. I do not have this matter set for any further
18 time, besides this afternoon. So that gives you, what, four
19 and a half hours to work with.
20 We are going to need to take at least one
21 midafternoon break. Nobody should sit for four and a half
22 hours straight.
23 So, you know, do the best you can to get through
24 the witnesses that you can. I mean, I encourage you to not
25 be repetitive, I think that's very important. If we don't
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 6 of 181
6
1 finish by 5:45 p.m., we're simply going to have to reconvene
2 the hearing at another time.
3 I mean, I'm certainly -- unless I am satisfied
4 that I've heard what I need to hear, and I can't make that
5 judgment at this point, of course.
6 So I think we have to play it by ear, but I am
7 very hopeful that we'll be able to wrap this up by 6:00 and
8 I encourage you to do what you can to streamline.
9 MR. HOLT: Yeah. We're hopeful of that, as well,
10 and I think we should be able to work within those
11 parameters.
12 THE COURT: Remember, also, you've got to speak
13 into a microphone.
14 MR. HOLT: Yeah. You want me standing up --
15 THE COURT: I'm already going deaf and I'll be
16 deafer by the end of this hearing.
17 MR. HOLT: Is it okay if I sit down so I'm closer
18 to the microphone?
19 THE COURT: Sitting down is fine or standing at
20 the podium is fine, either, as long as you're speaking into
21 a microphone.
22 MR. HOLT: Yeah.
23 With respect to exhibits, we understand that Your
24 Honor would like a hard copy as they're introduced.
25 THE COURT: I would.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 7 of 181
7
1 MR. HOLT: Are you okay with the witnesses and
2 opposing counsel just using electronic copies?
3 THE COURT: Absolutely okay with that. The reason
4 why I request a hard copy is I frequently make notes on
5 exhibits and it's easier for me to do that with my pen in my
6 hand.
7 MR. HOLT: Okay. With respect to impeachment, you
8 know, would you like the actual deposition transcript
9 introduced as an exhibit? Or is it okay if we just read it
10 into the record?
11 THE COURT: It's fine to read it into the record.
12 If there are disputes about what the deposition
13 transcript says -- and I know that sounds incredible, but
14 trust me, it occurs -- then I may ask for the transcript;
15 but, otherwise, it's not necessary.
16 MR. HOLT: Okay. And then with respect to just
17 opening remarks, we were hoping for just a couple of minutes
18 to kind of frame out for the Court what will be presented
19 today.
20 THE COURT: I think that's fine. I intended to
21 give both sides a few minutes for opening remarks.
22 MR. HOLT: Okay.
23 THE COURT: Anything further from plaintiff or
24 preliminary matters?
25 MR. HOLT: With respect to confidentiality, Your
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 8 of 181
8
1 Honor, there are some documents that will be introduced
2 today that are AEO. We're, obviously, willing to take
3 guidance from the Court on how you, you know, like to handle
4 that, but we were thinking that, you know, we could have the
5 principals for each party step out when AEO documents from
6 the other side are presented.
7 THE COURT: Any objection to that from defense
8 counsel?
9 MR. FRASIER: No, Your Honor.
10 THE COURT: All right, then that will be fine.
11 MR. BUXBAUM: Restriction of (indiscernible - away
12 from mic) from the public record.
13 THE COURT: Well, yeah, I mean, if exhibits are
14 admitted into evidence, there is a notation of that on the
15 electronic record, but there is no copy of the exhibit
16 that's necessarily a part of the record, so you don't need
17 to be concerned about that. I'll make sure that copies of
18 the exhibits that are admitted are maintained in confidence.
19 MR. BUXBAUM: Is there a transcript (indiscernible
20 - away from mic)?
21 THE COURT: You have to request a transcript of
22 the hearing. This is not a hearing before our Article III
23 judges, who always have a court reporter present in the
24 courtroom. This is a hearing before a magistrate judge. So
25 bear in mind that if any side wants a transcript, you have
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 9 of 181
9
1 to request a transcript. It will usually take at least a
2 week to obtain the transcript.
3 Also bear in mind, that I do not have realtime,
4 which is the methodology used in -- by the Article III
5 judges to see the questions and the answers as they are
6 being transcribed by the court reporter while the trial is
7 underway -- hearing is underway. So I may need you to
8 repeat questions for purposes of objections, et cetera.
9 MR. HOLT: Sounds good, Your Honor.
10 THE COURT: Is that it?
11 MR. HOLT: That's all from plaintiff's counsel.
12 THE COURT: Anything further in a preliminary
13 matter from defense counsel?
14 MR. FRASIER: Will there be any -- any sort of
15 opportunity to provide a brief closing argument at the end
16 of the hearing?
17 THE COURT: I hope so. It depends on time.
18 MR. FRASIER: Sure.
19 THE COURT: And we can revisit that at the
20 conclusion of the day. If we've done everything but
21 closings and you still want to give a closing, we can talk
22 about maybe a possibility of submitting a closing in
23 writing, for example. So let's hold that thought and talk
24 about it later.
25 MR. FRASIER: Okay, thank you.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 10 of 181
10
1 THE COURT: You're welcome.
2 MR. FRASIER: That's all I have.
3 THE COURT: All right, fair enough.
4 I've already, of course, received a signal from
5 one of my hearing aids that battery has gone out because
6 that's what always happens the moment that I step on the
7 bench, so give me a moment to take care of that and then
8 we'll get started.
9 MR. HOLT: Thank you.
10 (Pause in proceedings.)
11 THE COURT: In ten minutes the next one -- the
12 other one will go. All right, thank you.
13 Plaintiff's counsel, you may begin.
14 MR. HOLT: Good afternoon, Your Honor.
15 We appreciate your time today and the opportunity
16 to present additional evidence on DarkOwl's pending motion
17 to exclude Mr. Kegan's (ph) survey.
18 Your order requests that the parties present
19 evidence on two key issues. One, whether the parties are
20 competitors; and, two, whether Mr. Kegan's survey captured
21 the proper universe of respondents.
22 DarkOwl intends to call first Robert Daline, the
23 CEO and founder of ArkOwl as a fact witness, as well as Mark
24 Turnage, who is the CEO and co-founder of DarkOwl, as well
25 as two experts: Mr. Kegan and then our rebuttal expert Hal
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 11 of 181
11
1 Poret.
2 On the first key issue the evidence will show that
3 the parties are not direct competitors. In fact, they offer
4 vastly different services for radically different use cases.
5 DarkOwl, as you will hear, provides its customers
6 access to a massive database of dark web data. The data is
7 not accessible through ordinary Internet search tools like
8 Google. This data is mainly used for criminal activity,
9 that might include such things as credentials circulated on
10 the dark web.
11 DarkOwl provides this data to sophisticated cyber
12 security professionals, including to national intelligence
13 and law enforcement agencies and select organizations that
14 go through a stringent vetting process. This data is used
15 by DarkOwl's customers for purposes of assessing cyber
16 security risk, enhancing data protection systems, and
17 protecting national security.
18 THE COURT: Are you saying, Counsel, that the
19 customers of DarkOwl are essentially entirely law
20 enforcement related?
21 MR. HOLT: No, not entirely. We have a set of
22 customers that have to go through the stringent vetting
23 process before they have access to the dark web data that
24 our client offers.
25 THE COURT: And what do are those nonlaw
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 12 of 181
12
1 enforcement customers who go through the stringent vetting
2 process do?
3 MR. HOLT: They're --
4 THE COURT: They're criminals?
5 MR. HOLT: No. They're all involved in the cyber
6 security industry.
7 THE COURT: Okay, thank you.
8 MR. HOLT: ArkOwl, on the other hand, offers what
9 it advertises as an email and phone verification service.
10 When an online purchase takes place, analysts at the seller
11 will input the customer email and phone number into ArkOwl's
12 search tool and then will receive back in realtime certain
13 data that ArkOwl provides that may assist in determining
14 whether the transaction is fraudulent and should be
15 declined.
16 ArkOwl generally provides its services to fraud
17 analysts that monitor purchases for their companies. So the
18 parties' services and their target consumers are quite
19 distinct, yet Mr. Kegan's survey was based on the assumption
20 that the parties are direct competitors; i.e., they compete
21 for the same business.
22 This false assumption resulted in the survey
23 universe, the second key issue today, that is not
24 representative of the purchasers of DarkOwl's services,
25 which both parties agree is the proper universe here.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 13 of 181
13
1 Mr. Kegan has acknowledged that he did very little
2 to learn about DarkOwl or its services in designing his
3 survey. Again, he believed the parties were direct
4 competitors.
5 As a result, his screening questions to select the
6 survey universe improperly focused on, first, potential
7 customers of ArkOwl's services; namely, email and phone
8 verification services, services that DarkOwl doesn't
9 provide; or second, fraud prevention services, which is a
10 term so broad and vague that it doesn't assist in targeting
11 potential consumers of DarkOwl's niche services.
12 ArkOwl contends, nonetheless, that the correct
13 universe was surveyed because ArkOwl and DarkOwl are
14 competitors and thus, the potential customer bases overlap.
15 While the evidence is clear that the parties
16 aren't competitors, even if there was some overlap, the
17 survey is still fatally flawed because the screening
18 questions did not ensure that the proper universe was
19 actually surveyed, as DarkOwl's expert Mr. Poret will
20 testify.
21 THE COURT: So let me ask you this, Counsel.
22 Is it your contention that the determination of
23 whether the parties to the case are direct competitors or
24 not is a determination for the Court or for a jury?
25 MR. HOLT: Well, this case is no longer before a
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 14 of 181
14
1 jury; but it's a fact determination that goes to the
2 reliability of the survey, which we think is, you know,
3 appropriate before the Court.
4 THE COURT: So if it's a fact determination for
5 the Court because the case is no longer before a jury, is it
6 the type of fact determination that should be made prior to
7 the hearing of the entirety of the evidence on the claims?
8 MR. HOLT: We believe it is, Your Honor.
9 THE COURT: Why?
10 MR. HOLT: Well, it will, I think, significantly
11 impact the presentation of evidence at trial and we don't
12 believe that, you know, the Court -- the fact-finder should
13 see a survey that we firmly believe is unreliable and we
14 think it's prejudicial to DarkOwl to have that survey and
15 that related testimony.
16 THE COURT: Why can't your objections to the
17 survey be better handled simply on cross-examination of the
18 surveyor?
19 MR. HOLT: Well, I mean, that's certainly one way
20 to handle it; but, again, we believe the survey is so
21 fundamentally flawed, that it shouldn't be presented to the
22 Court.
23 THE COURT: So your concern is really about
24 whether the Court sees the survey and what the Court makes
25 of the survey? You're not even really worried about a jury
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 15 of 181
15
1 here? You're not worried about, you know, potentially not
2 well educated in the areas of law, lay people
3 misunderstanding what the survey is about? You want to keep
4 it from the Court in its entirety?
5 MR. HOLT: We do, Your Honor. We believe that
6 it's confusing and misleading for that evidence to be
7 presented to the Court as a part of a trial. We believe it
8 should be excluded in its entirety and, you know, the fact
9 that it would be admitted and there is testimony, whether
10 it's direct or cross, you know, presenting the survey or
11 criticizing it is just -- it's prejudicial to us and we
12 would like to exclude it at this stage so that we can
13 streamline the issues for trial.
14 THE COURT: You, nevertheless, have a rebuttal
15 expert, right?
16 MR. HOLT: We do.
17 THE COURT: And is the rebuttal expert, I presume
18 because he's here today and going to testify, will talk
19 about the propriety of the survey?
20 MR. HOLT: That is correct, Your Honor.
21 THE COURT: But your rebuttal expert did not
22 prepare his own survey?
23 MR. HOLT: He did not.
24 THE COURT: So you're not prepared to offer an
25 alternate survey to the survey that's been prepared by the
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 16 of 181
16
1 defendant?
2 MR. HOLT: That is right. And we will explain why
3 that is the case throughout the day.
4 THE COURT: All right, thank you.
5 MR. HOLT: So based on the evidence and the
6 parties' briefing, we believe that it's only appropriate for
7 the Court to exclude Mr. Kegan's survey in its entirety.
8 Thank you, Your Honor.
9 THE COURT: Thank you.
10 Opening statement from defense counsel, if any?
11 MR. FRASIER: I'm sorry?
12 THE COURT: Opening statement from defense
13 counsel, if any?
14 MR. FRASIER: Yes, Your Honor.
15 It occurred to me, though, with one other
16 procedural matter that I don't think we addressed. To
17 streamline matters, I believe we've agreed to only call
18 witnesses once, so they're calling Mr. Daline and then I
19 will just do my direct immediately after that.
20 THE COURT: Perfectly appropriate. I'm
21 appreciated that you agreed to that. That's fine with the
22 Court.
23 MR. FRASIER: Thank you, Your Honor.
24 THE COURT: You're welcome. Whenever you're
25 ready.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 17 of 181
17
1 MR. FRASIER: Yes.
2 Mr. Kegan should be allowed to testify at trial
3 and present his findings from the survey that he conducted,
4 because expert style survey is appropriate for the parties
5 in this particular circumstance, and Mr. Kegan's screening
6 questions appropriately captured a representative sample of
7 the relevant universe.
8 DarkOwl, the plaintiff, would have the Court
9 believe that the question on whether escort survey at all is
10 reliable is if the parties have the exact same type of
11 services, and that's not the law.
12 The question is whether or not the parties'
13 services are the type of services that are similar and seen
14 by the same types of customers in the same types of places,
15 and there has to be some sort of competitive proximity and
16 overlap.
17 And you will hear today that there is significant
18 competitive proximity and overlap.
19 THE COURT: So let me just ask you: Does your
20 client have, as a customer base, law enforcement-related
21 officials?
22 MR. FRASIER: No, Your Honor. And what you will
23 hear at trial today is that law enforcement -- law
24 enforcement is not DarkOwl's primary focus and it hasn't
25 been since at least 2017. Both parties for the last several
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 18 of 181
18
1 years have focused all of their marketing efforts at cyber
2 security companies, companies that aggregate data from
3 multiple sources and create their own product to serve
4 people like retail establishments, banks, cryptocurrency or
5 law enforcement.
6 So the primary focus of both entities is to sell
7 data -- relevant data to cyber security companies for those
8 companies to aggregate with other data and then use it in
9 their products or resell it as a part of a more integrated
10 package.
11 THE COURT: Thank you.
12 MR. FRASIER: The competitive overlap will also
13 become more evident at trial when we -- when you hear from
14 the witnesses, not only that both parties are focusing the
15 same type of industry, but that both parties are providing
16 email information -- relevant information about email
17 addresses, about domains, about IP addresses that could all
18 be used for the same purposes by the end-users, those users
19 of the cyber security companies.
20 Moreover, it's not -- the dark net is not as black
21 and white as DarkOwl would have you believe. Both parties
22 are providing data that is breached data, meaning data that
23 where there was some sort of security attack and the data
24 was leaked, probably, on the dark net and then resold. Both
25 parties have that data as part of their products.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 19 of 181
19
1 THE COURT: Is that all that your client provides,
2 is breached data?
3 MR. FRASIER: From the dark net?
4 THE COURT: Any breached data, whether it comes
5 from the dark net or otherwise.
6 MR. FRASIER: No. The -- no. My client
7 provides -- and you'll hear in his testimony that he
8 provides a myriad -- significant different types of
9 information about email addresses, including like the
10 creation date, the number of times it's appeared in the
11 ArkOwl database, associations with things, like domains that
12 are also in the database or with social media accounts. And
13 it provides information about IP addresses and social media
14 accounts and domains, as I said.
15 DarkOwl doesn't only provide data from the dark
16 net as well. There is no one accepted definition of the
17 dark net. And you will hear today that although DarkOwl
18 focuses on the dark net, what it describes as the dark net,
19 it also has multiple other sources that is definitely not
20 categorized as the dark net.
21 But the question isn't where -- where the data
22 comes from. It's what are they doing with it? Who they are
23 selling it to and for what?
24 And what you'll hear today is that they're doing
25 the same types of things with it. They're marketing it in
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 20 of 181
20
1 the same way. They're marketing personally identifiable
2 information to be sold to cyber security companies for them
3 to use in things like fraud prevention.
4 You'll also hear that DarkOwl has targeted -- has
5 identified, targeted, and directly solicited multiple of
6 ArkOwl customers offering this PII data service. So there
7 is -- this is more than just speculation. There is actual
8 evidence that they have targeted these companies to sell to
9 these companies the same type of information that ArkOwl
10 sells.
11 The second question, on whether or not the -- the
12 survey appropriately captured the relevant universe, you
13 will hear evidence and testimony today that, in fact, the
14 screening questions did use a funnel approach, to start
15 broad and get narrowed to effectively capture those people
16 who are making decisions about whether or not to hire
17 vendors like ArkOwl and DarkOwl.
18 You will hear that the -- the sample that was
19 captured has other data, other than the screening questions,
20 including things like the job title, that further cement the
21 question of: Does this sample contain a sufficient number
22 of potential DarkOwl customers?
23 At the end of the day, this hearing should be --
24 should be taking place at a trial. This is questions of
25 fact and I think both parties have struggled to figure out
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 21 of 181
21
1 how to fit it into a half a day because the significant
2 amount of trial is over the question of to what extent is
3 there competitive overlap between these two parties.
4 So the Court should deny this motion and let the
5 parties proceed to trial on these issues.
6 THE COURT: All right, thank you.
7 All right, let me ask plaintiff to call their
8 first witness, please.
9 MR. HOLT: Plaintiff calls Robert Daline.
10 THE COURT: All right, Mr. Daline, if you come
11 forward and stand in front of the witness box and raise your
12 right hand.
13 ROBERT DALINE,
14 having been first duly sworn, was examined and testified as
15 follows:
16 THE WITNESS: Yes.
17 THE COURT: Please be seated and speak into the
18 microphone.
19 THE WITNESS: Okay.
20 DIRECT EXAMINATION
21 BY MR. HOLT: :
22 Q. Good afternoon, Mr. Daline.
23 A. Good afternoon.
24 Q. Would you please state and spell your full name
25 for the record.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 22 of 181
22
1 A. Yes. Robert D. Daline -- Robert David Daline.
2 Q. And are you currently employed, Mr. Daline?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. By whom?
5 A. By ArkOwl.
6 Q. And what is your role there?
7 A. I am the chief executive officer and co-founder.
8 Q. And when did you found ArkOwl?
9 A. With the state of Minnesota, I founded it in 2012.
10 Q. Okay. Would it be fair to characterize ArkOwl as
11 an identity and verification service provider?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. And is personal identifiable information
14 verification ArkOwl's main focus?
15 A. And validation, yes.
16 Q. I understand that the term "PII" is used as an
17 acronym in the industry for the term "personal identifiable
18 information." Are you okay with me using PII throughout
19 today's hearing?
20 A. As an acronym, yes.
21 Q. What type of PII does ArkOwl help its customers
22 verify?
23 A. The email address, the phone number, a user's IP
24 address, or even their physical address.
25 Q. Anything else?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 23 of 181
23
1 A. We added a name match recently, so a name. And
2 that's -- that's only the inputs.
3 Q. Right, right, right.
4 When you say "name match," can you explain to me
5 what you're referring to there?
6 A. If a company inputs a full name, like Robert
7 Daline, we'll say whether there was a match in our database
8 or the databases that we check.
9 Q. Okay. And up until last year, was ArkOwl's focus
10 on providing email and phone verification?
11 A. Up until last year, the only inputs were email,
12 address, and phone number.
13 Q. Okay.
14 MR. HOLT: I would like to introduce into evidence
15 as Exhibit 1 a printout from ArkOwl's website. Your Honor,
16 may I approach the bench?
17 THE COURT: You may.
18 Q. (By Mr. Holt) Can you see the exhibit on your
19 screen, Mr. Daline?
20 A. I can, yes.
21 Q. Do you recognize?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. And what is this?
24 A. This is our -- our home page for our company
25 website.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 24 of 181
24
1 Q. And is this what it looks like today?
2 A. I believe so.
3 Q. I would draw your attention to the time-stamp at
4 the bottom left corner that reflects it was captured today.
5 Do you see that?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. And do you have any reason to believe that this is
8 not what your home page currently looks like?
9 A. I do not have any reason to doubt that.
10 Q. And what is the first most prominent description
11 of ArkOwl's services on its site?
12 A. Verify email addresses and phone numbers in
13 realtime. I'm assuming you just wanted me to read it out
14 loud, right?
15 Q. Yeah, that's great. Thank you.
16 A. Do you want me to keep reading?
17 Q. No, that's fine. Thank you.
18 A. No. Okay.
19 Q. It's my understanding that last year ArkOwl added
20 IP address and physical address verification to its
21 capabilities?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. So is it fair to say that ArkOwl provides a
24 platform that allows its users to use various PII as search
25 inputs?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 25 of 181
25
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. And in general terms, what outputs does an ArkOwl
3 customer receive when inputting this information into
4 ArkOwl's platform?
5 A. Oh, I mean, 81-plus on the website, but I think
6 we're up to maybe -- maybe 150, including if you input a
7 name or an email address, you might get a name back,
8 potentially a location. You might get pictures. You'll
9 also get breached data, whether the -- some of that breached
10 data includes whether it was seen in the dark web. You'll
11 get first and last seen date. You'll get domain data. And
12 that's just for the email address.
13 For the phone number, you'll get the data breach
14 information there too. You'll get the first seen, you'll
15 get some social checks, you'll get first and last seen. For
16 the IP address, you'll see the same where there is location
17 associated with the IP. You'll also get the ISP network
18 that the IP was on.
19 Do you want me to keep going, because there is a
20 bunch of these, so . . .
21 Q. I think that's fine for now.
22 A. Okay.
23 Q. I appreciate the comprehensiveness of your
24 response.
25 As part of the output, does ArkOwl ever provide
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 26 of 181
26
1 any password information to its customers?
2 A. We provide whether a password was in a breach,
3 like a yes or no, like this data breach included passwords,
4 but we do not include the passwords.
5 Q. How is that possible, if the search input doesn't
6 include password field?
7 A. The search input includes the email address or the
8 phone number. And with that, we'll say this email address
9 was found in this data breach, along in this data breach
10 included breaches of passwords, phone numbers, all of those
11 PII data was leaked in the same breach and this email
12 address was found in the breach.
13 So a user could assume that potentially, the
14 password that they put into, you know, let's say Adobe.com,
15 which was breached, the user name and password for their
16 Adobe account was leaked. So it's just more of a yes-or-no
17 check.
18 Q. Right. You're not actually providing password
19 information to your customer?
20 A. No.
21 Q. And any sort of login credentials being provided
22 by ArkOwl to its customers?
23 A. From the end-user, the customer, the output of the
24 email address?
25 Q. Yes.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 27 of 181
27
1 A. No.
2 Q. How is ArkOwl's data output then used by ArkOwl's
3 customer.
4 A. The output is used to help verify as to whether
5 the -- the customer that they're looking at, the entity is
6 looking at, to verify legitimacy or not. So they're
7 looking: Is this a potential fraud threat, or is this a
8 potentially good -- good customer?
9 Q. And just so I'm clear, the verification itself, is
10 that provided by ArkOwl, or is that provided by ArkOwl's
11 customer?
12 A. It's provided by the customer. ArkOwl provides
13 the data.
14 Q. Okay. And these data outputs that ArkOwl provides
15 for these queries, are those essentially realtime?
16 A. Yes, except for the ArkOwl's database, which -- I
17 mean, that's realtime. We store it, right?
18 Q. Can you explain that.
19 A. So ArkOwl stores a log of queries purchased, or a
20 log of queries made by a particular -- by all of our clients
21 collectively, so that we could provide the first seen date.
22 So that's not a realtime check --
23 Q. Okay.
24 A. -- out to the Internet; that's a realtime check of
25 our own database.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 28 of 181
28
1 Q. But with respect to the input and the output that
2 the customer receives, it's essentially realtime; it happens
3 instantly?
4 A. Correct.
5 Q. Okay. So let me just set up a short hypothetical
6 here to make sure I understand how the business works and to
7 potentially frame it up cleanly for the Court.
8 Let's say --
9 A. I said I would be perfectly honest.
10 We do have a batch query, that if you query -- if
11 you query like a thousand queries, it will tell you how much
12 time is left until the result. So I'm -- you know, based on
13 your question of realtime, they may have to wait for the
14 batch.
15 Q. Okay, understood, thanks. So let's get back to
16 that hypothetical.
17 Let's say that Nike is an ArkOwl customer. I go
18 to buy a pair of shoes on Nike.com and as a part of that
19 process, Nike has me provide my email address, my phone
20 number, credit card information, the usual information that
21 you would be required to provide in a commercial
22 transaction.
23 Nike could then use ArkOwl's service to obtain
24 information to determine if my email address and phone
25 number that I provided can be verified. And then based on
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 29 of 181
29
1 that information, Nike can then approve or decline my
2 transaction. Is that a fair capture of it?
3 A. Yes. We would provide the extra data that the
4 customer didn't -- didn't give you.
5 Q. Okay. And all of this happens within a matter
6 seconds or less?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. Could you give me a rough idea of how many paying
9 customers ArkOwl currently has.
10 A. Wow.
11 Q. I don't need specifics, I'm just ballparking it.
12 A. Yeah, we have -- we have a pay-as-you-go model for
13 some customers, so it's a little harder to keep track of if
14 we made a sale like two years ago. You know, they're still
15 a paying customer, they're using ArkOwl today. So there is
16 a lot of those.
17 I would say there is --
18 Q. Are we talking hundreds, thousands?
19 A. I think hundreds.
20 Q. Hundreds?
21 A. Hundreds, yeah.
22 Q. And of these paying customers, what percentage use
23 ArkOwl's service to assess fraud in connection with online
24 purchase transactions?
25 A. We -- ArkOwl provides the data. We don't
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 30 of 181
30
1 necessarily -- we're not necessarily sure to what extent the
2 end-user is using the data for. I would assume, you know,
3 if it's -- if it's a retail fraud department, that they
4 would be using it the way I used it when I was in the retail
5 fraud.
6 Q. But sitting here today, you're not aware of any
7 other uses of ArkOwl's data, apart from -- in connection
8 with an online transaction for paying customers?
9 A. Yes, I'm not aware.
10 Q. Okay.
11 A. Oh, wait.
12 Q. Yes.
13 A. We said retailer. We do have banks, cyber
14 security companies, and we do have law enforcement in Europe
15 using ArkOwl.
16 Q. The law enforcement officers in Europe, or law
17 enforcement agencies in Europe, those are current customers?
18 A. Correct.
19 Q. And they're paying customers?
20 A. Correct.
21 Q. And you also mentioned a couple of other
22 categories. Could you run through those for me.
23 A. Cyber security, so like whole fraud platforms.
24 THE COURT: I'm sorry, say that again. Whole?
25 THE WITNESS: -- fraud platform.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 31 of 181
31
1 THE COURT: Oh, okay.
2 A. So there is -- when it comes to -- you know, when
3 I was in -- I'll relate it to my experience.
4 When I was in online fraud, we would use a fraud
5 platform to aggregate all the data that we were looking at,
6 to help us review the order to see if it was fraud or if the
7 customer was somebody trying to commit fraud or if they were
8 legitimate, and it would take in all the data.
9 We used the Accertified platform when I was there,
10 and Accertify would collect all of the orders, collect all
11 of the data, and sometimes just the program itself would
12 make a decision fraud or not. I was an analyst, I was
13 required to look at orders and make the determination fraud
14 or not, given the data that we were looking at, plus the
15 data from any third-party tools.
16 Q. And this whole fraud platform that you refer to,
17 is that being used in connection with online purchases?
18 A. Probably. I don't -- I don't know all of their
19 customers.
20 Q. But you're not specifically aware of any other
21 use?
22 A. I'm not specifically aware of any other use they
23 would be using it for.
24 Q. Okay. You mentioned three, I think, when you
25 provided your supplemental response. Could you run through
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 32 of 181
32
1 those again? I just want to make sure I have them
2 correctly.
3 You mentioned an officer or law enforcement agency
4 in the UK; is that right?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. And can you tell me a little bit about that
7 particular customer.
8 A. There are several. There are police departments
9 and I'm not -- I'll confess, I've never been to the UK, so
10 I've only seen the accounts come in, gone on the website.
11 The website says, you know, Department of this London, or
12 whatnot, you know, police, and then in their -- in their
13 email footers, they say that they're police too.
14 I think, you know, there are several of those, but
15 I'm not -- I'm not totally sure -- like, I haven't
16 researched them a whole lot, outside of knowing that they're
17 not -- they're not retail.
18 Q. Okay. And again, you said that those are paying
19 customers?
20 A. Correct.
21 Q. Okay. And do you have any law enforcement
22 customers that are within the U.S.?
23 A. I do not believe so.
24 Q. So we have law enforcement in the UK, you
25 mentioned whole fraud platform. What was the third?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 33 of 181
33
1 A. There was cyber security, banking, so like Thin
2 Tech. Any -- anywhere online where you would take in an
3 email address and need to research that was -- has been kind
4 of more of the base of customers we've been building.
5 Q. Okay. And in that context, is it your
6 understanding that the data that ArkOwl is providing to its
7 customers is used in connection with the approval or
8 verification on an online purchase transaction?
9 A. Correct. I believe our service is being used for
10 fraud prevention and cyber security.
11 Q. In connection with online purchase transactions?
12 A. In -- in connection with -- with that, or cyber
13 security or the -- the law enforcement in Europe. I don't
14 know how they're using it in that. Maybe they are using it
15 in Europe for online transactions too, I have no clue,
16 because I just see the number of crews that come in.
17 Q. Understood.
18 But sitting here today, you're not aware of any
19 customer using ArkOwl's information for anything other than
20 supporting online purchase transactions?
21 A. I am not aware.
22 Q. Okay, thank you.
23 To your knowledge, are any of ArkOwl's paying
24 customers using ArkOwl to assess cyber security risk in
25 connection with insurance underwriting?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 34 of 181
34
1 A. I am not aware.
2 Q. Okay. To your knowledge, are any of ArkOwl's
3 paying customers using ArkOwl to assess the risk of a cyber
4 attack?
5 A. I am not aware.
6 Q. To your knowledge, are you -- are any of ArkOwl's
7 paying customers using ArkOwl to assess cyber security risk
8 by monitoring ransom ware sites?
9 A. I am not aware.
10 Q. To your knowledge, are there any of ArkOwl's
11 paying customers using ArkOwl in connection with national
12 security threats or investigations?
13 A. I am also not aware.
14 Q. Roughly speaking, how many queries were run
15 through ArkOwl's platform in 2022?
16 A. 19 million, roughly.
17 Q. So thousands of inquiries each day?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. This is a high volume verification business?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. Does ArkOwl use a variety of resources to generate
22 outputs for its customer's inquiries?
23 A. Like data sources?
24 Q. Yes.
25 A. Yes.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 35 of 181
35
1 Q. Okay. And are these all publicly available
2 sources?
3 A. Some of them, no.
4 Q. Could you list for me the ones that are not.
5 A. The ones that were purchased partners with would
6 be Whois. We use a company for Caller ID. That one is
7 Telnyx. We used Have I Been Pwnd for breach data.
8 Q. Are these not all publicly available?
9 A. You need to purchase an account or --
10 Q. For Whois?
11 A. For use, yes.
12 Q. For Whois? You mentioned Whois?
13 A. For Whois, yes.
14 I think the information itself is publicly
15 available, but the kind of bringing the data altogether and
16 cleaning it up is what we use Whois for.
17 Q. So the way ArkOwl provides the data to its
18 customers, you need some sort of account set up with some of
19 these resources, but the information is all publicly
20 available? I could go into Whois, Caller ID or Have I Been
21 Pwnd and --
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. -- obtain information? Okay.
24 Does the --
25 A. Sorry. Our first and last seen isn't publicly
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 36 of 181
36
1 available, that's only through ArkOwl.
2 Q. Have I been seen?
3 A. No. First seen, so it's when ArkOwl first saw it
4 in our -- in our own database.
5 Q. Okay. And that's simply an indication of when
6 that particular PII first hit ArkOwl's database?
7 A. Correct.
8 Q. Okay. Does the output that ArkOwl provides to its
9 customers contain data from the publicly accessible or
10 surface web?
11 A. Yes.
12 Q. Are you familiar with the dark web?
13 A. I'm familiar with the term, but not familiar with
14 using it.
15 Q. Okay. And in your own terms, like how would you
16 describe the dark web?
17 A. The dark web is not the -- the Google and kind of
18 the stuff that's -- you could readily go to maybe on your
19 phone with a browser, I suppose. You know, an expert on
20 dark web probably could go with their browser on their
21 phone, but I'm not an expert in the dark web.
22 Q. Okay, but when I refer to the "dark web," you know
23 generally what I'm referring to?
24 A. I know it's a place where you have companies --
25 you know, if you hear of breaches in the news, you also hear
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 37 of 181
37
1 it was leaked in the dark web or this was purchased off the
2 dark web. You know, X amount of drugs were sold -- it seems
3 like dark stuff happens in the dark web.
4 Q. Indeed, indeed.
5 Over the course of your career -- I think you
6 answered this question, but I'm going to ask it anyway.
7 Over the course of your career, have you
8 personally run a search on the dark web?
9 A. I have not.
10 Q. Do you know what a dark web search result would
11 look like?
12 A. Is it something you can just do a search of? I
13 don't --
14 Q. You're not familiar?
15 A. I'm not familiar.
16 Q. And to your knowledge, has anyone at ArkOwl ever
17 searched the dark web?
18 A. To my knowledge, no.
19 Q. Does ArkOwl promote any dark web-specific
20 services?
21 A. Yes, the breach data from Have I Been Pwnd.
22 Q. So it's your position that breach data and dark
23 web data are synonymous?
24 A. No. But some of the breaches where it says, You
25 know, this breach contained passwords and all of those PII
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 38 of 181
38
1 data, it will also say where the data -- data breach was
2 leaked.
3 Q. Okay.
4 A. And so in the information of it, it will say:
5 This was leaked on the dark web. These are the things that
6 were leaked: Passwords, user names, email addresses, phone
7 numbers.
8 Q. Okay, understood.
9 Just so I'm clear, you agree, though, that the
10 dark web and breached data are distinguishable terms?
11 They're not synonymous?
12 A. That's something that -- yes.
13 Q. So getting back to my question: Does ArkOwl
14 promote any dark web-specific services? Can you provide --
15 A. We do not search the dark web.
16 Q. Okay. Are there any ArkOwl materials -- marketing
17 materials that reference the dark web specifically?
18 A. If there are, I've forgotten about them.
19 Q. So let's go back to the breached data that you're
20 referring to.
21 Does ArkOwl access the dark web to pull
22 information that it provides to customers?
23 A. No. Like the Whois service, we access another
24 service that does the breach data.
25 Q. And what is the name of that service?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 39 of 181
39
1 A. That's Have I Been Pwnd, or Have I Been Pwnd.com.
2 Q. And what information is Have I Been Pwnd providing
3 to ArkOwl?
4 A. They provide a reverse email address and a reverse
5 phone number lookup. So where we input an email address or
6 a phone number, and they provide which data breaches that
7 email address has been in, or if the email address has even
8 been in a data breach.
9 Q. Do you have firsthand knowledge of whether the
10 data ArkOwl obtained from Have I Been Pwnd is actually
11 coming from the dark web?
12 A. I do not. I -- I wasn't there when they put that
13 data in their database.
14 Q. But it's your understanding that it's providing
15 information regarding breach data, but you're not sure if it
16 came from the dark web or the surface web or somewhere else?
17 A. Yeah, it claims it did. But like I said, we use
18 their service because we've never been in the data -- in the
19 dark web.
20 Q. You mentioned that Have I Been Pwnd represents
21 that it's pulling information from the dark web. Where does
22 it represent that?
23 A. It represents the -- when you search an email
24 address in their service, some of the breaches that come up,
25 their individual breaches -- and I'm using this as an
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 40 of 181
40
1 example, because I don't remember which breaches will say
2 that. But let's say like the Adobe.com or the LinkedIn.com
3 breach, it will say, you know, 220 million users were
4 compromised in this breach by LinkedIn and this data was
5 found to be leaked on the dark web and that's how we found
6 out about it, and --
7 Q. So it's breached data certainly? That's what Have
8 I Been Pwnd is providing, correct? Breached data?
9 A. Correct.
10 Q. But the data could be coming from the surface web?
11 A. If they say it's coming from the dark web, I just
12 trust them. It could come from the surface web. I'm not --
13 you know, I wasn't there. They could be lying to us.
14 Q. So when you provide data from Have I Been Pwnd to
15 your customers, is it giving an indication of whether the
16 information was pulled from the dark web?
17 A. We pass along exactly what Have I Been Pwnd's API
18 passes through to us, and sometimes Have I Been Pwnd's API
19 will say this came from the dark web, so our customers would
20 see that coming from ArkOwl.
21 Q. Do you recall testifying at your deposition that
22 you don't know if Have I Been Pwnd gets its data from the
23 dark web?
24 A. I remember that, because it was when I was
25 searching ArkOwl one time after the deposition, I was like,
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 41 of 181
41
1 Oh, they do say it, they say it right here.
2 So I do remember that's inconsistent with my
3 deposition, because I saw it after.
4 Q. And again, your subsequent review was going into
5 the Have I Been Pwnd website and analyzing the information
6 that it's providing to ArkOwl?
7 A. Yeah, we -- when I saw it coming through the API
8 into ArkOwl.
9 Q. Okay.
10 A. That was -- that was the only review of saying,
11 Oh, it says it's from the dark web.
12 Q. Just so I understand, you access Have I Been Pwnd,
13 they generally are providing breached data, some of that
14 breached data is on the surface web. It's your
15 understanding that at least a portion of that data is coming
16 from the dark web, as well?
17 A. That's what they claim.
18 Q. Okay. But again, just so I'm clear, ArkOwl itself
19 is not searching the dark web?
20 A. ArkOwl itself is not searching the dark web.
21 Q. What companies has ArkOwl gone head-to-head with
22 when selling its PII verification services?
23 A. We've gone head-to-head with any company that has
24 advertised fraud data solutions. You know, typically, we go
25 head-to-head with those that are providing email address
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 42 of 181
42
1 inputs and outputs for the email address --
2 Q. Sure.
3 A. -- in the form of data.
4 Q. And are those typically PII verification services?
5 A. Typically, yes.
6 Q. Okay. Do you recall during your deposition you
7 had testified with regard to a few specific direct
8 competitors?
9 A. Yes. There are those that we hear about more
10 often when talking with clients.
11 Q. So Ekata, PIPL, LexisNexis and SEON, would you
12 agree that those --
13 A. Yep.
14 Q. -- are those competitors?
15 A. Yep, those are competitors.
16 Q. And what about Email Hippo?
17 A. Email Hippo? I -- I haven't heard of them from a
18 customer, but I've looked at their service and I've thought
19 they look like a competitor.
20 Q. Okay. And all of these companies that we just ran
21 through, they all provide PII verification services?
22 A. I haven't tried Email Hippo. I would assume so,
23 based on their website.
24 Q. To your knowledge, do any of these particular
25 competitors provide dark web database services?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 43 of 181
43
1 A. SEON might. I don't -- I don't know -- I don't
2 use -- I haven't looked at them, so --
3 Q. That's fair.
4 Sitting here today, you're not aware?
5 A. Yeah, I'm not aware today.
6 Q. Sitting here today, are you aware of any instances
7 where ArkOwl has lost business to DarkOwl?
8 A. I'm not aware.
9 Q. Are you aware of any instances in which DarkOwl
10 has lost business to ArkOwl?
11 A. Not aware.
12 Q. Are you aware of any instances in which a
13 customer, or potential customer was deciding between DarkOwl
14 services, on the one hand, and ArkOwl services, on the
15 other?
16 A. Not that they would tell me, no. I'm not aware.
17 Q. To your knowledge, have you ever encountered
18 DarkOwl at any industry events?
19 A. No.
20 Q. Are you aware of any companies who use DarkOwl
21 services for any type of PII verification?
22 A. I have an assumption, but --
23 Q. No firsthand knowledge?
24 A. I mean, United States Postal Service, when we ran
25 into them at the industry conference, I would assume they
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 44 of 181
44
1 use DarkOwl because they came up to us.
2 Q. For PII verification?
3 A. I assumed -- I assumed that, but --
4 Q. Don't pretend knowledge.
5 A. It's an assumption, right.
6 Q. Fair enough. We don't want you speculating.
7 A. Yep.
8 Q. Sitting here today, are you aware any of customer
9 or potential customer deciding between these services of
10 ArkOwl and a provider of dark web database services?
11 A. No, I'm not aware.
12 MR. HOLT: I have no further questions at this
13 time, Your Honor.
14 THE COURT: Thank you.
15 Is there cross-examination, which is really direct
16 examination?
17 MR. FRASIER: Thank you, Your Honor.
18 THE COURT: You're welcome.
19 THE WITNESS: Can you hear me okay?
20 THE COURT: Yeah, I'm doing just fine. Thank you
21 very much.
22 THE WITNESS: I was expecting this chair to have
23 wheels and when I got here it --
24 THE COURT: You're not the first to be fooled by
25 that.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 45 of 181
45
1 THE WITNESS: Because those had wheels and I get
2 up and I'm like, Oh.
3 CROSS-EXAMINATION
4 BY MR. FRASIER:
5 Q. Good afternoon, Mr. Daline.
6 A. Good afternoon.
7 Q. You testified a minute ago that you were working
8 in fraud prevention departments before forming ArkOwl; is
9 that right?
10 A. That's correct.
11 Q. Approximately when was that?
12 A. That was back in 20 -- 2010 and 2011, so a while
13 ago.
14 Q. What did you do when you were working as a fraud
15 prevention specialist in 2010 and 2011?
16 A. I would be reviewing online orders. And that was
17 my daily job, was to look at online orders, to look at the
18 data as it came in. It was like a queue and I just take the
19 next one in the queue.
20 So what happens when you order something online, a
21 lot of times it goes right through because, typically,
22 information verifies or the orders lower dollar, and so the
23 decision for fraud are not is made pretty quickly.
24 But for bestbuy.com, where I worked first with
25 high dollar Mac Book Pros or tiny technologies that were
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 46 of 181
46
1 high in fraud, a lot of orders made it before physical
2 analysts who would sit down and review whether to let that
3 go out the door or --
4 Q. What type of information were you looking for to
5 make the determination?
6 A. The -- the whole thing was whether to -- we were
7 looking for excuses to approve the order. So we're looking
8 for something to tell me that the order is legitimate. You
9 know, do they -- is the billing and shipping address, do
10 they have the same name and do those names verify, and third
11 parties, could they be relatives? You know, is this email
12 address 12 years old? You know, does that -- could that
13 look like legitimate behavior? If it's three seconds old,
14 that really doesn't look like it's legitimate behavior.
15 But we are -- we are looking for any excuse to
16 make a profit there and to make sure the good customer gets
17 their order.
18 Q. Approximately how much time did you have to
19 conduct these manual reviews?
20 A. I believe it was like five to eight minutes.
21 Q. Per review?
22 A. Per review.
23 Q. And how did your work as a fraud prevention
24 specialist lead to ArkOwl?
25 A. Well, I kept seeing that there was -- we would
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 47 of 181
47
1 have third-party tools for address, we would have
2 third-party tools for, like, a billing name with an address.
3 We had a third-party tool to review the IP address or the
4 device ID.
5 But when it came to email addresses, a Google
6 search -- and we had like maybe five or eight different tabs
7 open all the time with things that we would just throw email
8 addresses into to say, Give me an excuse that this is a real
9 person at the end of this. You know, is -- is this account
10 registered somewhere? Or is this email address registered
11 somewhere?
12 Q. So how did that turn into ArkOwl?
13 A. Well, it turned into ArkOwl because we -- we made
14 ArkOwl as an email input, or we had the idea to have an
15 email input that would just check all of these things that I
16 was already doing as an analyst.
17 Q. You testified that you launched ArkOwl in
18 approximately 2012; is that right?
19 A. We launched the website in 2011.
20 Q. All right.
21 A. But we launched the company in 2012.
22 Q. What did the ArkOwl website -- or what did the
23 ArkOwl service look like in 2012?
24 A. In 2012 the -- we only had one data provider. We
25 only had one data check, which was Yahoo Pulse. So -- and
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 48 of 181
48
1 basically what you do is, you would put in an email address
2 and it had to be -- it had to be a Yahoo.com -- @Yahoo.com.
3 You would plug it in and the output would be name, birthday,
4 email creation, location and gender. And that's -- that was
5 our only feature for, maybe, several months until we added
6 Whois.
7 Q. And so it was a user interface?
8 A. A user interface, correct.
9 Q. Okay.
10 A. So much like Google, where you just go there and
11 type -- type something in, you would go to ArkOwl and type
12 in an email address.
13 Q. What types of businesses were ArkOwl's first
14 customers?
15 A. Well, the very first one was Target, because I was
16 working at Target at the time. And then it was bestbuy.com.
17 And then bestbuy.com, the manager had shared us with the --
18 the MRC at the time, the Merchant Risk Council. And from
19 that time on, we had a lot -- a lot more users, Apple,
20 Amazon, Orbits. Online retailers were our early -- early
21 days.
22 Q. Online retailers were your primary customers at
23 the beginning?
24 A. Correct.
25 Q. Now, you mentioned somebody sending an email to
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 49 of 181
49
1 MRC?
2 A. Correct.
3 Q. When did that happen?
4 A. Jason Taylor, who was my manager at Best Buy, and
5 then when I went to Target, he shared that around the time
6 when we first started ArkOwl. We first started it in
7 February. Jason had shared this in March.
8 Q. Of 2012?
9 A. Of 2012, yes.
10 Q. Right. And you said MRC is Merchant Risk Council;
11 is that right?
12 A. Correct.
13 Q. What kind of companies comprise the Merchant Risk
14 Council members?
15 A. Online retailers, fraud platforms, fraud software
16 platforms, online banks, the vendors, the data solutions for
17 those online retailers and banks, and fraud platforms.
18 Q. Are Merchant Risk Council members likely ArkOwl
19 competitors or customers or vendors or what?
20 A. They could be all of the above. They could be
21 customers, they could be competitors, or they could be
22 vendors.
23 Q. What unites that Merchant Risk Council members?
24 A. They probably talk that, you know, there is no
25 competitors in the field. It's just one big fight against
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 50 of 181
50
1 fraud.
2 Q. Okay. So ArkOwl's first customers were in retail.
3 Did ArkOwl start acquiring customers that were not in
4 retail?
5 A. Yes. Through -- through this, we started
6 acquiring the -- you know, some fraud platforms: Cyber
7 Source, Signifyd, Cell Secure (ph).
8 Q. Do you recall approximately when ArkOwl had the
9 three customers you just mentioned?
10 A. Cyber Source was early on. I don't think Signifyd
11 started until 2014, so I think Signifyd was 2014.
12 Q. And Cell Secure?
13 A. Cell Secure was pretty early on too. I think they
14 might have been 2014, 2015.
15 Q. What is Cyber Source?
16 A. Cyber Source is an all-around cyber security fraud
17 prevention platform. They take in, much like when we were
18 using Accertified to review the manual, do things manual
19 review, you could use Cyber Source for the same thing. They
20 would take in all the orders, all the data. Cyber Source
21 even can manage whole fraud departments. Instead of having
22 your own fraud department, they can say, Hey, we'll take
23 that under our roof so that you don't even need a fraud
24 department.
25 Q. What is Signifyd?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 51 of 181
51
1 A. I believe they do the same thing; they're a fraud
2 platform that will take on the whole -- the whole fraud
3 department or part of it. Whatever part that they need help
4 with, a fraud department might need help with, Signifyd is
5 there to say, We can help with that piece.
6 Q. So this was about a decade ago that you first
7 acquired these customers. Does ArkOwl still have cyber
8 security companies as customers?
9 A. Those are our main customers today.
10 Q. As of today, they're your main customers?
11 A. Correct.
12 Q. As of last year, roughly what percentage of
13 ArkOwl's revenue came from the cyber security companies?
14 A. I believe it was upwards of 80 to 85 percent.
15 Q. Other than the three you've identified, what other
16 cyber security customers does ArkOwl currently have?
17 A. We have Apruvd, a company called Getmelo (ph).
18 Those are also fraud prevention platforms. I'm sure there
19 are many, many others there.
20 Q. How do -- how do these security companies use
21 ArkOwl's data?
22 A. I believe it's to help them stop fraud on some
23 level. I'm -- I'm not totally -- I'm not totally sure. We
24 just provide the data.
25 Q. What insight does ArkOwl have as to how its
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 52 of 181
52
1 customers are using ArkOwl's data?
2 A. We pretty much only have the volume, so the amount
3 of queries performed in a particular day by a cyber security
4 platform.
5 Q. Did ArkOwl ever make a conscious decision to focus
6 marketing on cyber security companies?
7 A. Yes. In 2019 -- whenever the first time I went to
8 the MRC was that -- when I went -- when I physically went
9 there -- I think it was 2019 -- I found myself talking more
10 with the other fraud prevention platforms and the other
11 vendors in the space more than I was the retailers.
12 Q. All right. Let's -- let's jump back to ArkOwl
13 services.
14 On your direct you described what ArkOwl services
15 look like now, which is very different from what you
16 described in 2012.
17 At what point did ArkOwl's service change from
18 what you described as -- in 2012?
19 A. Yeah. I think sometime between 2012 and 2015 or
20 '16, we added a few more social checks, social registrations
21 where you could put in the email address and it would say
22 yes or no to a Facebook, or yes and no to Twitter. We added
23 the Whois domain information at that time.
24 So Whois is kind of that -- so at ArkOwl.com is
25 the Whois part of the email address, the domain. So that
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 53 of 181
53
1 the Whois researches that to say was this domain created,
2 like two days ago.
3 And then in 20 -- 2015 or 2016, we -- we massively
4 increased our social checks. We added the breached data,
5 we -- and kind of the main -- the main thing with that was
6 also to launch the API.
7 Q. What's an API?
8 A. API is an applications programmable interface. It
9 basically allows systems to connect to each other so that a
10 system could connect to our data -- an analytic system could
11 connect to our data and do machine learning, given our extra
12 data.
13 Q. In your direct, you talked a little bit about Have
14 I Been Pwnd.com. What -- I believe you testified that it
15 contains both email addresses and phone numbers; is that
16 right?
17 A. Correct.
18 Q. Has it always contained both email addresses and
19 phone numbers?
20 A. No. I believe they added phone numbers last year
21 or this year. It's recent.
22 Q. All right. And what information does Have I Been
23 Pwnd give ArkOwl?
24 A. The output is to describe whether an email was in
25 a data breach. So it might -- so if I plugged in my email,
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 54 of 181
54
1 it would say, RDaline@Gmail -- this is stricken from the
2 record, right? No one will have RDaline@Gmail, but RDaline
3 @Gmail has 20 breaches associated with it. And if you click
4 on that in the ArkOwl interface, it will show exactly which
5 breaches those are and we do display that in the API, as
6 well.
7 So maybe I'm in the Adobe breached or the LinkedIn
8 breached.
9 Q. How is the information you just described useful
10 to your clients?
11 A. It's very useful in determining account takeover,
12 whether there is an account takeover.
13 So the -- kind of the -- the really, like, Holy
14 Grail of email verification is to see if something was
15 created within the last few seconds, while on the flip side,
16 the Holy Grail for the fraudster is getting a highly
17 verified email to place your order with. And the best type
18 of verified email you can get is the one that a customer has
19 already used.
20 So if you can take a login and a password and sign
21 in to somebody's, you know, Groupon account and place an
22 order with a credit card that's saved in there, that looks
23 really legit. And so you use the breached data to be like,
24 Was this email address seen in any of these breaches? Could
25 the order that I'm looking at be in a possible account
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 55 of 181
55
1 takeover?
2 Q. You briefly described the Merchant Risk Council.
3 Are you aware of whether any Merchant Risk Council members
4 utilize data from the dark web?
5 A. I -- I am not. I am not aware.
6 Q. Are you aware of whether any of the Merchant Risk
7 Council members advertise using dark web data?
8 A. Oh, the vendors. Yes. SpyCloud is a -- is a
9 member that's using -- or that advertise dark web
10 monitoring. A company called Flashpoint. I saw that they
11 had a dark web in their description. IPQualityScore, which
12 also provides inputs of email address, phone number, IP
13 address, they advertise dark web data.
14 Q. Do you know what IPQualityScore does?
15 A. They -- they provide data, as well as fraud
16 scoring, for reverse lookups of IP address, email address
17 and phone number. And I believe they also advertise the
18 Vice ID.
19 Q. Is IPQualityScore a competitor of ArkOwl?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. How do you know that?
22 A. Because I've actually demoed their data and I can
23 see that it has an email input. I can put in an email and
24 they advertise that they provide data in return for that
25 email to help with fraud protection, which is what we do.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 56 of 181
56
1 MR. FRASIER: I would like to offer an exhibit.
2 Should I just resume numbering, Your Honor, so Exhibit 2?
3 UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Counsel, is your computer
4 plugged into the lectern?
5 MR. FRASIER: It should -- it says it is.
6 UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: It takes just a second.
7 MR. FRASIER: May I approach, Your Honor?
8 THE COURT: You may. Thank you.
9 MR. FRASIER: Apologies. This was working a
10 minute ago.
11 Success.
12 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) Mr. Daline, I am showing you what
13 has been marked as Exhibit 2. Do you recognize it?
14 A. Yes.
15 THE COURT: Let me make sure the record reflects
16 counsel can see that on your screen, on your --
17 MR. HOLT: I can, Your Honor. Thank you.
18 THE COURT: All right, go ahead.
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) What is Exhibit 2?
21 A. This looks like IPQualityScore's description of
22 their features and plans, purchase plans.
23 Q. Where did this document come from?
24 A. IPQualityScore's website.
25 Q. Did you go to IPQualityScore's website?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 57 of 181
57
1 A. I've been there, yes.
2 Q. Is that -- did you create this image?
3 A. I thought you might have. But, yeah, those tabs
4 are all mine, yep.
5 MR. FRASIER: I offer Exhibit 2.
6 THE COURT: Any objection to 2?
7 MR. HOLT: No objection, Your Honor.
8 THE COURT: All right, Exhibit 2 is received.
9 (Exhibit 2 admitted.)
10 MR. FRASIER: I would like to offer one more. May
11 I approach?
12 THE COURT: You may.
13 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) I'm showing you what's been
14 marked is Exhibit 3. Do you recognize it?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. What is Exhibit 3?
17 A. This is -- zoomed in on the page we were just
18 looking at, if you click on the dark data question mark
19 under one of IPQualityScore's plans.
20 Q. Where did this image come from?
21 A. IPQualityScore's website.
22 Q. Did you create this document?
23 A. I might have taken the screenshot, but I did not
24 create the IPQualityScore's website.
25 Q. Thank you for that clarification.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 58 of 181
58
1 MR. FRASIER: I offer Exhibit 3.
2 THE COURT: Any objection to 3?
3 MR. HOLT: No objection, Your Honor.
4 THE COURT: Thank you. 3 is received.
5 (Exhibit 3 admitted.)
6 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) And you said IPQualityScore. Do
7 you compete with IPQualityScore?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. What is ArkOwl's relationship with the company
10 Socure?
11 A. Socure is a client of ArkOwl's.
12 Q. What does Socure do?
13 A. Socure advertises identity verification, but I
14 have -- I have never used it.
15 Q. Is it a retail company?
16 A. No.
17 Q. What kind of company is it?
18 A. I believe it's a fraud protection identity
19 company.
20 Q. What is ArkOwl's relationship with Apruvd?
21 A. Apruvd is a client.
22 Q. What is Apruvd?
23 A. Apruvd is a fraud prevention platform and they
24 advertise -- they advertise their retailers, saying that
25 they would like to see their canceled orders, because they
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 59 of 181
59
1 think they can approve a few, and Apruvd gets a cut of what
2 they approved of the canceled orders.
3 Q. How long has Apruvd been an ArkOwl customer?
4 A. I believe so since 2017 or 2018.
5 Q. What is ArkOwl's relationship with Accertify?
6 A. Accertify is like a gateway to potential retailers
7 and banks to provide data through them. They are a fraud
8 platform.
9 Q. And what's ArkOwl's relationship?
10 A. We can provide data through them to whatever --
11 whoever their customers are.
12 Q. What is the company NICE Actimize?
13 A. It is similar to Accertify where it's a fraud
14 platform and their focus is more on banks and -- and tech
15 companies.
16 Q. And what's ArkOwl's relationship with NICE
17 Actimize?
18 A. It's similar to Accertify in the fact that we
19 would provide data to their customers through them.
20 Q. You testified that ArkOwl added phone number, IP
21 and postal data; is that -- is that right?
22 A. That's correct.
23 Q. What phone number data does ArkOwl offer?
24 A. ArkOwl offers the breached data for phone numbers,
25 caller ID, the phone carrier, whether it's like T-Mobile or
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 60 of 181
60
1 AT&T, information about the area code, saying, This area
2 code is connected to this region. We also provide social
3 checks, which provide back -- in some cases, names and
4 pictures and birthdays.
5 Q. What IP data does ArkOwl provide?
6 A. ArkOwl provides location, geo location of an IP
7 address, the ISP, which is kind of like the carrier for a
8 phone number. And we also provide first seen/last seen from
9 our own database for all of those data points -- or those
10 data inputs, sorry.
11 Q. Are you familiar with the website about-fraud.com?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. What is about-fraud.com?
14 A. About-fraud.com is a compilation and a collection
15 of vendors in the fraud industry.
16 MR. FRASIER: May I approach, Your Honor?
17 THE COURT: You may.
18 MR. FRASIER: There we go, all right.
19 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) I am now showing you what's been
20 marked as Exhibit 4. Is it in front of you, Mr. Daline?
21 A. Yes, I can see it.
22 Q. What is Exhibit 4?
23 A. This is the About-Fraud info graphic where they
24 compile the -- all the vendors in the industry that have
25 approached them.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 61 of 181
61
1 Q. Where did this image come from?
2 A. The About-Fraud website, but it was potentially
3 emailed to me.
4 Q. For Exhibit 4?
5 A. By -- it was -- I think it might have been emailed
6 to me by About-Fraud or it was on their website, one -- one
7 or the other.
8 MR. FRASIER: I offer Exhibit 4.
9 THE COURT: Well, first thing is, my version of it
10 is different from what's on the screen.
11 MR. FRASIER: Oh, that is interesting.
12 THE COURT: Maybe they've updated it since you've
13 printed this.
14 MR. FRASIER: Let me find the one that you have.
15 THE COURT: Mine says July 2020, so it might be a
16 little old.
17 MR. FRASIER: May I just use paper copies for this
18 exhibit, Your Honor?
19 THE COURT: Yeah, that would be fine. Any
20 objection? Do you want to offer paper copy of Exhibit 4?
21 MR. FRASIER: Yes. I offer the Exhibit 4 that I
22 just handed to you.
23 THE COURT: All right. Any objection to 4?
24 MR. HOLT: No objection, Your Honor.
25 THE COURT: 4 is received.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 62 of 181
62
1 (Exhibit 4 admitted.)
2 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) Thank you for your patience
3 through that.
4 Is what we're looking at an exhaustive list of
5 fraud prevention service companies?
6 A. No, definitely not.
7 Q. Okay. Where does ArkOwl appear on this graphic?
8 A. ArkOwl appears under Data Consortium and
9 Verification.
10 Q. Do you agree with that characterization?
11 A. I do.
12 Q. Are the other companies identified in the Data
13 Consortium and Verification box ArkOwl competitors?
14 A. I would believe so, yes, the ones that I know and
15 have researched and heard of.
16 Q. Which ones can you identify on the graphic that
17 are your competitors?
18 A. Email Age, Ekata, potentially Whois XML, Email
19 Hippo, IPQualityScore, People, MaxMind, Telesign, Digital
20 Element.
21 Q. Are any of the companies in the Data Consortium
22 and Verification box potential customers of ArkOwl?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. Which ones?
25 A. We've explored Ekata. Email Age has come up to us
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 63 of 181
63
1 before inviting us to try their data and have us provide
2 them with our data. IPQualityScore, potentially.
3 Q. In your experience in the industry, is it unusual
4 to have companies that are both competitors and potential
5 customers?
6 A. It's not unusual.
7 Q. Why not?
8 A. Because a lot of -- a lot of data softwares and
9 solutions provide different data, and so our data is
10 different than Ekata's data and it's different than Email
11 Age's data. Even though the input of the email is the same,
12 the data -- the data output is different, how we get the
13 data is different.
14 Q. So you end up competing with them in some context,
15 but potentially selling to them in other context?
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. Other than the ones that we just discussed, does
18 ArkOwl have any existing customers on the broader graphic?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. Which ones?
21 A. Let's see here. Socure, Signifyd, Cyber Source,
22 and then conversations with more than several other
23 entities.
24 Q. What do you mean, conversations with?
25 A. Well, they're potential customers, like potential
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 64 of 181
64
1 future -- they're in the pipeline.
2 Q. Which -- which companies have you specifically had
3 a conversation with in the -- in the graphic you're looking
4 at about becoming a customer of ArkOwl?
5 A. Ravelin, Frogstreet, Radial -- Radial, IDinsight.
6 Are we talking companies that we've had
7 discussions with in the past as well?
8 Q. I'm talking about companies on this graphic that
9 you have specifically discussed selling data to.
10 A. LexisNexis, Experian, RISK IDENT, TransUnion.
11 They all just kind of blur together after a while.
12 Q. That's fine. Let's change topics for a minute. I
13 would like to briefly discuss DarkOwl.
14 When did you first discover DarkOwl?
15 A. We first discovered DarkOwl in 2019.
16 Q. Did you ask DarkOwl to change its name in 2019?
17 A. I did not.
18 Q. Why?
19 A. Because I briefly skimmed over their website and
20 thought that they potentially weren't in the same industry
21 or a competitor.
22 Q. What made you think that they weren't in the same
23 industry or a competitor?
24 A. Because I didn't see a whole lot on email data. I
25 didn't see the word "email," I didn't see a whole lot of the
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 65 of 181
65
1 word "fraud," "data solution." I hadn't heard about it from
2 any of our customers. I was the one to discover it.
3 I didn't -- you know, I think I saw kind of more
4 of a, you know, words like "penetration test" or, you know,
5 stuff that was more for -- more for something that was
6 different.
7 Q. What changed?
8 A. Apruvd -- Corwin from Apruvd, one of our
9 customers, sent me an email asking if we were affiliated
10 with a company called DarkOwl and was saying -- asking if it
11 was one of our projects and saying that they have been
12 receiving sales emails from them.
13 MR. FRASIER: Your Honor, may I approach?
14 THE COURT: You may.
15 MR. FRASIER: I believe an electronic copy will
16 work this time.
17 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) You're viewing what's been marked
18 as Exhibit 5. Do you recognize it?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. What is Exhibit 5?
21 A. This is the email from Corwin that I received.
22 MR. FRASIER: I would offer Exhibit 5.
23 THE COURT: Objection to 5?
24 MR. HOLT: No objection, Your Honor.
25 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) Who is Corwin Cole?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 66 of 181
66
1 THE COURT: I'm sorry, 5 is admitted. Go ahead.
2 (Exhibit 5 admitted.)
3 MR. FRASIER: Thank you, Your Honor.
4 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) Who is Corwin Cole?
5 A. Corwin Cole is a CTO and co-founder of Apruvd.
6 Q. Okay. What was ArkOwl's relationship with Apruvd
7 when you received this email?
8 A. They were a client. They were a client that I met
9 with face-to-face already, both Corwin and the CEO.
10 Q. Is this the email you were referring to that
11 changed your attitude?
12 A. Yes.
13 MR. FRASIER: Your Honor, may I approach?
14 THE COURT: You may.
15 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) You're now viewing what's been
16 marked as Exhibit 6. Do you recognize Exhibit 6?
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. What is Exhibit 6?
19 A. This was a forward -- forward from Corwin of the
20 sales email that it looks like Evan from Apruvd had received
21 from Taylor Sharp of DarkOwl.
22 Q. When was this email sent in relation to the
23 Exhibit 5 we were just looking at?
24 A. I believe it was shortly after.
25 MR. FRASIER: I would offer Exhibit 6.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 67 of 181
67
1 THE COURT: Objection to 6?
2 MR. HOLT: I'm having a hard time seeing it.
3 MR. FRASIER: I can hand you a paper copy as well.
4 MR. HOLT: That would be great.
5 MR. FRASIER: I killed all these trees anyway, I
6 might as well.
7 MR. HOLT: No objection, Your Honor.
8 THE COURT: All right, thank you. 6 is received.
9 (Exhibit 6 admitted.)
10 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) So you testified that Apruvd was
11 a customer of ArkOwl's at this point; is that right?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. What was ArkOwl providing Apruvd?
14 A. ArkOwl was providing Apruvd with data output for
15 email addresses and phone numbers.
16 Q. Okay. Now, I'm going to flip down to the second
17 page of Exhibit 6.
18 MR. BUXBAUM: Counsel, how much time more time do
19 you have? You're well over your time.
20 MR. FRASIER: Sorry, this --
21 THE COURT: Wait a minute.
22 First of all, it's not your place to just, in the
23 middle of an examination, ask that question. If you want to
24 speak, you speak to the Court.
25 MR. BUXBAUM: Sorry.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 68 of 181
68
1 THE COURT: Do you have an estimate for how long
2 you might have?
3 MR. FRASIER: Maybe five more minutes, Your Honor.
4 THE COURT: Thank you. And I'm sorry, ask the
5 beginning of the last question again, because I didn't hear
6 it.
7 MR. FRASIER: Sure. I was just --
8 THE COURT: You were just getting to --
9 MR. FRASIER: -- flipping to the second page, yes.
10 THE COURT: Thank you.
11 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) Now, is the second -- is the
12 second page of Exhibit 2 the same email chain that we were
13 looking at?
14 A. I believe so, yes.
15 Q. From -- from the text of the second page of
16 Exhibit 6, does it appear to be the first contact that
17 DarkOwl had made to Apruvd?
18 A. Since -- in context, it's saying, "Reaching out to
19 again," I would say no, but that's -- that's an assumption
20 based on -- on the email.
21 Q. On the third paragraph of the second page of
22 Exhibit 6, the person wrote, quote, DarkOwl provides a
23 comprehensive data environment to monitor when personal
24 identification info, (PII), is posted on behalf of your
25 clients, end quote.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 69 of 181
69
1 With your experience with Apruvd, are those data
2 services useful to Apruvd?
3 A. Absolutely.
4 Q. How?
5 A. Apruvd only provides services for their clients.
6 They provide fraud prevention services where they need to
7 verify PII information, such as the output of an email
8 address.
9 Q. In your opinion, could Apruvd have used DarkOwl's
10 data services they're offering in this email for the same
11 purpose as it was using ArkOwl's?
12 A. The same -- same purpose, yes.
13 Q. Why do you say that?
14 A. It may not be to the same effect, because our data
15 is amazing, but for the same purpose, yes. If Apruvd was
16 looking for an email address input to have output to verify
17 whether there was an account takeover or whether the person
18 is a legitimate -- has legitimate information online,
19 whether leaked or on surface web, that is something that
20 Apruvd could have used DarkOwl for that.
21 Q. In your opinion, do -- does ArkOwl compete with
22 DarkOwl?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. And why?
25 A. Because of that. Because there is an ability to
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 70 of 181
70
1 input an email address and give output to verify a customer
2 for, whether it's -- whether the customer or client is
3 legitimate or fraudulent.
4 MR. FRASIER: Thank you. I have no further
5 questions.
6 THE COURT: Thank you.
7 Any recross? Recross, redirect?
8 MR. HOLT: Just a couple of minutes, Your Honor,
9 if I may.
10 THE COURT: Yeah.
11 MR. HOLT: Thank you.
12 THE COURT: And also, Mr. Holt, did you intend to
13 offer Exhibit 1 into evidence?
14 MR. HOLT: Yes.
15 THE COURT: I don't think you did. Is there any
16 objection to 1?
17 MR. FRASIER: No, Your Honor.
18 THE COURT: All right, 1 is received.
19 (Exhibit 1 admitted.)
20 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
21 BY MR. HOLT:
22 Q. Mr. Daline, throughout your examination by
23 Mr. Frasier, you repeatedly used the term "cyber security,"
24 and I think you said that the vast majority of your clients,
25 I think you said maybe upwards of 85 percent, are in the
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 71 of 181
71
1 cyber security industry?
2 A. Correct.
3 Q. Is that right? How would you define the term
4 "cyber security"?
5 A. I would define cyber security as being a broad
6 umbrella.
7 Q. Do you believe that every company within the cyber
8 security industry is a competitor of ArkOwl?
9 A. No.
10 Q. And did you not testify during my direct
11 examination earlier that you're not personally aware of any
12 of ArkOwl's customers using ArkOwl data for anything other
13 than support in connection with online purchase
14 transactions?
15 A. Online purchase transactions could be under that
16 cyber security umbrella.
17 Q. And sitting here today, you're not aware of any
18 other uses of DarkOwl's data by customers within the U.S.?
19 A. DarkOwl's? No.
20 Q. ArkOwl's?
21 A. ArkOwl's? No, not aware.
22 Q. So no other use cases within the U.S. that you're
23 aware of, other than in support of verifying consumer
24 transactions?
25 A. Within the U.S., I am not aware.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 72 of 181
72
1 Q. You repeatedly used the term "fraud prevention"
2 throughout your examination by Mr. Frasier as well. Do you
3 believe that every single company that's involved in fraud
4 prevention is a competitor of ArkOwl?
5 A. I do not.
6 Q. And, in fact, as you were going through Exhibit 4,
7 you acknowledged that there are many companies on that
8 exhibit, correct, that are not competitors?
9 A. Correct.
10 Q. Is it your position that every company that
11 generates an output to the search of an email address for
12 purposes of verifying the legitimacy of that email is in the
13 cyber security industry?
14 A. No.
15 Q. So you discussed a couple of emails that were
16 introduced as exhibits that were sent by Apruvd. Do you
17 recall that?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. And I believe you said that Apruvd is an ArkOwl
20 customer, correct?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. And Mr. Cole -- Corwin Cole, he sent you that
23 email?
24 A. Correct.
25 Q. And is Mr. Cole a friend of yours?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 73 of 181
73
1 A. He's a client, and I consider clients friends.
2 Q. And to your knowledge, is Apruvd a DarkOwl
3 customer?
4 A. To my knowledge, I do not believe they are.
5 Q. And do you have any knowledge that Mr. Cole was
6 confused between DarkOwl and ArkOwl?
7 A. Outside of that email that we looked at, no.
8 Q. Have you ever talked to Mr. Cole about being
9 confused between ArkOwl and DarkOwl?
10 A. Potentially. We had a phone call after that email
11 and I don't really remember how it went.
12 Q. Okay. And in fact, Apruvd has increased its sales
13 volume with ArkOwl since you received Mr. Cole's email;
14 isn't that true?
15 A. That's true.
16 MR. HOLT: Okay. I have no further questions,
17 Your Honor.
18 THE COURT: All right, thank you. Is there going
19 to be any redirect, re-redirect?
20 MR. FRASIER: No, Your Honor.
21 THE COURT: All right, let me follow up with a
22 couple of questions and then counsel, of course, will be
23 permitted to follow up on my questions.
24 So, Mr. Daline, I'm a little confused about your
25 definition of cyber security and you refer to it as a "broad
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 74 of 181
74
1 umbrella" and I understand from your testimony that you
2 believe that online purchase transactions are under the
3 cyber security umbrella. Is that correct from?
4 THE WITNESS: Yes.
5 THE COURT: What else is under the cyber security
6 umbrella, in your view?
7 THE WITNESS: Well, on- -- online transactions,
8 the piece of it that I worked on, which was for fraud
9 review, was under cyber security. Any online transaction --
10 just because it's an online transaction doesn't necessarily
11 mean that there is a potential fraud threat or even a fraud
12 review, but when it becomes the fraud department, that's
13 under cyber security umbrella.
14 THE COURT: What else is under cyber security
15 umbrella, in your definition?
16 THE WITNESS: In my definition, I believe
17 DarkOwl -- when we first discovered them in 2019, I believed
18 them to also be under cyber security umbrella, like pen
19 testing -- penetration test to make sure, you know, website
20 can't get breached. I believe that is also under cyber
21 security.
22 I believe any threat that's technology-related
23 could come under that "cyber security" term.
24 THE COURT: And are services related to
25 penetration testing offered by ArkOwl?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 75 of 181
75
1 THE WITNESS: No.
2 THE COURT: Are services related to testing of
3 threats -- technology-related threats offered by ArkOwl?
4 THE WITNESS: The data to stop threats, yes. So
5 the data to stop the threat of a fraudulent purchase online,
6 yes.
7 THE COURT: But once a threat is made, further
8 services are not offered by ArkOwl?
9 THE WITNESS: We do not provide any analytical
10 services or anything past the raw data currently.
11 THE COURT: Thank you. Those are my questions.
12 Plaintiff's counsel, do you want to follow up on
13 those at all?
14 MR. HOLT: No, Your Honor.
15 THE COURT: Defense counsel?
16 MR. FRASIER: No, Your Honor.
17 THE COURT: All right, thank you. Thank you.
18 Mr. Daline, you may step down.
19 THE WITNESS: Thank you.
20 THE COURT: All right, let's go a little bit
21 further before we have a little break here.
22 Does plaintiff have another witness?
23 MR. BUXBAUM: We do, Your Honor. Plaintiff would
24 like to call Mr. Mark Turnage, please.
25 THE COURT: And, Mr. Mark Turnage, I don't think
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 76 of 181
76
1 I've got your name right, but you can tell me what it is
2 when you come up here.
3 Raise your right hand. What is your name?
4 THE WITNESS: I'm sorry?
5 THE COURT: What is your name?
6 THE WITNESS: Mark -- Mark Turnage.
7 MARK TURNAGE,
8 having been first duly sworn, was examined and testified as
9 follows:
10 THE COURT: And speak into the microphone.
11 Whenever you're ready, Counsel
12 DIRECT EXAMINATION
13 BY MR. BUXBAUM:
14 Q. Good afternoon, Mr. Turnage. Thank you for your
15 time today.
16 Would you please provide your full name for the
17 Court.
18 A. Mark Turnage.
19 Q. Thank you.
20 Are you currently employed, Mr. Turnage?
21 A. I am. I'm the CEO and co-founder of DarkOwl.
22 Q. And could you give the Court a brief background of
23 your education, starting with college.
24 A. Yes. I attended the University of Colorado
25 Boulder, studied Arabic at the American University in Cairo,
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 77 of 181
77
1 did a graduate degree in Oxford and graduated from Yale Law
2 School.
3 Q. Did you found DarkOwl?
4 A. Yes, I did, with my co-founder.
5 Q. Who is your co-founder?
6 A. Russ Cohen, who is sitting in the courtroom today.
7 Q. Could you please briefly explain the circumstances
8 around the founding of DarkOwl.
9 A. Yes. In late 2015, early 2016, my co-founder Russ
10 and I bought some software assets out of the bankruptcy of a
11 cyber security services firm here in Denver. We took those
12 assets, which we bought out of the bankruptcy, and formed
13 DarkOwl.
14 Q. In general -- and we'll get into more detail in a
15 moment. In general, what does DarkOwl do?
16 A. We monitor the dark net for threats that emerge,
17 you know, from the dark net, and we built a platform that --
18 that does that.
19 MR. BUXBAUM: May I approach, Your Honor.
20 THE COURT: You may.
21 MR. BUXBAUM: This is an AEO document. I don't
22 think we've dealt with this issue yet, but I do think that
23 we agreed that (indiscernible - away from mic).
24 THE COURT: All right. So I presume this is an
25 AEO document to which your client, who is on the stand, has
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 78 of 181
78
1 already had access?
2 MR. BUXBAUM: Yes.
3 THE COURT: All right. And so you're asking that
4 Mr. Daline step out?
5 MR. BUXBAUM: Yes.
6 THE COURT: All right. Mr. Daline, if you would
7 step outside, I'm going to send your counsel out to get you
8 when we're done dealing with this document. Thank you.
9 MR. BUXBAUM: I can't see it anywhere.
10 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Mr. Turnage, do you recognize
11 this document?
12 A. Not -- I can't see what you're looking at, I'm
13 sorry.
14 Q. Oh, you don't have one either? Is it --
15 THE COURT: Can we put it on the screens for
16 display or not?
17 MS. DANIELSON: I'm trying, Your Honor.
18 THE COURT: You're having trouble?
19 MS. DANIELSON: I think it's frozen now.
20 MR. BUXBAUM: If I can approach, I can
21 (indiscernible) from the bench.
22 THE COURT: Sure. Do you want to sit?
23 THE WITNESS: I can see it now.
24 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Would you like a hard copy as
25 well?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 79 of 181
79
1 A. No. I'm fine, as long as I can see it on the
2 screen.
3 Q. Do you recognize this document?
4 A. I do.
5 Q. And what is it?
6 A. I'm sorry?
7 Q. What is it?
8 A. It's a company deck that we used in 2018.
9 MR. BUXBAUM: I would like to offer this as
10 exhibit -- where are we?
11 THE COURT: As Exhibit --
12 MR. BUXBAUM: 7.
13 THE COURT: -- 7. Any objection to 7?
14 MR. FRASIER: No objection.
15 THE COURT: 7 is received.
16 (Exhibit 7 admitted.)
17 MR. BUXBAUM: Thank you, Your Honor.
18 THE COURT: And I'm sorry, I didn't hear what the
19 witness said. It's a company?
20 THE WITNESS: Deck
21 THE COURT: Deck.
22 THE WITNESS: It's a description of the company.
23 THE COURT: Flag deck, yeah. Got it.
24 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) If you could please turn to page
25 2. And just looking over page 2, is it -- is this a fair
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 80 of 181
80
1 overview of what the dark web is?
2 A. Yes. And in brief, the Internet is described on
3 this slide as that iceberg. And the top of it, which is the
4 surface web is where we all spend our time.
5 If you look for something on Google and it returns
6 results, it's coming from the surface web. The middle part
7 of the iceberg is the deep web. That's where the bulk of
8 data that's found on Internet is actually stored. To get to
9 that data, you have to have a password. So that would be a
10 bank account, details of company network. This courthouse's
11 own network would be considered part of the deep web because
12 it's -- I cannot access that from my Google search bar.
13 Below that is the dark net and the dark net is
14 where we focus our efforts. The dark net is considered dark
15 because it requires -- usually requires proprietary browser
16 to get access to. And once you're in the dark net, user
17 identity is obfuscated and traffic is obscured, so it's
18 become a haven for cyber criminals.
19 MR. BUXBAUM: Your Honor, I'm sorry, just one -- I
20 don't know who these attendees are, but I think it would be
21 appropriate for them to leave as well.
22 THE COURT: Yeah. So gentlemen, I need to ask who
23 you are, because we're talking about some confidential
24 information. So could you tell us who you are, please.
25 UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Yes. He is my dad. I'm
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 81 of 181
81
1 just watching him testify (indiscernible).
2 THE COURT: Okay. Any problem with having your
3 son and his friend here?
4 THE WITNESS: No problems.
5 THE COURT: All right, fair enough, thank you.
6 Appreciate that.
7 MR. BUXBAUM: No problem. Sorry about that.
8 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Mr. Turnage, just so -- so
9 everyone is clear on terminology, is the dark web and the
10 dark net the same thing?
11 A. Yes, we use them interchangeably.
12 Q. We've heard testimony today that the concept of
13 cyber security services is a broad -- a broad concept that
14 encompasses a number of different things.
15 Would you consider DarkOwl to be in the cyber
16 security industry?
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. And just broadly, can you tell us what different
19 types of businesses would be in the cyber security industry.
20 A. Yeah. It's an incredibly broad term, "the cyber
21 security industry."
22 I mean, the cyber security industry incorporates
23 everything from protecting the data that's on your cell
24 phone to protecting the data that's on your company network,
25 the courthouse. And it can include the LED lights in room
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 82 of 181
82
1 can have cameras in them. Monitoring those for abuse as
2 part of the cyber security industry.
3 Monitoring threats among hackers is part of the
4 cyber security industry. Performing tests and services on
5 companies to see if they have exposure is part of the
6 services industry.
7 My -- I believe there are something like 10,000 to
8 14,000 cyber security companies around the world and the
9 diversity of services and technologies they offer is
10 immense.
11 Q. Is it fair to say that some of those companies
12 compete with each other and some do not?
13 A. I think that's fair.
14 MR. BUXBAUM: We can take that exhibit down now
15 and bring Mr. Daline back in.
16 THE COURT: Thank you. And would you mind,
17 Counsel, getting Mr. Daline? Thank you. You're closer to
18 the door, so . . .
19 MS. DANIELSON: Yes.
20 THE COURT: You may. All right, go ahead.
21 MR. BUXBAUM: May I approach?
22 THE COURT: You may.
23 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Show you a document that
24 hopefully will be marked as Exhibit 8.
25 Go ahead and put that up, if you can. Is it
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 83 of 181
83
1 frozen again?
2 MS. DANIELSON: I apologize, Your Honor.
3 Plaintiff (indiscernible).
4 THE COURT: Are you seeing it?
5 MR. BUXBAUM: I see it.
6 THE WITNESS: I can see it on my screen.
7 MS. DANIELSON: And then, Your Honor, on the right
8 it, should say (indiscernible - away from mic).
9 THE COURT: I'm educable, amazing. All right, I
10 think we've got it.
11 Thank you.
12 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) This is a document that was
13 marked in discovery as DarkOwl 004368. Do you recognize
14 this document, Mr. Turnage?
15 A. I do.
16 Q. What is it?
17 A. It's a page from our website talking about the use
18 cases for the dark net data that we collect.
19 Q. And where it lists seven use cases, is that a fair
20 representation of the core ways in which customers utilize
21 DarkOwl's services?
22 A. It is.
23 Q. Let's walk through each of these use cases
24 briefly.
25 MR. BUXBAUM: Can I offer that as Exhibit 8, Your
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 84 of 181
84
1 Honor?
2 THE COURT: Any objection to 8?
3 MR. FRASIER: No, Your Honor.
4 THE COURT: 8 is received.
5 (Exhibit 8 admitted.)
6 MR. BUXBAUM: May I approach?
7 THE COURT: You may.
8 MR. BUXBAUM: You can put that up.
9 MS. DANIELSON: You can just leave it here.
10 THE COURT: Thank you.
11 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) I am showing you a document that
12 has been marked in discovery as DarkOwl 004376. Do you
13 recognize this document, Mr. Turnage?
14 A. I do.
15 Q. And what is it?
16 A. It's a part of our website discussing the use case
17 of threat intelligence.
18 MR. BUXBAUM: Okay. I would like to offer this
19 into evidence as Exhibit 9, Your Honor.
20 THE COURT: Any objection to 9?
21 MR. FRASIER: No, Your Honor.
22 THE COURT: Thanks. 9 is received.
23 (Exhibit 9 admitted.)
24 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Mr. Turnage, can you please
25 explain what is meant by "threat intelligence" as a use case
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 85 of 181
85
1 for DarkOwl?
2 A. Yes. A lot of money has been spent in the cyber
3 security industry protecting networks, protecting devices,
4 protecting phones.
5 Threat intelligence refers to the intelligence of
6 looking outside your company or your organization or your
7 network for threats that are emerging to your organization.
8 So that can include hacker chatter, talking about
9 attacking company's network. It can incorporate discussions
10 about software vulnerabilities, it can be used to attack a
11 company or an organization to get access to their data.
12 There is a broad variety of uses, but you're looking outside
13 the network for threat data.
14 Q. And what categories of customers is DarkOwl
15 targeting or used by DarkOwl through this use case?
16 A. Other threat intelligence providers who would add
17 dark net data to their platform as an enrichment source.
18 Q. And does this use have any connection to approving
19 a commercial transaction in realtime?
20 A. No.
21 MR. BUXBAUM: May I approach, Your Honor.
22 THE COURT: You may.
23 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Showing you a -- is it up yet?
24 All right -- a document that was marked in discovery as
25 DarkOwl 004373, do you recognize this document?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 86 of 181
86
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. And what is it?
3 A. It's a page from our website.
4 MR. BUXBAUM: I would like to offer this into
5 evidence as Exhibit 10, Your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Any objection to 10?
7 MR. FRASIER: No, Your Honor.
8 THE COURT: 10 is received.
9 (Exhibit 10 admitted.)
10 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Mr. Turnage, could you please
11 explain what is meant by "third-party risk" as a use case
12 for DarkOwl?
13 A. Yes. Third-party risk is the means by which a
14 large organization that has many vendors or many contractors
15 assess the risk of those contractors.
16 And that's important because cyber criminals
17 oftentimes gain access to large organizations, networks,
18 through vendors. I mean, everybody remembers the case of
19 Target that was breached six or seven years ago, the hackers
20 that got into Target and stole tens of millions of credit
21 cards came through their air-conditioning vendor and it
22 wasn't even a main air-conditioner vendor. It was an
23 air-conditioning vendor in a small city that they had one or
24 two stores in, but they had access through to the Target
25 accounting network.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 87 of 181
87
1 So this is -- there is an entire cyber security
2 industry that's built up to provide companies, like Target,
3 with a cyber risk assessment of all of their contractors and
4 all of their vendors.
5 Q. What categories of customer is DarkOwl targeting
6 through this use case?
7 A. The third -- it's called vendor risk or
8 third-party risk companies that provide those risk services.
9 Q. Does this use have any connection to approving a
10 commercial transaction in realtime?
11 A. It does not.
12 MR. BUXBAUM: May I approach, Your Honor.
13 THE COURT: You may.
14 MR. BUXBAUM: Put that one up.
15 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) I'm showing you a document that
16 was marked in in discovery as DarkOwl 004361. Do you
17 recognize this document, Mr. Turnage?
18 A. I do. It's another page from our website.
19 Q. Okay.
20 MR. BUXBAUM: I would like to offer this into
21 evidence as Exhibit 11.
22 THE COURT: Any objection to 11?
23 MR. FRASIER: No, Your Honor.
24 THE COURT: 11 is received.
25 (Exhibit 11 admitted.)
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 88 of 181
88
1 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Mr. Turnage, can you please
2 explain to the Court what is meant by "cyber insurance
3 underwriting" as a use case for DarkOwl?
4 A. Yes. In -- in the last five to seven years cyber
5 attacks have become so prevalent that most companies today
6 buy cyber insurance policies to cover the costs if they are,
7 in fact, attacked. The problem that the insurance companies
8 have in underwriting those cyber policies is making an
9 assessment of the risk of the actual companies that they're
10 underwriting.
11 So if two similarly sized banks come in the door,
12 one has spent millions and millions of dollars on hardening
13 their cyber defenses, the other one has not, the cyber
14 companies -- the insurance companies are unable to assess
15 the level of risk.
16 So an entire sector of the cyber security industry
17 has built up, really, in the last five to seven years where
18 these companies assess cyber risk and then -- and then give
19 that data to the underwriter so they can write the insurance
20 policies.
21 Q. And what categories of customers is DarkOwl
22 targeting through this case?
23 A. We supply data to the cyber risk company -- the
24 cyber-insured tech companies that are looking in assessing
25 the risk of the companies for underwriting purposes.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 89 of 181
89
1 Q. And is there any way you can conceive of a
2 connection between this use and approving a commercial
3 transaction in realtime?
4 A. No.
5 MR. BUXBAUM: May I approach, Your Honor?
6 THE COURT: You may.
7 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) I am now showing you a document
8 that was marked as DarkOwl 004363 in discovery. Do you
9 recognize this document?
10 A. I do. It's another page from our website.
11 MR. BUXBAUM: I would like to offer this into
12 evidence as Exhibit 12, Your Honor.
13 THE COURT: Any objection to 12?
14 MR. FRASIER: No, Your Honor.
15 THE COURT: 12 is received.
16 (Exhibit 12 admitted.)
17 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Mr. Turnage, can you please
18 explain what is meant by "digital identity protection" as a
19 use case for DarkOwl?
20 A. Yes. Digital identity refers to your identity, or
21 our identities online and how those can be assessed and
22 whether they can be risk-rated is the use case here.
23 Q. I notice on the first -- I noticed that the
24 document references PII data. And specifically, it
25 references 8 billion email addresses?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 90 of 181
90
1 A. That's correct.
2 Q. Do you see that?
3 A. That's correct.
4 Q. Okay. Can you please explain how email addresses
5 are -- for example, are used within this use case.
6 A. Yes. Email addresses by themselves are
7 uninteresting. And in fact, many email addresses show up in
8 the dark net, for example, on spam lists. Our clients are
9 interested only in email addresses where they have live
10 active passwords associated with them.
11 Q. And just to be clear, are any of your customers
12 interested in finding out merely the presence or absence of
13 an email address in the dark net?
14 A. The presence or absence?
15 Q. Or absence.
16 A. No. In fact, our system is not built to give them
17 that information.
18 Q. Are you aware of any customers that are using
19 DarkOwl data under this use case, digital identity
20 protection, for PII verification purposes?
21 A. For PII verification, no.
22 Q. What categories of customers is DarkOwl targeting
23 through this use case?
24 A. This is -- actually, almost all of our customers
25 use -- at some level, use digital identity verification to
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 91 of 181
91
1 control their environment and their network and access to
2 their network. But the only way that you can get access to
3 a network is if you have an email that is associated to an
4 actual password. I can't get -- I cannot get access to your
5 law firm -- law firm's data because I have your email.
6 That's a -- that's a -- it's not a vector for cyber risk.
7 Q. Does this use have any connection to approving a
8 commercial transaction in realtime?
9 A. No. And in fact, we can't actually give this data
10 in realtime.
11 MR. BUXBAUM: May I approach, Your Honor?
12 THE COURT: You may.
13 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) I'm going to show you a document
14 that was previously marked in discovery as DarkOwl 004366.
15 Do you recognize this document?
16 A. I do. It's another page from our website.
17 MR. BUXBAUM: I would like to offer this into
18 evidence as Exhibit 13.
19 THE COURT: Any objection to 13?
20 MR. FRASIER: No, Your Honor.
21 THE COURT: 13 is received.
22 (Exhibit 13 admitted.)
23 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Mr. Turnage, can you please
24 explain what is meant by "fraud protection" as a use case
25 for DarkOwl.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 92 of 181
92
1 A. Yes. I mean, "fraud" is an enormously broad term,
2 but in the context of the use case for DarkOwl, it's
3 primarily focused on financial fraud.
4 So account -- bank account information that's
5 present and traded, bought and sold in the dark net, credit
6 card information that is bought and sold in the dark net,
7 other types of information. Increasingly crypto is a major
8 vector of fraud in the dark net.
9 Q. I notice on this page there is a reference to
10 email addresses, passwords and credit cards, for example.
11 Can you explain how email addresses and passwords
12 are used within this use case.
13 A. Well, actually, the more important part of this
14 exhibit is the plain text passwords. That's what our
15 customers are interested in.
16 So what they want to know is, does -- is Mark
17 Turnage's email alongside a plain text password that is live
18 today and can give somebody access to my bank account at
19 U.S. Bank. That's -- that's the use case here.
20 Q. Are you aware of any customers that use DarkOwl's
21 fraud protection services as a -- for PII verification
22 purposes for online transactions?
23 A. No. And it's not set up -- and our system is not
24 set up to do that.
25 Q. What categories of customers is DarkOwl targeting
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 93 of 181
93
1 through this use case?
2 A. Other cyber security companies that provide
3 services to financial institutions.
4 MR. BUXBAUM: May I approach, Your Honor.
5 THE COURT: You may.
6 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) I am showing you what has been
7 previously marked in discovery as DarkOwl 004030. Do you
8 recognize this document?
9 A. I do. It's another page from our website.
10 MR. BUXBAUM: I would like to offer this into
11 evidence as Exhibit 14, Your Honor.
12 THE COURT: Any objection?
13 MR. FRASIER: No, Your Honor.
14 THE COURT: 14 is received.
15 (Exhibit 14 admitted.)
16 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Mr. Turnage, can you please
17 explain what is meant by "critical infrastructure" as a use
18 case for DarkOwl.
19 A. Yes. So critical infrastructure is one of the
20 prime targets for both cyber criminals and for nation-states
21 that are active in the dark net.
22 In the recent -- in the current run -- Russian
23 Ukraine war, the Russians have targeted, both Ukrainian and
24 western European critical infrastructure with cyber attacks.
25 And so we're talking about power plants, water treatment
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 94 of 181
94
1 systems, lighting systems, street grids, stoplight systems,
2 anything that runs -- any infrastructure that could be
3 attacked by a cyber.
4 Q. What categories of customers is DarkOwl targeting
5 through this use case?
6 A. This is governments.
7 THE COURT: I'm sorry, I missed that. This is --
8 THE WITNESS: Governments.
9 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) And do you have examples of the
10 types of government agencies that would be a customer or use
11 this as a use case?
12 A. Yes. Intelligence agencies are the primary
13 customers for this use case, who are trying to monitor what
14 cyber criminals are targeting, how they're targeting it,
15 what software vulnerabilities they're using. Is there
16 chatter among those criminals about the -- and those cyber
17 actors?
18 And oftentimes, these are private cyber actors
19 acting on behalf of nation-states. The Russians are
20 particularly known for that.
21 Q. Does this use have any connection to approving a
22 commercial transaction in realtime?
23 A. I don't believe so, no.
24 MR. BUXBAUM: May I approach, Your Honor.
25 THE COURT: You may.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 95 of 181
95
1 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) All right. I am showing you what
2 was marked in discovery as DarkOwl 004370. Do you recognize
3 this document?
4 A. I do. It's another page from our website.
5 Q. Okay. And can you please explain what is meant by
6 "national security" as a use case for DarkOwl.
7 A. Yes. Increasingly, cyber actors and other
8 nation-state adversaries of the United States are active in
9 the dark net. I mentioned it in the context of the critical
10 infrastructural deal -- but critical infrastructure use
11 case. But increasingly, we find national security secrets,
12 discussions that are of import to national security in the
13 dark net.
14 So last year, we were approached by ,
15 which is They invested in
16 our company because has a direct need for dark net
17 data for their analyst teams. So that would be a use case
18 here.
19 Q. Does this use case have any connection to
20 approving a commercial transaction in realtime?
21 A. No.
22 MR. BUXBAUM: Your Honor, I would like to offer
23 this into evidence as Exhibit 15.
24 THE COURT: Any objection to 15?
25 MR. FRASIER: No, Your Honor.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 96 of 181
96
1 THE COURT: 15 is received.
2 (Exhibit 15 admitted.)
3 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Mr. Turnage, other than the seven
4 use cases that we've looked at that are featured on your
5 website -- or on DarkOwl's website, are there any other core
6 use cases for DarkOwl not included in the seven we just
7 discussed?
8 A. Well, there is a growing use of cryptocurrency in
9 the dark net. I said that it's a haven for criminal
10 activity. It's the primary means by which criminals conduct
11 business with each other.
12 So we -- we see a growing use case for monitoring
13 crypto -- use of cryptocurrency in the dark net. So some of
14 our crypto customers, for example, would want to know
15 whether a bitcoin wallet has been used on a child
16 pornography site and is it used to buy or sell. And if it
17 has, then they will not reimburse -- they won't convert any
18 of the crypto in that wallet to dollars, or whatever
19 currency they're trying to concert it for. That's a growing
20 use case that's not outlined on this website.
21 Q. Okay. For the categories of customers that
22 DarkOwl targets, what industry sectors are they typically
23 from?
24 A. Sorry, our customers you're referring to?
25 Q. Yes.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 97 of 181
97
1 A. Yeah, sorry. 80 percent of our customers come
2 from that broad category called cyber security industries.
3 We don't generally target end-users: banks, retail, health
4 care. Those companies generally are not our customers. We
5 generally target just cyber security -- very sophisticated
6 cyber security customers.
7 Q. And do you also target customers in sectors of
8 thin tech, though, insurance tech?
9 A. Yeah. And I consider the insured tech and thin
10 tech companies to fall under that very broad umbrella of
11 cyber security, because the customers we're targeting in
12 those areas are dealing with cyber risks.
13 Q. And what portion of your customers would make up
14 government or national intelligence agencies?
15 A. Directly about 20 percent of our customers are
16 government international intelligence and that number is
17 growing. And then indirectly, because the number of the
18 cyber security companies that we provide data to have as
19 customers themselves government. That probably is another
20 20 to 25 percent of our customers. So overall, 45, 40, 45
21 percent of our customers.
22 Q. And at these customers, or prospective specific
23 customers, who at those companies is making purchasing
24 decisions?
25 A. Almost entirely we deal with the C suite. So
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 98 of 181
98
1 either the CEO, the CFO, the CTO or the chief information
2 security officer. And the reason for that is, the nature of
3 the data that we supply them is so sensitive that we have to
4 be ensured -- we have to be sure that they understand the
5 obligations of dealing with that data. So almost all of our
6 customers are at the C suite level.
7 Q. And it probably goes without saying, but are
8 DarkOwl purchasers sophisticated?
9 A. They have to be to use our data.
10 Q. Are DarkOwl users sophisticated?
11 A. They have to be to use our data.
12 Q. Do you consider DarkOwl's business as niche?
13 A. It's a very small niche under the large cyber
14 security umbrella, yes.
15 Q. Okay. And how many other companies do you think
16 are out there that do roughly what you do?
17 A. I can probably name them on one hand.
18 Q. Okay. We'll come back to that.
19 Mr. Turnage, is there a vetting process for the
20 customers that DarkOwl takes on?
21 A. Yes. It's the most painful part of our sales
22 process. We -- we require that all our customers who get
23 access to our data sign quite comprehensive legal documents
24 that prevent the misuse of that data by them or by their
25 staff. So my sales team hates it. They actually get to a
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 99 of 181
99
1 point in the process where then the lawyers get involved and
2 they have to go through that.
3 We also turn down probably 30 percent of the
4 inbounds that we get from customers. We regularly get
5 inbounds from nation-states that are adversarial to the
6 United States. We don't sell to China, we don't sell to
7 Russia, we don't sell to Iran, we don't sell to North Korea.
8 They either approach us directly or they approach us through
9 shell companies.
10 Q. And just to be clear, when you talk about being
11 approached by foreign nation-states that may be adversaries
12 of the United States, you're not talking about countries in
13 those companies? You're talking about representatives of
14 the nation-states themselves?
15 A. Representatives of the nation-states themselves or
16 private actors acting on behalf of those nation-states that
17 we are able to determine.
18 Q. Mr. Turnage, when did you first hear of ArkOwl?
19 A. When I received a letter from ArkOwl demanding
20 that we stop using the DarkOwl brand.
21 Q. When I say the phrase "PII verification services,"
22 do you know what that means?
23 A. Broadly, just from looking at the website of
24 ArkOwl.
25 Q. And so what is your understanding of PII
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 100 of
181
100
1 verification services?
2 A. My understanding is that PII verification services
3 in the context of, say, a commercial transaction, looks at a
4 number of data points to allow the merchant to make an
5 assessment of whether or not that's a legitimate transaction
6 or not.
7 Q. And is it your understanding that ArkOwl performs
8 PII verification services?
9 A. That's my understanding, yes.
10 Q. Does DarkOwl consider PII verification a use case?
11 A. No, and our platform is not built for that.
12 Q. Why not?
13 A. I think the prior witness CEO, Mr. Daline,
14 testified that he provides 80 or 100 data points, including
15 things like: When was this email set up? Was it set up
16 five minutes ago? What IP address is this person coming
17 from and so on. We don't have any of that data. That's not
18 our -- we don't have any of that data in our system.
19 Q. Have you encountered ArkOwl in the marketplace?
20 A. Never.
21 Q. Has a customer or potential customer ever
22 suggested and wanted to or intended to use DarkOwl for PII
23 verification services?
24 A. No. And in fact, I've never had a conversation
25 outside the context of this litigation with anyone else
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 101 of
181
101
1 about ArkOwl. Never heard them mentioned in any context
2 whatsoever by a customer, by a prospect. I've never seen
3 them at a trade show, I've never seen them at a conference.
4 I've never heard at all any publications or speeches or
5 anything that they've done.
6 Q. Are you aware of any customer of DarkOwl's using
7 DarkOwl data to perform PII verification services?
8 A. No.
9 Q. As CEO, are you familiar with DarkOwl's
10 competitors?
11 A. I'm sorry, say that again.
12 Q. Are you familiar with DarkOwl's competitors?
13 A. Yes, I am.
14 Q. And who do you consider to be DarkOwl's
15 competitors?
16 A. Our primary competitors are two companies out of
17 the Israel. One is called Cyber 6 Skill, one is called
18 Webbs. Both of them were founded by former Musaad cyber
19 intelligence operative -- officers in Israel; that we
20 compete against a company called Searchlight Cyber based out
21 of the UK. And here in the U.S. we compete against a
22 company called Bluestone Analytics, which is a subsidiary of
23 a very large defense contractor.
24 Q. And what is the business focus of those companies
25 that you just listed?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 102 of
181
102
1 A. It's very similar to ours. They provide data to
2 cyber security industry and national intelligence agencies.
3 Q. And do you believe that any of those companies
4 provide PII verification services to support verification of
5 online commercial transactions?
6 A. Not all, to my knowledge.
7 Q. Do you consider ArkOwl to be a correct competitor
8 of DarkOwl?
9 A. No.
10 Q. Why not?
11 A. Not a single DarkOwl customer could get from
12 ArkOwl what they get from us, and not a single ArkOwl
13 customer, as I understand from Mr. Daline's explanation, can
14 get from DarkOwl what they get from ArkOwl.
15 Q. Okay. Can you explain why you believe that in a
16 little bit more detail?
17 A. Again, in the case of ArkOwl, ArkOwl has --
18 apparently has access to a wide range of surface web and
19 other datasets that we don't have access to and don't
20 provide our clients. And in the case of DarkOwl clients are
21 coming -- DarkOwl's clients come to us to get intelligence
22 from the dark net of a wide variety of sorts: hacker
23 chatter, software vulnerabilities that are being sought,
24 bought and sold on the dark net, vulnerabilities that are
25 being discussed amongst hackers as a means to attack the
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 103 of
181
103
1 federal courthouse here in Denver and so on. That is not
2 available, is I understand it, from Mr. Daline's explanation
3 from ArkOwl.
4 Q. Earlier you heard Mr. Daline testify that some of
5 ArkOwl's direct competitors are Ekata, PIPL, LexisNexis,
6 SEON, Email Hippo and IPQualityScore. Do you consider any
7 of those companies to be competitors of DarkOwl?
8 A. No. In fact, with the exception much LexisNexis,
9 which I know from my days as a lawyer, as a case -- as a way
10 to pull cases, I haven't really heard of many of those
11 companies, or certainly run into them in the marketplace.
12 Q. Have you heard of a company called Apruvd?
13 A. No.
14 Q. Mr. Turnage, was there a time when DarkOwl
15 utilized a third-party marketing service to send out
16 marketing blasts?
17 A. Yes. Starting around 2020 we employed -- we
18 wanted to expand the reach of our marketing, so we employed
19 a company that had a team based in the Philippines that did
20 email blasts in an attempt to draw out meetings.
21 Q. And did DarkOwl approve lists of businesses that
22 the marketing blasts would be sent out to from that
23 third-party agency?
24 A. No.
25 Q. Can we please look at the exhibit -- I believe it
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 104 of
181
104
1 was Exhibit 6 that was the email from Mr. Cole to
2 Mr. Daline? How do we -- is it -- Michael, do we have a
3 hard copy?
4 THE COURT: Yeah, if you need to get that from
5 defense counsel to put it on the screen.
6 MR. FRASIER: Sure, I can put it on the screen.
7 THE COURT: That would be great, thank you.
8 MR. BUXBAUM: I just have a few questions about
9 it.
10 MS. DANIELSON: Your Honor, may I approach?
11 THE COURT: You may.
12 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Do you see that, Mr. Turnage?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. If I could direct your attention to the email
15 toward the bottom part of the page -- I know the print is
16 small, but it says it's from Taylor Sharp to Evan McNiff
17 (ph). Do you see that?
18 A. Yes, I see it.
19 Q. Okay. Do you see Taylor Sharp's email address, it
20 says Taylor.Sharp@BD.DarkOwl.com?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. Is that -- is that an email from DarkOwl?
23 A. It is not. It's from the third-party company that
24 we hired to do marketing at. The BD stands for business
25 development.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 105 of
181
105
1 Q. Okay. And you were not aware of this email being
2 sent to Apruvd; is that correct?
3 A. That's correct, and Taylor Sharp was not an
4 employee of ours.
5 Q. Okay. And you've never heard of Apruvd before?
6 A. I'm sorry.
7 Q. And you've never heard of Apruvd before?
8 A. I've never heard of Apruvd.
9 Q. And you don't consider Apruvd to be a targeted
10 customer?
11 A. I don't know enough about them to know whether
12 they would be a targeted customer.
13 Q. Do you know how many of these types of blast
14 emails would have been sent out through your third-party
15 agent?
16 A. Many thousands.
17 Q. Did those generate any business?
18 A. They did not and we ended up terminating the
19 agency as a result.
20 MR. BUXBAUM: You can take that down. Thank you,
21 Counsel.
22 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Mr. Turnage, DarkOwl uses emails
23 as a search input; is that correct?
24 A. That's correct.
25 Q. And how long has it been doing that for?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 106 of
181
106
1 A. Since its inception.
2 Q. Which was when?
3 A. I'm sorry?
4 Q. Which was when?
5 A. 2016.
6 Q. Okay. And do you believe there was outward facing
7 marketing regarding that?
8 A. There was no question, yes.
9 Q. Okay. What about the fraud protection use case
10 that we talked about a little bit ago; how long has that
11 been something that DarkOwl has utilized and marketed?
12 A. Since inception.
13 Q. Which is in 2015?
14 A. 2015 -- late 2015 or early 2016.
15 Q. Okay. And would there have been publicly facing
16 marketing regarding that use case?
17 A. Yes.
18 MR. BUXBAUM: Thank you, Mr. Turnage. I have no
19 further questions at this time.
20 THE COURT: Thank you. Counsel, it's quarter to
21 4:00. Let's take a short break now and you may step down,
22 Mr. Turnage.
23 And let's reconvene around 4:00 p.m. and see how
24 much progress we can make at that time. We'll begin with
25 cross-examination. Thank you.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 107 of
181
107
1 (Recess taken from 3:44 p.m. to 4:05 p.m.)
2 THE COURT: All right. Ready for
3 cross-examination, and -- yes, Mr. -- I hope I don't get
4 your name wrong again. I should probably remember this.
5 MR. FRASIER: Mr. Daline, we're going to be
6 talking about AEO documents at first, so I'll have you step
7 out.
8 THE COURT: Mr. Turnage. Mr. Turnage, you may
9 resume the stand. We'll have Mr. Daline leave, because
10 we're going to use a confidential document, and whenever
11 you're ready Mr. Frazier.
12 MR. FRASIER: Thank you, Your Honor.
13 CROSS-EXAMINATION
14 BY MR. FRASIER: :
15 Q. Good afternoon, Mr. Turnage.
16 A. Good afternoon.
17 Q. We're going to start broad. DarkOwl is a SAS
18 company, right?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. Software as a service?
21 A. That's correct.
22 Q. DarkOwl is a data company?
23 A. That's correct.
24 Q. DarkOwl has a database that it has accumulated
25 from the dark net, right?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 108 of
181
108
1 A. Correct, primarily from the dark net.
2 Q. DarkOwl's products allow its customers to search
3 the database that DarkOwl has accumulated, right?
4 A. Yes. They can either search the database or they
5 can access to curated data feeds, or structured data feeds
6 of certain types of data.
7 MR. FRASIER: May I approach, Your Honor?
8 THE COURT: You may. Thank you.
9 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) Showing you what has been marked
10 Exhibit 16. This is a -- sorry, I'm going to -- I'm showing
11 you what's been marked Exhibit 16. This is a product
12 training manual; is that right?
13 A. It looks -- yes, it appears to be so, yes.
14 Q. I'm going to turn to page 6 of Exhibit 16. Page 6
15 that I'm showing you right now is a graphic reflecting
16 DarkOwl's existing products and services; is that right?
17 A. That's correct. There has been one addition since
18 this chart was put together.
19 Q. So this -- this chart was accurate as of last
20 year?
21 A. It was accurate as of last year, correct.
22 Accurate as of about two months ago.
23 Q. So in the graphic, the black cylinder called
24 DarkOwl Collection represents the data that DarkOwl has
25 aggregated?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 109 of
181
109
1 A. That's correct.
2 Q. DarkOwl indexes certain data that it collects,
3 right.
4 A. That's correct.
5 Q. DarkOwl indexes email addresses?
6 A. Among other things, yes.
7 Q. IP addresses?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Now, in the middle of the graphic on page 6 there
10 is a box with the writing, Extracted IOCs/Structured Data.
11 Do you see that?
12 A. That's correct, yes.
13 Q. IOC stands for indicators of compromise?
14 A. That's correct.
15 Q. And the data -- excuse me. The box that I just
16 referenced is referencing a subdatabase that DarkOwl
17 maintains?
18 A. Effectively, yes.
19 Q. And all the data in the Extracted IOC/Structured
20 Database is data that has been indexed?
21 A. Has been indexed, yes.
22 Q. The -- this database, the extracted IOC's
23 database, is available to your customers via API, right?
24 A. That's correct.
25 Q. The reason DarkOwl created the separate database
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 110 of
181
110
1 for extracted IOCs is to minimize the amount of noise your
2 customers encounter when running searches; is that right?
3 A. That's correct. They can get access to the same
4 data through the far left blue box called Vision API Search,
5 but the structured database gives it to them in a more
6 refined structured format.
7 Q. The structured data set allows users to get
8 relevant information much more quickly, right?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. The blue box underneath the Extracted IOC's
11 Database called Vision API Entity --
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. -- do you see that?
14 A. Yes, I do.
15 Q. That represents a product of DarkOwl's?
16 A. Yes. The four -- the four lines under that are
17 four separate products.
18 Q. Okay. And each of those products allows a DarkOwl
19 customer to search the structure database for the specific
20 item mentioned under vision API entity?
21 A. Yes, yes. Effectively, yes.
22 Q. And then the blue box immediately to its right
23 called Vision API Entity Set allows DarkOwl users to search
24 the same structure database for sets of data --
25 A. Right.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 111 of
181
111
1 Q. -- as opposed to just one type?
2 A. Correct.
3 Q. For example, the DarkOwl user could use the entity
4 Set API Product to search for every email in your database
5 associated with a given domain?
6 A. Every email and password. It doesn't return just
7 emails.
8 Q. You can't -- a customer couldn't search a
9 password, right? They could certificate they would search
10 an email?
11 A. They could search for password as well. We don't
12 return just emails. We don't return a red light or a green
13 light present or absent. We return an email and a password.
14 Q. I'm asking about input. So in the --
15 A. Excuse me?
16 Q. I'm asking about inputs.
17 A. Inputs.
18 Q. So a customer using the Vision API Entity Set
19 would input an email domain and an email --
20 A. Or an email, yes.
21 Q. And with an entity set it could search both; is
22 that right?
23 A. No. Well, yes, effectively -- so the difference
24 is, if you search for JohnSmith@gmail, you would search in
25 the left-hand box, just so you're looking for one email. If
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 112 of
181
112
1 you were looking for all gmail accounts, you would search in
2 the right box. That's the input, that's right.
3 Q. It's your opinion that DarkOwl and ArkOwl are not
4 competitors; is that right?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. Do you believe there is any competitive overlap
7 between DarkOwl and ArkOwl?
8 A. No.
9 Q. Now, this document we're looking at is designated
10 as Attorney's Eyes Only. Is there any reason why ArkOwl
11 would receive a competitive advantage from reviewing this
12 document?
13 A. I'm not sure and I'm not sure how it -- how at
14 what point in the process it got designated as Attorney's
15 Eyes Only.
16 Q. Do you care if Mr. Daline hears your testimony
17 regarding this exhibit?
18 A. I don't actually mind if he hears that testimony.
19 MR. BUXBAUM: No objection here.
20 THE COURT: You can go get him.
21 MR. FRASIER: May I.
22 THE COURT: Sure.
23 MR. FRASIER: Thank you, Mr. Turnage.
24 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) Now, when DarkOwl customers use
25 the vision API entity product to run a search for an email
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 113 of
181
113
1 address, that user would get back all the surrounding
2 contextual information in the metadata, right
3 A. No. It would just get the metadata, the email
4 address and the passwords. It wouldn't get the contextual
5 information.
6 Q. It would get when DarkOwl -- when that email
7 address was scraped by DarkOwl?
8 A. I'm sorry, say that again.
9 Q. It would -- the user would see when the email
10 address was scraped by DarkOwl?
11 A. Yes, too.
12 Q. Where it was found on the dark net?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. Whether it was associated with a data breach?
15 A. In some cases, yes. Not in all cases.
16 Q. It would identify the specific data breach that
17 that email address was --
18 A. Not currently.
19 Q. DarkOwl collects data leaks; is that right?
20 A. I'm sorry. DarkOwl collects?
21 Q. Data leaks.
22 THE COURT: Data links, I think.
23 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) Data leaks, L-E-A-K-S.
24 A. Data leaks. Yes, we do collect data leaks.
25 Q. And a data leak refers to data that a hacker has
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 114 of
181
114
1 extracted from inside a computer network?
2 A. That's correct.
3 Q. And then reposted or sold; is that right?
4 A. Reposted or sold, that's correct.
5 Q. Primarily on the dark net?
6 A. Well, our focus is primarily on the dark net, but
7 many data leaks are posted on the surface web as well.
8 Q. DarkOwl has a specific API that monitors surface
9 websites and dark net sites where ransom ware operators
10 breached data?
11 A. That's correct. They're called --
12 Q. We've been using the term "dark net" a lot or
13 "dark web," but there is no one accepted definition of the
14 dark net?
15 A. Probably not. There is probably not -- no, I've
16 never heard everybody agreeing to a single definition of the
17 dark net.
18 Q. Some people would consider peer-to-peer networks
19 as part of the dark net?
20 A. That's correct.
21 Q. Do you consider peer-to-peer --
22 A. I do. They require proprietary browser to get to
23 and oftentimes user identities are obfuscated, but it also
24 depends on which peer-to-peer networks you're talking about.
25 So, for example, and I can talk on Apple Messenger. That's
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 115 of
181
115
1 a peer-to-peer network. That's not a dark net.
2 Q. Now, some people would include any password
3 protected website in their definition of the dark net?
4 A. No, I've never heard that once in my career.
5 Q. Now, I asked you about your definition of the dark
6 net in your deposition?
7 A. Correct.
8 Q. Would you -- would you consider any website that
9 is password protected as part of the deep net?
10 A. Generally, yes, it's part of the deep net.
11 Q. But not --
12 A. Deep net, but not the dark net.
13 Q. Okay.
14 A. So the example I gave earlier I think when there
15 was a slide up here, was my bank account information is
16 password protected. That's part of the deep web, in my
17 definition. It's not part of the dark net.
18 Q. Does DarkOwl collect data from the deep net?
19 A. Very rarely. The only data we collect from the
20 deep web would be criminal forums that are password
21 protected.
22 Q. Now, DarkOwl is focused on selling to companies in
23 the cyber security industry?
24 A. Broadly, yes.
25 Q. That's your core target market?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 116 of
181
116
1 A. Broadly yes, yes.
2 Q. Many of your customers' aggregate data from a
3 broad variety of services, including the surface web, deep
4 web and dark web?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. They use DarkOwl's data to enrich other data from
7 those other sources?
8 A. That's correct.
9 Q. They then aggregate all the data they acquired for
10 their own customer's use?
11 A. That's correct.
12 Q. You mentioned --
13 A. Sorry, not in every case, but many of them do.
14 Q. Right. You mentioned that your customers have to
15 sign a legal document. That's their end user license?
16 A. That's correct.
17 Q. Other than the end user license agreement, DarkOwl
18 has no control over how its customers use the data you
19 provide?
20 A. Just so we're clear, when you say "control," what
21 do you mean by that?
22 Q. I would mean, for example, physical control via
23 software that they can search something -- they can use it
24 in one way, but not another way.
25 A. No. We have some control -- if that's your
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 117 of
181
117
1 definition, we have some control over how they use the data.
2 Q. What control do you have?
3 A. If they're using the user interface, we can
4 monitor all their searches, and if -- for example, if I have
5 Citibank and J.P. Morgan as a client and I see J.P. Morgan
6 searching for Citibank data, we cut them off. That's a
7 violation of the EULA. So we have control over that -- in
8 that context.
9 We also have control by the EULA over whether they
10 use the data that we give them to compete with us directly.
11 So I don't want to find one of my clients showing up at a
12 U.S. government agency and competing for my business.
13 Q. So you have a noncompete in the EULA --
14 A. It's not a noncompete. It's a use of data
15 prescription.
16 Q. And you said EULA, you're referring to the end
17 user license --
18 A. End user license agreement, excuse me, yes.
19 Q. I want to make sure we're not talking over each
20 other so that --
21 A. Yeah, yeah, sorry.
22 Q. No problem.
23 You referenced a technical control or a physical
24 control via the user interface. DarkOwl has no way of
25 tracking what your customers are doing via your API
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 118 of
181
118
1 products, though?
2 A. We do not. We can track volume, what they do, but
3 all of our -- we know what the use cases are, we know what
4 they're using the data for.
5 Q. Now, DarkOwl has numerous potential use cases for
6 its service?
7 A. That's correct.
8 Q. More than just what we looked at earlier this
9 afternoon?
10 A. Well, I mean, those -- I would say that's a pretty
11 accurate description and that's where we're putting our
12 marketing dollars in terms of use cases.
13 Q. Those are use cases that you are specifically
14 targeting?
15 A. Correct.
16 Q. Now, DarkOwl in the past has had customer
17 prospects ask for things that no other customers of yours
18 were doing?
19 A. Yes. I mean, some of these use cases came from
20 customers approaching us, including use case
21 when approached us.
22 Q. Sure. And there are potential use cases for
23 DarkOwl services that are not currently being utilized by
24 your customers?
25 A. If there are, would you let me know. I would love
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 119 of
181
119
1 to actually try and monetize those.
2 Q. In fact, you testified that if you knew about a
3 use case, DarkOwl would be selling or trying to sell into
4 that space?
5 A. It depends. It depends on whether we have a
6 competitive advantage in that particular use -- you know, if
7 somebody comes in the door and says, Hey, here is a use
8 case, we would love to buy your data for this use case, it's
9 not that simple. It's a question of whether we're
10 competitive in that market, whether it makes sense in that
11 market.
12 Q. What would you do to determine if it made sense in
13 that market?
14 A. Well, for example, the supplier that Mr. Daline
15 cited earlier today, Have I Been Pwnd, gives away their data
16 for free. My investors would be quite upset with me if I
17 decided to compete against Have I Been Pwnd? They give
18 their data away for free. They give that information away
19 for free. I don't compete against companies who do that.
20 And by the way, there are a range of other
21 companies in the industry, including Google, Apple and
22 others, who actually monitor for the presence or absence of
23 an email address in the dark net for free. I don't compete
24 against those companies.
25 So if somebody comes in and says, I'll give you
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 120 of
181
120
1 $100,000 to buy your data to monitor the presence or absence
2 of an email address in the dark net, ultimately that's not
3 going to be a sustainable client. They're going to figure
4 out pretty quickly they can get that data for free.
5 Q. But if there were a use case out there that you
6 discovered, you would be trying to sell to it?
7 A. I would certainly consider if there was a use case
8 out there that I didn't know about.
9 Q. Now, I asked you about use cases in your
10 deposition. Do you recall that?
11 A. I do.
12 Q. I asked you:
13 "Do you think there are potential use cases for
14 dark web data -- for DarkOwl customers that are not
15 currently being utilized by your customers?"
16 A. That's correct, I remember that question.
17 Q. And you answered:
18 "There may be. I mean, we have had -- in the past
19 we have had customers, prospects walk in the door, and, you
20 know, ask for things that no other customers are using"?
21 A. Yeah. And the example I give today in the court
22 is approached us and they
23 weren't a use case that we were doing.
24 Q. And then you went on and said:
25 "But I -- it's hard for me to know what those are
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 121 of
181
121
1 today because if -- if we -- if I knew about them, we would
2 be serving -- we would be selling or trying to sell into
3 those spaces"?
4 A. Yeah. And my definition of a use case is
5 something that's sustainably compatible -- competitive for
6 us.
7 MR. FRASIER: Your Honor, may I approach?
8 THE COURT: You may. Mr. Frazier, did you intend
9 to offer Defendant 16?
10 MR. FRASIER: Thank you, Your Honor. I offer
11 Exhibit 16.
12 THE COURT: All right. Any objection to 16,
13 Defendant 16?
14 MR. BUXBAUM: No objection, Your Honor, sorry.
15 THE COURT: Thank you. It is received.
16 (Exhibit 16 admitted.)
17 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) Mr. Turnage, I am not yet showing
18 you the document because it's currently marked as Attorney's
19 Eyes Only.
20 A. Okay, sorry. So I'm not supposed to look at this?
21 Q. No, it's -- you can look at, my client cannot.
22 A. Oh, sorry. I thought it was -- okay, sorry.
23 Q. I will not show you documents that you cannot look
24 at, I promise.
25 MR. FRASIER: Why don't you step out.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 122 of
181
122
1 MR. DALINE: Can I go to a side where I can't see
2 it or do you want me out?
3 MR. FRASIER: Why don't you just step out for a
4 minute and we'll see if -- all right.
5 There we go. We can publish it to the witness.
6 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) I'm showing you what has been
7 marked Exhibit 17. Do you recognize this document?
8 A. I do, I do.
9 Q. This is a document that DarkOwl uses to onboard
10 new employees?
11 A. We have in the past. I haven't seen this document
12 used in awhile to onboard new employees.
13 Q. This document is also designated Attorney's Eyes
14 Only. Is this a document that you believe ArkOwl would gain
15 a competitive advantage from?
16 A. Perhaps. I would like to see what specific and
17 then we can ask Mr. Daline to step back in. I just don't
18 know what specifically you're going to question me about in
19 the document.
20 Q. Okay. In flipping through this document, the page
21 2 that I'm showing you now is what DarkOwl will look like in
22 2015?
23 A. Correct.
24 Q. And then the second -- or the third page, rather,
25 is a description of the product, the features and the data
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 123 of
181
123
1 sources that were added in that year?
2 A. That's correct.
3 Q. And in each subsequent year DarkOwl added fonts?
4 A. That's correct.
5 Q. And each year it added five features as well?
6 A. Correct.
7 Q. And it added new data sources?
8 A. Correct.
9 Q. And I'm allowed to ask you about each of these.
10 A. Sure.
11 Q. On page 16 of 18, this is the same image that we
12 were looking at in the Product Training Manual, right?
13 A. That's correct.
14 Q. And you already testified that this graphic
15 doesn't actually represent DarkOwl as of now because you
16 have a new product?
17 A. We have added one more: Blue box.
18 Q. It's called Dark Sonar?
19 A. That's correct.
20 Q. And the ransom ware API was added just last year
21 as well?
22 A. That's correct.
23 Q. In the last year DarkOwl has also added 14 new
24 search templates?
25 A. A variety. I don't know if the exact number is
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 124 of
181
124
1 14.
2 Q. They've added several new search blocks this year?
3 A. That's correct.
4 Q. In the last year DarkOwl has added hundreds of new
5 channels and servers?
6 A. That's correct.
7 Q. Do you know was DarkOwl, this graphic will look
8 for 2024?
9 A. Broadly similar with some more additions.
10 Q. Do you know what additions will be in there for
11 2024?
12 A. I'm just trying to think what will be in 2024 that
13 you would see. Well, what you would see is a box at the top
14 of the UI, the user interface, which would be a
15 collaboration platform for teams of analysts working
16 together. And that's at the request of , to build to
17 that collaboration platform so that their analysts can share
18 data among themselves without us being able to see it.
19 Q. It will also include other data sources that
20 DarkOwl might start using in the next year?
21 A. Yeah. If we start collecting from new data
22 sources, it would include those as well.
23 MR. FRASIER: I offer Exhibit 17 --
24 A. But that's not shown on this -- data sources
25 aren't shown on this slide. It would just go into that
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 125 of
181
125
1 black box at the top.
2 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) It would show up on -- in the
3 parallel version of what's on --
4 A. Yeah, if this is updated and used in on boarding,
5 it would show.
6 MR. FRASIER: I offer Exhibit 17.
7 THE COURT: Any objection to 17?
8 MR. HOLT: No objection, Your Honor.
9 THE COURT: Thank you. 17 is received.
10 (Exhibit 17 admitted.)
11 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) Now, DarkOwl did not initially
12 target cyber companies?
13 A. Originally, when we started the business, we
14 targeted for the first year of our operations, we
15 targeted -- we generally targeted Fortune 500 companies.
16 Q. Prior to 2017 its go-to market strategy was to
17 sell to banks, retail companies and health care companies?
18 A. Yeah, for about nine months, up until early 2017.
19 Q. And then what happened in 2017 was that DarkOwl
20 got approached by a cyber security company asking you to --
21 to sell to them, right?
22 A. Yeah. What we found was that the Fortune 500
23 companies were not sophisticated enough to use our platform
24 and we were approached by a cyber security company, a threat
25 int- -- an threat intelligence company asking if we
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 126 of
181
126
1 would license our database to their platform, sell them
2 data.
3 Q. And so this was a potential customer coming to
4 DarkOwl saying, Hey, we want to use your data?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. And then did that cause DarkOwl to pivot -- to
7 focus to selling to cyber security companies?
8 A. That's -- well, we pivoted because we recognized
9 that if that cyber security company was coming to us and we
10 were struggling in the marketplace with respect to the
11 sophistication of the end-user, if there was an end-user
12 group out there that was sophisticated enough to use our
13 platform, it was other cyber security companies.
14 Q. Sure.
15 A. So we pivoted.
16 Q. You mentioned this in your direct a little bit.
17 But it was late 2020 that DarkOwl hired the
18 third-party vendor to outbound sales generation?
19 A. I believe -- I believe it was 2020. I don't know
20 if it was mid, late, early 2020 timeframe.
21 Q. Okay. And it was a company called Cieence spelled
22 with a C?
23 A. C-I-E-E-N-C-E, that's correct.
24 Q. And you testified that that company sent out
25 thousands of emails per week?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 127 of
181
127
1 A. It did.
2 Q. Did DarkOwl receive regular reports from Cieence
3 on their sales efforts?
4 A. Yeah. What they would send us -- the primary
5 report we received from Cieence was meetings they had set up
6 effectively. They were compensated not for sending out
7 emails, not for doing any of that, they were compensated if
8 they actually set up a meeting with a prospective client.
9 Q. Okay. And you had no visibility on who they were
10 sending their emails to?
11 A. No.
12 Q. You had no --
13 A. In fact, it was a disaster because they sent
14 emails to our customers asking for meetings, which was a
15 complete disaster.
16 Q. Now, DarkOwl -- you testified that DarkOwl
17 terminated that contract?
18 A. We did.
19 Q. But that wasn't until the fall of 2021, correct?
20 A. That's right. My -- the woman who was running
21 business development for me went out on maternity leave for
22 a period of six months and we allowed Cieence to continue
23 their efforts; they had minimal success. And then I -- then
24 there was an uproar from our clients were being approached
25 by this third party, so we terminated them when she came
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 128 of
181
128
1 back from maternity leave.
2 Q. Okay. So you allowed DarkOwl to have this company
3 sending out emails --
4 A. That's correct.
5 Q. -- for almost a year?
6 A. We hired them to do so, yes.
7 Our belief was that they would get better over
8 time, that they would get more focused on understanding our
9 core markets and our target markets, and they did not.
10 Q. DarkOwl didn't produce emails from Cieence in this
11 case, did it?
12 A. Produce? Sorry.
13 Q. Produce them in the litigation, produce them as
14 evidence in the case.
15 A. I don't even think we have those emails, actually.
16 We never -- they were a separate stand-alone company. Like
17 the first time that email that you showed here just now, I
18 had never seen that before, or that messaging, either.
19 Q. So you had no visibility into the emails or
20 messaging from --
21 A. I did not personally. And somebody in our
22 marketing department may have had, but -- but this is the
23 first time I've seen that email.
24 Q. Okay. And you don't know whether or not the
25 DarkOwl marketing department was exercising any control over
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 129 of
181
129
1 the messaging.
2 A. We didn't have a very large marketing department.
3 Q. Okay. That was in the summer of 2021 that DarkOwl
4 hired a new head of sales?
5 A. Hired?
6 Q. A new head of sales.
7 A. Yes, that's correct.
8 Q. Sorry, I could --
9 MR. FRASIER: Do you mind getting that? Pause
10 just for a second while my client gets --
11 THE WITNESS: Yeah, no problem.
12 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) All right. So it was the summer
13 of 2021 that DarkOwl hired --
14 A. Approximately, yes.
15 Q. -- hired a new head of sales?
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. Okay. Now, that head of sales eventually changed
18 DarkOwl strategy to focus largely on inbound sales?
19 A. He tried to, yes.
20 Q. DarkOwl -- DarkOwl still kept two full-time sales
21 representatives?
22 A. That's correct.
23 Q. And those sales representatives were doing
24 outbound sales?
25 A. Some outbound and then dealing with inbound sales
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 130 of
181
130
1 as well.
2 Q. The shift to primary inbound sales generation in
3 2021 meant DarkOwl focuses its sales efforts on posting
4 content and driving people to DarkOwl's website?
5 A. It was part of their strategy, yes.
6 Q. Is that still the strategy today?
7 A. No.
8 Q. When did the sales strategy change?
9 A. We fired them in February of this year and changed
10 the strategy because it wasn't working.
11 Q. Okay. Changed to what?
12 A. We have an outbound strategy that is our primary
13 method of lead generation now.
14 Q. What is the outbound strategy that you currently
15 have?
16 A. We identify those companies that we want to target
17 and target the CEO and the C suite for meetings to discuss
18 whether our solution can add value to their product.
19 Q. And that changed just in the last few months?
20 A. It changed in January or February of this year.
21 Q. So in -- for a year in 2020, you're mostly doing
22 outbounds?
23 A. For a --
24 Q. From fall of -- from late 2020 to fall of 2021
25 DarkOwl was doing mostly outbound sales generation?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 131 of
181
131
1 A. No. Inbound. So from the fall of 2021 through
2 2022, we had -- we added inbound. And the way you generate
3 inbound leads is by digital marketing, Google or other.
4 So if somebody searches for dark net monitoring
5 on Google, it throws them to our website and we can see them
6 coming in the door through the front door and respond to
7 their needs.
8 What we found was that the level -- the quality of
9 those leads was very, very poor, because our market is
10 extremely small. It's a very focused market. And we were
11 not generating leads from large sophisticated cyber security
12 companies; we were generating leads from graduate students.
13 Q. Okay. I have a question about another exhibit
14 that is currently marked Attorney's Eyes Only.
15 MR. FRASIER: Sorry, Rob. Your Honor, this
16 document is a spreadsheet that I did not print out a digital
17 copy, because you know how they look. May I just display
18 it?
19 THE COURT: You may.
20 MR. FRASIER: Actually, I changed my mind, Your
21 Honor. I'm starting with what I have a hard copy of.
22 This is Exhibit -- may I approach, Your Honor?
23 THE COURT: You may. And this also Attorney's
24 Eyes Only?
25 MR. FRASIER: Yeah, it is Attorney's Eyes Only.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 132 of
181
132
1 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) Mr. Turnage, you're being shown
2 what's been marked Exhibit 17. Do you recognize this
3 document?
4 A. I do. It's a document that I believe was produced
5 by the VP of sales that we hired.
6 Q. All right. Now, this document is currently
7 designated as "Attorney's Eyes Only." Is this something
8 that ArkOwl could gain a competitive advantage in reviewing?
9 A. Again, I would love to see the slide before I
10 answer that question, only because I don't remember exactly
11 what's in this deck.
12 Q. You said this was prepared by the sales director?
13 A. The (indiscernible) sales director, correct.
14 Q. Now, it was his job to assign DarkOwl sales reps
15 to particular leads, right?
16 A. To?
17 Q. To particular leads.
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. Now, this document that we're looking at, Exhibit
20 17, was presented to the DarkOwl sales team?
21 A. My understanding is -- my recollection is, yes, it
22 was.
23 MR. FRASIER: I would offer Exhibit 17.
24 THE COURT: 18?
25 MR. FRASIER: Is it 18?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 133 of
181
133
1 THE COURT: Yes, it's 18.
2 MR. FRASIER: Thank you.
3 THE COURT: Any objection to 18?
4 MR. HOLT: No objection, Your Honor.
5 THE COURT: All right, 18 is received.
6 (Exhibit 18 admitted.)
7 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) I'm going to flip to page 5 of --
8 it would be 4 of the paper copy where it says, "Key Prospect
9 High Level."
10 Do you recognize this page?
11 A. I do.
12 Q. Now, on the titles on the right hand in the dark
13 blue are titles -- are titles of the DarkOwl's target
14 market; is that right?
15 A. In the -- in the views of the VP. He had been
16 with the company about a month and put together, this was
17 his thinking at the time.
18 Q. Do you agree with these titles being DarkOwl's
19 target market?
20 A. Broadly, yes. I mean, VP of engineering is not
21 usually a target for us. VP of engineering doesn't have
22 binding authority for the type of product that we do.
23 Q. But, generally speaking, the dark box contains --
24 A. Generally speaking, yes.
25 Q. Okay. I'm flipping down to -- I'm not going to go
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 134 of
181
134
1 to this page. I think we all hated this graphic.
2 Turning to page 18 of the physical copy, this is,
3 bottom marked DarkOwl 001327.
4 Now, the head of sales created the list appearing
5 on this page to identify potential customers of DarkOwl,
6 right?
7 A. That's correct.
8 Q. The list includes actual DarkOwl customers as
9 well?
10 A. Yeah, which is -- it showed how little familiarity
11 he had with our business. These are his target lists and it
12 includes people who are already customers of ours.
13 Q. Now, he also included on this document Email Age?
14 A. I'm sorry, say that again.
15 Q. He included on the targets, the addressable
16 markets, a company called Email Age?
17 A. I don't see it. If you could point it out to me,
18 that would be great.
19 Q. It's in the Fraud Detection, Dark Net
20 Quantification Box.
21 A. Yeah.
22 Q. Right there: He included PIPL?
23 A. I see it to the left of Email Age.
24 Q. Included Ekata?
25 A. I don't see it, but I can take your word for it.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 135 of
181
135
1 Q. Included GBG Identity Verification Solutions?
2 A. I assume you're correct that it's on that list
3 somewhere. Oh, there it is, right in the middle.
4 Q. Good eye.
5 A. It's -- yeah, small text.
6 Q. Now, I will show you the spreadsheet I referenced
7 earlier.
8 MR. FRASIER: I'm sorry, did I offer that as an
9 exhibit? I think I did.
10 THE COURT: You did not offer -- oh, yes, you
11 offered 18. This has been received.
12 MR. FRASIER: Yes, thank you.
13 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) I'm showing you what was marked
14 as a Deposition Exhibit 12.
15 THE COURT: Are you going to offer this into
16 evidence, Mr. Frasier? If so, we'll call it Exhibit 19 --
17 MR. FRASIER: Okay.
18 THE COURT: -- for purposes of today.
19 MR. FRASIER: Thank you.
20 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) Now, the document we're looking
21 at, Exhibit 19, is also a document created by the head of
22 sales, correct?
23 A. That's my recollection, yes.
24 Q. And you produced in this case the most updated
25 version of this document?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 136 of
181
136
1 A. My guess is that -- was this -- just so I'm clear,
2 was this separate from the deck you were just showing me?
3 Q. Yes, this is -- yes.
4 A. Okay. I haven't seen this document updated since
5 this document was put together by him, so I assume you had
6 the most updated version.
7 Q. Now, DarkOwl used this document to inform your
8 website redesign in late 2021 or early 2022?
9 A. To in part, yes.
10 Q. I'm going to click on the third tab on the bottom
11 called Big Data Targets. On the top line of tab 3 are names
12 of DarkOwl's sales people, correct?
13 A. That's correct.
14 Q. Both rows 3 and 4 are DarkOwl sales reps?
15 A. That's correct.
16 Q. Now, the person who created this, it was his job
17 to assign sales reps to leads?
18 A. This was his first attempt, yes.
19 Q. And this was the most updated version of this
20 document?
21 A. It was only used for a while and it was
22 realized -- what he did was he collected names from the
23 Internet of these companies. And in many cases, the use
24 case was nonsense; it didn't exist.
25 Q. But tab 3 is a list of companies -- your head of
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 137 of
181
137
1 sales at the time believed to be DarkOwl potential
2 customers?
3 A. At the time, yes. He had just joined the company
4 and he compiled this list of companies from the Internet and
5 assigned the salespeople to go after them.
6 Q. And it included some of DarkOwl's prospects that
7 you were chasing at the time?
8 A. I can't actually -- I don't know if that was the
9 case or not. Probably. I mean, looking at -- but again,
10 just to put this in context, on this list are clients of
11 ours. So why would you assign companies to salespeople
12 who -- when they're already clients?
13 Q. Now, C28 in green, ?
14 A. Yep.
15 Q. Subsequently became a DarkOwl customer?
16 A. That's correct.
17 Q. All right. Now, in G49, also
18 became a DarkOwl customer?
19 A. That's correct.
20 Q. And it's your best guess that the names in the
21 parens after the companies indicated the salesperson has
22 been assigned to go after that company?
23 A. I think that -- my guess -- my best guess is that
24 they were in conversation and he has acknowledged -- they
25 were already in conversation and he acknowledged that
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 138 of
181
138
1 they're already there.
2 Q. Now, E82 includes PIPL ( ), do you see that?
3 A. Yep.
4 Q. Do you know if DarkOwl was engaged in
5 conversations with PIPL when this document was created?
6 A. I don't know.
7 Q. But it's included on the --
8 A. It's included on the list, but I don't know if
9 Jessica was talking to PIPL.
10 Q. All right. E98, your head of sales identified
11 Signifyd as a potential DarkOwl customer?
12 A. Yeah. He's on -- it's on his list that he pulled
13 from the Internet.
14 Q. And in F107, Interceptis (ph) by Accertify, right?
15 A. I see it on the list, yes.
16 Q. Now, F8 included the Actimize platform?
17 A. Sorry, your -- your screen is over your -- it's
18 Actimize, yes. That's on the spreadsheet.
19 Q. All right. And in F157 included SEON, S-E-O-N?
20 A. It's right there on the spreadsheet.
21 Q. F30, he included Sitcon (ph), right?
22 A. That's correct.
23 Q. And he included Email Age?
24 A. That's correct.
25 Q. Feeds Eye (ph)?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 139 of
181
139
1 A. That's correct.
2 Q. Frogster on F98?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. GBG Identity Verification Services on F100?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. Riskified (ph) on F150?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. Sift Science (ph) on F160?
9 A. Yes. And none of them became customers.
10 Q. Do you know whether DarkOwl reached out to any of
11 the customers?
12 A. I don't know if it reached out to them and none of
13 those are customers of ours today.
14 Q. All right. Now, I just want to make sure that
15 we're -- that you let me finish my question before you start
16 answering your question.
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. We're just about done.
19 MR. FRASIER: I would like to offer Exhibit 19
20 into evidence.
21 THE COURT: Any objection to 19?
22 MR. HOLT: No objection, Your Honor.
23 THE COURT: Thank you. 19 is received.
24 (Exhibit 19 admitted.)
25 MR. FRASIER: Your Honor, I would like to confer
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 140 of
181
140
1 with opposing counsel just for a second on exhibits.
2 THE COURT: Sure.
3 (Counsel confer.)
4 MR. FRASIER: Thank you for your patience. I have
5 a series of one- or two-page documents that we have agreed
6 to combine into one exhibit to streamline things, so it will
7 just take me a second here.
8 Thank you again for your patience.
9 Your Honor, may I approach.
10 THE COURT: You may.
11 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) All right. You mentioned
12 Cieence, the outbound sales generation company.
13 A. I believe you mentioned them. But, yes, we've
14 spoken about them.
15 Q. I'm showing you what's been marked as Exhibit 20.
16 We can walk through it. It's a series of emails. So I'll
17 start with this one marked as Bates ending in 136.
18 Do you recognize this document?
19 A. No.
20 Q. Now, this is an email from Cieence on behalf of
21 DarkOwl; is that right?
22 A. Apparently so. I mean, everything looks like it's
23 from Cieence too.
24 Q. Okay. And the document marked -- this is not in
25 order -- 144 is also an email from Cieence on behalf of
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 141 of
181
141
1 DarkOwl?
2 A. It appears so, yes.
3 Q. And the document marked 145 is also an email from
4 Cieence on behalf of DarkOwl?
5 A. It looks so, yes.
6 Q. And the email 147 is also an email on behalf of
7 DarkOwl from Cieence?
8 A. Yes, it looks.
9 Q. And 148 is also an email from Cieence on behalf of
10 DarkOwl?
11 A. It looks so, yes.
12 Q. 149 is also an email on behalf of DarkOwl from
13 Cieence?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. 150 is also an email from DarkOwl on behalf --
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. -- or Cieence on behalf of DarkOwl?
18 158 is the same?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. All right, I believe that's all of them. I'm
21 happy to flip through any of these if you have questions
22 about specifics. I am not going to ask specifics about any
23 one email.
24 But the series of emails that we're looking at
25 now, the Exhibit 20, are all solicitations on behalf -- on
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 142 of
181
142
1 behalf of DarkOwl; is that right?
2 A. Yes, by Cieence on behalf of DarkOwl.
3 Q. Now, these were all directed to a company called
4 Signifyd; is that right?
5 A. They appear to be, yes.
6 Q. Okay. And Cieence had Taylor Sharp sending
7 emails?
8 A. Taylor Sharp is I think a made-up name. They were
9 all Philippino employees of Cieence who were doing this. I
10 think they made Anglicized names.
11 Q. And they contacted multiple different people at
12 signified; is that right?
13 A. I think their strategy was to -- where they could
14 get emails addresses from -- multiple emails addresses from
15 cap, they would target them.
16 Q. Now, this document was produced in response to a
17 subpoena to Signifyd, correct?
18 A. I would have to ask my attorneys that question,
19 but I would assume so.
20 Q. DarkOwl doesn't have the emails that Cieence sent
21 on behalf of DarkOwl?
22 A. No, we did not. We never preserve those emails.
23 Q. Okay. And all of these emails were Cieence trying
24 to solicit business for DarkOwl?
25 A. Trying to get a meeting.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 143 of
181
143
1 Q. For business?
2 A. For business.
3 Q. Okay.
4 MR. FRASIER: I have no further questions.
5 THE COURT: Do you want to offer 20?
6 MR. FRASIER: Yes, I do. Thank you, Your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Is there any objection to 20?
8 MR. HOLT: No objection, Your Honor.
9 THE COURT: 20 is received.
10 (Exhibit 20 admitted.)
11 THE COURT: Is there any redirect?
12 MR. HOLT: No redirect, Your Honor. And I was
13 hoping that I could have maybe five minutes caucus with
14 opposing counsel. We're running short on time and we have a
15 number of witnesses that have flown in and we would love to
16 pack everything in. We're willing to make some concessions
17 if we can come to some agreements.
18 THE COURT: You may do that. Let me just tell
19 counsel that to the extent that you need more time for the
20 hearing, just so that everybody isn't freaked out, I do have
21 availability this week, because I had a case of a separate
22 trial on Wednesday that settled this morning. So there is
23 some availability on my calendar on Wednesday. I know that
24 may not be convenient for everybody else, but I wanted to
25 throw that out there.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 144 of
181
144
1 But if you would like to caucus for five minutes,
2 I'll take a brief recess.
3 MR. HOLT: That would be great.
4 THE COURT: Thank you.
5 (Recess taken from 4:53 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.)
6 THE COURT: All right. We're back. Are we
7 finished with the examination of Mr. Turnage?
8 MR. FRASIER: I am.
9 MR. BUXBAUM: We are, yes.
10 THE COURT: All right, thank you. Mr. Turnage may
11 step down. He's already stepped down. All right, where do
12 you want to go next? Does plaintiff have any additional
13 witnesses?
14 MR. BUXBAUM: Your Honor, no additional fact
15 witnesses from the parties, but we're looking at one hour.
16 I guess we have a hard stop at 6:00. We've got three
17 witnesses, and we're trying to come up with a schedule that
18 works. It's going to be pretty tight, but --
19 THE COURT: And you actually don't have a full
20 hour. I have to have you at the doors at 6:00.
21 MR. BUXBAUM: Okay.
22 THE COURT: So, you know, you've got to wrap up in
23 the courtroom by, what, five minutes of or something.
24 MR. BUXBAUM: So I guess with that in mind, if we
25 can be cooperative and just walk through the best --
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 145 of
181
145
1 MR. FRASIER: Yeah. I mean, I'll try to keep my
2 direct of our expert. So, Your Honor, we have one more fact
3 witness I'm going to call, very short, and then I will do
4 the direct of our expert and they'll do a cross, and then
5 they'll do a direct of their expert and I'll do the cross.
6 THE COURT: Okay.
7 MR. FRASIER: I'll try to my limit my directs to
8 ten minutes.
9 THE COURT: Okay. And I appreciate your reference
10 to collaborate. And I'm not trying to be at all dismissive
11 of those efforts, but I'm telling you, we're not going to
12 get done by ten minutes of 6:00, right? I mean, it's very
13 unlikely we're going to get done by that time.
14 And I also am a little concerned about rushing
15 you --
16 MR. FRASIER: Sure.
17 THE COURT: -- and having you feel like you're not
18 getting a full opportunity to present everything you want to
19 present. So -- and I understand how inconvenient it is for
20 everybody to come back and there is a witness from out of
21 town, et cetera, et cetera, but I think we have to get real
22 about spending some time to reschedule the remainder of this
23 hearing and talk about that for a minute.
24 I just don't see any way you're going to get done
25 with the amount of witnesses you need to call.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 146 of
181
146
1 MR. BUXBAUM: Well, Your Honor, we have two expert
2 witnesses that have flown in. Our expert is flying to
3 Houston for a trial immediately after this, so it's going to
4 be really difficult. With that in mind, can I caucus with
5 plaintiff's counsel again and see what we can do.
6 THE COURT: Yeah, why don't you see if you can
7 reach some agreement. I mean, if you want to, I can have my
8 courtroom deputy look at my calendar and tell you every
9 available block of time that I have between now and the day
10 that I retire, which is August 4, to finish this hearing.
11 You know, we've got a trial date next month so we want to
12 try to get this done prior to the trial, but, you know, if
13 we don't get this done, there is a chance that the trial
14 would have to be moved as well, and I don't want to put you
15 in that position either.
16 So, you know, if you want to take a minute to look
17 at my schedule and think about my schedule, I think it would
18 be best. I don't think there is -- I cannot keep you in the
19 building after 6:00. That's when the security officers
20 leave, and if I could go until 9:00 p.m., I would go until
21 9:00 p.m., but I can't do it. So we don't have any choice.
22 And I'm telling you, with the amount of back and forth that
23 you've indicated in the number of witnesses, very little
24 chance we're going to get done by 6:00.
25 MR. FRASIER: Your Honor, before we caucus would
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 147 of
181
147
1 Your Honor be open to taking -- to taking some testimony by
2 Zoom for the --
3 THE COURT: Sure. I mean, you know, specially if
4 counsel agree and there is no objection, we could have
5 witnesses testify by video. We did that entirely in COVID
6 times, as you well know. So that's always a possibility as
7 well.
8 I mean, it also may ease a little bit of your
9 worries about getting this done today. We don't necessarily
10 have to have your experts fly in here from out of town to be
11 in here in person. I understand you prefer that. I prefer
12 that too, but honestly to get this done, that may not
13 believe possible.
14 So something to think about.
15 MR. BUXBAUM: Can you give us two minutes.
16 THE COURT: Yeah, go ahead. I'll sit right where
17 I am, try not to listen.
18 MR. BUXBAUM: Your Honor, in the Zoom situation
19 that we would still have some people in court or would it be
20 all.
21 THE COURT: Sure. You can do it however you want.
22 If you've got folks who can be present in the courtroom,
23 that's fine with me.
24 MR. BUXBAUM: Or, we could do (indiscernible -
25 away from mic).
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 148 of
181
148
1 THE COURT: Yeah, I understand that.
2 MR. BUXBAUM: We could do it all by Zoom.
3 THE COURT: You could, you could do it all by
4 Zoom. I mean, it's not ideal, but we can do it that way if
5 we have to. And frankly, when it comes to counsel, I'm very
6 reluctant to allow, for example, plaintiff's counsel to be
7 present in the courtroom and not defense counsel. I mean,
8 if some counsel are not going to be able to be present in
9 person, I'm more likely to say no counsel are present in
10 person.
11 MR. BUXBAUM: As you may recall, from when we were
12 trying to schedule this, you know, with the experts
13 traveling all around all the time, that's their job, you
14 know, and we've got -- I know my colleague and I have a
15 mediation in Spokane in a couple weeks, and I know you have
16 concerns about getting us all in. We'll see what Tom and
17 Mike talk, discuss.
18 THE COURT: Yeah. I mean, you know, you can
19 always withdraw the motion.
20 MR. BUXBAUM: We're not going to withdraw the
21 motion.
22 THE COURT: I said it in jest.
23 (Pause in the proceedings.)
24 MR. HOLT: Your Honor, I think we have a plan to
25 proceed.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 149 of
181
149
1 THE COURT: All right, what's the plan?
2 MR. HOLT: We're going to call -- I'm sorry,
3 defendant's counsel is going to call Mr. Cohen, CFO of
4 DarkOwl. It's about a ten-minute examination. I doubt
5 we'll have anything for cross, and then we're going to put
6 our rebuttal expert, Hal Poret. He's got a trial coming up
7 and he's just going to be unavailable in the near term, and
8 we'll try to get to Mr. Kegan. If we cannot, then we'll do
9 a follow-up Zoom hearing, if that's okay.
10 THE COURT: All right, let's try it. Mr. Cohen.
11 RUSSELL COHEN,
12 having been first duly sworn, was examined and testified as
13 follows:
14 MR. FRASIER: Thank you, Your Honor. Appreciate
15 the flexibility from everybody here.
16 DIRECT EXAMINATION
17 BY MR. FRASIER: :
18 Q. Mr. Cohen, you are DarkOwl's president and CFO,
19 right?
20 A. Correct.
21 THE CLERK: I'm sorry, Counsel, I need the
22 witness' name.
23 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) Could you please state your full
24 name.
25 A. My full name is Russell Cohen.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 150 of
181
150
1 THE CLERK: Thank you.
2 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) And you're the president and CFO
3 of DarkOwl
4 A. Yes, and co-founder.
5 Q. You're constantly trying to describe who could use
6 DarkOwl's data in different ways, right?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. And over time DarkOwl would emphasize some types
9 of potential customers over other types of potential
10 customers?
11 A. For marketing purposes, sure.
12 Q. You would agree that DarkOwl's data could be used
13 in myriad of ways?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. In fact, DarkOwl's enterprise customers use its
16 data in many different -- for many different purposes?
17 A. Correct.
18 Q. Sometimes they use DarkOwl's data in ways that are
19 surprising?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. The market for dark net data service is not yet
22 commoditized?
23 A. Correct.
24 Q. And you agree that DarkOwl is still learning what
25 your core market is about and what customers want from that
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 151 of
181
151
1 core market?
2 A. We're getting better, but, yes.
3 Q. Now, DarkOwl's potential market is large, isn't
4 it?
5 A. I believe so.
6 Q. It's more than a thousand potential customers?
7 A. How many governments are there? Sure.
8 Q. You said there are many thousands of potential
9 customers?
10 A. Sure.
11 Q. In fact, DarkOwl tries to sell to everybody who
12 touches on the broader cyber security space?
13 A. That's overly general, but we try to sell to
14 people who hire sophisticated cyber security experts.
15 Q. Now, you recall giving your deposition in this
16 case, right? You recall me asking you questions in your
17 deposition?
18 A. Yes.
19 MR. FRASIER: Could we turn on the
20 (indiscernible).
21 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) I was asking you about an exhibit
22 and where you would put DarkOwl in any of the categories in
23 the exhibit and you said:
24 "I would broadly say that we sell to everybody.
25 We try to sell to everybody with -- who touches the broader
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 152 of
181
152
1 cyber security space, which is what this is trying to
2 describe."
3 Is that right?
4 A. What line are we on? Oh, okay, towards the
5 bottom.
6 Q. Starting at line 15.
7 A. Yeah. What is the exhibit?
8 THE COURT: The question is: Did you say that in
9 your deposition? I can read it.
10 A. Yes, I said it.
11 MR. FRASIER: Mr. Cohen, I have no other questions
12 for you. Thank you.
13 THE COURT: You're done?
14 MR. FRASIER: Yes, I'm done.
15 THE COURT: Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't hear that.
16 All right. And there is no cross-examination?
17 MR. BUXBAUM: No questions, Your Honor.
18 THE COURT: Mr. Cohen, you may step down. All
19 right. And does the plaintiff have any additional
20 witnesses?
21 MR. BUXBAUM: Expert witnesses only.
22 THE COURT: All right.
23 MR. BUXBAUM: We would like to call Hal Poret.
24 HAL PORET,
25 having been first duly sworn, was examined and testified as
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 153 of
181
153
1 follows:
2 THE COURT: Whenever you're ready, Mr. Buxbaum.
3 DIRECT EXAMINATION
4 BY MR. BUXBAUM: :
5 Q. Good afternoon, Mr. Poret. Would you please state
6 your name for the Court.
7 A. Hal Poret.
8 Q. Mr. Poret, are you currently employed?
9 A. Yes, I am.
10 Q. What is your job and title?
11 A. I run my own survey research company.
12 Q. Mr. Poret, could you briefly give us an overview
13 of your educational and career background?
14 A. Sure. I have a bachelor's in math and a master's
15 in math and then I also have a law degree from Harvard Law
16 School. For the past 20 years I have worked in the field of
17 survey research, designing and conducting well over a
18 thousand surveys, both in the area of regular corporate
19 market research and then also in connection with legal
20 matters, such as this.
21 I work for another market research company for a
22 while, but since 201 I've run my own survey research
23 company.
24 Q. Thank you. Mr. Poret, were you retained as an
25 expert witness by DarkOwl in this case?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 154 of
181
154
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. And what was purpose of your engagement?
3 A. I was initially asked whether I could do my own
4 survey, but for various reasons after looking into it, felt
5 that I -- I didn't feel that I could reliably reach the
6 proper universe in a case like there and feel confident that
7 I had done a proper survey, so I indicated that I couldn't
8 do that and I was ultimately then retained to review and
9 analyze Mr. Kegan's survey.
10 Q. And why didn't you believe you could reach a
11 proper universe of respondents to prepare your own
12 likelihood of confusion survey?
13 A. Because when I looked into and came to understand
14 what DarkOwl is, what DarkOwl does and, you know, what its
15 services are and thought about who are the customers that I
16 would have to try to reach, I realized this -- these are
17 very sophisticated, complex services being marketed to very
18 sophisticated organizations and you -- you know, to be able
19 to reach people who are relatively high level, sophisticated
20 positions in sophisticated organizations and get them to
21 participate in a survey is -- is extremely difficult.
22 And most surveys that we do are done using general
23 consumer panels and I certainly -- it was instantly obvious
24 that it would be impossible to reach this universe through a
25 general consumer panel. You can't just cast a net out into
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 155 of
181
155
1 the street and hope you're going to hit people who are, you
2 know, officers at sophisticated organizations who would
3 contract for services like DarkOwl. So that certainly
4 wouldn't work.
5 And I considered trying to use a specialty
6 business panel that maybe would be able to reach this
7 particular niche, but when I looked into it, I ultimately
8 didn't feel confident that I would be able to reach people
9 who were truly prospective DarkOwl customers, even using a
10 specialty business panel.
11 Q. And so you were engaged as a rebuttal witness?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. And did you prepare a rebuttal report?
14 A. Yes, I did.
15 MR. BUXBAUM: Your Honor, may I approach.
16 THE COURT: You may.
17 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Do you recognize this document,
18 Mr. Poret?
19 A. Yes, this is my rebuttal report.
20 MR. BUXBAUM: Okay. I would like to offer this
21 into evidence as Exhibit 21.
22 THE COURT: It is. Any objection to 21?
23 MR. FRASIER: No, Your Honor.
24 THE COURT: 21 is received.
25 MR. BUXBAUM: Thank you, Your Honor.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 156 of
181
156
1 (Exhibit 21 admitted.)
2 Q. (By Mr. Buxbaum) Mr. Poret, what was your ultimate
3 conclusion regarding the liability of Mr. Kegan's survey?
4 A. It was that it was too severely flawed in a number
5 of critical ways to have any value or reliability on the
6 topic of likelihood of confusion.
7 Q. If I could direct your attention to page 6 for
8 just a moment, a line or two down from the top, you say,
9 "Critical aspects of the Kegan survey design are based on an
10 inaccurate characterization that the parties offer
11 essentially the same type of service and that such service
12 are directly competing alternatives." Did I read that
13 correctly?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. And could you please explain what you meant by
16 that and why you said it?
17 A. Well, sure. In -- in designing a survey and
18 explaining it, Mr. Kegan essentially indicated that he
19 believes these are parties that are directly -- directly
20 competing and serve the same marketplace and that,
21 therefore, let him to select the -- the wrong universe,
22 assuming that DarkOwl's potential customers are essentially
23 the same as who ArkOwl's potential customers are, and it led
24 him to select methodology that assumes that it would be
25 appropriate to ask the same individuals to review ArkOwl's
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 157 of
181
157
1 website and DarkOwl's website in close proximity when that
2 would only be appropriate if they really were directly
3 competitive alternative services or so overlapping that the
4 same consumer would in the real world actually consider
5 those things in close proximity.
6 Q. Looking at page 2, the bottom paragraph, if I
7 could direct your attention to that. Does that bottom
8 paragraph reflect a summary of your opinion on the flaws in
9 the survey?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. Can you please just read the 1 and 2 in that
12 paragraph?
13 A. Sure. Number 1 is serious flaws in the screening
14 questions, prevented the survey from accurately identifying
15 members of the relevant universe. And Number 2 is even to
16 the extent the survey included some members of the relevant
17 universe, the survey construct failed to obtain a sample
18 that is representative of the universe.
19 Q. Could you please explain the role of screening
20 questions in a survey in general?
21 A. Yes. The screening questions need to reliably
22 identify the person taking the survey as a prospective
23 customer of the relevant service, which in this instance
24 works be DarkOwl's service.
25 Q. And for this case, what sort of respondents would
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 158 of
181
158
1 comprise an appropriate universe? I think you just answered
2 DarkOwl customers?
3 A. That people would be in the relevant universe if
4 they said they are actual or prospective customers of the
5 type of service that DarkOwl offers, which we've heard
6 described today and is a dark -- a dark web of searching and
7 cataloging or indexing the service.
8 Q. And what was your ultimate opinion regarding the
9 screening questions that Mr. Kegan used in his survey?
10 A. That they were extremely overbroad and inaccurate
11 and could not have led to identifying the relevant universe.
12 And in fact, there is no way to know whether even a single
13 person who took the survey is in the relevant universe.
14 Q. Okay. Let's look at the first substance screening
15 questioning. If you could turn to page 9 in -- or direct
16 your attention to page 9. What was the first substantive
17 screening question that Mr. Kegan used in the survey?
18 A. It asked which, if any, of the following types of
19 services do you personally use as part of your job
20 responsibilities and it offered a number of choices, and the
21 respondent needed to select the choice data services in
22 order to continue with the survey.
23 Q. So just to be clear, if -- if they selected any of
24 the other answers other than data services they were
25 excluded, but if they said they do use data services, that
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 159 of
181
159
1 was sufficient to move through to the next stage of the
2 survey?
3 A. It's if they did select data services, they moved
4 through. If they did not, they would be terminated.
5 Q. And do you believe that that screening question
6 was flawed?
7 A. Yes. The term "data services" is so overbroad as
8 to encompass so many different things that have nothing to
9 do with what DarkOwl does. I mean, the most common use of
10 the term data services that I see is to refer to all of the
11 services that actually where company store their data and
12 share their data: Dropbox, Google Drive, Apple, Microsoft.
13 You know, there is countless things. I mean, I as a
14 one-person business who does surveys, I use data services, I
15 use Microsoft OneDrive, I use Dropbox, all kinds of things.
16 So none of those have anything to do with DarkOwl.
17 And there is also lots of other things that people
18 would think of as data services, like all of the companies
19 who -- what they do is they take a company's sales data, for
20 instance, and they mine it and they give you insights into
21 it and they say, oh, here are your best customers and things
22 like that.
23 So there are so many different services that would
24 fall under the heading of data services that there is no
25 reason to think that anybody who selected data services is
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 160 of
181
160
1 specifically referring to the type of dark web services that
2 DarkOwl offers.
3 Q. So is it fair to summarize that concern as the
4 data services requirement was quite overinclusive?
5 A. It's both overinclusive and underinclusive,
6 because one problem is somebody who is a consumer of dark
7 web services might not have picked data services, because
8 the term "data services" wouldn't convey this type of dark
9 web catalog service to them. So they could have been
10 excluded improperly, which would make it underinclusive.
11 But mostly it's really overinclusive because of
12 the fact that probably the vast, vast majority of things
13 people would think data services apply to has nothing to do
14 with what DarkOwl does.
15 Q. Let's look at the next screening question. I'll
16 direct your attention to page 13. What was the next
17 substantive screening question that Mr. Kegan used?
18 A. So if they selected data services, they were then
19 which of the following type of vendor provided services do
20 you personally use as part of your job responsibilities.
21 And again, there is a number choices, but the ones that
22 would qualify people for the survey were fraud prevention
23 services or user or customer identification or data
24 verification services.
25 Q. And do you believe that that screening question
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 161 of
181
161
1 was flawed?
2 A. Yes, in that again, these do not come even close
3 to identifying somebody as a prospective DarkOwl customer,
4 because in the case of user or customer identification or
5 data verification services, that certainly is more of an
6 attempt to possibly identify an ArkOwl customer, not a
7 consumer of dark web services.
8 And again, in the case of fraud prevention
9 services, the term "fraud prevention" is so vague and
10 overbroad that it covers countless things that have nothing
11 to do with what DarkOwl does. Again, such as, you know,
12 banking services, credit card services, antivirus services.
13 They're just -- there are so many things that fall under
14 fraud prevention.
15 So the bottom line is, once somebody has answered,
16 I use data services and I use fraud prevention services or
17 user customer identification services, we still have no idea
18 if what they have in mind has anything to do with what
19 DarkOwl does.
20 And in fact, I was thinking if I took this survey,
21 I would have qualified for it because I -- like I said, I
22 use all kinds of data services and I would have thought,
23 yeah, I use fraud prevention services, I use antivirus
24 software on my computer, I -- my credit cards have fraud
25 protection elements, my banking services have fraud
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 162 of
181
162
1 prevention aspects. So, you know, I would have qualified
2 for this survey as a one-person business who, you know,
3 would never have the slightest even thought for using
4 something like DarkOwl.
5 Q. Mr. Poret, you made reference earlier to a
6 distinction between general consumer panels and specialty
7 panels. Just for the edification of us nontrademark survey
8 experts, could you please explain what that difference is.
9 A. Sure. So most surveys are done with general
10 consumer panels. It's basically millions of Americans who
11 have signed up and said, I'm willing to take surveys, send
12 me an invitation. And that works great for ordinary
13 consumer products. If you need to study purchasers of cell
14 phones or milk or potato chips, or even automobiles, you can
15 just reach out to a consumer panel and there is going to be
16 plenty of those on it.
17 For something like this, that -- that doesn't
18 work. That would be searching for a needle in a haystack.
19 You can't contact 100 people and hope that even one of them
20 would be in the market for DarkOwl services.
21 So if you were going to even try to reach
22 consumers of a sophisticated service like this that are
23 people who are high-ranking executives at sophisticated
24 organizations, you would have to at least try to use a
25 business panel, which is something where special efforts
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 163 of
181
163
1 have been made to recruit people who have certain positions
2 in business and are being paid much, much higher incentives
3 to get them to be willing to do surveys about a specialized
4 area.
5 Q. And Mr. Kegan did not use a specialty panel; is
6 that correct?
7 A. No. Right, that's correct. Mr. Kegan testified
8 that he used a general consumer panel and he also explained
9 that 15 percent of the people who came in from the general
10 consumer panel met the criteria and qualified for the
11 survey.
12 And that alone proves beyond any doubt that this
13 can't be a credible universe of prospective DarkOwl
14 customers, because there is no way that 15 percent of people
15 under general consumer panel are in the market for this
16 highly specialized, sophisticated, and expensive service.
17 It would be one in 10,000 or one in 100,000.
18 So I mean, the mere fact alone that these
19 screening questions led to 15 percent of a general consumer
20 panel saying, Yep, I checked these boxes, you know, that
21 alone is -- is conclusive proof that the people who met
22 these criteria are not prospective DarkOwl customers.
23 They're people who thought data services and fraud
24 prevention meant some of the much more ordinary typical
25 things that I mentioned before.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 164 of
181
164
1 Q. I believe you made a statement in your survey
2 along the lines that, even if two companies happen to share
3 a customer or a target customer, that wouldn't necessarily
4 make those two companies competitors.
5 Can you just elaborate on that a little bit.
6 A. Sure. This same organization, of course, uses all
7 kinds of different services. The same company uses payroll
8 services, they use legal services, they use waste removal
9 services from their office. So the mere fact that a
10 particular company might use two different services on its
11 own does not really tell you anything about the competitive
12 relationship between those types of services.
13 Q. So just to be clear, is it your opinion that
14 Mr. Kegan did not identify the relevant population or
15 universe for his survey?
16 A. Yes, it's clear that people qualified for this
17 survey on an improper basis and we literally could not
18 identify a single person in the survey as a prospective
19 DarkOwl customer.
20 Q. Your opinion, does the failure to identify a
21 proper universe of respondents affect the reliability of a
22 likelihood of confusion survey?
23 A. Yes, very, very much so.
24 Q. In your opinion, is the survey's failure to
25 identify a proper universe a fatal flaw in the survey,
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 165 of
181
165
1 rendering it unreliable?
2 A. It certainly is in this case. I mean, flaws in a
3 universe can range from small ones to large ones; but in
4 this case, it's really the largest possible version of a
5 flaw, because we really literally have no idea if the person
6 who took the survey is even remotely in the ballpark here.
7 And it's a serious problem, because if it's, you
8 know, somebody who is not really a prospective DarkOwl
9 customer, first of all, they don't have the interest or
10 attention to pay attention to these websites shown in the
11 survey, they don't have the ability to understand them and
12 see what -- what these services even mean, and they don't
13 have the knowledge and sophistication that a real
14 prospective DarkOwl customer would have to be able to
15 understand what the service is and who the party they're
16 dealing with.
17 So it would, in this case, the wrong universe
18 would render this test, you know, completely artificial and
19 unrealistic.
20 Q. And just to be clear, is it your opinion that,
21 even if the companies could be shown to have some overlap in
22 potential target customers, that the survey is still fatally
23 flawed in the way it was constructed?
24 A. Yes, absolutely, because you don't -- you don't
25 know if there is a single person in the survey who is a
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 166 of
181
166
1 DarkOwl customer, or prospective customer.
2 Q. You testified earlier that the survey makes a
3 false assumption that the parties are direct competitors.
4 Other than affecting the universe of respondents, did that
5 misrepresentation or false assumption cause the survey to be
6 reliable -- unreliable in other ways?
7 A. Yes. The main survey design is also unreliable
8 for that reason, because Mr. Kegan used a format which is
9 common in our area, but it's common for services or products
10 that are either directly competitive or so highly related
11 that the same consumer would consider them in close
12 proximity.
13 Because what the survey is doing is it's
14 essentially saying, imagine you're shopping for this type of
15 service, here is a bunch of options, consider them. And
16 that's realistic if the services really are ones that have
17 competitive proximity, such that a real consumer might be
18 out there thinking, Gee, should I use DarkOwl or should I
19 use ArkOwl or should I use this other one?
20 Like, if that's not the case, then this entire
21 methodology becomes artificial and just unrealistically
22 suggestive and it just becomes kind of a simple, you know,
23 matching game, Did somebody get a notice that there is some
24 kind of similarity here? And say, Okay, yeah, that's --
25 these must be related.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 167 of
181
167
1 Q. Other than the failure to identify a proper
2 universe of respondents and artificial construct for the
3 survey, I believe you identified other flaws unrelated to
4 these issues with the survey. Can you please just briefly
5 describe the other flaws that you identified with the survey
6 that affect its reliability.
7 A. Sure. So I mean, one of them is on top of what
8 we're talking about. The survey introduced DarkOwl's
9 services as, quote, data services, and it also introduced
10 ArkOwl services as, quote, data services. So it's sort of
11 the exacerbating this process by basically telling the
12 respondents these are the same type of service when they're
13 not.
14 And then also, the survey, it's based on a very
15 limited exposure to a web page, and while I don't blame
16 Mr. Kegan for trying to use web pages, because there is not
17 too much you can do in a survey, the reality, these are
18 sophisticated services that require contracting for, you
19 know, something that's expensive and very involved, and it's
20 extremely difficult to simulate that type of consumer
21 experience in a survey. It's certainly very, very difficult
22 to do that realistically when all that's happening is a
23 consumer in a survey is, you know, taking 30 seconds to
24 glance at a web page from which it's going to be really hard
25 to tell what these services really are.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 168 of
181
168
1 So that -- you know, that was another problem.
2 And then another problem is -- with it is the
3 lineup of the web pages that were being shown besides ArkOwl
4 and DarkOwl. They're not -- those also are not really the
5 competitors of DarkOwl, and so it's not really
6 realistically -- realistically representing, you know,
7 marketplace of options.
8 And then the final thing is -- is a very critical
9 one. There is no control group. You know, do you ever hear
10 about a scientific experiment, it's got a test group, the
11 one that tries the medication and a control group that is
12 given a placebo, which is identical, but lacks the
13 medication, this survey did not have a control group. It
14 had one single group. And a really proper likelihood of
15 confusion survey should have a separate control group.
16 So that's one of the other big problems.
17 Q. And you detail these more in your report, correct?
18 A. Yes.
19 MR. BUXBAUM: Thank you, Mr. Poret. I have no
20 further questions. It's your witness.
21 THE COURT: Thank you. Cross-examination?
22 CROSS-EXAMINATION
23 BY MR. FRASIER: :
24 Q. Thank you, Mr. Perot.
25 Mr. Perot, you're not an expert in the cyber
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 169 of
181
169
1 security industry?
2 A. You are correct.
3 Q. You're not an expert in DarkOwl services?
4 A. No.
5 Q. You're not an expert in the dark net, in general?
6 A. I am not.
7 Q. You didn't -- you didn't conduct any survey to
8 determine what people thought of when they heard the phrase
9 "data services," right?
10 A. Right.
11 Q. So it's just your lay opinion that people are
12 likely to think of something that is not DarkOwl when they
13 hear "data services"?
14 A. It's not quite so much that; it's that the phrase
15 "data services" simply is so overbroad that there is no way
16 to even know what people thought it meant, and there are so
17 many possibilities of what it could mean that are different
18 that we don't have any reliable information about what
19 people meant when they said they use data services.
20 Q. All right. And that was -- that was just based on
21 your personal belief and experience in hearing the phrase
22 "data services"?
23 A. I wouldn't say it's just based on personal
24 experience. It's also based on my professional experience
25 of having done many surveys in all kinds of different
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 170 of
181
170
1 product and service categories, and you know, knowing what
2 language is used to properly nail down a specific type of
3 service.
4 Q. You don't contend that DarkOwl does not offer data
5 services, right?
6 A. I certainly don't contend that their services are
7 unrelated to the -- to data, but I do contend that the term
8 "data services" is potentially very vague, inaccurate, and
9 even misleading as -- as a stand-alone term to apply.
10 Q. You don't contend that data services primarily
11 refers to services that DarkOwl does not perform?
12 A. I do think the term "data services" for the vast
13 majority of people would make them think of something other
14 than what DarkOwl offers, particularly considering that most
15 people are not even aware that a thing, such as DarkOwl
16 exists, because ordinary consumers have no reason to know
17 about and use that kind of service.
18 Q. I'm not sure you answered the question.
19 The question was: You don't contend that data
20 services primarily refers to services that DarkOwl does not
21 perform?
22 A. I think the bucket of things that fall within data
23 services do refer to things other than what -- what DarkOwl
24 does. I think that term encompasses a large category of
25 things, most of which are not what DarkOwl does.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 171 of
181
171
1 Q. All right. On your deposition -- in your
2 deposition, I asked you if -- let me pull up your deposition
3 transcript.
4 I asked you the question:
5 "Is it your opinion that data services primarily
6 refers to services DarkOwl does not perform?"
7 And you responded:
8 "No, I'm not using the term primarily in my
9 opinion. I'm just stating, if you are writing proper
10 screening questions, you need to -- to use terminology that
11 do not leave you guessing as to what the person thought it
12 meant and that you can rely on the answer."
13 So at the time you were not saying that data
14 services primarily refers to something DarkOwl does not
15 refer to?
16 A. I'm not sure I -- I'm not sure I followed that
17 question.
18 Q. It is not your opinion that the term "data
19 services" primarily refers to services that DarkOwl does not
20 perform?
21 A. Well, I think what I was trying to say in my
22 deposition is my primary point about the term "data
23 services" is that it's overly vague, so it doesn't primarily
24 refer to anything.
25 Q. Now, in your report, you did not assume that
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 172 of
181
172
1 DarkOwl services do not fall within the description of user
2 or customer verification services, right?
3 A. I have had a little trouble following that
4 question, but I don't think I made any assumption along
5 those lines.
6 Q. And you're not an expert in user customer
7 verification services?
8 A. No, I'm not an expert in that area.
9 Q. You're not an expert in fraud prevention services?
10 A. No.
11 Q. I believe you testified in your direct that for
12 this type of survey to be valid, there needs to either be
13 direct competition or, at least, enough competitive overlap
14 such that potential customers would likely encounter both
15 marks; is that -- is that accurate?
16 A. That's a fair enough summary.
17 Q. Now, your conclusion that Mr. Kegan did not survey
18 the appropriate universe is based on information given to
19 you by DarkOwl about who their customers are, right?
20 A. It's based, in part -- well, I mean, it's based
21 primarily on my review of the materials relating to DarkOwl
22 that I had access to in connection with this case, which,
23 yes, some of those came from counsel for DarkOwl.
24 MR. FRASIER: Spreadsheet -- I apologize, Your
25 Honor. Did the spreadsheet remain Attorney's Eyes Only?
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 173 of
181
173
1 It's Exhibit 19.
2 MR. BUXBAUM: Yeah, it did.
3 Q. (By Mr. Frasier) Now, on page 8 of your report,
4 the very top, you describe DarkOwl's -- you write: DarkOwl
5 customers include many other types of entities, including
6 governments, law enforcement agencies, and other corporate
7 entities that seek cyber security/intelligence analysis.
8 Do you see that?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. And then you have a footnote to three documents?
11 A. Yes.
12 Q. And those documents were given to you by DarkOwl
13 in response to your request for documents relating to
14 DarkOwl's customers?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. And one of those three documents was what has been
17 marked as Exhibit 19 in this case; is that right?
18 A. Well, I'm sure you can tell from the number, so I
19 have no reason to doubt that if you're saying this is one of
20 those documents.
21 Q. Yeah. And I'm showing you -- I'm showing you what
22 has been marked Exhibit 19. This is one of the documents
23 that DarkOwl provided you to review in determining who their
24 customers are.
25 A. Okay.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 174 of
181
174
1 Q. Do you recall reviewing this document?
2 A. I mean, honestly, it's a little bit hard for me to
3 tell, just from this view, whether this is that document,
4 but it certainly looks consistent with the types of
5 materials that I reviewed.
6 Q. And do you recall clicking through all three tabs
7 on the bottom of Exhibit 12 -- or Exhibit 19?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. And you didn't rely on anything DarkOwl told you
10 about Exhibit 19 in reaching your conclusion?
11 A. I'm not even sure what conclusion you're talking
12 about. But, no, I think it's fair to say I didn't rely on
13 any of that for my analysis. I relied on the explanations
14 that I gave previously.
15 Q. And so to be clear, you're not an expert on
16 whether or not the parties are competitors?
17 A. No, I'm not substantively an expert on that topic.
18 Q. It's -- among other things, it's your opinion that
19 if they are not competitors, this survey approach is not
20 appropriate?
21 A. Yes, that's one of the things, but my position --
22 my opinion about the universe is not reliant on what you
23 just mentioned, because the screening questions simply
24 didn't get at the universe, regardless of whether they're
25 competitors. But you're correct, that I'm not a substantive
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 175 of
181
175
1 expert in the nature of these parties' services. That just
2 is relevant to the -- the valuation of the survey
3 methodology.
4 MR. FRASIER: Okay, thank you. I have no further
5 questions.
6 THE COURT: Thank you. Is there any redirect?
7 MR. BUXBAUM: No redirect, Your Honor.
8 THE COURT: All right, thank you. You may step
9 down.
10 All right. It's quarter to 6:00. Do you want to
11 get started with the final witness, as I understand it, or
12 do you want to defer that to another day for a video
13 presentation?
14 MR. FRASIER: I would prefer to do it all in one
15 chunk, Your Honor, and have not have his testimony broken
16 up.
17 THE COURT: I think that makes sense. Is there
18 any objection to that from plaintiff's counsel?
19 MR. BUXBAUM: No, there is not.
20 THE COURT: All right. So let's talk before we
21 depart about reconvening for purposes of the video testimony
22 of Mr. Kegan; is that right? And he'll be the final witness
23 on either side of this dispute?
24 MR. BUXBAUM: That's right.
25 THE COURT: All right. So give me a ballpark,
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 176 of
181
176
1 maybe how much time you think you might need with Mr. Kegan,
2 both on direct and cross. I know it's difficult, but --
3 MR. FRASIER: I will say a half hour, so maybe we
4 should block off an hour just in case, especially with
5 technology being involved.
6 MR. BUXBAUM: Yeah, I think we can fit it in
7 within an hour.
8 THE COURT: In an hour as well. So we're looking
9 at half a day, is what I'm inclined to do, okay.
10 MR. BUXBAUM: Your Honor, I think an hour will
11 cover both --
12 THE COURT: Both, direct and cost.
13 MR. BUXBAUM: Yes.
14 THE COURT: All right, fair enough. And why don't
15 we start with the witness. Do we -- are there limitations
16 that he has in terms of his availability to testify?
17 MR. FRASIER: So we can compare calendars.
18 Mr. Kegan just actually raised a point that we had prepared
19 his direct based on Your Honor's order about the scope of
20 this hearing. And Mr. Poret's testimony certainly raised
21 issues that were beyond the scope of that. And to the
22 extent we need to address those additional issues, we will
23 need a little bit more time than what we had originally
24 outlined.
25 THE COURT: Well, chances are I'm going to build
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 177 of
181
177
1 in some, you know, additional time to whatever we end up
2 landing on.
3 So I understand what you're saying -- and I think
4 I would be foolish to assume it's only going to take an
5 hour. I think it's likely going to take a little more than
6 that, so I'll build in some extra time whenever we decide.
7 So why don't we start looking at dates, Counsel,
8 and bearing in mind that we have a trial date that is set
9 for some time in June, were you able to locate the trial
10 date?
11 MR. BUXBAUM: June 26.
12 MR. HOLT: Yeah, June 26, Your Honor.
13 THE COURT: All right.
14 MR. BUXBAUM: Pretrial.
15 THE COURT: Yeah.
16 MR. BUXBAUM: Pretrial conference, I think, is
17 25th or something like that.
18 THE COURT: Yeah, I think it's right around that
19 time. Okay. So that means, you know, sooner rather than
20 later, we have to try to wrap this up so the Court can get
21 you an order on this motion prior to the trial. And the
22 order will have to be in writing and so there will have to
23 be some time taken to draft the order.
24 So is there any chance that anybody is available
25 this week, or should we just not even look at the rest of
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 178 of
181
178
1 this week? Is it out of the question?
2 MR. BUXBAUM: We don't need everyone. I mean, the
3 good news is think we only need a smaller subsection.
4 THE COURT: I agree.
5 MR. BUXBAUM: We just need four of us.
6 MR. HOLT: Yeah. Certainly not tomorrow.
7 Thursday or Friday would be preferable.
8 MR. BUXBAUM: Thursday or Friday on our side. Any
9 chance over there?
10 UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: If it's Friday, it would
11 need to be the in the middle of the day. My wife is working
12 so I will have childcare observations.
13 MR. BUXBAUM: What's your availability at the end
14 of this week, Your Honor?
15 THE COURT: I could do it between 10 a.m. and 2
16 p.m. on Friday.
17 MR. BUXBAUM: I'm trying to make it Mountain
18 Central. So 10 a.m. is --
19 UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: 11 Central.
20 THE COURT: That would be 11 to 3:00.
21 MR. BUXBAUM: That would be perfect, Your Honor.
22 11 o'clock on Friday.
23 THE COURT: That work for plaintiff's counsel
24 (indiscernible).
25 UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Yeah, 10 Mountain, 11
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 179 of
181
179
1 Central, noon Eastern.
2 (Confer on scheduling.)
3 THE COURT: I see that that's -- I'm moving it.
4 I'm moving that other matter.
5 All right. So 10 a.m. on Friday, May 19. Now,
6 we're going to do this all by video, Counsel, and the
7 witness will be present by video?
8 MR. FRASIER: That would be preferable.
9 THE COURT: So you'll need to communicate with
10 Ms. Galera to make sure that you have the instructions that
11 you need to get set up on our VTC, which is our video
12 presentation. So you don't have to do that tonight, but
13 you'll need to do that between now and then to make sure
14 that it's set up appropriately.
15 Is there anything else I need to remind counsel of
16 with respect to a video hearing at 10 a.m. on Friday?
17 THE CLERK: I don't think so, Your Honor.
18 THE COURT: That will take care of it.
19 All right, fair enough. So I appreciate counsel's
20 efforts to try to get us through as much of this as we could
21 today. I'll look forward to seeing you again by video at 10
22 a.m. on Friday. And I hear we're going to have four people
23 present by video: The witness, Mr. Frasier and two
24 attorneys for plaintiffs, or three?
25 MR. BUXBAUM: I guess three.
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 180 of
181
180
1 THE COURT: All right. So five people total
2 present by video on Friday for his examination, and
3 cross-examination. Fair enough. I will see you then.
4 Thank you. We're in recess.
5 (Whereupon, the within hearing concluded at 5:50
6 p.m.)
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
Case No. 1:21-cv-02163-KLM Document 72-1 filed 06/06/23 USDC Colorado pg 181 of
181
181
1 TRANSCRIBER'S CERTIFICATE
2 I certify that the foregoing is a correct
3 transcript, to the best of my knowledge and belief (pursuant
4 to the quality of the recording) from the record of
5 proceedings in the above-entitled matter.
6
7 /s/Dyann Labo May 26, 2023
8 Signature of Transcriber Date
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
PATTERSON TRANSCRIPTION COMPANY
scheduling@pattersontranscription.com
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cod.208879.72.1.pdf
- Size
- 723,387 bytes
- SHA-256
- d305465dc9768bfada0ec698b35c14660b5099cdb78a1678a90adc8d41452faa
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.cod.208879.72.1.pdf
- Original
- www.courtlistener.com