Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Declaration of Brendan Clarke in Support of Class Certification

Declaration of Brendan Clarke in Support of Class Certification

Date
2023-04-28

Full text

EXHIBIT 16
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA   Document 559-18   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/28/2023   Page 1 of 4

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/DAMIAN

This Document Relates to the Federal Securities Tranche
DECLARATION OF BRENDAN CLARKE IN SUPPORT OF CLASS CERTIFICATION

I, Brendan Clarke, declare as follows:
1.
I respectfully submit this declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ motion for class
certification.  I have personal knowledge of the statements herein and if called upon as a witness,
could and would competently testify hereto.
2.
I am currently serving as a named Plaintiff in the above-captioned action (the
“Action”), a securities class action asserting market manipulation claims against Robinhood
Markets, Inc. and two of its wholly owned subsidiaries, Robinhood Financial, LLC and
Robinhood Securities, LLC (collectively, “Robinhood”).
3.
I understand that the Action alleges that Robinhood imposed trading restrictions,
including turning off the buy button, for a number of securities including common stock in AMC
Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (“AMC”), Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (“BBBY”), BlackBerry Ltd.
(“BB”), Express Inc. (“EXPR”), GameStop Corp. (“GME”), Koss Corp. (“KOSS”), Tootsie Roll
Industries Inc. (“TR”), and American Depositary Shares of foreign-issuers Nokia Corp. (“NOK”)
and trivago N.V. (“TRVG”) (these nine collectively, the “Affected Stocks”) between January 28,
2021 and February 4, 2021.  The Action alleges that Robinhood restricted the Affected Stocks

In re: JANUARY 2021 SHORT SQUEEZE
TRADING LITIGATION

DocuSign Envelope ID: A1A5D2AD-BC16-4462-AC3C-CAED900F85C4
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA   Document 559-18   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/28/2023   Page 2 of 4

2

because Robinhood did not have sufficient liquidity to meet its collateral requirements, but did
not disclose the reason for its restrictions.  Robinhood’s restrictions caused the prices of the
Affected Stocks to fall.  I believe the Action is meritorious.
4.
In connection with Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, I am now moving to
serve as a Court-appointed Class Representative.  I understand that if appointed as a Class
Representative, I would represent not only myself, but also the proposed Class consisting of all
persons or entities who held shares of the Affected Stocks as of the close of trading on January
27, 2021, and sold any such shares between January 28, 2021, and February 4, 2021.
5.
I understand that Court-appointed Lead Plaintiff Blue Laine-Beveridge, and the
other named plaintiffs, Abraham Huacuja, Ava Bernard, Brian Harbison, Cecilia Rivas, Doi
Nguyen, Joseph Gurney, Marcel Poirier, Sandy Ng, Santiago Gil Bohórquez, and Thomas Cash
are also seeking to be Class Representatives.  If appointed, we will all serve as Class
Representatives.
6.
I understand that if appointed as a Class Representative, I have a fiduciary duty to
act in the interests of all other investors who are members of the Class.  As such, I am committed
to vigorously prosecuting this Action on behalf of the Class, and to at all times exercising my
good faith and sound judgment to seek a recovery that is fair and beneficial for the Class.
7.
To date, I have participated in this Action by, among other things, reaching out to
The Rosen Law Firm (“Lead Counsel”) to join the action, communicating by phone and email
with Lead Counsel, reviewing and approving pleadings and otherwise monitoring the progress
and status of the Action, joining periodic group calls with the other proposed Class
Representatives and Lead Counsel to discuss the progress of the litigation, collecting and
producing documents to Defendants, and sitting for my deposition on March 24, 2023.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A1A5D2AD-BC16-4462-AC3C-CAED900F85C4
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA   Document 559-18   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/28/2023   Page 3 of 4

3

8.
Based on my involvement in this Action, I believe that The Rosen Law Firm
possesses the necessary expertise and resources to prosecute this Action effectively, and that The
Rosen Law Firm has thus far prosecuted this Action effectively – including by drafting a
pleading that survived Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
9.
Should I be appointed as a Class Representative, I will fulfill my fiduciary duty to
the Class and continue to work with Lead Counsel to make sure that the Class continues to
receive the best possible representation so as to ensure the success of this lawsuit.
10.
If appointed as a Class Representative, I will continue to participate in this Action
to keep informed of its status and progress, the strengths and weaknesses of the case, and the
prospects for settlement.  I will continue to consult with Lead Counsel with respect to significant
developments in this Action.  I will perform all of these duties mindful of my responsibility of
serving what I, in good faith and in consultation with Lead Counsel, believe to be the best
interests of the Class.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on __________________

______________________________

BRENDAN CLARKE

DocuSign Envelope ID: A1A5D2AD-BC16-4462-AC3C-CAED900F85C4
4/20/2023
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA   Document 559-18   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/28/2023   Page 4 of 4

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.559.18.pdf
Size
206,282 bytes
SHA-256
f5c2746044f61f3816e06c18e5131b1b3d6722ade93144ce41062dfb7cc30c3e
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.559.18.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top