Kneleeta Armstrong, Opposing HB58 (Lash Extensions)

Summary

Kneleeta Armstrong, a licensed Advanced Esthetics Instructor, opposed HB58, which would remove lash extensions from the esthetics scope of practice. The testimony says that, if it passed, unlicensed lash techs would be able to perform services on the public, putting the public at great risk.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Kneleeta Armstrong, Opposing HB58 (Lash Extensions).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2023-04-18-commerce-labor-testimony-armstrong-oppo-test-4db96ff0ba/, SHA-256 19ce99a2f17cafb2812e9e110030c524f64ecf0a9b9549e1857130d2c0732290.

Full text

Kneleeta Armstrong’s Wri en Tes mony in Opposi on to HB58



I am a licensed Advanced Esthe cs Instructor and I am opposing HB58 because removing lash extensions
from the esthe cs scope of prac ce will put the public at great risk for lack of safety. If passed,
unlicensed lash techs would be able to perform services on the public with li le or no knowledge of
sanita on and contraindica ons.

File and source

File: 2023-04-18_commerce-labor_testimony_armstrong-oppo-test.pdf
Size: 209,403 bytes
SHA-256: 19ce99a2f17cafb2812e9e110030c524f64ecf0a9b9549e1857130d2c0732290
Our copy: 2023-04-18_commerce-labor_testimony_armstrong-oppo-test.pdf
Original: No public link identified.