Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Megan Davis House Bill 58 Proponent Testimony

Megan Davis House Bill 58 Proponent Testimony

Summary

Written proponent testimony of Megan Davis of Toledo, OH, addressed to Chairman Johnson, Vice-Chair Manchester, Ranking Member McNally and members of the House Commerce and Labor Committee, in favor of House Bill 58. Davis states that the cosmetology curriculum does not include instruction for African-American textured hair, including locking, braiding, twisting, or natural hair care. The testimony says braiding is safe because practitioners do not use dyes, straighteners or other chemicals. It urges the committee to amend the bill, saying Ohio uses both a 450-hour specialty license for "natural hair stylists" and registration as a boutique service provider.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Issuer
Congressional materials
Document type
2023 03 28 Commerce Labor Testimony Megan Davis Hb58 Pro Test
Date
2023-03-28
Case
2023 03 28 Commerce Labor Testimony Megan Davis Hb58 Pro Test

Cite this document

“Megan Davis House Bill 58 Proponent Testimony.” Dated 2023-03-28. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2023-03-28-2023-03-28-commerce-labor-testimony-megan-davis-hb58-pro-test/, SHA-256 8e5f88da3faea4118c57a7aaf5b9b7faa7169545755cdd48b96ecdbc7f27b924.

Full text

Megan Davis House Bill 58 Proponent Testimony


Chairman Johnson, Vice-Chair Manchester, Ranking Member McNally and members of the
House Commerce and Labor Committee. Thank you for the opportunity to testify today on
House Bill 58.

My name is Megan Davis from Toledo, OH and I am in favor of HB 58.

I’m an African American wife and mother of 7 and I have an adult disabled child with multiple
disabilities and is aged out of many community programs, therefore I’m her primary caregiver.

Although I have attended a cosmetology school, I was unable to complete it due to the
excessive hour requirements and having to provide care for my daughter. The curriculum does
not include instruction, for African-American textured hair to include locking, braiding, twisting,
or natural hair care. There is also a lack of diversity in instructors and a lack in cultural inclusion
in cosmetology in general. Over the years, the Ohio Board has not changed the curriculum nor
do they require any of these techniques or skills to be licensed in this state. The other boutique
services they are challenging are also not a part of the curriculum or state tested licensing
requirements.

Further, the Board does not require tanning practitioners or tattoo and piercing artists to
complete any formal training or sanitation and laws and rules to operate chemicals and body
altering tools; and in Ohio, you can become a licensed practical nurse, in fewer hours and for a
similar amount of tuition for a secure career.

What I do was taught to me by other women who looked like me and took time to share the
techniques and tools to manage and style my own hair and hair like mine. The opposition of this
bill is has a direct impact on African American and Minority, Women Owned business in Ohio.

I support HB 58 for these additional reasons:

 Braiding is safe. It does not need to be regulated because practitioners do not use dyes,
straighteners or other chemicals. It poses no risks that consumers cannot manage themselves.

 Braiding provides a vehicle for individuals to engage in their own economic advancement. It
allows Ohioans to start, operate and own their own businesses. And provide for their families,
especially in challenging circumstances such as caregiving which is increasing in our
communities post COVID.

 The bill moves Ohio's regulation of braiders in the right direction. It repeals unnecessary
requirements. It also promotes economic liberty.

In conclusion, I urge the committee to not just go further, but to see this through. The
committee should amend the bill to remedy the problems that arise from the fact that Ohio has
the nation's most complicated licensing regime for braiders. Specifically, Ohio uses both (a) an
unnecessary 450-hour specialty license for "natural hair stylists" and (b) registration as a
boutique service provider.
Please work with us to simplify Ohio's current regulations, and at this time I will answer any
questions the Committee may have.


File and source

File
2023-03-28_commerce-labor_testimony_megan-davis-hb58-pro-test.pdf
Size
254,232 bytes
SHA-256
8e5f88da3faea4118c57a7aaf5b9b7faa7169545755cdd48b96ecdbc7f27b924
Our copy
2023-03-28_commerce-labor_testimony_megan-davis-hb58-pro-test.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top