Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents OHC Economic Impact Testimony — House Workforce and Economic Development Committee

OHC Economic Impact Testimony — House Workforce and Economic Development Committee

Summary

Proponent testimony of Steve Smith, Principal with The Model Group, before the House Workforce and Economic Development Committee on House Bill 3, with an economic and fiscal impact analysis commissioned by Ohio Housing Council (OHC). The testimony states that HB 3 is projected to yield approximately 4,325 new affordable housing units annually, for a total of 25,950 new units over the 6 years of the program. It states that construction would create 11,550 jobs in each year of the program, totaling 69,300 jobs, and that tax revenue to state, county, and local governments would total nearly $3.9 billion.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“OHC Economic Impact Testimony — House Workforce and Economic Development Committee.” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2023-03-14-econ-workforce-dev-testimony-testimony-920-d468df04da/, SHA-256 e7555a730c7c727cf8abb90283c14bf9f849c0a0a5f1574b6fbd3a56c37d48b4.

Full text

 P.O. Box 12266

 Columbus OH 43212

 P: (614) 221-6567

 F:(614) 488-8526

                                      OHC Economic Impact Testimony




Chairman Swearingen, Vice Chairman Santucci, Ranking Member Upchurch, and members of the House
Workforce and Economic Development Committee, thank you for the opportunity to provide proponent
testimony on House Bill 3.


My name is Steve Smith, Principal with The Model Group based out of Cincinnati and we have worked
throughout Ohio, Kentucky and Indiana for over 40 years. The mission of our company is to Positively
Transform Communities, and we do that through neighborhood revitalization and high impact affordable
housing with non-profit owners and service providers.


In addition, Model Group has served on the Executive Committee of Ohio Housing Council (OHC) for many
years.


The OHC is a statewide membership organization of housing professionals committed to increasing and
preserving affordable housing throughout Ohio. We represent not-for-profit developers, for-profit developers,
investors, and service providers throughout the housing industry.


In preparation for the discussion about a state workforce housing tax credit, OHC commissioned Elliott D.
Pollack & Company, a well-respected economic consulting firm with deep experience in real estate and
housing, to do an economic and fiscal impact analysis of the proposal.


Elliott D. Pollack & Company used data from the Ohio Housing Finance Authority, the US Census Bureau, and
their vast knowledge of the impact of housing tax credits in other states for their study. Using the IMPLAN
model, their analysis focused on the construction impacts as well as the ongoing operations including direct
expenditures by the residents.
Before I share the summary of the workforce housing credit impacts for Ohio, let me share with you a very
brief summary of how this tax credit would pair seamlessly with an existing federal tax credit program. Born
out of the Reagan Administration Tax Reform of 1986, the federal affordable housing credit is an indirect
federal subsidy used to finance the construction and rehabilitation of income-restricted affordable rental
housing. The Reagan Administration created this as an incentive for private developers and private investors to
provide more affordable housing to fill the gap existing in the market. Without the incentive, affordable rental
housing projects do not generate sufficient profit to warrant the investment.


The tax credit gives investors (typically large banks and insurance companies) a dollar-for-dollar reduction in
their federal tax liability in exchange for providing financing to develop affordable rental housing. The investors
contribute equity into the housing development, thus allowing some units to rent at below-market rates. In
return, investors receive tax credits paid in annual allotments, generally over 10 years.


The figures in the study are based on Ohio’s historical experience with low-income housing developments.
Average construction costs, square footage and rents were gathered from Ohio industry data but align with
experiences in other states.


I have included the full economic analysis as part of my written testimony, but I would like to highlight a few of
the significant impacts that enacting HB 3 will produce:


    •   HB 3 is projected to yield approximately 4,325 new affordable housing units annually, for a total of
        25,950 new units over the 6 years of the program.


    •   Construction of the new housing units will lead to the creation of 11,550 jobs in each and every year of
        the program, totaling 69,300 jobs over a 6-year period.


    •   These jobs will pay $4.8 billion in wages, and provide over $10 billion in construction-related economic
        activity throughout the state.


    •   Housing unit operations and new resident spending in the economy will also create 2,365 permanent
        jobs and over $108 million in annual wages.


    •   In total, new construction, property operations, and additional resident spending will create over
        $24.7 billion in economic activity over the course of construction and 30 years of operations.
    •   Most significantly, HB 3 would produce a net plus in generating tax revenues in Ohio. In total,
        construction and operating tax revenues of the program to be created by HB 3 would total nearly $3.9
        billion in tax revenue to state, county, and local governments.


Twenty-two other states have some version of a state affordable housing tax credit. We know from direct
experience in those states that workforce housing is a proven driver of economic development, job creation,
and tax revenue. Successful outcomes in other states clearly demonstrate that state credit programs make
good policy and business sense.


Passage of HB 3 would not only stabilize vulnerable households, and thereby relieve pressure on other social
systems, but would also open the door to significant federal resources and allow leveraging of substantial
private equity investment to meet Ohio’s unmet housing needs. Not only that, but as our economic study
outlines, housing development creates jobs, stimulates economic growth, and boosts state and local tax
revenues.


Thank you, Chairman Swearingen, Vice Chairman Santucci, Ranking Member Upchurch, and members of the
committee for the opportunity to provide testimony on House Bill 3 and I urge your swift passage of this
important legislation.


I am happy to answer any questions.


                                                      ###


File and source

File
2023-03-14_econ-workforce-dev_testimony_testimony-920.pdf
Size
154,909 bytes
SHA-256
e7555a730c7c727cf8abb90283c14bf9f849c0a0a5f1574b6fbd3a56c37d48b4
Our copy
2023-03-14_econ-workforce-dev_testimony_testimony-920.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top