The Honorable Doug O'Donnell, Internal Revenue Service — Committee on Small Business (February 22, 2023)
Summary
Doug O’Donnell, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the addressee of a February 22, 2023 letter from the Committee on Small Business about the agency's implementation of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, and Executive Order 13272. The letter states that the Office of Advocacy in the Small Business Administration noted on May 23, 2022 that the agency failed to provide a valid factual basis for its certification of the Required Minimum Distributions rule. The Committee requests documents and information by March 10, 2023.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“The Honorable Doug O'Donnell, Internal Revenue Service — Committee on Small Business (February 22, 2023).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2023-02-22-housesbc-majority-to-irs-02-22-2023-letter-to-irs-re-rfa-d82a0192b7/
, SHA-256 52b67be557df6f3fcb1a9f55e35d2032ed637f049100414f7f95ad3171981be3.Full text
February 22, 2023
The Honorable Doug O’Donnell
Commissioner
Internal Revenue Service
999 North Capitol St. N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20002
Dear Commissioner O’Donnell:
The Committee on Small Business is investigating the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS)
implementation of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA), and Executive Order 13272 (EO13272).1 We write today
to request documents and information related to our investigation.
As you know, the RFA, SBREFA, and EO13272 were designed to provide small
businesses notice of proposed agency rules that affected their business and provide them the
opportunity to participate in the process.2 Despite this stated goal, it seems that some agencies
are failing to properly implement these measures to the detriment of small businesses across the
country. In fact, your agency received a letter from the Office of Advocacy (Advocacy) in the
Small Business Administration (SBA) on May 23, 2022 noting that your agency failed to provide
a valid factual basis for your certification of the Required Minimum Distributions rule.3
Agencies across the federal government are provided discretion when determining a
regulation’s impact on the small businesses. Agencies are required to produce an IRFA in
proposed rules only after the agency determines the proposed rule is expected to have a
“significant impact” on a “substantial number of small entities.”4 If not, the agency simply
certifies the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities and provides a “factual basis for such certification.”5 That certification is published in the
1
5 U.S.C.§§ 601-12; Pub. L. No. 104-121 (Mar. 29, 1996); Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency
Rulemaking, 67 Fed. Reg. 53,461 (Aug. 16, 2002).
2
5 U.S.C.§§ 601-12.
3
Letter from Major L. Clark, III, Deputy Chief Counsel, and Meagan Singer, Asst. Chief Counsel, Office of
Advocacy, U.S. Small Bus. Admin., to Doug O’Donnell, Commissioner, Internal Revenue Serv. (May 23, 2022),
available at https://cdn.advocacy.sba.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/24094737/Comment-Letter-IRS-Required-
Minimum-Distributions-5-23-22.pdf.
4
5 U.S.C. § 603(a).
5
5 U.S.C. § 603(b).
The Honorable Doug O’Donnell
February 22, 2023
Page 2 of 4
Federal Register and reported to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy at SBA at the time the
proposed or final rule is published for public comment.6
If the agency determines that the proposed rule will have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities, section 212 of SBREFA requires agencies to publish one or
more small entity compliance guides for each rule, or group of rules.7 Additionally, in the final
rule, the agency needs to publish a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) that includes
but is not limited to “a description of and an estimate of the number of small entities to which the
rule will apply or an explanation of why no such estimate is available.”8
Small businesses across America deserve to know how the IRS is working to consider
small businesses in their rulemaking process. We therefore request the following documents and
information, as soon as possible but no later than March 10, 2023:
1. Identify any central IRS position or office, if one exists, responsible for ensuring that IRS
complies with the RFA, SBREFA, and EO13272.
2. Identify any IRS positions or offices responsible for reducing the regulatory burden on
small businesses.
3. Provide all small entity compliance guides produced or in use at the agency within the
last calendar year.
4. Provide the agency’s definition of “significant impact” and “substantial number of small
entities” from 2010 until present, including any and all changes over that time and the
justifications for those changes.
5. Provide the name, docket number, and citation of all rules, proposed and final, that that
the agency certified as having no significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities from 2020 to present.
6. All documents and communications relating to the agency’s determination of whether
there was a “significant impact” on a “substantial number of small entities” for all
proposed and final rules from 2020 until present.
7. All documents and communications detailing any and all factors the agency considers
when determining whether the proposed rule will have a “significant impact” on a
“substantial number of small entities” and the weight of each factor given in the
determination.
6
Id.
7
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, Pub. L. 104-121, § 212 (as amended by the Small Business
and Work Opportunity Act of 2007, Pub. L. 110-28 § 8302).
8
5 U.S.C. § 604(a)(4).
The Honorable Doug O’Donnell
February 22, 2023
Page 3 of 4
8. All documents and communications relating to consideration of alternate rule proposals
when the agency has determined a proposed or final rule has a substantial impact on a
substantial number of small entities from 2020 until present.
9. All documents and communications relating to instances where input from mandated
SBREFA panels compelled the agency to amend a proposed rule, with supporting
documents, from 2020 to present.
10. All documents and communications relating to the standards the agency uses to
determine its “factual basis” to support a determination that a proposed rule would not
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small businesses.
To schedule the delivery of responsive documents or ask any related follow-up questions,
please contact Committee on Small Business Majority Staff at (202) 225-5821. The Committee
on Small Business has broad authority to investigate “problems of all types of small business”
under House Rule X. Thank you in advance for your cooperation with this inquiry.
Sincerely,
_________________________ _________________________
Roger Williams Blaine Luetkemeyer
Chairman Vice Chairman
Committee on Small Business Committee on Small Business
_________________________ _________________________
Beth Van Duyne Pete Stauber
Chairman Member of Congress
Subcommittee on Oversight, Committee on Small Business
Investigations, and Regulations
_________________________ _________________________
Dan Meuser Jake Ellzey
Member of Congress Member of Congress
Committee on Small Business Committee on Small Business
The Honorable Doug O’Donnell
February 22, 2023
Page 4 of 4
_________________________ _________________________
Marc Molinaro Aaron Bean
Member of Congress Member of Congress
Committee on Small Business Committee on Small Business
_________________________
Nick LaLota
Member of Congress
Committee on Small Business
cc: The Honorable Nydia M. Velasquez, Ranking Member
Committee on Small Business
The Honorable Dean Phillips, Vice Ranking Member
Committee on Small Business
File and source
- File
- 2023-02-22_HouseSBC-Majority-to-irs_02-22-2023-letter-to-irs-re-rfa.pdf
- Size
- 168,500 bytes
- SHA-256
- 52b67be557df6f3fcb1a9f55e35d2032ed637f049100414f7f95ad3171981be3
- Original
- No public link identified.