Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Complaint (2023-01-27) — Golden Entertainment PA, Inc. v. Small Business Administration

Complaint (2023-01-27) — Golden Entertainment PA, Inc. v. Small Business Administration

Issuer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Document type
Complaint
Date
2023-01-27
Case
Plaintiff, v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,
Case number
22-1731

Source document: Complaint (2023-01-27) — Golden Entertainment PA, Inc. v. Small Business Administration; document type: Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief.

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT PA, INC.,
1405 Old Oxford Road, Suite G
Durham, NC 27704,

Plaintiff,

v.

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,
409 3rd Street, SW
Washington, DC 20416,

ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN,
Administrator, Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, SW
Washington, DC 20416,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 22-1731 (JDB)

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
Plaintiff Golden Entertainment PA, Inc. (“Golden Entertainment PA” or the “Company”),
by and through its attorneys, alleges and states as follows:
INTRODUCTION
1.
This is an action under the Mandamus statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1361, the Administrative
Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706, and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201
and 2202, seeking emergency federal financial assistance unlawfully withheld by Defendants
Small Business Administration (“SBA”) and its Administrator, Isabella Casillas Guzman.
2.
The Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act, as
amended, 15 U.S.C. § 9009a, established the Shuttered Venue Operators Grant (“SVOG”) Program
to provide emergency financial assistance to eligible businesses, including motion picture theater
Case 1:22-cv-01731-JDB     Document 17     Filed 01/27/23     Page 1 of 10

2
operators, impacted by the global COVID-19 pandemic.  The SVOG Program is administered by
the SBA and Administrator Casillas Guzman.
3.
Golden Entertainment MN, Inc. opened a motion picture theater in October 2019
in Dubois, Pennsylvania.
4.
Beginning in early spring 2020, unprecedented pandemic-related government
restrictions substantially impacted Golden Entertainment MN, Inc.’s business and the business at
the newly opened Dubois, Pennsylvania location, which was forced to shut down due to local
restrictions.  The revenues for the Dubois, Pennsylvania location alone dropped between the fourth
quarter of 2019 (when the theater opened) by over 90% as compared to the fourth quarter of 2020.
5.
On April 20, 2021, Golden Entertainment MN, Inc., spun-off the Dubois,
Pennsylvania location into a wholly owned subsidiary (Golden Entertainment PA, Inc.) and
obtained an Employer Identification Number (“EIN”) for Plaintiff Golden Entertainment PA that
was separate from the EIN for its parent corporation, Golden Entertainment MN, Inc.
6.
Relying on SBA guidance, Plaintiff Golden Entertainment PA filed an application
for an SVOG award of $623,443.42 on April 26, 2021, using the 2019 earned revenues of the prior
owner (Golden Entertainment MN, Inc.).  See Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) No. 84 (Oct. 20,
2021),
https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/2021-10/10-20-
21%20SVOG%20FAQ%20FINAL_508_final.pdf (stating that if ownership was transferred that
the new owner could use revenues reported by the prior owner to prove eligibility).
7.
The SBA denied Golden Entertainment PA’s application and its appeal, giving no
reason for the initial denial and providing an incorrect conclusory statement with the appeal
denial—that the Dubois, Pennsylvania theater was not eligible because it was not fully operational
on February 29, 2020.  The Dubois, Pennsylvania theater in fact was in full operation on that date.
Case 1:22-cv-01731-JDB     Document 17     Filed 01/27/23     Page 2 of 10

3
8.
On December 7, 2022, after Golden Entertainment PA filed this action, the SBA
reversed its denial and sent Golden Entertainment PA a notice stating that it would be awarded
$140,285.57 in SVOG funds.  Golden Entertainment signed and returned the award document.
However, as of this filing, Golden Entertainment PA has not received these funds.
9.
Further, the award notice did not provide all the relief that Golden Entertainment
PA sought and did not explain the reason for an award that was $483,157.85 less than Golden
Entertainment PA requested and for which it demonstrated eligibility.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
10.
This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to the Mandamus statute, 28
U.S.C. § 1361, and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 because it presents federal questions under the APA.
11.
Venue lies in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e)(1).
12.
This Court has authority to issue declaratory and injunctive relief under 5 U.S.C.
§ 706 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1361, 2201 and 2202.
PARTIES
13.
Plaintiff Golden Entertainment PA, Inc. is the operator of a motion picture theater
in Dubois, Pennsylvania.  The theater was opened by Golden Entertainment MN, Inc. in October
2019.  On April 20, 2021, Golden Entertainment MN, Inc. spun-off Plaintiff Golden Entertainment
PA, Inc. into a wholly owned subsidiary with a separate EIN.
14.
Defendant Small Business Administration is an independent agency of the federal
government.  The SBA’s mission is to help Americans start, build, and grow businesses.
15.
Defendant Isabella Casillas Guzman is the Administrator of the SBA and oversees
its operations.  Administrator Casillas Guzman is sued in her official capacity.
Case 1:22-cv-01731-JDB     Document 17     Filed 01/27/23     Page 3 of 10

4
BACKGROUND
A.
Shuttered Venue Operators Grant Program
16.
The Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act (the
“Act”), signed into law December 27, 2020, included $15 billion for grants to operators of
shuttered venues, including motion picture theaters.  Pub. L. No. 116-260 § 324.  The American
Rescue Plan, enacted March 11, 2021, amended the Act by providing an additional $1,249,500,000
for SVOG awards.  Pub. L. No. 117-2 § 5005(a).
17.
SVOG awards may be used for specified business expenses, including payroll, rent,
and utility payments, that are incurred between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021.  15 U.S.C.
§ 9009a(d)(1)(A)(i).
18.
An eligible entity may receive a SVOG award in an amount equal to 45% of its
gross earned revenue in 2019 up to a maximum award of $10 million.  15 U.S.C. § 9009a(c).  For
entities “that began operations after January 1, 2019,” the entity may receive an initial SVOG
award in “the amount equal to the product obtained by multiplying—(aa) the average monthly
gross earned revenue for each full month during which the eligible person or entity was in
operation during 2019; by (bb) 6.”  Id. § 9009a(c)(1)(A)(i)(II).
19.
Eligible entities under the Act include motion picture theater operators, live venue
operators, as well as talent representatives, live performing arts organization operators, theatrical
producers, live venue promoters, and museum operators.  15 U.S.C. § 9009a(a)(1)(A).
20.
In addition to falling within an eligible business category, to qualify for a SVOG
award a business must meet general eligibility criteria including, inter alia, that the business was
fully operational on February 29, 2020, suffered at least a 25% reduction of gross earned revenue
during at least one quarter of 2020 as compared to 2019, and has reopened or intends to reopen.
Case 1:22-cv-01731-JDB     Document 17     Filed 01/27/23     Page 4 of 10

5
15 U.S.C. § 9009a(a)(1)(A).  The Act lists a number of characteristics that would render an entity
ineligible, including, inter alia, issuance of securities on a national securities exchange or
presenting live performances of a prurient sexual nature.  Id. § 9009a(a)(1)(A)(vi), 9009a(a)(1)(B).
B.
 Golden Entertainment PA’s Award Request and SBA’s Denial
21.
On April 26, 2021, Golden Entertainment PA applied for a SVOG award of
$623,443.42, an amount calculated pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 9009a.
22.
In its application, Golden Entertainment PA demonstrated that the Company
satisfied the eligibility criteria for a SVOG award.  The Company demonstrated that its losses in
2020 exceeded the 25% statutory threshold for 2019 and 2020.  Indeed, the revenues for the
Dubois, Pennsylvania location between the fourth quarter of 2019, when the theater opened,
dropped by over 90% as compared to the fourth quarter of 2020.  Golden Entertainment PA also
provided the certifications of eligibility required by the SBA’s guidance on SVOG applications.
23.
On August 27, 2021, Golden Entertainment PA learned from the SBA’s portal that
its application was denied.  The portal’s notice gave no explanation for the SBA’s denial.
24.
In September 2021, Golden Entertainment PA submitted an administrative appeal
to the SBA.
25.
Golden Entertainment PA’s appeal explained in detail and with supporting
documentation how the Company meets each of the general eligibility requirements for a SVOG
award and each of the specific eligibility requirements for a motion picture theater operator.  The
Company provided documentation that the Dubois, Pennsylvania theater has (1) at least one
auditorium that includes a motion picture screen and fixed audience seating; (2) a projection booth
or space containing not less than one motion picture projector; (3) a paid ticket charge to attend
Case 1:22-cv-01731-JDB     Document 17     Filed 01/27/23     Page 5 of 10

6
exhibition of motion pictures; and (4) motion picture exhibitions that are marketed through
showtime listings.
26.
On November 19, 2021, the SBA notified Golden Entertainment PA by email that
its appeal was denied.  The email listed a standard set of the reasons an appeal could be denied
based on the SVOG Eligibility Matrix, and stated that Golden Entertainment PA’s appeal was
declined “at least in part” based on reasons 1 and 14.  Reason 1 is listed as “[n]ot fully operational
on February 29, 2020.”  Reason 14 is listed as “[i]ncomplete application.”
27.
Golden Entertainment PA filed this action for judicial review on June 16, 2022,
alleging that the SBA’s denial of its application and appeal was arbitrary and capricious, contrary
to law, and unsupported by substantial evidence in violation of the APA.
28.
On December 7, 2022, the SBA reversed its denial and issued Golden
Entertainment PA an award notice for $140,285.57 in SVOG funds.  Defendants then filed a motion
to dismiss before the money was actually disbursed to Plaintiff.
29.
On December 29, 2022, Golden Entertainment PA signed and returned the award
document.
30.
Golden Entertainment PA has yet to receive the $140,285.57.
31.
The award of $140,285.57 is $483,157.85 less than that Golden Entertainment PA
had requested in its application.
32.
The SBA’s award of $140,285.57 in SVOG funds, the SBA’s failure to disburse
the $140,285.57 in funds, and the SBA’s denial of the additional $483,157.85 Golden Entertain
PA sought constitute final agency action.
Case 1:22-cv-01731-JDB     Document 17     Filed 01/27/23     Page 6 of 10

7
CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
33.
The courts recognize a strong presumption favoring judicial review of
administrative action.
34.
The APA provides that “[a] person suffering legal wrong because of agency action,
or adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is
entitled to judicial review thereof.”  5 U.S.C. § 702.
35.
The APA provides that “final agency action for which there is no other adequate
remedy in a court” is “subject to judicial review.”  5 U.S.C. § 704.
36.
The APA provides that courts will “hold unlawful and set aside” agency action that
is “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law” or
“unsupported by substantial evidence.”  5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A) and (E), respectively.
37.
The SBA is an “agency” whose final actions are reviewable under the APA.
COUNT I—MANDAMUS
38.
Golden Entertainment PA realleges and incorporates by reference each of the
preceding paragraphs and allegations.
39.
The Court has power under the Mandamus statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1361, and the APA,
5 U.S.C. § 706(1), to compel agency action unlawfully withheld.
40.
Golden Entertainment PA’s right to the $140,285.57 in SVOG funds that the SBA
awarded is clear and indisputable, and the SBA is in clear violation of its duty to fund the award.
41.
Golden Entertainment PA has no adequate alternative remedy.  Money damages are
unavailable.
42.
The Court should issue an order directing Defendants to fund Golden Entertainment
PA’s SVOG award of $140,285.57.
Case 1:22-cv-01731-JDB     Document 17     Filed 01/27/23     Page 7 of 10

8
COUNT II—ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS AGENCY ACTION
43.
Golden Entertainment PA realleges and incorporates by reference each of the
preceding paragraphs and allegations.
44.
A basic requirement of administrative law is that an agency must explain the
reasoning behind its decisions.  However, the SBA gave Golden Entertainment PA no reason
whatsoever for (1) issuing an award notice in the amount of $140,285.57, but not disbursing the
funds, or (2) issuing an award notice for $483,157.85 less than Golden Entertainment PA
demonstrated eligibility.
45.
The SBA’s failure to disburse funds in the amount of $140,285.57 and denial of the
full amount of Golden Entertainment PA’s SVOG award request are arbitrary and capricious.
COUNT III—AGENCY ACTION CONTRARY TO LAW
46.
Golden Entertainment PA realleges and incorporates by reference each of the
preceding paragraphs and allegations.
47.
Golden Entertainment PA satisfies the Act’s eligibility criteria for a SVOG award
in the requested amount of $623,443.42 as a motion picture theater operator.
48.
The SBA’s SVOG award notice of only about 22% of the amount for which Golden
Entertainment PA demonstrated eligibility violated the Act and is contrary to law.
COUNT IV—AGENCY DECISION UNSUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
49.
Golden Entertainment PA realleges and incorporates by reference each of the
preceding paragraphs and allegations.
50.
The SBA’s award of only $140,285.57 in SVOG funds, $483,157.85 less than that
requested by Golden Entertainment PA, is supported by no evidence in the record, let alone
substantial evidence.  Golden Entertainment PA’s application presented evidence demonstrating
Case 1:22-cv-01731-JDB     Document 17     Filed 01/27/23     Page 8 of 10

9
the Company’s eligibility for a SVOG award in the full amount Golden Entertainment PA
requested.
51.
The SBA’s denial of the full amount of SVOG funds Golden Entertainment PA
requested is thus unsupported by any evidence, much less substantial evidence.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF

For the foregoing reasons, Golden Entertainment PA respectfully requests that this Court:
1.
Order Defendants to fund Golden Entertainment PA’s SVOG award of
$140,285.57.
2.
Declare unlawful and set aside Defendants’ denial of the Company’s request for
SVOG award funds totaling $623,443.42.
3.
Preliminarily and permanently order Defendants to reconsider the SVOG award
amount consistent with applicable law and the evidence before the SBA.
4.
Preliminarily and permanently order Defendants to award Golden Entertainment
PA a total of $623,443.42 in SVOG funds.
5.
Preliminarily and permanently order Defendants to award Golden Entertainment
PA $311,721.71 in supplemental SVOG funds.
6.
Award Plaintiff its costs and reasonable attorney fees; and
7.
Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Dated January 27, 2023

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Caroline L. Wolverton

Angela B. Styles
D.C. Bar No. 448397
Caroline L. Wolverton
D.C. Bar No. 496433
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
2001 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
Case 1:22-cv-01731-JDB     Document 17     Filed 01/27/23     Page 9 of 10

10
(202) 887-4000
Counsel for Golden Entertainment PA, Inc.
Case 1:22-cv-01731-JDB     Document 17     Filed 01/27/23     Page 10 of 10

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.dcd.244500.17.0.pdf
Size
465,150 bytes
SHA-256
cf420fe3bf0639322f2dc9aa45635d91fac5875005438625ca3b2841fbe21e95
Our copy
gov.uscourts.dcd.244500.17.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top